BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 57,376
- 17,026
- 2,180
it is a matter of checks and balances. Prepping for a TV appearance is not out of the ordinary. Putting out a dialogue that deceives the electorate during a campaign is unethical and dishonest. We, the people need to know how the policies of a sitting administration are working...especially right before an election.
Their narrative was in direct conflict with what their advisors told them and, coincidentally, not a poor reflection on their current international initiatives. If, In fact, they did this intentionally, then the WH lied to the American People about policy while they were trying to decide if a new President and new policy was needed.
If this is the case, it needs to be exposed. Not to slander the existing President.....but to deter a future one from doing the same.
We need to know that the executive branch is kept in check at all times. I am surprised you don't see it that way.
The real question is, why do Benghazi Truthers only just now see it that way? If this isn't just an excuse to hate Obama, if this really is the reaction to perceived dishonesty over the deaths of four Americans, then why weren't these same people out on the streets over Condoleezza Rice's deceitful talk show appearances drumming up support for invading Iraq? Why weren't they marching on the White House over Colin Powell lying to the United Nations, or Bush's shameless twisting of the facts addressing the American public?
If those pushing this bizarre theory really were all about government honesty, we'd have seen some consistency.
Because they don't care about the lives Bush lost, they just want back in power so they can do it elsewhere in the world. Anything is acceptable to the hypocrites.