You don't they (or Hitler) wouldn't have? If not you're naive
Your post is a bit difficult to decipher, but it seems you, also, maintain America is correct to use the standards of its loathsome enemies?
I sure do, in fact ISIS,the Taliban etc don't abide by rules of engagement (ROE) we shouldn't be bound by them either if they don't
Many posters seen on USMB have expressed vehement disagreement with your relativistic morality.
That would be the left loons, they are of little importance to me. I'm a huge General Patton fan, he once said "the object of war is not to die for his country but to make the other bastard die for his". War is brutal and you use any means available to win. The left moans about the loss of civilian life in the two atomic bombings, the Japanese had absolutely no qualms at killing civilians. China proves that
I agree with you, all except for what you think "the left" is moaning about. At least this leftie grieves that the atomic bomb exists. Do I think, realistically, we can stuff that genie back in the bottle? No. Can we try everything, including standing on our heads and spitting nickels, to minimize the threat of nuclear war? What else can we do? In the 1930's and 1940's a bunch of world leaders went NUTS. We fought back. Thank God we won. But I agree with our president that the same spark of creative intelligence which makes us human also makes us the very devil himself, able to destroy our entire planet and all its civilizations. It is not wrong to remain mindful of that, is it? You may not agree with how he is going about it, but Obama's remarks at Hiroshima were simply about that.