New Leftist Line: Benghazi Was Chris Stevens' Fault, And He's Dead, So Let's Move On

Yep, the shithead is trying to change the subject with some other lie about conservatives destroying the economy.....typical.

Can't cover up scumbag liberal blaming the Ambassador for his own death, so find new fire to start over there to distract....

It was just a matter of time until liberals started blaming the Ambassador for his own death. They probably whisper in cocktail parties a "homo shouldn't be in Libya."

Conjecture, that's what you're reporting. How about those conservative cocktail parties where I assume they're saying, "Let's drive the country over the cliff. That'll show him"? How can you defend that kind of blatant sabotage of the economy?
 
Yep, the shithead is trying to change the subject with some other lie about conservatives destroying the economy.....typical.

Can't cover up scumbag liberal blaming the Ambassador for his own death, so find new fire to start over there to distract....

It was just a matter of time until liberals started blaming the Ambassador for his own death. They probably whisper in cocktail parties a "homo shouldn't be in Libya."

Conjecture, that's what you're reporting. How about those conservative cocktail parties where I assume they're saying, "Let's drive the country over the cliff. That'll show him"? How can you defend that kind of blatant sabotage of the economy?

Just using your line of reasoning, make something up and then bash the opposition with it. Two can play your silly little games, brainiac.
 
It was just a matter of time until liberals started blaming the Ambassador for his own death. They probably whisper in cocktail parties a "homo shouldn't be in Libya."

Conjecture, that's what you're reporting. How about those conservative cocktail parties where I assume they're saying, "Let's drive the country over the cliff. That'll show him"? How can you defend that kind of blatant sabotage of the economy?

Obama has been downgrading our economy since he was sworn in. our credit rating has been downgradef on his watch stopping obama's polocies mean the economy will return, but your totally blind when it comes to obama.
 
The lesson learned is, America will abandon any citizen, no matter what their office, if it is politically expedient to do so, then blame the victims for relying on a feckless government to protect them.

This lesson doesn't mean very much to democrats or republicans. It is vitally important to terrorists and anyone else who would do us harm. They now know something about the US that can't be bought with money, nor discovered by spies. America is a nation willing to betray its citizens for political gain.
 
Can you imagine the uproar if this had happened under the Bush Administration? There would have been rioting in the streets...

It did happen under the Bush administration and everyone rallied around the President

There's the difference right there. Bad things happen to Americans under Bush, we all rally around. Bad things happen to Americans under Obama, righties point fingers and walk on bodies.
 
don't take the bait from the asswipe, it just wants to change the subject then bother you for 5-10 posts about nothing in its head.

It knows it can get people to argue over the economy once it starts some bullshit.

It was just a matter of time until liberals started blaming the Ambassador for his own death. They probably whisper in cocktail parties a "homo shouldn't be in Libya."

Conjecture, that's what you're reporting. How about those conservative cocktail parties where I assume they're saying, "Let's drive the country over the cliff. That'll show him"? How can you defend that kind of blatant sabotage of the economy?

Obama has been downgrading our economy since he was sworn in. our credit rating has been downgradef on his watch stopping obama's polocies mean the economy will return, but your totally blind when it comes to obama.
 
It was just a matter of time until liberals started blaming the Ambassador for his own death. They probably whisper in cocktail parties a "homo shouldn't be in Libya."

Conjecture, that's what you're reporting. How about those conservative cocktail parties where I assume they're saying, "Let's drive the country over the cliff. That'll show him"? How can you defend that kind of blatant sabotage of the economy?

Obama has been downgrading our economy since he was sworn in. our credit rating has been downgradef on his watch stopping obama's polocies mean the economy will return, but your totally blind when it comes to obama.

Old news. The ball is in the court of Boehner & Co. If they don't come up with a workable compromise , it'll be on them.
 
Can you imagine the uproar if this had happened under the Bush Administration? There would have been rioting in the streets...

It did happen under the Bush administration and everyone rallied around the President

There's the difference right there. Bad things happen to Americans under Bush, we all rally around. Bad things happen to Americans under Obama, righties point fingers and walk on bodies.

Proof liberals have a short memory, right after 911 everyone came together. Then after about a week liberals went back to bush bashing again, and now under obama it's bush blaming.
 
don't take the bait from the asswipe, it just wants to change the subject then bother you for 5-10 posts about nothing in its head.

It knows it can get people to argue over the economy once it starts some bullshit.

Conjecture, that's what you're reporting. How about those conservative cocktail parties where I assume they're saying, "Let's drive the country over the cliff. That'll show him"? How can you defend that kind of blatant sabotage of the economy?

