New Study: Greenland Was 3-7°C Warmer And Far Less Glaciated Than Today 6000-8000 Years Ago

Sunsettommy

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
16,292
Reaction score
14,010
Points
2,400
Greenland had far less snow and Ice a few thousand years ago as the region was much warmer than it is now with the miracle CO2 levels at around the 260 ppm level.

I am sure warmest/alarmest will panic over this. :auiqs.jpg:

============

No Tricks Zone

New Study: Greenland Was 3-7°C Warmer And Far Less Glaciated Than Today 6000-8000 Years Ago

By Kenneth Richard on 12. January 2026

Excerpt:

A large portion of the Greenland ice sheet that is today over 500 m thick did not exist during the Early to Mid Holocene.


LINK
 
Greenland had far less snow and Ice a few thousand years ago as the region was much warmer than it is now with the miracle CO2 levels at around the 260 ppm level.

I am sure warmest/alarmest will panic over this. :auiqs.jpg:

============

No Tricks Zone

New Study: Greenland Was 3-7°C Warmer And Far Less Glaciated Than Today 6000-8000 Years Ago

By Kenneth Richard on 12. January 2026

Excerpt:

A large portion of the Greenland ice sheet that is today over 500 m thick did not exist during the Early to Mid Holocene.


LINK
The loons don't need no REAL SCIENCE!! The DOOM GOBLINS are making a killing...or were!

The hoax is sooooo over!!

Greg
 
6000 years ago the Greenland Ice Age had not yet reached the southern tip. The Vikings farmed there until the 1400s when the advancing ice age made it impossible for them to continue to grow crops there.
 
Greenland had far less snow and Ice a few thousand years ago as the region was much warmer than it is now with the miracle CO2 levels at around the 260 ppm level.

I am sure warmest/alarmest will panic over this. :auiqs.jpg:

============

No Tricks Zone

New Study: Greenland Was 3-7°C Warmer And Far Less Glaciated Than Today 6000-8000 Years Ago

By Kenneth Richard on 12. January 2026

Excerpt:

A large portion of the Greenland ice sheet that is today over 500 m thick did not exist during the Early to Mid Holocene.


LINK



Greenland's ice age started when Greenland moved to within 600 miles of North Pole 1-2 million years ago. It started at the northernmost top and moved south. It hit the middle of Greenland 400-800k years ago...


 
Greenland's ice age started when Greenland moved to within 600 miles of North Pole 1-2 million years ago. It started at the northernmost top and moved south. It hit the middle of Greenland 400-800k years ago...


Greenland began its major glaciation around 3 million years ago due to global cooling leading to extensive ice cap formation, though the ice sheet has waxed and waned, with evidence suggesting periods of significant melt even within the last million years. The process involved the growth of ice sheets that preserved ancient landscapes, with the oldest ice dating back about 1 million years, but the ice has disappeared and reformed multiple times, as shown by preserved tundra soil from ~2.7 million years ago and evidence of near-ice-free conditions ~400,000 years ago.

When did it start?
  • ~3 Million Years Ago (Ma): A significant transition to colder conditions began, leading to the initial formation of the large ice sheet.
  • ~2.7 Ma: Ancient tundra soil was preserved beneath the ice, indicating an ice-free landscape existed before this time, followed by ice sheet growth.
  • ~2.5 Ma: Evidence points to even more widespread glaciation.
  • ~1 Million Years Ago (Ma): The oldest ice still present today dates from this period, but there were also times of significant melting before this.
  • ~400,000 Years Ago (ka): Evidence suggests much of Greenland was ice-free, with tundra ecosystems thriving, even with CO2 levels lower than today.

Why did it happen?
  • Global Cooling: A shift from a warmer "hothouse" to a colder "icehouse" world initiated Northern Hemisphere glaciation.
  • Tectonic Factors: The uplift of large landmasses like Tibet and the closure of the Isthmus of Panama may have influenced global climate and ocean currents, contributing to cooling.
  • Ocean Currents & Solar Energy: Changes in ocean circulation and variations in summer solar energy reaching the Arctic also played roles in waxing and waning ice cover.
 
