Netanyahu's response to UN's resulution.

[Tresha91203]

The Palestinian agenda is to wipe out the Jews and have all the land "from the river to the sea." No one even tries to hide that. The UN sides with the ME, knowing their intentions.

We all know that if the UN demanded we return, oh say, Virginia, Maryland and DC to the Native Americans and claims we are occupying their territory, we'd tell the UN to pound sand.

With all of the atrocities around the globe, the UN's laser focus on Israel is very telling IMO.

Give up the wall and all of Jerusalem, rofl. Yeah, as soon as the US gives up DC to the Native Americans and Texas to the Mexicans. Hypocrites.

You treat the Palestinians like we great blacks

No one treats the palestinians half as badly as you treated the blacks, and still do in some places. More blacks murdered by US police this year than innocent palestinians killed by Israel over the last 10 years

I think we need to stop treating these people like second class citizens.

You need to give Palestinians their own country. One morter lobbed into Israel level 1/4 of the country. You two are an abusive couple who need to get a divorce.

What other solution is there?

That is not an option. If Israel gave the Palestinians their 1967 borders, there would most definitely be a mortar fired into Israel. Israel then would level 1/4 of Palestine. Israel would be demonized and sanctioned, and the Palestinians would be considered the victims by the UN.

You see, the goal is not a 2 state solution. The goal is the removal of Jews completely, even if it means the death of every Jew in the region ... preferably the death of every Jew in the region, actually.

Note: not preferred by me, but by the Palestinian authority with the blessing of the UN.

 

[fanger]

Jews, Muslims and Christians lived peacefully together in Pre-israel Palestine

 

[Phoenall]

The Palestinian agenda is to wipe out the Jews and have all the land "from the river to the sea." No one even tries to hide that. The UN sides with the ME, knowing their intentions.

We all know that if the UN demanded we return, oh say, Virginia, Maryland and DC to the Native Americans and claims we are occupying their territory, we'd tell the UN to pound sand.

With all of the atrocities around the globe, the UN's laser focus on Israel is very telling IMO.

Give up the wall and all of Jerusalem, rofl. Yeah, as soon as the US gives up DC to the Native Americans and Texas to the Mexicans. Hypocrites.

You treat the Palestinians like we great blacks

No one treats the palestinians half as badly as you treated the blacks, and still do in some places. More blacks murdered by US police this year than innocent palestinians killed by Israel over the last 10 years

I think we need to stop treating these people like second class citizens.

You need to give Palestinians their own country. One morter lobbed into Israel level 1/4 of the country. You two are an abusive couple who need to get a divorce.

What other solution is there?

Then give them part of the US, say Florida or California see how you like having 6 million terrorists parked on your doorstep. You do know that they were already given their own country in 1923, it was called trans Jordan, and they refused to go there and went instead to the part set aside for the Jewish national home. While they behave as scum they will be treated as scum and so the war will go on. Watch what happens when the UN forces the confrontation and the arab muslims demand pre-conditions before they will even sit down.
I would level 100% of the country and saw that is how to deal with war criminals and terrorists


The other solution is for the US to grow a pair, stop all aid to islam and force the arab muslims to go where they came from. Then strengthen the borders of Israel and start hunting muslim terrorists to extinction. Dont get involved in islamic politics and refuse to take sides while destroying terrorists and their leaders.

 

[Phoenall]

Jews, Muslims and Christians lived peacefully together in Pre-israel Palestine

Until you start looking into the facts and you see that the muslims ruled with an iron fist and the Jews and Christians were little more than slaves. The arab muslim warlords enacted the dhimmi laws and forced the non muslims to hand over the jizya.

Pre Israel we had the 1929 hebron massacre of the Jews, the civil wars of 1930 and 1931, then the invasion in 1947 that saw many Jews killed.

 

[fanger]

Israel is pissed off because finally ~The US CONDEMNED Israel for BREAKING international laws, by defying the entire world and building ILLEGAL SETTLEMENTS, which are considered detrimental for any peace talks, which will lead to Israel ending the occupation. So according to God’s “chosen” people you should NOT criticize Israel’s crimes and the fact that they are not, like any democracy, doing the democratic thing when it comes to those they occupy and steal from. There is no other explanation for the bizarre behavior of what is a rogue nation that has gone out of control.


