They are statistically basically the same. I get it that Swift was playing with a better line, and QB in Philly than Barkley in NY, but how many more yards do you really think Barkley is going to get vs Swift at a significant increase in price? Again, though my argument is not that Barkley isnt an upgrade to Swift. It's just not a signing that Philly should have made based on what they needed to make them competitive. Swift was top 5 in rushing last year. Barkley isn't better than CMC so how much of an upgrade is it really? Their defense is what cooked them last year, and Fletcher Cox just retired.