- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,991
- 47,199
- 2,180
it's obvious they're being cooked. They are calling the ratio of deaths over the number of people with symptoms "the mortality rate." Anyone with two brain cells to rub together knows that isn't how you calculate the mortality rate.We need to start seeing the economic models as well so people have a better picture of the impacts of various scenarios as well.
The data is there I'm sure and it should be presented to the American people so they know what that is going to look like as well.
I definitely agree. If the people are walking into a situation with open eyes and decide to sink the economy for a 100 generations for a slightly better outcome with this coronavirus bullshit, that's fine.
But people have to have the information so they can realistically count the cost in living standards and weigh it against any benefit.
I don't like the idea of people pretending that there is no cost associated with a long term economic lockdown
Exactly. Right now they've been bombarded with data from the medical side which has some convinced we must do anything, no matter the cost. That's a moral decision. Fine. I get it, but we have not gotten similar information on the economic cost, which is directly related to these decisions, which would allow people to make an informed decision as to whether or not they agree with a given path.
Either way, we deserve to know how a given path impacts us economically.
I think the death/infection numbers are being cooked. The Ohio Dept of Health said on 12 March that 100,000 Ohioites were infected and the number was doubling every 6 days. Puts the number of infected now at more than a million in Ohio.
Yet, less than a hundred had died in the whole state, that's a death rate of less than 0.01%. A whole lot less than the 2 and 3 percent they have been jabbering about.
Last edited: