"No collusion......No obstruction......Completely cleared"?????

[Jitss617]

He has already good for him[/QUOTE]


Above an example of a Trump ass kisser's "erudition" and why Trump simply LOVES the poorly educated....and they love him back.....lol.

LOL, you keep adding 10 stupid troll threads a day and wonder why the intellectuals ignore them? Enjoy arguing with your intellectual equals....

Wooo slow down buddy

 

[nat4900]

2020 will be like clubbin' baby seals. Just the ones left after the dems' circular firing squad. I'm going to enjoy every minute of the clowns dropping out one by one until election night, and then realizing Trump is president for another 4-years in spite of the MSM. deep state, and leftover never-Trumpers.

Dimwit.........Of just the THREE leading Dem. candidates......polls ALL show each of the 3 beating the orange clown.....and THAT is with a good economy and against an incumbent.

But, I sincerely "hate" to intrude on your delusion....Have another tall glass of orange kool-aid.......lol

 

[Jitss617]

2020 will be like clubbin' baby seals. Just the ones left after the dems' circular firing squad. I'm going to enjoy every minute of the clowns dropping out one by one until election night, and then realizing Trump is president for another 4-years in spite of the MSM. deep state, and leftover never-Trumpers.

Dimwit.........Of just the THREE leading Dem. candidates......polls ALL show each of the 3 beating the orange clown.....and THAT is with a good economy and against an incumbent.

But, I sincerely "hate" to intrude on your delusion....Have another tall glass of orange kool-aid.......lol

Who you voting for?

 

[nat4900]

you keep adding 10 stupid troll threads a day and wonder why the intellectuals ignore them?

Gee......KYJelly.......you shouldn't be so hard on yourself.......LMAO

 

[nat4900]

Who you voting for?

I well know who I'm voting AGAINST..............LOL

 

[Jitss617]

Who you voting for?

I well know who I'm voting AGAINST..............LOL

Come on who you leaning to

 

[Hale]

ou may have noticed that the moronic accusations on Biden by the right wing media and social media outlets have considerably slowed down........WHY???

That's simple: Even the Dims know he's an idiot who can't possibly be elected. They're deeply embarrassed by ALL of their candidates, but he's just a bumbling never-has-been.

 

[Hale]

Dimwit.........Of just the THREE leading Dem. candidates......polls ALL show each of the 3 beating the orange clown.....and THAT is with a good economy and against an incumbent.

Nice to see you've now descended to total fantasy. "ALL" polls? Really, ask your mom to change you.

 

[P@triot]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

The answer to all 3 are the same...like the rest of the nation, he is tried of you whiny, immature children wasting valuable time, money, and resources for a witch-hunt. He's been completely and totally exonerated, snowflake. Not only that, but all evidence collected has indisputably proven that Hitlery Clinton and the Dumbocrats were the one's who actually colluded with the Russians.

 

[JimH52]

Okay, so the dossier refutes you and the lies you've told for the last two years, that just means you need to LIE HARDER....

Dimwit.....I know you feel all "cosmopolitan" when using the term "dossier"......but you're still a ******* idiot.......Your orange turd can't last too long from the barrage of reality that is about to hit him in the next months.

You may choose to believe his constant LIES (after all, you are an idiot).....but most sane voters have had enough of the clown.

Keep drinking that kool aid.

So, you LYING ****;

{For that reason, this Office's focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was
on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term "collusion." The Office
considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy?either under statutes that have their
own conspiracy language 18 U.S.C. 1349, l951(a)), or under the general conspiracy
statute (l 8 U.S.C. 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume
1, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal
criminal law - including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are
discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the
Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either
under a specific statute or under Section 371 ?s offenses clause.

The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under
Section 371's defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a
lawful function of the US. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See
Dennis v. United States, 384 US. 855, 861 (1966); v. United States, 265 U.S.
182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Consulting LLC, 347 F. Supp. 3d 38,
46 (BBC. 2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials?
or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful
function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in
Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign
official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the
Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.
Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with
conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section
IV above.}

You really are quite stupid.

Who do you waste your time typing shit that nobody reads....trump humper....

 

[Uncensored2008]

Okay, so the dossier refutes you and the lies you've told for the last two years, that just means you need to LIE HARDER....