Obama has been downgrading our economy since he was sworn in. our credit rating has been downgradef on his watch stopping obama's polocies mean the economy will return, but your totally blind when it comes to obama.

Typical rightist attempt to suppress freedom of speech going hand-in-hand with their attempt to suppress the vote. Hopefully, it will work just as well. This is still the land of the free not your fascist paradise, GB.
 
Can you imagine the uproar if this had happened under the Bush Administration? There would have been rioting in the streets...

Yeah, after Bush allowed 3,000+ Americans to die on 9/11, there were riots everywhere.....:eusa_eh:

A Democrat Congress voted twice to send troops to Iraq and last I checked.. are still funding the operation... 10 years later.
 
don't take the bait from the asswipe, it just wants to change the subject then bother you for 5-10 posts about nothing in its head.

It knows it can get people to argue over the economy once it starts some bullshit.

Obama has been downgrading our economy since he was sworn in. our credit rating has been downgradef on his watch stopping obama's polocies mean the economy will return, but your totally blind when it comes to obama.

Typical rightist attempt to suppress freedom of speech going hand-in-hand with their attempt to suppress the vote. Hopefully, it will work just as well. This is still the land of the free not your fascist paradise, GB.

What on Earth did he type that is an attemp to "suppress freedom of speech going hand-in-hand with their attempt to suppress the vote"?

Have you ben drinking?
 
It did happen under the Bush administration and everyone rallied around the President

There's the difference right there. Bad things happen to Americans under Bush, we all rally around. Bad things happen to Americans under Obama, righties point fingers and walk on bodies.

Proof liberals have a short memory, right after 911 everyone came together. Then after about a week liberals went back to bush bashing again, and now under obama it's bush blaming.

Goanna move on to Boehner-blaming, if he doesn't get off his butt to work out a deficit deal. The people have had enough of the Benghazi distraction. They want to know why the Republicans are dwelling on a tragedy that would have been impossible to head off, when we've got huge deficit problems to work on.
 
don't take the bait from the asswipe, it just wants to change the subject then bother you for 5-10 posts about nothing in its head.

It knows it can get people to argue over the economy once it starts some bullshit.

Typical rightist attempt to suppress freedom of speech going hand-in-hand with their attempt to suppress the vote. Hopefully, it will work just as well. This is still the land of the free not your fascist paradise, GB.

What on Earth did he type that is an attemp to "suppress freedom of speech going hand-in-hand with their attempt to suppress the vote"?

Have you ben drinking?

You having a problem with English? Who's doing the drinking here? I'll speak of whatever I care to, especially when the topic is being pushed merely to distract us from the real problem of the deficit.
 
It did happen under the Bush administration and everyone rallied around the President

There's the difference right there. Bad things happen to Americans under Bush, we all rally around. Bad things happen to Americans under Obama, righties point fingers and walk on bodies.

Proof liberals have a short memory, right after 911 everyone came together. Then after about a week liberals went back to bush bashing again, and now under obama it's bush blaming.

Maybe some loonie lefties were bashing Bush still, however the MSM stayed in Bed With the Bush administration until long after the Iraq occupation became FUBAR.
 
According to the article and the Leftist posters on this blog, there is no other way to protect the man who gave the direct order to stand down in order to sacrifice those poor sould in Benghazi.
It also cost the careers of a General and Rear Admiral in the process. Little is being said about this. Why?
It's not just the problem with Benghazi. It's the lies that have followed.
Hey blaming the dead for one's mistakes or incompetence is SOP for the Liberals in the W.H.
Why is it that Oblamer and his cronies must lie about everything and then play the race card at every turn?
 
Can you imagine the uproar if this had happened under the Bush Administration? There would have been rioting in the streets...

Yeah, after Bush allowed 3,000+ Americans to die on 9/11, there were riots everywhere.....:eusa_eh:

Except for the fact that under Bubba Clinton's watch all four terrorist pilots trained in the U.S., That was while America had ungone attacks at WTC #1, South African Embassies Bombings, Khobar Towers, and the USS Cole. But hey, Let's blame Bush for it all. Never mind the incompetence of Clinton and his hog tying of our intelligence agencies up with red tape.
BTW you forgot to mention the KIA in Afghanistan under Oblamer.

Oh you mean the terrorists under the umbrella of Osama Bin Laden? A terrorist funded by Ronald Reagan and George HW Bush? A terrorist who's family was so chummy with the Bushes that Georgie W. took over Arbusto, a company started by Osama Bin Laden's brother?

And yep..the Republicans pressured the CIA not to certify that Khobar and the Cole were attacked by Al Qaeda..and nixed any special ops. They had a better idea..impeachment.

Good stuff.

History.
 

Forum List

Back
Top