New Corona Variant, that might be very dangerous, spreads in South Africa

[ClaireH]

Thank

Thank Eagle1462010 for promptly getting the mutation list to badger. Soon after, the important North Carolina lab connection to Omicron N969K was found.

Thanks Eagle! It’s so nice to have multiple posters fighting the good fight for truth and transparency!

 

[Ray9]

Biden's new Covid variant:




I am the one, Orgasmatron, the outstretched grasping hand
My image is of agony, my servants rape the land
Obsequious and arrogant, clandestine and vain
Two thousand years of misery, of torture in my name
Hypocrisy made paramount, paranoia the law
My name is called religion, sadistic, sacred whore

I twist the truth, I rule the world, my crown is called deceit
I am the emperor of lies, you grovel at my feet
I rob you and I slaughter you, your downfall is my gain
And still you play the sycophant and revel in your pain
And all my promises are lies, all my love is hate
I am the politician, and I decide your fate

I march before a martyred world, an army for the fight
I speak of great heroic days, of victory and might
I hold a banner drenched in blood, I urge you to be brave
I lead you to your destiny, I lead you to your grave
Your bones will build my palaces, your eyes will stud my crown
For I am Mars, the god of war, and I will cut you down

Biden preparing for a news conference on the orgasmatron variant:

movie sleeper orgasmatron scene youtube - Bing video

www.bing.com

 

[Circe]

And people *should* research their own conditions.

You seem to be one of these people who "instruct" others, as above, and give useless and unrequested advice. I wish you'd quit it.

 

[ClaireH]

As someone who works in healthcare, I can confidently say that 99% of patients are completely incapable of researching anything online to any sort of scientific standard.

They cherry pick any stupid bullshit they find on the web that they think justifies what they *want* to do versus what they *should* do.

Most people have no desire to research actual peer-reviewed studies. And if they do, they have a hard time finding and identifying them. And if they do find them, they are difficult to understand unless you actually have education/experience in that specific field.

By all means, advocate for yourself and your loved ones. But patients googling their condition and then thinking they know more than PhD holding experts is stupid and dangerous.

Well I’m going to have to disagree with most of your points. Come on Braal— 99%. Really, you’re going with that? That stats not even valid much less a close estimate come on.

The average IQ in the states is stuck on 100 and really not much better going on in Japan with a couple of points higher by average. So this alone rules out your statistic, even though I think you were intentionally exaggerating.

I think we know very different people but I am really surprised to know you have a medical background and hold that opinion.

Surely you are aware that medical journal entries are easily located online, accessible by daily email, without any difficulty whatsoever like you indicated.

Maybe 20 years ago it wasn’t as common for people to research medical information when the internet was still relatively new for the masses. For many years now (guessing at least 10 maybe 15 for certain sources) anyone could pull up PubMed, Medscape, Science, Nature, and similar foreign journals online. All you have to do is check the box that you are interested to learn. Simple process.

Now I’m going to only ask the following question because it’s a total guess…. but are you by chance one of the medical types who feels that no one else could grasp the data unless they have had your experience and expertise? I will delay my urge to fill in the blank until I read your response.

 

[badger2]

Tomorrow we’ll expound on three more Omicron mutations, all of which link to the bovine coronavirus (BCoV) jump from cattle to humans resulting in the HCoV-OC43 virus. Analysis of these sequences links to yaks in Yunnan, and the people that ride them, reinforcing the suggestion from a Belarus report that yaks are intermediate host of SARS-CoV-2. These Omicron mutations are close together on the SARS-CoV-2 spike: Q493K, G496S, Q498R.

 

[Ray9]

Tomorrow we’ll expound on three more Omicron mutations, all of which link to the bovine coronavirus (BCoV) jump from cattle to humans resulting in the HCoV-OC43 virus. Analysis of these sequences links to yaks in Yunnan, and the people that ride them, reinforcing the suggestion from a Belarus report that yaks are intermediate host of SARS-CoV-2. These Omicron mutations are close together on the SARS-CoV-2 spike: Q493K, G496S, Q498R.

Joe Biden correction:

It's the Omnicron variant!

Biden says he will direct FDA, CDC to use 'fastest process available' to clear Covid vaccines targeting omicron

President Joe Biden said he is directing federal agencies to be ready to move quickly to approve vaccines tailored to protect against the Covid omicron variant.

www.cnbc.com

Sheesh, he is the president you know.

 

[Briss]

The virus doesn't care if you don't believe . . .

Maybe, but that doesn't mean it's completely without feelings. Through an intense bargaining session with the virus, the Administration was able to hammer out a deal whereby the virus agrees to stay away from the workplace so long as no more than 99 people are working there. The fact that the virus would agree to such terms when it is clearly under no obligation to do so is an obvious indication that it gives at least half a rat's ass about humanity.