This is the beginning of Israel being held accountable for disastrous policies and crimes against humanity. Enough of the whining, lies, violence, manipulations, theft of Water and Land, and expecting unconditional support (and Money) from the rest of the world.

 

[Hollie]

Israel is pissed off because finally ~The US CONDEMNED Israel for BREAKING international laws, by defying the entire world and building ILLEGAL SETTLEMENTS, which are considered detrimental for any peace talks, which will lead to Israel ending the occupation. So according to God’s “chosen” people you should NOT criticize Israel’s crimes and the fact that they are not, like any democracy, doing the democratic thing when it comes to those they occupy and steal from. There is no other explanation for the bizarre behavior of what is a rogue nation that has gone out of control.


This is the beginning of Israel being held accountable for disastrous policies and crimes against humanity. Enough of the whining, lies, violence, manipulations, theft of Water and Land, and expecting unconditional support (and Money) from the rest of the world.

If you had bothered to review the facts, you would have discovered that it is the Islamic terrorists occupying Gaza and the West Bank who are expecting welfare money from the rest of the world.

 

[montelatici]

Normally, and under international law, the welfare of occupied populations is the responsibility of the occupying power. Funding to support the Palestinians is welfare granted to Israel so it pays less for its occupation.

 

[Phoenall]

Israel is pissed off because finally ~The US CONDEMNED Israel for BREAKING international laws, by defying the entire world and building ILLEGAL SETTLEMENTS, which are considered detrimental for any peace talks, which will lead to Israel ending the occupation. So according to God’s “chosen” people you should NOT criticize Israel’s crimes and the fact that they are not, like any democracy, doing the democratic thing when it comes to those they occupy and steal from. There is no other explanation for the bizarre behavior of what is a rogue nation that has gone out of control.


This is the beginning of Israel being held accountable for disastrous policies and crimes against humanity. Enough of the whining, lies, violence, manipulations, theft of Water and Land, and expecting unconditional support (and Money) from the rest of the world.

LIAR the US just sat on the side and did nothing, now they have to face the backwash. Justas the UN will also have to face the backwash when Israel refuses to halt responces to war crimes and terrorist attacks

 

[toomuchtime_]

Israel is asked to follow the law so takes its ambassadors back. That's not playing nice.

But there is no relevant law and the UN lacks jurisdiction in this matter, so the resolution can only be seen as anti Israeli propaganda.

 

[Phoenall]

Normally, and under international law, the welfare of occupied populations is the responsibility of the occupying power. Funding to support the Palestinians is welfare granted to Israel so it pays less for its occupation.

That was in place before the Jews responded to Jordans invasion in 1967. And Israel is well within the guidelines of the Geneva conventions when it comes to the welfare of the arab muslims in the west bank. The people of gaza are not covered as they are not occupied under the terms of international law

 

[Hollie]

Normally, and under international law, the welfare of occupied populations is the responsibility of the occupying power. Funding to support the Palestinians is welfare granted to Israel so it pays less for its occupation.

Normally, you're totally befuddled about international law. The islamic terrorist enclave of Gaza'istan is not occupied. Perhaps you can cite code from international law dealing with any requirement for the welfare of designated Islamic terrorist franchises.

 

[sealybobo]

The Palestinian agenda is to wipe out the Jews and have all the land "from the river to the sea." No one even tries to hide that. The UN sides with the ME, knowing their intentions.

We all know that if the UN demanded we return, oh say, Virginia, Maryland and DC to the Native Americans and claims we are occupying their territory, we'd tell the UN to pound sand.

With all of the atrocities around the globe, the UN's laser focus on Israel is very telling IMO.

Give up the wall and all of Jerusalem, rofl. Yeah, as soon as the US gives up DC to the Native Americans and Texas to the Mexicans. Hypocrites.

