Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He can claim whatever he wants to. It's a question of fact and law. That's why there are trials.The guy can claim the restaurant owner failed to be "due diligence" He should have asked him for ID, but failed to. Besides, until somebody pointed out the picture, he didn't complain.
Right?
He can claim whatever he wants to. It's a question of fact and law. That's why there are trials.
What the courts won't do is take the restaurant's complaint, and issue a summary judgement without giving the defendant a chance to make his argument and call his witnesses.
Are you Jorge Perez of Related Group? Do you know how much 17 acres of dirt in Palm Beach is worth?$18 million vs $1 billion?
Use your head for something beside holding up your hat, kid.
Lenders run title searches. True storyActually in your example, when you said you owned a home, they would ask, are their any encumbrances on it? And you said NO!
Based on your lie, they give you a collateral secured rate, where if they knew you had two mortgages and a mechanics lien on the house, they would have charged you the unsecured personal loan rate.
That is such a LIE. Madoff victims ultimately lost their money. Trump’s “victim” made money, in accordance with the contract they made.Because like Trump and the banks, the Bernie Maddoff customers said the same thing as the banks. They were 100% satisfied.
People made fortunes, before they lost them.
In 2008, as the global economy began to decline, large numbers of Madoff investors needed money and began asking to cash in their investments. That's when Madoff's Ponzi scheme burst – he did not have enough money to cover his investors' requests and new investor money was hard to be found in the economic downturn.
Even as the Bernie Maddoff scheme was collapsing, people were sending him money.
And you think the bank didn’t know the real value? They knew it….Trump knew they knew it….and the bank was thrilled to land him as a client. He paid off his loan as contracted, and the “victim” made $100 million and wants to do another deal.Actually in your example, when you said you owned a home, they would ask, are their any encumbrances on it? And you said NO!
Based on your lie, they give you a collateral secured rate, where if they knew you had two mortgages and a mechanics lien on the house, they would have charged you the unsecured personal loan rate.
The Dems are setting a precedent here for looking into wealthy people’s dealings where there is no victim, and then allowing ONE individual to “rule” that he must turn over hundreds of millions of dollars to the state.I never invoked the 6th amendment. I recognize the copy/paste and I know that's the justification the judge uses.
But it's a crock of shit. If this is the way the law was meant to be used it's unconstitutional. Everyone is entitled to due process.
You can't just deem someone guilty of a non-crime and have an unrestricted right to take their property.
The Dems are setting a precedent here for looking into wealthy people’s dealings where there is no victim, and then allowing ONE individual to “rule” that he must turn over hundreds of millions of dollars to the state.
Are you Jorge Perez of Related Group? Do you know how much 17 acres of dirt in Palm Beach is worth?
Dumbfuck the bank wasn't a victimThe same way that the victims of Bernie Maddoff who made the same claims.
Dumbfuck the bank said it wasn't a victimMost was disgorgement.
Disgorgement
In legal terms, disgorgement is an action where something is given up – namely, profits – because they have been obtained illegally or unethically. Thecorporatefinanceinstitute.com
Disgorgement is supposed to be viewed as remedial action instead of being used as a punishment. According to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, disgorgement is supposed to take away a wrongdoer’s ill-gotten gains and to serve as a warning to any entity that attempts to effectively steal from others or to profit in a way that is unethical.
Disgorgement is considered an equitable remedy, not a punitive action. It is not designed to punish, but to act as a tool for justice, requiring illegally obtained gains to be returned. It means that – in order to be equitable and not punitive – the SEC can only recover the approximate amount that was earned illegally or unethically. Seeking interest or additional payment would make the disgorgement punitive.
You have no point dumbfuck
Irrelevant.Dumbfuck the bank said it wasn't a victim
When was trump convicted of fraud dumbfuckIrrelevant.
Disgorgement means Trump is required to pay back the money estimated he made from his fraud.
Thank you for your correction.When was trump convicted of fraud dumbfuck
Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it isn't there.You have no point dumbfuck
Except you support a two tier justice system
You only understand the cultist talking points.Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it isn't there.
Its relevant dumbfuckIrrelevant.
Disgorgement means Trump is required to pay back the money estimated he made from his fraud.
I understand your cultist talking points perfectly.You only understand the cultist talking points.
No victim no fraud
And when was Trump convicted of fraud in a criminal court?
