Newsom orders 2035 phaseout of gas-powered vehicles

Cellblock2429

Gold Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2016
Messages
23,692
Reaction score
5,683
Points
290
Location
New York
Dear moderators, if right wingers have no problem with ad hominems instead of valid arguments, I don't want to get banned for repeating my rhetoric. Or, y'all are just plain hypocrites and fakes. And, everyone should vote blue and not red.
you should be banned for spamming false information
You are more false and have nothing but fallacy. Why haven't You been banned? Right wing bias of moderators who don't seem to care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?
/—-/ May I have some Ranch dressing with your word salad?
My rhetoric is better. You should get banned for such superficial retorts with nothing but ad hominem value.
/——-/ “care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?”
Yeah, clear as a bell. Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha. Soaring rhetoric Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha
I am working on dumbing it down for the right wing. It can be a challenge and take time.
It's easy to dumb it down when you're starting with dumb
It is not as easy as you think, since right wingers cannot do it and have nothing but fallacy (of ad hominems) to prove it almost every time it comes up. Is there a stereotype for that?
/-----/ When Libtards pretend to be better educated than they really are, they post: “care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?” Now, this is supposed to mean something intellectual and erudite.
 

Cellblock2429

Gold Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2016
Messages
23,692
Reaction score
5,683
Points
290
Location
New York
Dear moderators, if right wingers have no problem with ad hominems instead of valid arguments, I don't want to get banned for repeating my rhetoric. Or, y'all are just plain hypocrites and fakes. And, everyone should vote blue and not red.
you should be banned for spamming false information
You are more false and have nothing but fallacy. Why haven't You been banned? Right wing bias of moderators who don't seem to care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?
/—-/ May I have some Ranch dressing with your word salad?
My rhetoric is better. You should get banned for such superficial retorts with nothing but ad hominem value.
/——-/ “care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?”
Yeah, clear as a bell. Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha. Soaring rhetoric Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha
I am working on dumbing it down for the right wing. It can be a challenge and take time.
/----/ Well, to quote the smartest Libtard on USMB, “care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?”
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,450
Reaction score
1,949
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Dear moderators, if right wingers have no problem with ad hominems instead of valid arguments, I don't want to get banned for repeating my rhetoric. Or, y'all are just plain hypocrites and fakes. And, everyone should vote blue and not red.
you should be banned for spamming false information
You are more false and have nothing but fallacy. Why haven't You been banned? Right wing bias of moderators who don't seem to care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?
/—-/ May I have some Ranch dressing with your word salad?
My rhetoric is better. You should get banned for such superficial retorts with nothing but ad hominem value.
/——-/ “care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?”
Yeah, clear as a bell. Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha. Soaring rhetoric Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha
I am working on dumbing it down for the right wing. It can be a challenge and take time.
It's easy to dumb it down when you're starting with dumb
It is not as easy as you think, since right wingers cannot do it and have nothing but fallacy (of ad hominems) to prove it almost every time it comes up. Is there a stereotype for that?
/-----/ When Libtards pretend to be better educated than they really are, they post: “care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?” Now, this is supposed to mean something intellectual and erudite.
Not to the right wing; is there a stereotype for that as well?
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,450
Reaction score
1,949
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Dear moderators, if right wingers have no problem with ad hominems instead of valid arguments, I don't want to get banned for repeating my rhetoric. Or, y'all are just plain hypocrites and fakes. And, everyone should vote blue and not red.
you should be banned for spamming false information
You are more false and have nothing but fallacy. Why haven't You been banned? Right wing bias of moderators who don't seem to care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?
/—-/ May I have some Ranch dressing with your word salad?
My rhetoric is better. You should get banned for such superficial retorts with nothing but ad hominem value.
/——-/ “care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?”
Yeah, clear as a bell. Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha. Soaring rhetoric Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha
I am working on dumbing it down for the right wing. It can be a challenge and take time.
/----/ Well, to quote the smartest Libtard on USMB, “care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?”
Nothing is more noble, nothing more venerable than fidelity. Faithfulness and truth are the most sacred excellences and endowments of the human mind.

