New Yorker Magazine Defends Netflix's Cuties

[Mac-7]

Since you did, there was no "kiddie porn" in their trailers.

Not the worst kind that liberals can get arrested for having on their computer

but Cuties is stiff suggestive and what I call soft porn

 

[Mac-7]

What I did do was to ask a rightard to clarify what he meant by "promo" since that is not the term used for trailers.

You asked and I answered without trying to insult you

maybe next time I wont

 

[Mac-7]

No, I think you're idiots for calling it child porn when no authoritative voice is accusing them of putting out child porn.

Your opinions are provided by “authoritative voices?”

Too bad

we think for ourselves

 

[Faun]

Which of those Netflix employees were involved with adding this movie to Neflix's library? You still have no names.

We have played this game before

when 98% of netflix donations go to democrats then I can see who the party of porn is

and its the democrats

No worries, I knew you couldn't name one. And by party of porn, you mean Impeached pussy grabber's party?

I love watching you drones scramble for insults of something he once did in defense of something youre currently doing,,,

I'm glad to see you can do that since you can't refute posts or answer questions. For example, earlier you said, "doesnt change the fact dems are now promoting child porn,,," And when challenged to name one, you ran.

you are classic,,,
youre defense of dems being pedos is republicans are too,,,\

LOLOL

And here you are, still running from that challenge.

classic,,,
tell me more about how its OK dems are pedos because republicans are too,,,

LOLOL

You're still running.

dont be afraid,,,just tell us again cause its really funny,,,

LOLOL

The irony of you posting that as you run from my question is hysterical.

nothing to answer,,,

I'm against anyone that promotes or is a pedo,,,

youre the one saying its OK for dems to be cause repubes do it too,,,

You're an idiot and a liar. I never said it's ok for Democrats, or Republicans, or anyone to do that.

And you're lying to avoid answering a question that you brought upon yourself.

Again ... you said, "doesnt change the fact dems are now promoting child porn,,," Either you can name the Democrats who did that or you're full of shit again. And given you flat out refuse to answer, your non-answer answers that for you -- you're full of shit.

Netflix is promoting Cuties

Cuties is soft porn

and Netflix supports the democrat party

So you watched it too?

So DemonRats defend the movie “Cuties” and say it’s not child porn, but if a conservative watches it, they call them a pedophile.

this is why we all think you’re pathetic jackasses
View attachment 388941

LOL

I'd rather be a jackass than a brain-dead cult45 zombie. Case in point, I neither defended the movie nor called anyone a pedophile.

What are you arguing then if you’re not defending it? You’re most certainly are not condemning the film ?

you’re a jackass. You just said you’d rather be a jackasses then support the president of the United States?

again, what are you here arguing ? What is your point?

do you even know what you are arguing about?

I'm not arguing. I'm pointing out what hyperventilating idiots you rightards are. There's no argument there.

So if you think we’re idiots for thinking the film is child porn, then that means you think the film isn’t and is therefore acceptable.

or you’re saying that you, yourself, are an idiot along with all of us because we think it’s child porn.

you make no sense whatsoever, which is why I call people like you jackasses.

No, I think you're idiots for calling it child porn when no authoritative voice is accusing them of putting out child porn. Let me know when the Department of Justice goes after them. Until then, you sound like hyperventilating idiots.

Republicans call on DOJ to investigate Netflix over ‘Cuties’ film

Several GOP leaders are calling on the Justice Department to investigate and raise legal action over Netflix’s “Cuties” film.

thehill.com

Tulsi Gabbard calls Netflix ‘complicit’ in whetting the appetites of pedophiles after Cuties release - Washington Examiner

Former presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard condemned streaming platform Netflix on Friday, saying the company is complicit in helping fuel the sex-trafficking industry after the release of Cuties.Cuties, a French film about an 11-year-old girl who finds an escape from her traditionalist family...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

How dumb of an idiot can you be?You have to be trolling.

republicans and Tulsi Gabbard are calling for an investigation. But I guess they’re all just Russian spies according to you.

only a pedo would defend this movie and laugh at others who are traumatized from it.

You are one sick fuck!

Not as dumb as you, apparently. I say, "let me know when the Department of Justice goes after them," but instead of doing that, you post how some hyperventilating folks in Congress are whining to the Department of Justice.

And I have neither defended nor promoted the movie. I can't because I haven't seen it. As I already pointed out, I'm merely laughing at you clutching your pearl necklace as you fall back onto your fainting couch.

 

[Faun]

No, I think you're idiots for calling it child porn when no authoritative voice is accusing them of putting out child porn.

Your opinions are provided by “authoritative voices?”

