- Apr 11, 2023
- 45,482
- 21,953
- 2,488
Don't tell lies. You look even sillier than you are when you do.So Queen Nan just sat back and refused assistance? Why?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't tell lies. You look even sillier than you are when you do.So Queen Nan just sat back and refused assistance? Why?
“You people”. Just so we know…who are you talking about?you people torched dreams and beat innocents and call it free speech. Get that through your conscience.
“You People” (your side) - The side that supports people burning, looting, and beating throughout US cities when a court decision, election, legislative bill, or law enforcement action does not go their way.“You people”. Just so we know…who are you talking about?
“You People” (your side) - The side that supports people burning, looting, and beating throughout US cities when a court decision, election, legislative bill, or law enforcement action does not go their way.
Really? Those that participated in 1/6/21 event at the US Capitol were the same ones who burned and looted American businesses and beat innocents or threw rocks at police througout 2020 in cities such as Minneapolis, St. Louis, Chicago, Washington DC, New York, Seattle, Denver, Portland???You’re describing your 1/6 brethren there.
You can’t equate the two. Pelosi isn’t being charged with a felony. Trump is. Trump’s DOJ didn‘t look at an insurrection and blame the democrats. REPUBLICANS DID. THEY EVEN SAID TRUMP WAS RESPONSIBLE.Pelosi made sure she would not have to testify her role or non-role in accepting resources to protect the Capitol leading up to January 6th. Had she done that, it would have provided more credibility to the Committee mission and objective. Had she welcomed the opportunity to testify, I would be pushing for Trump to testify.
My intention is not to equate the two. I find it less than credible when the one bringing the charges and creating the committee goes out of her way to make sure she does not have to testify. If she was so certain about Trump, why the extra effort to make it a rule of the Committee that she not have to testify?You can’t equate the two. Pelosi isn’t being charged with a felony. Trump is. Trump’s DOJ didn‘t look at an insurrection and blame the democrats. REPUBLICANS DID. THEY EVEN SAID TRUMP WAS RESPONSIBLE.
You talking about MAGA again, huh. Stop the gaslighting.“You People” (your side) - The side that supports people burning, looting, and beating throughout US cities when a court decision, election, legislative bill, or law enforcement action does not go their way.
Speaker of the house McCarthy along with Reps. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.). all spoke with Trump on January 6th. And they defied subpoenas to find out relevant information.My intention is not to equate the two. I find it less than credible when the one bringing the charges and creating the committee goes out of her way to make sure she does not have to testify. If she was so certain about Trump, why the extra effort to make it a rule of the Committee that she not have to testify?
And? How relevant is that compared to the one setting up the committee and making rules to exempt herself from testifying?Speaker of the house McCarthy along with Reps. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.). all spoke with Trump on January 6th. And they defied subpoenas to find out relevant information.
First off, they set up a bi-partisan committee structure with equal numbers of republicans and democrats, but McCarthy rejected the offer. The final form was because republicans nominated congressmen who were likely to be subpoenaed as witnesses to Trumps role. And who may have been part of the conspiracy.And? How relevant is that compared to the one setting up the committee and making rules to exempt herself from testifying?
Never let foxes setup the judge's tribunal in the henhouseFirst off, they set up a bi-partisan committee structure with equal numbers of republicans and democrats, but McCarthy rejected the offer. The final form was because republicans nominated congressmen who were likely to be subpoenaed as witnesses to Trumps role. And who may have been part of the conspiracy.
Again, why did the speaker make rules to prohibit her having to testify?First off, they set up a bi-partisan committee structure with equal numbers of republicans and democrats, but McCarthy rejected the offer. The final form was because republicans nominated congressmen who were likely to be subpoenaed as witnesses to Trumps role. And who may have been part of the conspiracy.
Why do you think?Again, why did the speaker make rules to prohibit her having to testify?
Really? Those that participated in 1/6/21 event at the US Capitol were the same ones who burned and looted American businesses and beat innocents or threw rocks at police througout 2020 in cities such as Minneapolis, St. Louis, Chicago, Washington DC, New York, Seattle, Denver, Portland???
According to you, these are 1/6 participants in 2020:
View attachment 890803
View attachment 890804
View attachment 890805
She is not charged with felonies, so step off. No one will answer if you ask again.Again, why did the speaker make rules to prohibit her having to testify?
Ha ha….My intention is not to equate the two. I find it less than credible when the one bringing the charges and creating the committee goes out of her way to make sure she does not have to testify. If she was so certain about Trump, why the extra effort to make it a rule of the Committee that she not have to testify?
A dufus with HDS..Didn’t know hitlery was up?
My intention is not to equate the two. I find it less than credible when the one bringing the charges and creating the committee goes out of her way to make sure she does not have to testify. If she was so certain about Trump, why the extra effort to make it a rule of the Committee that she not have to testify?
You still have the hots for Hillary….HDS.Hilarious, your tds for the man!