I guess the Vikings appreciated it.

At the time when they arrived they did. Of course, they also arrived there and started colonies at the tail end of the Medieval Warm Period. Within two generations the climate started getting colder, and 300 years after that the Little Ice Age set in and they abandoned the island.
 
  • ~3 Million Years Ago (Ma): A significant transition to colder conditions began, leading to the initial formation of the large ice sheet.
  • ~2.7 Ma: Ancient tundra soil was preserved beneath the ice, indicating an ice-free landscape existed before this time, followed by ice sheet growth.
  • ~2.5 Ma: Evidence points to even more widespread glaciation.
  • ~1 Million Years Ago (Ma): The oldest ice still present today dates from this period, but there were also times of significant melting before this.
  • ~400,000 Years Ago (ka): Evidence suggests much of Greenland was ice-free, with tundra ecosystems thriving, even with CO2 levels lower than today.

This is the problem with a lot of people who do not really understand science. And even the terms can be a bit confusing.

We are at the tail end of the Wisconsin Ice Age, which is simply a phase of the Quaternary Glaciation. And even among experts, the use of "Glaciation" and "Ice Age" is almost interchangeable. In general, the phases tend to run roughly around 100,000 years for a glacial cycle, then around 30,000 years for an interglacial. Then things start to get colder again and another ice age starts.

VORHZw0c_o.png


Now in the above chart, the top level is Greenland Ice Core Data, the bottom is Antarctic Ice Cores. And the reason it is more obvious in Greenland is because almost all of the glaciation happens in the Northern Hemisphere, because there ocean coverage is only 60% compared to over 80% of the Southern Hemisphere.

But even only going back 58 kya, the cycles are obvious. And it must be remembered, every one of those variances has occurred either during the Wisconsan Ice Age or in the Holocene Interglacial. When examining the above chart, one must absolutely be aware that pretty much everything to the right of GI-4 is during our current interglacial. And every single fluctuation to the left actually occurred during an ice age.

This is because this chart only goes back 58 ky, and the last ice age started at roughly 120 kya. This is not even a chart of ice age cycles themselves, but of climate changes and fluctuations during the last third of the last ice age, and the start of the current interglacial.

Original source if any are interested.

 
Greenland had far less snow and Ice a few thousand years ago as the region was much warmer than it is now with the miracle CO2 levels at around the 260 ppm level.

I am sure warmest/alarmest will panic over this. :auiqs.jpg:

============

No Tricks Zone

New Study: Greenland Was 3-7°C Warmer And Far Less Glaciated Than Today 6000-8000 Years Ago

By Kenneth Richard on 12. January 2026

Excerpt:

A large portion of the Greenland ice sheet that is today over 500 m thick did not exist during the Early to Mid Holocene.


LINK
That’s denier science, er, or something
 
And the reason it is more obvious in Greenland is because almost all of the glaciation happens in the Northern Hemisphere, because there ocean coverage is only 60% compared to over 80% of the Southern Hemisphere.
This is not a minor point. The threshold for extensive continental glaciation is different for each pole for good reasons. The southern pole has a continent parked over it which lowers the threshold for extensive continental glaciation (glaciates at a warmer temperature) and is surrounded by ocean which limits the spreading of the glaciers compared to land. The northern pole has an ocean parked over it which raises the threshold for extensive continental glaciation (glaciates at a colder temperature) but has surrounding land for glaciers to spread when it does glaciate.

This is why the climate of the planet for the last 3 million years has been driven by what happens in the northern hemisphere because that's where the greatest changes to albedo occur.

glacial cycles.gif
 
This is not a minor point.

I am aware of that, as well as how continental placement matters significantly.

But I am also aware of the "low science IQ" of a great many in here, and try to communicate in a way that most who are not scientifically illiterate can understand.

Such as in the Northern Hemisphere, far more of the land is located close to the poles. While in the Southern Hemisphere far more of the land is located closer to the equator. That also has a significant impact.