Too bad

we think for ourselves

LOLOL

While it's a joke to say conservatives think for themselves, even if you could, why on Earth would I go by your opinion?? I truly believe conservatives are nuts.

If it's truly child porn, legal action will be taken. If that happens, then I'll be the "it's child porn" bandwagon. If no legal action is taken, then I'll assume it's not child porn and you rightards are simply hyperventilating again -- which is my current position as there have been no legal actions yet to take it down.

 

[beagle9]

Again, like I've told others, I'm not defending it, just stating that this is not something new. BTW, how come nobody ever bitched about Fast Times at Ridgemont High? That showed a girl having sex with at least 2 different guys, and ended up having an abortion. Are you saying it's okay if they are mid to late teenagers?

Yes you are.

Calling this a movie about girls exploring their sexuality DAMN sure is defending it.

NOTHING makes this movie OK.

There is no plot that could ever justify this.

Yet you keep trying to.

That is very disturbing.

If it's child porn, then either Impeached Trump's Department of Justice presses charges against those involved -- or Impeached Trump is a pedophile who gets off on that kind of movie. We'll see which one of those is true.

Trump, Trump, Trump is responsible for everything eh ??? The government's justice department should be actively watching out for anything that involves children being exploited, abused or mistreated in unlawful ways. Many members of government are left overs from previous administration's, and they should know their job's and roles in government without Trump having to hold all their hands.

Trump is just a figurehead representing a vast overblown government that he has some great leadership ideas and/or some great opinions to offer it, but if they become negligent in their duties to be found in conducting their offices properly, then it matters not who the president is, but rather that their immediate supervisors should be recommending their removal to the president if nessesary.

 

[ABikerSailor]

You guys DO realize that movie producers for mainstream movies have teams of lawyers working for them to make sure no laws are broken in the production of the picture right?

I agree with Faun. If there was actual child porn involved in the movie, there would have already been legal action to stop the movie from being released as well as charges brought up against the people who produced it.

 

[beagle9]

Alethia4u......You wrote - - - "And if anyone that finds these little girls in this movie seductive, then they must have pedo's tendencies, closet pedos" .......... Yep you wrote this.

If this country were to listen to such lunacy as you have wrote above, then all investigations would stop, and prosecutions would end concerning these important things.

Is that what you want ??? How does these things get investigated if people like you are running around saying what you said above ???

That is one sick and twisted excuse or spin you just used above in concerning the very tragic subject... Otherwise did you use it in hopes that you could shame anyone for reviewing evidence of the possible criminal wrong doing in the exploitation of children, and reviewing the evidence of that wrong doing without being accused of being a pervert for doing so ??

How many children have been abused, killed, and molested because people might worry about people like you who would attempt to divert any investigation by accusing people of having perverted mind's if they were to look into the possibility of abuses, and crimes being conducted by bad people against children ???

Do you realize how sick of a human being that you are for doing such a thing ??? Do you not care about trying to help in ending child abuse, child trafficking, and other illegal activities being directed against children ????

 

[beagle9]

You guys DO realize that movie producers for mainstream movies have teams of lawyers working for them to make sure no laws are broken in the production of the picture right?

I agree with Faun. If there was actual child porn involved in the movie, there would have already been legal action to stop the movie from being released as well as charges brought up against the people who produced it.

Maybe laws of man weren't broken in accordance to man, but most know the difference in moral and immoral activity, especially when it comes to children being exploited or used in some sort of twisted way. Maybe laws need to be strengthened or created in order to address the ever changing landscape's concerning such matters.

 

[MisterBeale]

What I am most disappointed about, is that this controversy has been politicized.

I wish I could intelligently comment on this, without watching the movie, but I can't. Nor, from what I have heard about it, do I want to. It seems, it has become a lightening rod in our culture war.

I read articles from the left and the right, I DO see both points of view, but I seriously am reading comments from some politicians and critics on the left, that DO NOT want to make children a pawn in the culture wars, and have decided this is not something they will sacrifice for the cause.

For those of you who do not wish to watch the movie, but really DO want to comment intelligently on this debate, those who want to see snapshots from the movie with censored redacted areas that have blacked out obscene areas, I have found someone that has done the heavy lifting for us.

Most do not realize. . . after this movie goes to DVD, these images will appear on the internet, they will become animated GIFs that pedos and others will trade in. . who really gives a shit about, "the deeper meaning of the movie. . . "

I just don't think the partisans get it. . .

Netflix’s “Cuties” is About Normalizing the Sexualization of Children. And Nothing Else.
“Cuties” was praised and defended by countless pundits in mass media. Here’s exactly what they’re praising.

