Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
Tha stat is bullshit and it's easy to explain why. The stat your graph gives is simply stating most of those studies did not say the words of man causing climate change. If you understood how science works, you would get this. What Those studies say is that the level of CO2 and other elements is what is changing our climate. Where is all that CO2 coming from? Man made activities. See climate scientists aren't in the profession to say anything sociological, political, or economically related. They just point to facts. They are simply stating the massive levels of CO2 generated are what is causing climate chance. It's man who has generated all that CO2. It doesn't take a scientist to make the connection.So you're actually dumb enough to believe that 97% of those climate scientists and the vast majority of the peer reviewed articles FROM AROUND THE WORLD supporting the human caused climate change fact are just in the pockets of democrats? That's your grand conclusion is it?
Let's face it. You found out just now what peer-reviewed means.
Out comes the John Cook Et Al lie, that was placed in peer reviewed paper, that was found to be a total fabrication, yet passed PAL REVIEW..
Liberals and their math... Go figure..
Misstating the statements of other scientists is LYING! FABRICATING!
MISLEADING! But your ok with this kind of behavior by John Cook?
You should stop reading Skeptical Science-John Cooks blogg and pull your head out of wherever it is implanted. use your dam brain. Try and find one live brain cell to use for critical thinking skills.
Last edited: