New Peer-Reviewed Study Shows Ivermectin ‘Significantly’ Reduces COVID Infections, Hospitalization, and Mortality Rates.

[Lesh]

It’s best to believe the government and the corporate media right?

I sure as hell AIN'T gonna believe the Lizard People "doctors"

 

[L.K.Eder]

Good info!
But topic is that it is now peer reviewed and considered gospel.
“The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality”

gospel. lol

 

[L.K.Eder]

Lol. You certainly didn’t read ANY of them. They are research papers. Ever heard of them?

yeah. read the one from Egypt cited several times in your post. and then find out what real peer review did say about this study.

 

[L.K.Eder]

I got it for free, dumbass.

you got your money's worth.

 

[gipper]

I sure as hell AIN'T gonna believe the Lizard People "doctors"

Well of course. Believe only government and corporate media.

 

[ClaireH]

BUT BUT ORANGE MAN BAD

New Peer-Reviewed Study Shows Ivermectin ‘Significantly’ Reduces COVID Infections, Hospitalization, and Mortality Rates.

Ethical research scientists tried to get the information 2 years ago. They were blocked by extra layer of screening PRIOR to peer review during preprints by one top medical journal and “falsehoods by Fauci”… that should be some comedy routing if it wasn’t the horrendous reality.

Following article published in 2020:

“Results: Repurposing of drugs from different pharmacological groups including antivirals like remdesivir, lopinavir, ritonavir, arbidol, oseltamivir, penciclovir, favipiravir, ganciclovir, and ribavirin; other antibiotics like azithromycin, ivermectin, eravacycline, valrubicin, streptomycin, nitazoxanide, teicoplanin, caspofungin, and colistin; and other agents like hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, tocilizumab, camostat, nafamostat, carfilzomib, interferon, aprepitant, and dexamethasone can be considered for COVID-19 therapy.”

Repurposing Drugs for COVID-19: An Approach for Treatment in the Pandemic - PubMed

Although current results are promising, limitations to drug repurposing, such as a low success rate and the possibility of adverse events, can't be overlooked. With continuous research and technical advancements, repurposing will no doubt provide a notable scientific contribution to innovation...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[ColonelAngus]

The CDC had significantly different guidance for masks for H1N1. Kind of interesting...

Information on the effectiveness of facemasks and respirators for decreasing the risk of influenza infection in community settings is extremely limited. Thus, it is difficult to assess their potential effectiveness in decreasing the risk of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus transmission in these settings. In the absence of clear scientific data, the interim recommendations below have been developed on the basis of public health judgment, the historical use of facemasks and respirators in other settings for preventing transmission of influenza and other respiratory viruses, and on current information on the spread and severity of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus.

CDC H1N1 Flu | Interim Recommendations for Facemask and Respirator Use to Reduce Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Transmission

www.cdc.gov

 

[ClaireH]

I know three triple vaxxed people who have covid as I type this.

I’m afraid I know about 20 or so personally, with just learning of many more today. All individuals (co-workers and neighbors) accepted one of the (fake) vaccines and at least 10 of them had boosters. Not sure if the others had a booster. The neighbor who told me to rush out and get my shot has fortunately recovered from his 2 shots- Good thing the jabs weren’t from one of those bad batches or it could have turned out worse.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Omicron is like a cold for most people.

You cultists want it to be very deadly...and you REALLY want to see the UNVAXXED DIE FROM OMICRON....but it is not going to happen with the magnitude you have in your dreams.

 

[ClaireH]

Other than chicken soup, there is no out of hospital palliative drug available.

Test Positive, and they tell you to come back when you need a ventilator

~S~

If anyone is told they “need a
ventilator” later when they have been diagnosed with COVID-19 (in general, a patient placed on a ventilator has a 50-50 chance of death, used most often as a last resort effort. I can certainly understand hearing about many people rejecting this advice from hospitals. Personally, I would throw a major fit if they tried to put one on me. Total cluelessness at its finest when this does nothing for clearing the lungs.

Now, before I have some “outlier poster” respond who claims, “My aunt was put on a ventilator and lived!” well if it was due to COVID-19 and lived following intubation that person is very lucky.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The CDC had significantly different guidance for masks for H1N1. Kind of interesting...

​

Information on the effectiveness of facemasks and respirators for decreasing the risk of influenza infection in community settings is extremely limited. Thus, it is difficult to assess their potential effectiveness in decreasing the risk of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus transmission in these settings. In the absence of clear scientific data, the interim recommendations below have been developed on the basis of public health judgment, the historical use of facemasks and respirators in other settings for preventing transmission of influenza and other respiratory viruses, and on current information on the spread and severity of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus.

