New House Speaker flying christian nationalist flag outside his office.

Never heard that... :linky:

Posted a link to that fact, and can post more; more than one state had one. So why not show you have functioning frontal lobes and do your own homework instead of sniveling at those who have done theirs to wipe your ass for you.
 
Up to a (certain extent) you can, but if open to the public at large, you have some options such as no guns allowed, proper clothing required etc, but never can a business discriminate on the basis of race because race is not a preference or a choice. Other things are being argued as not being a preference or a choice, but those arguments are not settled, and therefore until they are the law doesn't apply in their favor.

Religious rights gives everyone the right to not be involved or engage in anything that violates their FREEDOM of RELIGION in which involves their beliefs and standards based upon those religious beliefs that are and have been allowed forever in the USA under certain guidelines and criteria, and especially so when there are alternative businesses that fit the preferences and needs of those who are anti-God or anti-religious or etc in America. The place is big enough to accommodate all, and to appease all without people being offended or made to suffer regardless of who you are in life. Pursue freedom of choice, and if choice is limited then create companies that cater to your needs. It's really that simple. Food and water is all humans need to live, and no one would deny anyone the necessities of life without being in violation of the law's, but other special interest are subject to preference and wants instead of needs, so seek therefore what you all think you need in life, but don't get upset if it's not being produced for you or catered to you based upon your personal preferences. This is not a dictatorship.

As long as choice and alternative options exist, then there is no reason why people should be invading someone's business with alterior motives, otherwise that are known to go against the religious values of the ownership, and to then challenge the standards set forth by the owner of that business when he or she is operating said business under certain guidelines that he or she has set and imposed without breaking the law.

I agree that standardized prepared cakes in the case up front should be sold to anyone that walks in, otherwise if the shop is advertised as open to the public, and without signage that shows the shop as being a religious business, but the cake designing that has to be done by the baker in the back, otherwise that might be in violation of his or her religious beliefs should be off limits to those seeking alternative designs for certain venues that offend the religious owners religion and/or his or her values based upon that religion.

Let's face it folks, Muslim shops or businesses will not be designing and baking any cakes for anyone that violates their strong religious beliefs, yet they aren't targeted by these group's in an attempt to change their operations in such a way.

WHY ??
The queers aren't going to target Muslim businesses because they are fellow democrat voters.
 
Is this really who you guys want to be? Have you forgotten that state sponsored religion was the reason many people, including some of the first, came to America? Freedom of religion must include freedom from religion.

A new report confirmed that the House speaker is displaying an “Appeal to Heaven” flag outside his door.
1710624996815.png
 
refusing to bake a cake for a gay couple is not the same thing
It sure is.

But iron age religious horse shit gets special treatment in this country.

And you are completely wrong about the supreme court anyway. They didn't rule that bakers don't have to make cakes for gay people ya dummy. The ruled on a procedural matter used by the state.
 
Last edited:
First and foremost it's anti-American.

Here's the definition for ya.

How is One Nation under God anti American when it's right there in our pledge of allegiance
 
You realize the pledge of allegiance isn't any sort of official thing, right?

It was written by a baptist minister who was also an avowed socialist.
I don't care about it's history, I care that I've repeated it 1000s of times and believe it
 
Mocking MTG is not a war on women. It is simply pointing out a lunatic in a powerful position.
Cherry picking or being a hypocrite is engaging in a war against conservative women, but all the while ignoring the liberal women that are killing their unborn babies in wholesale fashion among many other tragic things they are doing. MTG speaks truth to power, and you knuckleheads hate it with a passion.
 

Forum List

Back
Top