New Yorker Magazine Defends Netflix's Cuties

[Correll]

Blah, blah, blah. You just are here to satisfy your three minutes of hate. You have no rational thought.

Calling out the sexual exploitation of children is "hate" ....

Folks you can't make this shit up.

Because none of you are actually thinking about what the movie is actually about.

This is just right wing outrage farming.

Bullshit. We understand the rationalization for the movie. We disagree with that excuse and judge the movie on it's abuse of it's child actresses, and the way it presents child hypersexualization.

 

[John T. Ford]

Bullshit. We understand the rationalization for the movie. We disagree with that excuse and judge the movie on it's abuse of it's child actresses, and the way it presents child hypersexualization.

No one in their right mind would attempt to justify this softcore kiddie porn Netflix is pushing.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Bullshit. We understand the rationalization for the movie. We disagree with that excuse and judge the movie on it's abuse of it's child actresses, and the way it presents child hypersexualization.

No one in their right mind would attempt to justify this softcore kiddie porn Netflix is pushing.

People who watch biden creep on little girls then want to make him president would and do.

Cuties is made by Democrats, for Democrats.

 

[John T. Ford]

Bullshit. We understand the rationalization for the movie. We disagree with that excuse and judge the movie on it's abuse of it's child actresses, and the way it presents child hypersexualization.

No one in their right mind would attempt to justify this softcore kiddie porn Netflix is pushing.

People who watch biden creep on little girls then want to make him president would and do.

Cuties is made by Democrats, for Democrats.

Exactly ...

Because it's Democrats who are attempting to normalize pedophilia.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Again, you guys are acting like this is something brand new, but it's not. Back in 1980, there was a movie about young girls exploring and discovering their sexuality. It was called "Foxes" and had Jodi Foster in it.

 

[Adrenochrome Junkie]

Again, you guys are acting like this is something brand new, but it's not. Back in 1980, there was a movie about young girls exploring and discovering their sexuality. It was called "Foxes" and had Jodi Foster in it.

Again you’re acting like pedophilia is not bad. Jodie foster wasn’t taking pics of her vagina or motioning a hand job while down on her knees

why can liberals not denounce this movie? Why must they support it?

it’s almost as if being anti-pedophilia = supporting Donald Trump

pro pedophilia = Joe Biden

Wait a second... I think I’m on to something

 

[ABikerSailor]

Again, you guys are acting like this is something brand new, but it's not. Back in 1980, there was a movie about young girls exploring and discovering their sexuality. It was called "Foxes" and had Jodi Foster in it.

Again you’re acting like pedophilia is not bad. Jodie foster wasn’t taking pics of her vagina or motioning a hand job while down on her knees

why can liberals not denounce this movie? Why must they support it?

it’s almost as if being anti-pedophilia = supporting Donald Trump

pro pedophilia = Joe Biden

Wait a second... I think I’m on to something

I'm not supporting the movie, I'm just telling you that this isn't something new as it was being done in 1980. People are clutching their pearls and acting like this is a brand new perversion, but it's not. I'm pretty sure that I could find other movies where young girls are exploring their sexuality.

What about Fast Times at Ridgemont High? That movie had a young high school girl who was exploring her sexuality, had sex with at least 2 different guys, ended up pregnant, and had an abortion. Why didn't conservatives bitch about that movie as well? Or, is it just young teens they care about, but if you are over 16, it's all good?

 

[John T. Ford]

Again, you guys are acting like this is something brand new, but it's not. Back in 1980, there was a movie about young girls exploring and discovering their sexuality. It was called "Foxes" and had Jodi Foster in it.

You think that fuckin' makes it OK .....

 

[John T. Ford]

I'm not supporting the movie, I'm just telling you that this isn't something new as it was being done in 1980. People are clutching their pearls and acting like this is a brand new perversion, but it's not. I'm pretty sure that I could find other movies where young girls are exploring their sexuality.

What about Fast Times at Ridgemont High? That movie had a young high school girl who was exploring her sexuality, had sex with at least 2 different guys, ended up pregnant, and had an abortion. Why didn't conservatives bitch about that movie as well? Or, is it just young teens they care about, but if you are over 16, it's all good?

It's NOT a fuckin movie about girls exploring their sexuality.

It's a softcore kiddie porn show with 11 year old girls in it.

There is no defense for this shit.

There is no plot that could ever justify this.