As well as why far more evidence of Ice Ages is located in South America than in the rest of the Southern Hemisphere combined. Whenever some scientific moron tries to proclaim that events like the "Roman Warm Period", the "Medieval Warm Period" or the "Little Ice Age" were "regional events", I simply point to the huge amounts of evidence of glacial advances and retreats that mirror those in the Northern Hemisphere occurring in South America.

About the only location in that half of the planet that is conducive to such glaciation forming in the first place. That is why even in the animation you provided, the only sizeable glaciation in the southern hemisphere is located in South America. Africa and Australia lack the mountain ranges that are a key part of how glaciation starts. New Zealand has a hell of a lot of glaciers, but it lacks enough land mass to develop the massive "ice sheets" as were seen in Europe and North America.
 
At the time when they arrived they did. Of course, they also arrived there and started colonies at the tail end of the Medieval Warm Period. Within two generations the climate started getting colder, and 300 years after that the Little Ice Age set in and they abandoned the island.
Yeah, I thought they cut it pretty close.
 
I am aware of that, as well as how continental placement matters significantly.

But I am also aware of the "low science IQ" of a great many in here, and try to communicate in a way that most who are not scientifically illiterate can understand.

Such as in the Northern Hemisphere, far more of the land is located close to the poles. While in the Southern Hemisphere far more of the land is located closer to the equator. That also has a significant impact.

As well as why far more evidence of Ice Ages is located in South America than in the rest of the Southern Hemisphere combined. Whenever some scientific moron tries to proclaim that events like the "Roman Warm Period", the "Medieval Warm Period" or the "Little Ice Age" were "regional events", I simply point to the huge amounts of evidence of glacial advances and retreats that mirror those in the Northern Hemisphere occurring in South America.

About the only location in that half of the planet that is conducive to such glaciation forming in the first place. That is why even in the animation you provided, the only sizeable glaciation in the southern hemisphere is located in South America. Africa and Australia lack the mountain ranges that are a key part of how glaciation starts. New Zealand has a hell of a lot of glaciers, but it lacks enough land mass to develop the massive "ice sheets" as were seen in Europe and North America.




What pieces of land on Earth today within 600 miles of a pole are in ice age, and what are not?


Can you find one piece of land within 600 miles to a pole that is not in ice age today?

Can you find one pice of land outside of 600 miles to a pole that is in ice age today?


Hence, 600 miles to the pole is a LAW, when land gets to within 600 miles of a pole, it goes into ice age, and when it moves outside of 600 miles to a pole, it exits ice age....



Treasonous CO2 FRAUD liars really hate that truth....
 
Greenland had far less snow and Ice a few thousand years ago as the region was much warmer than it is now with the miracle CO2 levels at around the 260 ppm level.

I am sure warmest/alarmest will panic over this. :auiqs.jpg:

============

No Tricks Zone

New Study: Greenland Was 3-7°C Warmer And Far Less Glaciated Than Today 6000-8000 Years Ago

By Kenneth Richard on 12. January 2026

Excerpt:

A large portion of the Greenland ice sheet that is today over 500 m thick did not exist during the Early to Mid Holocene.


LINK


Atmospheric carbon dioxide is atmospheric PLANT FOOD and all species on this earth depend on plants to survive.

By the word "plants " I include even plankton and other flora and fauna that live in the oceans.


 
15th post
6000 years ago the Greenland Ice Age had not yet reached the southern tip. The Vikings farmed there until the 1400s when the advancing ice age made it impossible for them to continue to grow crops there.
Over the past 20 years, Greenland, part of the North American Plate, has moved 0.9 inches to the Northwest. That would equal 270 inches in the last 6000 years, or 22.5 feet. Hardly enough to affect the whole climate of Greenland. One only has to look at the Milankovitch Cycles to understand why Greenland was warmer 6000 to 8000 years ago. However that seems to big a project for the dunderheaded deniers on this board.
 
Atmospheric carbon dioxide is atmospheric PLANT FOOD and all species on this earth depend on plants to survive.

By the word "plants " I include even plankton and other flora and fauna that live in the oceans.


