- Thread starter
- #41
Thanks for posting that. There is indeed a chance he could become President, so in that light, Newt's comments give me some hope. I take the comments of any politician, pundit, politico or partisan with a pretty large grain of salt, but I'll take what I can get.From Slate, no less.
Very good article, very much worth reading.
A Spirited Debate With Newt Gingrich on the Merits of Donald Trump
"
Isaac Chotiner: You were at a meeting on Monday with other Washington figures and Trump. What did you make of him?
Newt Gingrich: Well, Callista and I were both very impressed. In that kind of a setting he talks in a relatively low tone. He is very much somebody who has been good at business. And he listens well. He outlined the campaign as he saw it. I think he did a good job listening. He occasionally asked clarifying questions. He was very open to critical advice. I am not going to get into details, but I will say my overall impression was that in that setting he was totally under control as a guy who has done a ton of business and knows exactly how to operate in that kind of room."
Very much different than the caricature that the Main Stream Media and the Political Class would have you believe.
The two most hopeful things he said are that Trump listens well and asks clarifying questions. Good. That indicates a curiosity and a seriousness that he hasn't displayed generally. And I base that opinion not on media reports, but from direct observation of the guy.
I agree with you that there is a discrepancy, and by all means, the closer Trump is to Newt's comments the better. But at the same time, there is also a huge discrepancy in the embarrassing carnival barker he is on the campaign trail, and the thoughtful adult Newt claims he is in private. Why is that discrepancy so large? And does he realize that his campaign behavior will probably deny him the opportunity to BE that thoughtful adult in the White House?
.
"Thoughtful adults" as you mean it, left the building a long time ago.
Political discourse in the nation has for decades been completely dominated by Political Correctness.
Hillary isn't going to run a issue based campaign, she'll fear monger and lie about Trump being a racist, while her partisans call him Hitler.
The Republican Party is playing the same game against their own front runner.
Trump's public persona was the ANSWER to Political Correctness and it seemed to be working, at least until the GOP joined in on the Dog Pile.
Do you believe that the GOP flipped the South and keeps it on their side with a racist Southern Strategy?