Why do you people keep defending it.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Again, you guys are acting like this is something brand new, but it's not. Back in 1980, there was a movie about young girls exploring and discovering their sexuality. It was called "Foxes" and had Jodi Foster in it.

You think that fuckin' make sit OK .....

Didn't say that made it okay, just said that movies like this have existed for a long time. Fast Times at Ridgemont High showed older teens in high school having sex and getting abortions, yet nobody bitched about that movie.

 

[ABikerSailor]

I'm not supporting the movie, I'm just telling you that this isn't something new as it was being done in 1980. People are clutching their pearls and acting like this is a brand new perversion, but it's not. I'm pretty sure that I could find other movies where young girls are exploring their sexuality.

What about Fast Times at Ridgemont High? That movie had a young high school girl who was exploring her sexuality, had sex with at least 2 different guys, ended up pregnant, and had an abortion. Why didn't conservatives bitch about that movie as well? Or, is it just young teens they care about, but if you are over 16, it's all good?

It's NOT a fuckin movie about girls exploring their sexuality.

It's a softcore kiddie porn show with 11 year old girls in it.

There is no defense for this shit.

There is no plot that could ever justify this.

Why do you people keep defending it.

Again, like I've told others, I'm not defending it, just stating that this is not something new. BTW, how come nobody ever bitched about Fast Times at Ridgemont High? That showed a girl having sex with at least 2 different guys, and ended up having an abortion. Are you saying it's okay if they are mid to late teenagers?

 

[Correll]

Again, you guys are acting like this is something brand new, but it's not. Back in 1980, there was a movie about young girls exploring and discovering their sexuality. It was called "Foxes" and had Jodi Foster in it.

You think that fuckin' make sit OK .....

Didn't say that made it okay, just said that movies like this have existed for a long time. Fast Times at Ridgemont High showed older teens in high school having sex and getting abortions, yet nobody bitched about that movie.

You are quibbling over whether or not this is a new thing. YOu are doing this, to deflect from the fact that kiddie porn has become a partisan issue, dem for, and republcians against.

Deflection is a form of defense.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Again, you guys are acting like this is something brand new, but it's not. Back in 1980, there was a movie about young girls exploring and discovering their sexuality. It was called "Foxes" and had Jodi Foster in it.

You think that fuckin' make sit OK .....

Didn't say that made it okay, just said that movies like this have existed for a long time. Fast Times at Ridgemont High showed older teens in high school having sex and getting abortions, yet nobody bitched about that movie.

You are quibbling over whether or not this is a new thing. YOu are doing this, to deflect from the fact that kiddie porn has become a partisan issue, dem for, and republcians against.

Deflection is a form of defense.

You don't know how I feel about things, just what you presume from what I've written. Am I against child porn? Very much so. Why? Because I was sexually abused when I was a child, from around 6 until I was 10.

 

[progressive hunter]

Which of those Netflix employees were involved with adding this movie to Neflix's library? You still have no names.

We have played this game before

when 98% of netflix donations go to democrats then I can see who the party of porn is

and its the democrats

No worries, I knew you couldn't name one. And by party of porn, you mean Impeached pussy grabber's party?

I love watching you drones scramble for insults of something he once did in defense of something youre currently doing,,,

I'm glad to see you can do that since you can't refute posts or answer questions. For example, earlier you said, "doesnt change the fact dems are now promoting child porn,,," And when challenged to name one, you ran.

you are classic,,,
youre defense of dems being pedos is republicans are too,,,\

LOLOL

And here you are, still running from that challenge.

classic,,,
tell me more about how its OK dems are pedos because republicans are too,,,

LOLOL

You're still running.

dont be afraid,,,just tell us again cause its really funny,,,

LOLOL

The irony of you posting that as you run from my question is hysterical.

nothing to answer,,,

I'm against anyone that promotes or is a pedo,,,

youre the one saying its OK for dems to be cause repubes do it too,,,

I'm not supporting the movie, I'm just telling you that this isn't something new as it was being done in 1980. People are clutching their pearls and acting like this is a brand new perversion, but it's not. I'm pretty sure that I could find other movies where young girls are exploring their sexuality.

What about Fast Times at Ridgemont High? That movie had a young high school girl who was exploring her sexuality, had sex with at least 2 different guys, ended up pregnant, and had an abortion. Why didn't conservatives bitch about that movie as well? Or, is it just young teens they care about, but if you are over 16, it's all good?