This is hardly a straight line relationship. Combine increased heat experienced under higher CO2 conditions, and you may see decreased crop yields.



    1. [COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]

      C3 plants and higher CO2

      [COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]C3 plants, which utilize the Calvin cycle for carbon fixation, are generally more efficient at converting CO2 into biomass under lower CO2 levels. However, as CO2 levels increase, C3 plants may benefit from higher CO2 concentrations, leading to increased growth and yields. This is particularly true in environments where CO2 levels are elevated, such as in the tropics.
      C4 plants, on the other hand, have evolved to reduce the loss of carbon through photorespiration by using a different carbon fixation pathway. While C4 plants are more productive in high CO2 environments, they require additional energy and resources compared to C3 plants.
      The relationship between C3 and C4 plants and elevated CO2 levels is complex and varies by plant species and environmental conditions. Research indicates that while C3 plants may benefit from higher CO2 levels, C4 plants may not experience the same growth benefits and may even show a decrease in protein yield under certain conditions.
      Overall, the impact of higher CO2 levels on C3 and C4 plants is influenced by their specific adaptations and the environmental conditions they are subjected to. Understanding these adaptations and their responses to elevated CO2 is crucial for sustainable agriculture and food production.
      https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=29c6...dGlvbmFyeS5uZXQvYzMtYzQtY2FtLXBsYW50cy8&ntb=1
      Biology Dictionary+4
    1. [/COLOR]
    [/COLOR]




  1. C3​

    C3 plants, which utilize the Calvin cycle for carbon fixation, are generally more efficient at converting CO2 into biomass under lower CO2 levels. However, as CO2 levels increase, C3 plants may benefit from higher CO2 concentrations, leading to increased growth and yields. This is particularly true in environments where CO2 levels are elevated, such as in the tropics.
    C4 plants, on the other hand, have evolved to reduce the loss of carbon through photorespiration by using a different carbon fixation pathway. While C4 plants are more productive in high CO2 environments, they require additional energy and resources compared to C3 plants.
    The relationship between C3 and C4 plants and elevated CO2 levels is complex and varies by plant species and environmental conditions. Research indicates that while C3 plants may benefit from higher CO2 levels, C4 plants may not experience the same growth benefits and may even show a decrease in protein yield under certain conditions.
    Overall, the impact of higher CO2 levels on C3 and C4 plants is influenced by their specific adaptations and the environmental conditions they are subjected to. Understanding these adaptations and their responses to elevated CO2 is crucial for sustainable agriculture and food production.


    Biology Dictionary+4
 
This is not a minor point. The threshold for extensive continental glaciation is different for each pole for good reasons. The southern pole has a continent parked over it which lowers the threshold for extensive continental glaciation (glaciates at a warmer temperature) and is surrounded by ocean which limits the spreading of the glaciers compared to land. The northern pole has an ocean parked over it which raises the threshold for extensive continental glaciation (glaciates at a colder temperature) but has surrounding land for glaciers to spread when it does glaciate.

This is why the climate of the planet for the last 3 million years has been driven by what happens in the northern hemisphere because that's where the greatest changes to albedo occur.

View attachment 1206109
Both right and wrong. The southern oceans, because of their greater extent, absorb more heat at the beginning of the warmer periods at the start of the interglacials controlled by the Milankovitch Cycles. The relationship between the oceans and land masses are not simple. And the rise of the Himalayan Mountains, like the rise of the Appalachians in the Ordovician Period, reduced the amount of CO2 in the air by chemical weathering. At a slow enough rate that animals and plants had to time to evolve and migrate to adjust to changing conditions. That is not the case with AGW. Not only that, but we have effectively block most migration routes. So we are at the beginning of the sixth great extinction event.
 
At the time when they arrived they did. Of course, they also arrived there and started colonies at the tail end of the Medieval Warm Period. Within two generations the climate started getting colder, and 300 years after that the Little Ice Age set in and they abandoned the island.
A good many of them did not abandon the island, they died because they would not adapt to methods used by the Native Americans.
 
Back
Top Bottom