Marcus Tullius Cicero
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,315
Reaction score
9,303
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
Emphasizing that California must stay at the forefront of the fight against climate change, Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday issued an executive order to restrict new car sales in the state to only zero-emission vehicles by 2035 and threw his support behind a ban on the controversial use of hydraulic fracturing by oil companies. Any questions as to what Democrats want to do?

Newsom orders 2035 phaseout of gas-powered vehicles, calls for fracking ban
We need infrastructure upgrade now to also stimulate our economy!
Maybe Gavan should have thought about that before he killed his economy
States can't print their own money and right wing tax cut economics ensures we never have enough money. Why do right wing allege to "hate the nanny-State" but love our nanny-State alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror?
Its always about the endless increases in programs. Never ending. Hidden taxes that strangles the common citizen who tries to be civil and follow the rules while others play the "system" with no conscience and survive through stealing from others.
I blame the right wing for their nanny-Statism while alleging they are not really like that in socialism threads.
Californa is a nanny state moron
Having nothing but ad hominems is even more, moronic.
Moron if you believe me calling Californa a nanny state was an ad hominem well moron you don't know what a nanny state is

nanny state
noun [ C ]
mainly UK disapproving

UK

/ˌnæn.i ˈsteɪt/ US

/ˌnæn.i ˈsteɪt/

a government that tries to give too much advice or make too many laws about how people should live their lives, especially about eating, smoking, or drinking alcohol:
The government was accused of trying to create a nanny state when it announced new guidelines on healthy eating.
Abolish our useless nanny-State alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror, right wingers. We don't need your nanny-State socialism on a national or international basis. We have a common Defense clause not a common Offense clause nor a general warfare clause. All of that money could have been going to upgrade infrastructure the whole time.
I think it's funny as shit that you don't know what a nanny state is
The general welfare instead of what right wingers prefer, the general warfare?
no dumbass it's called being dictator telling others what they can and cannot do or have
We have a First Amendment; not bright enough to insist on faithful execution of our Commerce clause and the market based economy it implies? Only right wingers are that clueless and that Causeless. Our useless and expensive and alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror you all also don't want to pay for with real times of War, Tax Rates, are worse and only create more refugees for you right wingers to complain about.
you have shown that you do not understand what a nanny state is. how old are you? or are you just trolling?
You have shown you are special pleading. Socialism on a national or international basis is a form of nanny-Statism.
What is a nanny State?
Public sector intervention in private sector markets.
I see you still have not learned what a nanny State is. New York is another nanny State
True free market Capitalism is not what right wingers believe in. Any public sector intervention could be a "necessary and proper evil". A nanny-State. Government is socialism and socialism requires social morals for free unlike capitalism which can buy capital morality for a market friendly price.
You still haven't learned what a nanny State is.
lol. The lack of a right wing paradise of Free Market Capitalism y'all can never achieve. A Commune of Heaven on Earth has more likelihood than your right wing fantasy.
When you finally learn what a nanny state is we'll correct your other mistakes other than that I don't have adult conversations with adult with childlike minds
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,315
Reaction score
9,303
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
Dear moderators, if right wingers have no problem with ad hominems instead of valid arguments, I don't want to get banned for repeating my rhetoric. Or, y'all are just plain hypocrites and fakes. And, everyone should vote blue and not red.
you should be banned for spamming false information
You are more false and have nothing but fallacy. Why haven't You been banned? Right wing bias of moderators who don't seem to care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?
/—-/ May I have some Ranch dressing with your word salad?
My rhetoric is better. You should get banned for such superficial retorts with nothing but ad hominem value.
/——-/ “care about fallacy or sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation?”
Yeah, clear as a bell. Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha. Soaring rhetoric Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha
I am working on dumbing it down for the right wing. It can be a challenge and take time.
It's easy to dumb it down when you're starting with dumb
It is not as easy as you think, since right wingers cannot do it and have nothing but fallacy (of ad hominems) to prove it almost every time it comes up. Is there a stereotype for that?
it's fits you like a glove and it's easy to dumb down something when you start at the dumb level.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top