 

[badger2]

Joe Biden correction:

It's the Omnicron variant!

Biden says he will direct FDA, CDC to use 'fastest process available' to clear Covid vaccines targeting omicron

President Joe Biden said he is directing federal agencies to be ready to move quickly to approve vaccines tailored to protect against the Covid omicron variant.

www.cnbc.com

Sheesh, he is the president you know.

Yes, JoeXi has done and thought everything for us.

 

[Flopper]

As someone who works in healthcare, I can confidently say that 99% of patients are completely incapable of researching anything online to any sort of scientific standard.

They cherry pick any stupid bullshit they find on the web that they think justifies what they *want* to do versus what they *should* do.

Most people have no desire to research actual peer-reviewed studies. And if they do, they have a hard time finding and identifying them. And if they do find them, they are difficult to understand unless you actually have education/experience in that specific field.

By all means, advocate for yourself and your loved ones. But patients googling their condition and then thinking they know more than PhD holding experts is stupid and dangerous.

And just as crazy is a talk show host telling his listeners, not to lessen to the goverment or so called scientists but use the Internet to research the covid vaccines and make their own decision. Immunology and virology are two most complex subjects in medical science and these idiots suggest the public bypass those with in-depth knowledge that can provide guidance and do their own research.

 

[Flopper]

Well I’m going to have to disagree with most of your points. Come on Braal— 99%. Really, you’re going with that? That stats not even valid much less a close estimate come on.

The average IQ in the states is stuck on 100 and really not much better going on in Japan with a couple of points higher by average. So this alone rules out your statistic, even though I think you were intentionally exaggerating.

I think we know very different people but I am really surprised to know you have a medical background and hold that opinion.

Surely you are aware that medical journal entries are easily located online, accessible by daily email, without any difficulty whatsoever like you indicated.

Maybe 20 years ago it wasn’t as common for people to research medical information when the internet was still relatively new for the masses. For many years now (guessing at least 10 maybe 15 for certain sources) anyone could pull up PubMed, Medscape, Science, Nature, and similar foreign journals online. All you have to do is check the box that you are interested to learn. Simple process.

Now I’m going to only ask the following question because it’s a total guess…. but are you by chance one of the medical types who feels that no one else could grasp the data unless they have had your experience and expertise? I will delay my urge to fill in the blank until I read your response.

It depends what we call research. If by research we mean looking at the CDC, John Hopkins, Kaiser Foundation, or WebMD for information on getting vaccinated or which medication would be best tolerate or is affordable, I think most people can do this. However, I believe very few people are capable of reading abstracts in medical and scientific journals and using them to make medical decisions.

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

Cuomo replacement declares state of emergency in New York......Fauci on standby.

What for this Africa Bambata variant?

Hurry before it is Deleted!

"Omicron Variant: South African Medical Association Says New Variant Causes ‘mild Symptoms'​

Angelique Coetzee, the chairwoman of the South African Medical Association, said that the new variant of the B.1.1.529 results in 'mild symptoms'"​

Omicron variant: South African Medical Association says new variant causes ‘mild symptoms'

Angelique Coetzee, the chairwoman of the South African Medical Association, said that the new variant of the B.1.1.529 results in 'mild symptoms'

www.republicworld.com

 

[badger2]

It depends what we call research. If by research we mean looking at the CDC, John Hopkins, Kaiser Foundation, or WebMD for information on getting vaccinated or which medication would be best tolerate or is affordable, I think most people can do this. However, I believe very few people are capable of reading abstracts in medical and scientific journals and using them to make medical decisions.

Johns Hopkins was one of the first to possess the chimp virus that goes into AstraZeneca, and most Americans can understand their mother tongue when they read.

 

[badger2]

The Reader-Prisoner has every right to research on their own. Not only dipshit communist Chinese science, but all other science does not yet know where the virus comes from. Autodidacticity will do something about the adaption to absurdity.

 

[badger2]

Omicron variant mutations close together on the spike are Q493K, G496S, and Q498R. For the virus Daszak and Wuhan lab found in 2011 near Kunming, RsSHC014, it is also Q493 without further mutation. This is the virus that Ralph Baric manipulated in the North Carolina lab. For Chinese ferret badger, it is N493, I496, and N498, so where the bat uses Q, like SARS-CoV-2, ferret badger uses N. Where SARS-CoV-2 uses glycine (G), the badger will use an isoleucine @496, which is a more transparent mutation considering that coronaviruses in general like to toy with combinations or multiples of branched-chain amino acids when they mutate.