CDC H1N1 Flu | Interim Recommendations for Facemask and Respirator Use to Reduce Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Transmission

www.cdc.gov

Yep. Per the CDC - no masks in a crowded area with people having H1N1.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Ethical research scientists tried to get the information 2 years ago. They were blocked by extra layer of screening PRIOR to peer review during preprints by one top medical journal and “falsehoods by Fauci”… that should be some comedy routing if it wasn’t the horrendous reality.

Following article published in 2020:

“Results: Repurposing of drugs from different pharmacological groups including antivirals like remdesivir, lopinavir, ritonavir, arbidol, oseltamivir, penciclovir, favipiravir, ganciclovir, and ribavirin; other antibiotics like azithromycin, ivermectin, eravacycline, valrubicin, streptomycin, nitazoxanide, teicoplanin, caspofungin, and colistin; and other agents like hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, tocilizumab, camostat, nafamostat, carfilzomib, interferon, aprepitant, and dexamethasone can be considered for COVID-19 therapy.”

Repurposing Drugs for COVID-19: An Approach for Treatment in the Pandemic - PubMed

Although current results are promising, limitations to drug repurposing, such as a low success rate and the possibility of adverse events, can't be overlooked. With continuous research and technical advancements, repurposing will no doubt provide a notable scientific contribution to innovation...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Yep.

 

[ClaireH]

What do any of you care if someone is prescribed Ivermectin by their doctor?

My best guess is it’s threatening to the narrative that only fake vaccines are the way to the future in order to live!

Low IQ voters can still have a fair amount of common sense. There are about 7 or so board regulars who always (since I’ve been here, anyway) continue to “argue” something that has been disproven more than once by various sources and research scientists. This evidence proves they lack any sense. That’s even worse than a low IQ voter, much worse actually.

 

[jc456]

You're asking that question to a guy who's so fucking dumb he doesn't even know Ivermectin has been used to treat humans for 50+ years.

Well a naked xiden told him not true

 

[ClaireH]

The problem with that study, is the numbers are too small. they claim it was from 150 thousand participants, yet reported hospitalizations of:

There was also a 56 percent reduction in the hospitalization rate for ivermectin users (44 versus 99 hospitalizations).

150 thousand people, and fewer than 150 hospitalizations? That's 1 in 1,000 even coming down with COVID requiring medical intervention.

I don't know about you, but I'd say that peer reviewed study was reviewed by somebody who doesn't know medicine, because the numbers are nonsense.

Read the link I posted, ye of little faith.

Honest question: why do you continue
to believe the false political narrative?
Please choose the best answer:
1. Because my government’s health officials said so.
2. Because if CNN states it, it’s a fact.
3. Because I invested heavily in Pfizer or Moderna stock.
4. Because my personal doctor would never lie to me.
5. Because I always place political goals of my party above the good of the country.
6. Feel free to apply your own answer

 

[ClaireH]

For the doubting Thomas who requested extended study: how about this:

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines​

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines - PMC

Repurposed medicines may have a role against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The antiparasitic ivermectin, with antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, has now been tested in numerous clinical trials. We assessed the efficacy of ivermectin treatment in ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[L.K.Eder]

For the doubting Thomas who requested extended study: how about this:

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines​

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines - PMC

Repurposed medicines may have a role against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The antiparasitic ivermectin, with antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, has now been tested in numerous clinical trials. We assessed the efficacy of ivermectin treatment in ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

what do you think this proves, professor?

 

[Lesh]

If anyone is told they “need a
ventilator” later when they have been diagnosed with COVID-19 (in general, a patient placed on a ventilator has a 50-50 chance of death, used most often as a last resort effort. I can certainly understand hearing about many people rejecting this advice from hospitals. Personally, I would throw a major fit if they tried to put one on me. Total cluelessness at its finest when this does nothing for clearing the lungs.

Now, before I have some “outlier poster” respond who claims, “My aunt was put on a ventilator and lived!” well if it was due to COVID-19 and lived following intubation that person is very lucky.

If you need a ventilator and refuse it...you are most likely going to die.

They don't use it unless it's direly needed.

 

[ClaireH]

what do you think this proves, professor?

Mostly this: “Ivermectin is likely to be an equitable, acceptable, and feasible global intervention against COVID-19. Health professionals should strongly consider its use, in both treatment and prophylaxis.”

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines - PMC

Repurposed medicines may have a role against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The antiparasitic ivermectin, with antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, has now been tested in numerous clinical trials. We assessed the efficacy of ivermectin treatment in ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Stop being lazy in life L K E, you are pulling some of your own family members down.

 

[ClaireH]

If you need a ventilator and refuse it...you are most likely going to die.

They don't use it unless it's direly needed.

As I stated, without any other option intubation it’s something done as a last resort measure. The issue remains: intubation/ventilators used prematurely and increased the number of deaths of COVID-19.