Netflix’s “Cuties”: Here’s Exactly What Mass Media is Praising

"Cuties" was praised and defended by countless pundits in mass media. Here's exactly what they're praising.

vigilantcitizen.com

 

[ABikerSailor]

You guys DO realize that movie producers for mainstream movies have teams of lawyers working for them to make sure no laws are broken in the production of the picture right?

I agree with Faun. If there was actual child porn involved in the movie, there would have already been legal action to stop the movie from being released as well as charges brought up against the people who produced it.

Maybe laws of man weren't broken in accordance to man, but most know the difference in moral and immoral activity, especially when it comes to children being exploited or used in some sort of twisted way. Maybe laws need to be strengthened or created in order to address the ever changing landscape's concerning such matters.

Who's morals? Yours? Morals can vary a great deal depending on the society you are in. Remember Islam and the Taliban? You'd probably be hung for your beliefs, based on their morals.

 

[beagle9]

Oh really... What's my beliefs ??

 

[Jarlaxle]

What is it with trashy liberals and pedophilia?

We have been inundated with story after story of sex traffic and pedophilia the last couple years.

And we have had the #metoo rage.

Something like 200 kids rescued since Ghislaine Maxwell was caught.

All this crap and here we have the liberal trash rag The New Yorker defending Netflix's child pornography movie Cuties.

Liberals are sick trash.


View attachment 386966

Gee look what looks like its been added by the film makers

View attachment 387588

The scene clearly shows that a communist hammer & sickle has been painted over the graffiti on a wall behind the characters.

It’s obvious that the symbol stands out from the rest of the graffiti and was deliberately put there by the film makers.

Or...a guy painting graffiti did it.

 

[Faun]

You guys DO realize that movie producers for mainstream movies have teams of lawyers working for them to make sure no laws are broken in the production of the picture right?

I agree with Faun. If there was actual child porn involved in the movie, there would have already been legal action to stop the movie from being released as well as charges brought up against the people who produced it.

Maybe laws of man weren't broken in accordance to man, but most know the difference in moral and immoral activity, especially when it comes to children being exploited or used in some sort of twisted way. Maybe laws need to be strengthened or created in order to address the ever changing landscape's concerning such matters.

LOLOLOL

Rightards preaching about morality.

 

[beagle9]

You guys DO realize that movie producers for mainstream movies have teams of lawyers working for them to make sure no laws are broken in the production of the picture right?

I agree with Faun. If there was actual child porn involved in the movie, there would have already been legal action to stop the movie from being released as well as charges brought up against the people who produced it.

Maybe laws of man weren't broken in accordance to man, but most know the difference in moral and immoral activity, especially when it comes to children being exploited or used in some sort of twisted way. Maybe laws need to be strengthened or created in order to address the ever changing landscape's concerning such matters.

LOLOLOL

Rightards preaching about morality.

Oh and your morals are somehow sound while you are in here defending "Cuties" eh ???

 

[beagle9]

What is it with trashy liberals and pedophilia?

We have been inundated with story after story of sex traffic and pedophilia the last couple years.

And we have had the #metoo rage.

Something like 200 kids rescued since Ghislaine Maxwell was caught.

All this crap and here we have the liberal trash rag The New Yorker defending Netflix's child pornography movie Cuties.

Liberals are sick trash.


View attachment 386966

Gee look what looks like its been added by the film makers

View attachment 387588

The scene clearly shows that a communist hammer & sickle has been painted over the graffiti on a wall behind the characters.

It’s obvious that the symbol stands out from the rest of the graffiti and was deliberately put there by the film makers.

Or...a guy painting graffiti did it.

Yeah, but who was the guy doing that for ??

 

[Faun]

You guys DO realize that movie producers for mainstream movies have teams of lawyers working for them to make sure no laws are broken in the production of the picture right?

I agree with Faun. If there was actual child porn involved in the movie, there would have already been legal action to stop the movie from being released as well as charges brought up against the people who produced it.

Maybe laws of man weren't broken in accordance to man, but most know the difference in moral and immoral activity, especially when it comes to children being exploited or used in some sort of twisted way. Maybe laws need to be strengthened or created in order to address the ever changing landscape's concerning such matters.

LOLOLOL

Rightards preaching about morality.

Oh and your morals are somehow sound while you are in here defending "Cuties" eh ???

Pointing out rightards are in no position to define morals is defending it?

 

[beagle9]

You guys DO realize that movie producers for mainstream movies have teams of lawyers working for them to make sure no laws are broken in the production of the picture right?

I agree with Faun. If there was actual child porn involved in the movie, there would have already been legal action to stop the movie from being released as well as charges brought up against the people who produced it.