 

[ClaireH]

It depends what we call research. If by research we mean looking at the CDC, John Hopkins, Kaiser Foundation, or WebMD for information on getting vaccinated or which medication would be best tolerate or is affordable, I think most people can do this. However, I believe very few people are capable of reading abstracts in medical and scientific journals and using them to make medical decisions.

I am not suggesting that anyone just go on their own, detach from their GP’s and specialists, not in the least. Adding information that isn’t known by one’s doctor when relevant can come from a variety of sources. Most GPs don’t have the time to research for hours. Many doctors hire assistants to research specific illnesses and retrieve latest medications proven effective. Nursing staff also researches new meds and outcomes, but time constraints due to patient workload are limiting. Most doctors and nurses don’t have the time to review all cases, say, regarding searching for successful treatment options out for Type 2 diabetes. New studies come out daily for all kinds of common diseases and ailments.


If a person cares enough about his or her health, and the health of family members who have a serious condition, and has an average or above IQ (many Americans fall between 100-120) their efforts have paid off to reduce discomfort. Mine did anyway, when researching for a family member who had pancreatic cancer. The beast of all cancers. I wish I could say the outcome wasn’t still death, (stage 4 already in lymph system at diagnosis) but the suffering was at least minimized and a few side effects kicked to the curb with the better meds. One med wasn’t FDA approved available from Canada with script, and doc signed off after drug comparison. FDA had a holdup and it was found superior to approved drug. FDA is inept overall and has been for years.

 

[Flopper]

I am not suggesting that anyone just go on their own, detach from their GP’s and specialists, not in the least. Adding information that isn’t known by one’s doctor when relevant can come from a variety of sources. Most GPs don’t have the time to research for hours. Many doctors hire assistants to research specific illnesses and retrieve latest medications proven effective. Nursing staff also researches new meds and outcomes, but time constraints due to patient workload are limiting. Most doctors and nurses don’t have the time to review all cases, say, regarding searching for successful treatment options out for Type 2 diabetes. New studies come out daily for all kinds of common diseases and ailments.


If a person cares enough about his or her health, and the health of family members who have a serious condition, and has an average or above IQ (many Americans fall between 100-120) their efforts have paid off to reduce discomfort. Mine did anyway, when researching for a family member who had pancreatic cancer. The beast of all cancers. I wish I could say the outcome wasn’t still death, (stage 4 already in lymph system at diagnosis) but the suffering was at least minimized and a few side effects kicked to the curb with the better meds. One med wasn’t FDA approved available from Canada with script, and doc signed off after drug comparison. FDA had a holdup and it was found superior to approved drug. FDA is inept overall and has been for years.

There is nothing wrong with doing your own research. In fact it's really a good idea. My family doctor has suggested several sources to read about my health problems. I just don't think many people do this kind of thing. When I suggested an article about living with Arthritis to my neighbor, he said I pay doctors to tell me the kind of stuff I need to know. I though about what he said and knowing my neighbor, he would probably be better off not doing his own research because he would probably do it on Instagram or Facebook.

 

[badger2]

Investigation of Omicron variant gets compromised when we see reports that are supposed to be some of the most authoritarian and professional, fall short. In a report on the origins of SARS-CoV-2, which is linked at Edward Hoopers Origins page, they cite the Wuhan study, but stop at position 400 of the spike, as can be seen in Fig 1.:

Difference in receptor usage between severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus and SARS-like coronavirus of bat origin - PubMed

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by the SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV), which uses angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as its receptor for cell entry. A group of SARS-like CoVs (SL-CoVs) has been identified in horseshoe bats. SL-CoVs and SARS-CoVs share identical...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

’....Fig. 1....’

They stop 22 amino acids shy of where Ralph Baric took notice of the W422 (tryptophan) and 20 amino acids short of the increased risk of breast cancer @ 420. Omicron mutation N969K is the connection to W422 of RsSHC014, because it is also a W @969.

 

[badger2]

Note that in the above report, they use an HIV pseudovirus. This links to the chimp adenovirus from The Gambia for use in AstraZeneca vaccine. Therefore, Hooper’s poliovirus vaccinations in The Gambia and Guinea-Bissau link the HIV-2 genome in pseudovirus comparison, which many believe to be an older virus than HIV-1.

 

[badger2]

Hooper’s book, The River is online and unlike Kennedy’s book on Fau Chi, does contain an index. The Gambia is mentioned on pp. 388, 624, 626, 633 and 642.

 

[badger2]

It’s not know if Hooper knows about 1962 Canadian PHEV, whose sequences are almost identical to yak coronavirus (including the yaks of Yunnan). But on Hooper’s page in the Blunders and Blunderbusses article is the statement, ‘In 2001 I jumped off the fence on the polio vaccine hypothesis in favor of ‘disproved’....But I am open to persuasion that my conclusion was premature.’