You treat the Palestinians like we great blacks

No one treats the palestinians half as badly as you treated the blacks, and still do in some places. More blacks murdered by US police this year than innocent palestinians killed by Israel over the last 10 years

I think we need to stop treating these people like second class citizens.

You need to give Palestinians their own country. One morter lobbed into Israel level 1/4 of the country. You two are an abusive couple who need to get a divorce.

What other solution is there?

Then give them part of the US, say Florida or California see how you like having 6 million terrorists parked on your doorstep. You do know that they were already given their own country in 1923, it was called trans Jordan, and they refused to go there and went instead to the part set aside for the Jewish national home. While they behave as scum they will be treated as scum and so the war will go on. Watch what happens when the UN forces the confrontation and the arab muslims demand pre-conditions before they will even sit down.
I would level 100% of the country and saw that is how to deal with war criminals and terrorists


The other solution is for the US to grow a pair, stop all aid to islam and force the arab muslims to go where they came from. Then strengthen the borders of Israel and start hunting muslim terrorists to extinction. Dont get involved in islamic politics and refuse to take sides while destroying terrorists and their leaders.

Cant argue with that

 

[montelatici]

Normally, and under international law, the welfare of occupied populations is the responsibility of the occupying power. Funding to support the Palestinians is welfare granted to Israel so it pays less for its occupation.

Normally, you're totally befuddled about international law. The islamic terrorist enclave of Gaza'istan is not occupied. Perhaps you can cite code from international law dealing with any requirement for the welfare of designated Islamic terrorist franchises.

1. Gaza is occupied under international law per the International Court of Justice.

"28. Although it no longer maintains a military presence in Gaza, Israel has not only shown the ability to conduct incursions into Gaza at will, but also expressly reserved the right to do so as required by military necessity. This consideration is potentially significant considering that there is support in international case law for the conclusion that it is not a prerequisite that a State maintain continuous presence in a territory in order to qualify as an occupying power. In particular, the ICTY has held that the law of occupation would also apply to areas where a state possesses “the capacity to send troops within a reasonable time to make the authority of the occupying power felt.” In this respect, it is also noted that the geographic proximity of the Gaza Strip to Israel potentially facilitates the ability of Israel to exercise effective control over the territory, despite the lack of a continuous military presence.

29. Overall, there is a reasonable basis upon which to conclude that Israel continues to be an occupying power in Gaza despite the 2005 disengagement. The Office has therefore proceeded on the basis that the situation in Gaza can be considered within the framework of an international armed conflict in view of the continuing military occupation by Israel."

Opinio Juris » Blog Archive The OTP Concludes Israel Is Still Occupying Gaza - Opinio Juris

2. The Occupying Power is responsible for the welfare of the people under occupation, per

"Under Article 43 of the Hague Regulations, an occupying power must restore and maintain public order and civil life, including public welfare, in an occupied territory.......... "

http://www.hpcrresearch.org/sites/default/files/publications/sassoli.pdf

 

[Hollie]

Normally, and under international law, the welfare of occupied populations is the responsibility of the occupying power. Funding to support the Palestinians is welfare granted to Israel so it pays less for its occupation.

Normally, you're totally befuddled about international law. The islamic terrorist enclave of Gaza'istan is not occupied. Perhaps you can cite code from international law dealing with any requirement for the welfare of designated Islamic terrorist franchises.

1. Gaza is occupied under international law per the International Court of Justice.

"28. Although it no longer maintains a military presence in Gaza, Israel has not only shown the ability to conduct incursions into Gaza at will, but also expressly reserved the right to do so as required by military necessity. This consideration is potentially significant considering that there is support in international case law for the conclusion that it is not a prerequisite that a State maintain continuous presence in a territory in order to qualify as an occupying power. In particular, the ICTY has held that the law of occupation would also apply to areas where a state possesses “the capacity to send troops within a reasonable time to make the authority of the occupying power felt.” In this respect, it is also noted that the geographic proximity of the Gaza Strip to Israel potentially facilitates the ability of Israel to exercise effective control over the territory, despite the lack of a continuous military presence.