It's NOT a fuckin movie about girls exploring their sexuality.

It's a softcore kiddie porn show with 11 year old girls in it.

There is no defense for this shit.

There is no plot that could ever justify this.

Why do you people keep defending it.

Again, like I've told others, I'm not defending it, just stating that this is not something new. BTW, how come nobody ever bitched about Fast Times at Ridgemont High? That showed a girl having sex with at least 2 different guys, and ended up having an abortion. Are you saying it's okay if they are mid to late teenagers?

you are fucking kiddin right???

how is half naked 9- 11 yr old girls acting out sex scenes not a new thing???

 

[John T. Ford]

Again, like I've told others, I'm not defending it, just stating that this is not something new. BTW, how come nobody ever bitched about Fast Times at Ridgemont High? That showed a girl having sex with at least 2 different guys, and ended up having an abortion. Are you saying it's okay if they are mid to late teenagers?

Yes you are.

Calling this a movie about girls exploring their sexuality DAMN sure is defending it.

NOTHING makes this movie OK.

There is no plot that could ever justify this.

Yet you keep trying to.

That is very disturbing.

 

[John T. Ford]

You don't know how I feel about things, just what you presume from what I've written. Am I against child porn? Very much so. Why? Because I was sexually abused when I was a child, from around 6 until I was 10.

Right ...

Nor do I want to know in this case.

But, what I do know is what your comments are saying.

It's obvious.

 

[Adrenochrome Junkie]

Again, you guys are acting like this is something brand new, but it's not. Back in 1980, there was a movie about young girls exploring and discovering their sexuality. It was called "Foxes" and had Jodi Foster in it.

Again you’re acting like pedophilia is not bad. Jodie foster wasn’t taking pics of her vagina or motioning a hand job while down on her knees

why can liberals not denounce this movie? Why must they support it?

it’s almost as if being anti-pedophilia = supporting Donald Trump

pro pedophilia = Joe Biden

Wait a second... I think I’m on to something

I'm not supporting the movie, I'm just telling you that this isn't something new as it was being done in 1980. People are clutching their pearls and acting like this is a brand new perversion, but it's not. I'm pretty sure that I could find other movies where young girls are exploring their sexuality.

What about Fast Times at Ridgemont High? That movie had a young high school girl who was exploring her sexuality, had sex with at least 2 different guys, ended up pregnant, and had an abortion. Why didn't conservatives bitch about that movie as well? Or, is it just young teens they care about, but if you are over 16, it's all good?

So you denounced fast times at ridgemont high and a Jodie foster movie, but you can’t denounce “cuties”.
the actresses and actors in fast times were 18 years old. There were no sexual senes amongs children and adults as in cuties. Sex was consent among high schoolers.
Nor were those 2 movies as sexually graffic as “cuties”
next you’ll tell me American Pie is worse than “cuties”

have you seen “cuties”?

can you denounce “cuties”

because so far the trend here has been “no” with all the liberals

 

[John T. Ford]

You are quibbling over whether or not this is a new thing. YOu are doing this, to deflect from the fact that kiddie porn has become a partisan issue, dem for, and republcians against.

Deflection is a form of defense.

That goes beyond deflection .....

 

[Correll]

Again, you guys are acting like this is something brand new, but it's not. Back in 1980, there was a movie about young girls exploring and discovering their sexuality. It was called "Foxes" and had Jodi Foster in it.

You think that fuckin' make sit OK .....

Didn't say that made it okay, just said that movies like this have existed for a long time. Fast Times at Ridgemont High showed older teens in high school having sex and getting abortions, yet nobody bitched about that movie.

You are quibbling over whether or not this is a new thing. YOu are doing this, to deflect from the fact that kiddie porn has become a partisan issue, dem for, and republcians against.

Deflection is a form of defense.

You don't know how I feel about things, just what you presume from what I've written. Am I against child porn? Very much so. Why? Because I was sexually abused when I was a child, from around 6 until I was 10.

I made no comment on your feelings, merely on your actions.

You saw people attacking kiddie porn, and instead of joining in the attack, you counter attacked, with quibbles over whether or not this is really a new low, or just more of the same lows that sick hollywood has been doing for a long time.


Counter attacks, deflections, distractions, like that, are a form of defense.


What part of this are you not getting?

 

[progressive hunter]