Maybe laws of man weren't broken in accordance to man, but most know the difference in moral and immoral activity, especially when it comes to children being exploited or used in some sort of twisted way. Maybe laws need to be strengthened or created in order to address the ever changing landscape's concerning such matters.

LOLOLOL

Rightards preaching about morality.

Oh and your morals are somehow sound while you are in here defending "Cuties" eh ???

Pointing out rightards are in no position to define morals is defending it?

It is that the poster's in here are either defending child exploitation or not (i.e. when visting the OP in order to debate it), and hopefully all who visit will suggest solutions to the issue's talked about here, and not just go about trying to deflect or derail by attacking the good poster's who are seeking solutions to all the madness today.... Now which is it with you ???....

Could be that you are just being a troll.(feeding your ego)...... If you are trolling, then you should be reported for trolling in my opinion.

Attacking poster's instead of debating the OP in a constructive manor with them, is basically trolling........ If inviting attacks just so you can attack again, also makes you a troll. Trolling is against the rules.

 

[Faun]

You guys DO realize that movie producers for mainstream movies have teams of lawyers working for them to make sure no laws are broken in the production of the picture right?

I agree with Faun. If there was actual child porn involved in the movie, there would have already been legal action to stop the movie from being released as well as charges brought up against the people who produced it.

Maybe laws of man weren't broken in accordance to man, but most know the difference in moral and immoral activity, especially when it comes to children being exploited or used in some sort of twisted way. Maybe laws need to be strengthened or created in order to address the ever changing landscape's concerning such matters.

LOLOLOL

Rightards preaching about morality.

Oh and your morals are somehow sound while you are in here defending "Cuties" eh ???

Pointing out rightards are in no position to define morals is defending it?

It is that the poster's in here are either defending child exploitation or not (i.e. when visting the OP in order to debate it), and hopefully all who visit will suggest solutions to the issue's talked about here, and not just go about trying to deflect or derail by attacking the good poster's who are seeking solutions to all the madness today.... Now which is it with you ???....

Could be that you are just being a troll.(feeding your ego)...... If you are trolling, then you should be reported for trolling in my opinion.

Attacking poster's instead of debating the OP in a constructive manor with them, is basically trolling........ If inviting attacks just so you can attack again, also makes you a troll. Trolling is against the rules.

"It is that the poster's in here are either defending child exploitation or not"

That's complete and utter bullshit. It's also that some, like myself who haven't seen it, claim rightards are overreacting and that it's not actually child pornography based on there being no attempts by the Justice Department to get it taken down. That's not defending the movie; as I can't having not seen it. It's pointing out that rightards are ... well ... rightards.

 

[beagle9]

You guys DO realize that movie producers for mainstream movies have teams of lawyers working for them to make sure no laws are broken in the production of the picture right?

I agree with Faun. If there was actual child porn involved in the movie, there would have already been legal action to stop the movie from being released as well as charges brought up against the people who produced it.

Maybe laws of man weren't broken in accordance to man, but most know the difference in moral and immoral activity, especially when it comes to children being exploited or used in some sort of twisted way. Maybe laws need to be strengthened or created in order to address the ever changing landscape's concerning such matters.

LOLOLOL

Rightards preaching about morality.

Oh and your morals are somehow sound while you are in here defending "Cuties" eh ???

Pointing out rightards are in no position to define morals is defending it?

It is that the poster's in here are either defending child exploitation or not (i.e. when visting the OP in order to debate it), and hopefully all who visit will suggest solutions to the issue's talked about here, and not just go about trying to deflect or derail by attacking the good poster's who are seeking solutions to all the madness today.... Now which is it with you ???....

Could be that you are just being a troll.(feeding your ego)...... If you are trolling, then you should be reported for trolling in my opinion.

Attacking poster's instead of debating the OP in a constructive manor with them, is basically trolling........ If inviting attacks just so you can attack again, also makes you a troll. Trolling is against the rules.

"It is that the poster's in here are either defending child exploitation or not"

That's complete and utter bullshit. It's also that some, like myself who haven't seen it, claim rightards are overreacting and that it's not actually child pornography based on there being no attempts by the Justice Department to get it taken down. That's not defending the movie; as I can't having not seen it. It's pointing out that rightards are ... well ... rightards.

By what I saw on Tucker Carlson when reported on the thing, uhhh I'm guessing at the minimum it was "child exploitation", and this was due to the actions and clothes that the young girls were required to wear or act like in those clothes, and this opinion was being drawn upon the reviewing of the reported clips that were shown on Tucker Carlson while I watched his show. Wouldn't "child exploitation" lead to worse things sadly enough ?? These things involving children are unexceptable in a civilized society. If laws were broken, I hope that the adults are prosecuted to the fullest extent of our laws if were being broken in these ways.