I mostly rely on the meteorology class I took ... the one where the student had to be concurrent with second year calculus ... I have not found the science in the IPCC report lacking ... rather I find the editorial content and the political conclusions they draw to be misguided ... the issue here is that
Crick says there's peer-reviewed papers in reputable scientific journals concluding that man causes almost all global warming ...
I'd like a link to such a paper ... no, I don't have a link to a paper that concludes man isn't responsible ... but I don't make that claim ... "2] Man-kind's activities contribute to global warming" ... I'm the math guy, I want numbers, what percentage of global warming is caused by man, and why do you think this is true? ... I cannot answer this myself ...
You are correct ...
Chris Landsea ... thank you for this, that was stupid of me ...
I read he was fired and that might have been a bias source ... but the question remains ... who was brought in to make these criticisms in the report? ... my guess is no one, since the IPCC sets their agenda, then hires the specific experts to advance this agenda ... it's very unlikely they would bring in someone doesn't accept the political conclusions made by the report ...
=====
Have you personally read the entire IPCC report? ...