Dimwit.....I know you feel all "cosmopolitan" when using the term "dossier"......but you're still a ******* idiot.......Your orange turd can't last too long from the barrage of reality that is about to hit him in the next months.

You may choose to believe his constant LIES (after all, you are an idiot).....but most sane voters have had enough of the clown.

Keep drinking that kool aid.

So, you LYING ****;

{For that reason, this Office's focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was
on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term "collusion." The Office
considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy?either under statutes that have their
own conspiracy language 18 U.S.C. 1349, l951(a)), or under the general conspiracy
statute (l 8 U.S.C. 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume
1, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal
criminal law - including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are
discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the
Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either
under a specific statute or under Section 371 ?s offenses clause.

The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under
Section 371's defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a
lawful function of the US. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See
Dennis v. United States, 384 US. 855, 861 (1966); v. United States, 265 U.S.
182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Consulting LLC, 347 F. Supp. 3d 38,
46 (BBC. 2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials?
or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful
function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in
Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign
official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the
Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.
Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with
conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section
IV above.}

You really are quite stupid.

Who do you waste your time typing shit that nobody reads....trump humper....

Those are from the Mueller report, you know the document you Stalinist SWORE was the most important document in history - until you found out it refuted your lying asses..

You really are quite stupid.

 

[Hale]

Who do you waste your time typing shit that nobody reads....trump humper....

Knowledgeable people read such things, it's only the terminally stupid or mentally defective who willfully choose to remain ignorant.

Why do you waste your time proving this?

 

[lantern2814]

For all you libtards, here it is in simple terms. IT IS OVER! YOU LOST! You do NOT get to redo the investigation because you didn't get what you wanted. By all means keep beating the dead horse as Trump rolls to an easy re-election. And a lot of Dims get locked up for the REAL crimes committed.

 

[nat4900]

Nice to see you've now descended to total fantasy. "ALL" polls? Really, ask your mom to change you.

EXCEPT.....good ol' right wing Rasmussen, YES, ALL polls have YOUR orange clown losing to Biden, Sanders and Warren......the current top 3 Dem. candidates.

Look it up and take an antacid along with your kool-aid.

 

[nat4900]

Not only that, but all evidence collected has indisputably proven that Hitlery Clinton and the Dumbocrats were the one's who actually colluded with the Russians.

Did you pull all that "evidence" out of your ass.......or was it shoved up your ass by Hannity?...............LMAO

Why Putin hates Hillary

Why does Vladimir Putin hate Hillary Clinton? -

'Putin hates Clinton' and other things FBI knows about Russia

 

[SeniorChiefPollock]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

WHY are you still whining that Hillary lost? You do realize you have at least six more years of President Trump, yes? You honestly think a lame dick like Biden or Bernie can beat him?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[nat4900]

The answer to all 3 are the same...like the rest of the nation, he is tried of you whiny,

Gee, for someone who has spent one of every 5 days (20%) since in office GOLFING, why the orange moron so "tired."

(He is going to be a lot more "tired" in the next several months.......LOL)

 

[nat4900]

WHY are you still whining that Hillary lost?

WOW........the type of "conclusion" that a 7 year old would make....Who turns on your computer, dimwit???

 

[nat4900]

Knowledgeable people read such things, it's only the terminally stupid or mentally defective who willfully choose to remain ignorant.

Why do you waste your time proving this?

These right wing, Trump ass kissers ONLY read the parts of Mueller's report that BARR has "summarized" for them........

BUT.......like the Nixon tapes......there is nothing more damning than what judge Sullivan is compelling Barr to make public, than the tape of Flynn being told to "shut-up" by Trump's attorney before testifying before Mueller..Clear and simple.....
WITNESS TAMPERING......

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

The answer to all 3 are the same...like the rest of the nation, he is tried of you whiny,

Gee, for someone who has spent one of every 5 days (20%) since in office GOLFING, why the orange moron so "tired."

(He is going to be a lot more "tired" in the next several months.......LOL)

Wait,
We have heard from actual so-called TV experts prior to 2016, Trump can’t win. The stupid live stunned [emoji1662] in the headlights reaction was priceless. Douche bags praying for a commercial break, with nothing to say. It must have felt like decades. Now, after spending 40 plus million dollars, nothing. So you can understand why vague, weak threats from so-called internet geniuses are very hard to take seriously.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk