۞ No, Connies - Hillary is not going to have her security clearance revoked ۞

[paperview]

But the ever over-reaching GOPpers are going to try.

They introduced a bill, called the TRUST Act:

"Today U.S. Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) joined Senator Core Gardner (R-CO) and Senator Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-TX) to introduce legislation aimed at revoking the former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's security clearance."
Sen. Tim Scott joins group aimed at revoking Clinton's security clearance | WCIV

A bill to prohibit any officer or employee of the Federal Government who has exercised extreme carelessness in the handling of classified information from being granted or retaining a security clearance.

“If the FBI won’t recommend action based on its findings, Congress will. At the very least, Secretary Clinton should not have access to classified information and our bill makes sure of it,” Gardner said in a statement.

Senate bill would revoke Clinton's security clearance | TheHill'

Now, five points to the first person who can tell us why this bill

1) will never pass
2) wouldn't affect Hillary
3) is unconstitutional

 

[FA_Q2]

You can keep your points but -
1 - The dems are not going to go for it.
2 - Ex post facto
3 - It's not unconstitutional in any way. The government is under no onus to keep or reject a particular persons security clearance.

The FBI was actually rather clear - in any case similar to Hillary's administrative actions should and would have been taken and that includes revoking clearances. If she were any other person in any other situation she would have lost her clearance immediately. Because of who she is and her position (candidate for the presidency) such will be ignored.

BTW, revocation of her clearance does not actually require a law to be passed at all.

 

[paperview]

You can keep your points but -
1 - The dems are not going to go for it.
2 - Ex post facto
3 - It's not unconstitutional in any way. The government is under no onus to keep or reject a particular persons security clearance.

The FBI was actually rather clear - in any case similar to Hillary's administrative actions should and would have been taken and that includes revoking clearances. If she were any other person in any other situation she would have lost her clearance immediately. Because of who she is and her position (candidate for the presidency) such will be ignored.

BTW, revocation of her clearance does not actually require a law to be passed at all.

First two :4 points!



Third. It is. As it pertains to Hillary. Read the language of the bill again.

 

[paperview]

BTW, revocation of her clearance does not actually require a law to be passed at all.

The power to grant security clearances resides with the Commander in Chief.

Acquaint yourself with this phrase: Separation of Powers.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

After this past week anyone supporting Hillary Clinton should probably have their voter's card revoked

 

[Vigilante]

Just proves Trump was RIGHT AGAIN...THIS WAS RIGGED!

 

[deltex1]

But the ever over-reaching GOPpers are going to try.

They introduced a bill, called the TRUST Act:

"Today U.S. Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) joined Senator Core Gardner (R-CO) and Senator Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-TX) to introduce legislation aimed at revoking the former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's security clearance."
Sen. Tim Scott joins group aimed at revoking Clinton's security clearance | WCIV

A bill to prohibit any officer or employee of the Federal Government who has exercised extreme carelessness in the handling of classified information from being granted or retaining a security clearance.

“If the FBI won’t recommend action based on its findings, Congress will. At the very least, Secretary Clinton should not have access to classified information and our bill makes sure of it,” Gardner said in a statement.

Senate bill would revoke Clinton's security clearance | TheHill'

Now, five points to the first person who can tell us why this bill

1) will never pass
2) wouldn't affect Hillary
3) is unconstitutional

Was that because of a recommendation by Vlad Putin? I'm sure he wants to keep Hillary in the flow of t s information.

 

[MarathonMike]

This is really bizarre because the President actually DOES NOT hold a clearance BUT is privy to any and all classified information based on a "Need to Know". I only recently became aware of this nuance.

So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects.

 

[HenryBHough]

Great optic, Democrats voting on record to reject protecting America from security risks.

 

[paperview]

This is really bizarre because the President actually DOES NOT hold a clearance BUT is privy to any and all classified information based on a "Need to Know". I only recently became aware of this nuance.

So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects.

No.
The president gets an automatic security clearance.

Bone up.

"So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects."

She won't get her clearance revoked.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

This might've been a good thread with a quality OP.

 

[MarathonMike]

This is really bizarre because the President actually DOES NOT hold a clearance BUT is privy to any and all classified information based on a "Need to Know". I only recently became aware of this nuance.

So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects.

No.
The president gets an automatic security clearance.

Bone up.

"So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects."

She won't get her clearance revoked.

I suggest you "bone up". You are incorrect, the President holds no clearance.

 

[DarkFury]

This is really bizarre because the President actually DOES NOT hold a clearance BUT is privy to any and all classified information based on a "Need to Know". I only recently became aware of this nuance.

So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects.

No.
The president gets an automatic security clearance.

Bone up.

"So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects."

She won't get her clearance revoked.

You need to bone up, if it gets revoked BEFORE she holds that office it DQ's her from running for that office.

 

[paperview]

This is really bizarre because the President actually DOES NOT hold a clearance BUT is privy to any and all classified information based on a "Need to Know". I only recently became aware of this nuance.

So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects.

No.
The president gets an automatic security clearance.

Bone up.

"So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects."

She won't get her clearance revoked.

I suggest you "bone up". You are incorrect, the President holds no clearance.

You are severely misinformed.

 

[paperview]

This is really bizarre because the President actually DOES NOT hold a clearance BUT is privy to any and all classified information based on a "Need to Know". I only recently became aware of this nuance.

So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects.

No.
The president gets an automatic security clearance.

Bone up.

"So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects."

She won't get her clearance revoked.

You need to bone up, if it gets revoked BEFORE she holds that office it DQ's her from running for that office.

It won't be revoked.

You can take that to the bank.

 

[paperview]

Furthermore: NOTHING Congress passes (and of course would never be signed into law)

can disqualify a candidate from running from office if they meet the Constitutional requirements.

 

[DarkFury]

This is really bizarre because the President actually DOES NOT hold a clearance BUT is privy to any and all classified information based on a "Need to Know". I only recently became aware of this nuance.

So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects.

No.
The president gets an automatic security clearance.

Bone up.

"So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects."

She won't get her clearance revoked.

You need to bone up, if it gets revoked BEFORE she holds that office it DQ's her from running for that office.

It won't be revoked.

You can take that to the bank.

At this point in life she is only a civilian. Its REAL easy, REAL easy.

 

[paperview]

This is really bizarre because the President actually DOES NOT hold a clearance BUT is privy to any and all classified information based on a "Need to Know". I only recently became aware of this nuance.

So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects.

No.
The president gets an automatic security clearance.

Bone up.

"So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects."

She won't get her clearance revoked.

You need to bone up, if it gets revoked BEFORE she holds that office it DQ's her from running for that office.

It won't be revoked.

You can take that to the bank.

At this point in life she is only a civilian. Its REAL easy, REAL easy.

OK.

Give it your best shot at how this would be accomplished.

This should be good.

 

[DarkFury]

This is really bizarre because the President actually DOES NOT hold a clearance BUT is privy to any and all classified information based on a "Need to Know". I only recently became aware of this nuance.

So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects.

No.
The president gets an automatic security clearance.

Bone up.

"So her getting her clearance revoked would not disqualify her from being President but the fact she had a Top Secret clearance revoked creates a trust issue with briefing her on classified subjects."

She won't get her clearance revoked.

You need to bone up, if it gets revoked BEFORE she holds that office it DQ's her from running for that office.

It won't be revoked.

You can take that to the bank.

At this point in life she is only a civilian. Its REAL easy, REAL easy.

OK.

Give it your best shot at how this would be accomplished.

This should be good.

"
"The basis for revocation or denial is laid out in Executive Order 12968 which, ironically, was signed by President Bill Clinton. It states:

"Access to classified information shall be granted only to employees whose personal and professional history affirmatively indicates…strength of character, trustworthiness, honesty, reliability, discretion, and sound judgment…and willingness to abide by regulations governing the use, handling, and protection of classified information.”
Gregg Jarrett: Could Hillary serve as president if her security clearance is revoked? | Fox News

 

[DarkFury]

"
Effect of Criminal Conduct on Security Clearances
Although, Criminal Conduct is always a security concern; it becomes a potentially disqualifying condition under the Adjudicative Guidelines when it involves: A single serious crime (felony) or multiple lesser offenses (infractions or misdemeanors); Discharge or dismissal from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions; Allegation or admission of criminal conduct, regardless of whether the person was formally charged, formally prosecuted or convicted; Individual is currently on parole or probation…
Effect of Criminal Conduct on Security Clearances - ClearanceJobs