Newsweek: Capitol Police Lt. on J6 Says it Was Set-Up-"You guys were all set up 100%"

Analysis / Bias

In review, Revolver.News primarily aggregates news from external sources. Most stories favor the right and frequently utilize loaded emotional headlines and wording, such as this TRUMP SUPPORTER COMMITS SUICIDE AFTER GETTING CAUGHT IN LEFT’S INJUSTICE SYSTEM This story links to the right-wing conspiracy website the Gateway Pundit. Other aggregated news stories come from credible sources such as Axios, Daily Beast, The Hill, and Local News Stations. However, some stories are published from low-quality sources such as RT, Hot Air, Wayne Dupree, and Twitter.

Editorially, Revolver.News occasionally produces original content that aligns with the right and is generally favorable toward the former Trump administration, such as While A Terrific Judge, Amy Coney Barrett May Create Electoral Pitfalls For Trump 2020. Although this is an opinion piece, it does not provide a single hyperlinked source to verify its claims. In general, Revolver.News reports news from a strong right-leaning perspective and lacks credibility due to a complete lack of transparency.

 
Did the blob testify?

It wasn’t Trump who with his colleagues developed a Committee to go after Pelosi and then made rules to exempt him from testifying. Pelosi did exactly that so she would not have to testify about her role in refusing extra support to protect the Capitol.
 
It wasn’t Trump who with his colleagues developed a Committee to go after Pelosi and then made rules to exempt him from testifying. Pelosi did exactly that so she would not have to testify about her role in refusing extra support to protect the Capitol.
So your blob didn't have to testify but you're saying Pelosi did have to...

Yeah, that makes no sense--except if you're in the cult.
 
So your blob didn't have to testify but you're saying Pelosi did have to...

Yeah, that makes no sense--except if you're in the cult.
I am saying it was her show yet she exempted herself from testifying. Of course Trump or any other person being the target of an investigation from a political opponent is going to do everything and anything not to testify.

Are you saying that if you were the target of a political investigation you would testify and not question as to why the person who created the committee to investigate you excludes himself or herself from testifying?
 
I am saying it was her show yet she exempted herself from testifying.
Seldom do committee members testify themselves. I’m not sure what planet you’re living on but you should drop us a post card sometime.
Of course Trump or any other person being the target of an investigation from a political opponent is going to do everything and anything not to testify.
Yeah, it’s called ignoring a subpoena. That used to be a crime.
Are you saying that if you were the target of a political investigation you would testify and not question as to why the person who created the committee to investigate you excludes himself or herself from testifying?
Sure. But then again, I wouldn’t try to pull an insurrection to stay in power. Trump ignored the law and he got away with it...so far.
 

Secret Service Foreknowledge or Criminal Negligence? Damning New Evidence Surfaces

In FBI’s January 6 “Pipe Bomb” Story

18 Jan 2024

Over three years have passed since January 6, 2021, and the truth of what really happened that day has never been more relevant. For the regime, the stakes involved in selling the official narrative of January 6 as a uniquely horrific domestic terror event are higher than ever. Such are the stakes that Biden’s crypt-keepers presumably injected him with the strongest stuff they had to keep the President conscious and standing upright for the duration of his hour and a half-long speech marking the anniversary of the day “we almost lost America.” And it makes sense. The ludicrous notion of January 6 as an “insurrection” has long served as the key pretext for the accelerated political weaponization of the national security state against Trump and his supporters. More recently, the still more ludicrous theory of Trump’s culpability for this “insurrection” has become the sham legal basis behind the attempt to throw him in prison and remove him from the ballots—all in the name of democracy, of course.
That the regime has invested so much in the “insurrection” story of January 6th helps to explain its commensurate hostility to anyone who challenges that narrative. This applies especially to our reporting on what we’ve coined the “Fedsurrection”—the elements of January 6 that overwhelmingly point toward government involvement. Last year, we reported on a case in which an FBI agent investigating January 6 crimes had his security clearance revoked and his loyalty to the United States questioned simply for sharing one of our articles with colleagues. A top Democrat lawyer teamed up with Ray Epps to sue or threaten to sue Revolver News, Tucker Carlson, and anyone who asks uncomfortable questions about certain events during January 6, which Epps, in his own words, “orchestrated.”
~Snip~
In light of all of these coincidences, it is interesting to note Younger’s current place of employment: Pendulum. Pendulum is a company staffed with DOD, DARPA, and CIA alums that does business with the government to “combat misinformation online.” Pendulum has so far released reports on Election Fraud, Covid Vaccine Misinformation, and, of course, QAnon Domestic Extremism.
We wonder if Pendulum would consider our reporting on the pipe bomb to be dangerous misinformation, but more on that very soon. Stay tuned.


Commentary:
Good article, follows the timeline and is quite extensive.
Much like the Jan 6th False Flag Operation, the fabricated "MAGA Bomber" went to some effort to create realistic but nonfunctional devices.
Fabrication for political effect once again.
Actually, that device is similar to what is used by the FBI in its own training sessions on such devices, and I mean exactly alike. The pipe, where and how the splice is located, the end caps and the kitchen timer device are all 100% alike to the ones the FBI uses to train its agents.
The entire J6 Fed insurrection was a set up to divert any and all evidence and objection to the obviously stolen election. All of it was planned and executed for that reason alone.
Trump won handily, and that HAD to be hidden from any investigation.
If the protest wouldn't turn violent spontaneously, there were dozens or hundreds of feds dressed as protesters who made sure it turned violent enough to hide the greatest crime in US history: The blatant theft of a presidential election.
So what is your point ? Biden caused the insurrection in order to stop his being named president because he stole it ? You’re all over the place….this is a piece of convoluted made up shit.
 
The entire J6 Fed insurrection was a set up to divert any and all evidence and objection to the obviously stolen election.
Hilarious. You deranged bozos need new cult leader. One who’s not so fat and old. Next you’ll be claiming Trump is fat because of a Biden led conspiracy that has people syphoning HFCs into his Big Macs
 
Last edited:
Hilarious. You deranged bozos need new cult leader. One who’s not so fat and old. Next you’ll be claiming Trump is fat because of a Biden led conspiracy that has people syphoning HFCs into his Big Macs
Hilarious, your tds for the man!
 
Seldom do committee members testify themselves. I’m not sure what planet you’re living on but you should drop us a post card sometime.

Yeah, it’s called ignoring a subpoena. That used to be a crime.

Sure. But then again, I wouldn’t try to pull an insurrection to stay in power. Trump ignored the law and he got away with it...so far.

Pelosi made sure she would not have to testify her role or non-role in accepting resources to protect the Capitol leading up to January 6th. Had she done that, it would have provided more credibility to the Committee mission and objective. Had she welcomed the opportunity to testify, I would be pushing for Trump to testify.
 
Pelosi made sure she would not have to testify her role or non-role in accepting resources to protect the Capitol leading up to January 6th. Had she done that, it would have provided more credibility to the Committee mission and objective. Had she welcomed the opportunity to testify, I would be pushing for Trump to testify.
funny, her own daughter in Peloser's office said out loud it wasn't an insurrection.
 
Pelosi made sure she would not have to testify her role or non-role in accepting resources to protect the Capitol leading up to January 6th. Had she done that, it would have provided more credibility to the Committee mission and objective. Had she welcomed the opportunity to testify, I would be pushing for Trump to testify.
Had you guys not tried to stage a coup...none of this would have happened.
 
Never happened... But the larger question is this whacky stance you’ve taken. Like when someone beats their wife, do you blame her for not arming herself better?

Its your fault for turning violent. Get that through your thick skull.
you people torched dreams and beat innocents and call it free speech. Get that through your conscience.
 

Forum List

Back
Top