29. Overall, there is a reasonable basis upon which to conclude that Israel continues to be an occupying power in Gaza despite the 2005 disengagement. The Office has therefore proceeded on the basis that the situation in Gaza can be considered within the framework of an international armed conflict in view of the continuing military occupation by Israel."

Opinio Juris » Blog Archive The OTP Concludes Israel Is Still Occupying Gaza - Opinio Juris

2. The Occupying Power is responsible for the welfare of the people under occupation, per

"Under Article 43 of the Hague Regulations, an occupying power must restore and maintain public order and civil life, including public welfare, in an occupied territory.......... "

http://www.hpcrresearch.org/sites/default/files/publications/sassoli.pdf

Yes, the above is an opinion. One with no force of law or effective enforcement.

See, this is the problem faced by those like you who simply cut and paste articles they find on the web while you have no understanding of what it is you cut and paste.

 

[Indeependent]

Israel is pissed off because finally ~The US CONDEMNED Israel for BREAKING international laws, by defying the entire world and building ILLEGAL SETTLEMENTS, which are considered detrimental for any peace talks, which will lead to Israel ending the occupation. So according to God’s “chosen” people you should NOT criticize Israel’s crimes and the fact that they are not, like any democracy, doing the democratic thing when it comes to those they occupy and steal from. There is no other explanation for the bizarre behavior of what is a rogue nation that has gone out of control.


This is the beginning of Israel being held accountable for disastrous policies and crimes against humanity. Enough of the whining, lies, violence, manipulations, theft of Water and Land, and expecting unconditional support (and Money) from the rest of the world.

Not the US, Obama and Kerry, who have been condemned by most of their fellow Democrats.
Please do learn about "context".

 

[montelatici]

Normally, and under international law, the welfare of occupied populations is the responsibility of the occupying power. Funding to support the Palestinians is welfare granted to Israel so it pays less for its occupation.

Normally, you're totally befuddled about international law. The islamic terrorist enclave of Gaza'istan is not occupied. Perhaps you can cite code from international law dealing with any requirement for the welfare of designated Islamic terrorist franchises.

1. Gaza is occupied under international law per the International Court of Justice.

"28. Although it no longer maintains a military presence in Gaza, Israel has not only shown the ability to conduct incursions into Gaza at will, but also expressly reserved the right to do so as required by military necessity. This consideration is potentially significant considering that there is support in international case law for the conclusion that it is not a prerequisite that a State maintain continuous presence in a territory in order to qualify as an occupying power. In particular, the ICTY has held that the law of occupation would also apply to areas where a state possesses “the capacity to send troops within a reasonable time to make the authority of the occupying power felt.” In this respect, it is also noted that the geographic proximity of the Gaza Strip to Israel potentially facilitates the ability of Israel to exercise effective control over the territory, despite the lack of a continuous military presence.

29. Overall, there is a reasonable basis upon which to conclude that Israel continues to be an occupying power in Gaza despite the 2005 disengagement. The Office has therefore proceeded on the basis that the situation in Gaza can be considered within the framework of an international armed conflict in view of the continuing military occupation by Israel."

Opinio Juris » Blog Archive The OTP Concludes Israel Is Still Occupying Gaza - Opinio Juris

2. The Occupying Power is responsible for the welfare of the people under occupation, per

"Under Article 43 of the Hague Regulations, an occupying power must restore and maintain public order and civil life, including public welfare, in an occupied territory.......... "

http://www.hpcrresearch.org/sites/default/files/publications/sassoli.pdf

Yes, the above is an opinion. One with no force of law or effective enforcement.

See, this is the problem faced by those like you who simply cut and paste articles they find on the web while you have no understanding of what it is you cut and paste.

Judicial decisions of higher courts are always opinions, as in "Opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States". I think we can all see who is a bit out of her depth.

Here look up some USSC Opinions. LOL

Opinions - Supreme Court of the United States

 

[Hollie]

Normally, and under international law, the welfare of occupied populations is the responsibility of the occupying power. Funding to support the Palestinians is welfare granted to Israel so it pays less for its occupation.

Normally, you're totally befuddled about international law. The islamic terrorist enclave of Gaza'istan is not occupied. Perhaps you can cite code from international law dealing with any requirement for the welfare of designated Islamic terrorist franchises.

1. Gaza is occupied under international law per the International Court of Justice.

"28. Although it no longer maintains a military presence in Gaza, Israel has not only shown the ability to conduct incursions into Gaza at will, but also expressly reserved the right to do so as required by military necessity. This consideration is potentially significant considering that there is support in international case law for the conclusion that it is not a prerequisite that a State maintain continuous presence in a territory in order to qualify as an occupying power. In particular, the ICTY has held that the law of occupation would also apply to areas where a state possesses “the capacity to send troops within a reasonable time to make the authority of the occupying power felt.” In this respect, it is also noted that the geographic proximity of the Gaza Strip to Israel potentially facilitates the ability of Israel to exercise effective control over the territory, despite the lack of a continuous military presence.

29. Overall, there is a reasonable basis upon which to conclude that Israel continues to be an occupying power in Gaza despite the 2005 disengagement. The Office has therefore proceeded on the basis that the situation in Gaza can be considered within the framework of an international armed conflict in view of the continuing military occupation by Israel."

Opinio Juris » Blog Archive The OTP Concludes Israel Is Still Occupying Gaza - Opinio Juris

2. The Occupying Power is responsible for the welfare of the people under occupation, per

"Under Article 43 of the Hague Regulations, an occupying power must restore and maintain public order and civil life, including public welfare, in an occupied territory.......... "

http://www.hpcrresearch.org/sites/default/files/publications/sassoli.pdf

Yes, the above is an opinion. One with no force of law or effective enforcement.

See, this is the problem faced by those like you who simply cut and paste articles they find on the web while you have no understanding of what it is you cut and paste.

Judicial decisions of higher courts are always opinions, as in "Opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States". I think we can all see who is a bit out of her depth.

Here look up some USSC Opinions. LOL

Opinions - Supreme Court of the United States

Yes, yes. As noted your cut and paste opinion has no force of law or enforcement. LOL.

Look up the definition of "opinion". We can all see your befuddlement.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Normally, and under international law, the welfare of occupied populations is the responsibility of the occupying power. Funding to support the Palestinians is welfare granted to Israel so it pays less for its occupation.

Normally, you're totally befuddled about international law. The islamic terrorist enclave of Gaza'istan is not occupied. Perhaps you can cite code from international law dealing with any requirement for the welfare of designated Islamic terrorist franchises.

1. Gaza is occupied under international law per the International Court of Justice.

"28. Although it no longer maintains a military presence in Gaza, Israel has not only shown the ability to conduct incursions into Gaza at will, but also expressly reserved the right to do so as required by military necessity. This consideration is potentially significant considering that there is support in international case law for the conclusion that it is not a prerequisite that a State maintain continuous presence in a territory in order to qualify as an occupying power. In particular, the ICTY has held that the law of occupation would also apply to areas where a state possesses “the capacity to send troops within a reasonable time to make the authority of the occupying power felt.” In this respect, it is also noted that the geographic proximity of the Gaza Strip to Israel potentially facilitates the ability of Israel to exercise effective control over the territory, despite the lack of a continuous military presence.

29. Overall, there is a reasonable basis upon which to conclude that Israel continues to be an occupying power in Gaza despite the 2005 disengagement. The Office has therefore proceeded on the basis that the situation in Gaza can be considered within the framework of an international armed conflict in view of the continuing military occupation by Israel."

Opinio Juris » Blog Archive The OTP Concludes Israel Is Still Occupying Gaza - Opinio Juris

2. The Occupying Power is responsible for the welfare of the people under occupation, per

"Under Article 43 of the Hague Regulations, an occupying power must restore and maintain public order and civil life, including public welfare, in an occupied territory.......... "

http://www.hpcrresearch.org/sites/default/files/publications/sassoli.pdf

None of this provides a rational basis for claiming Israel's communities in Judea and SamarIa are illegal.

 

[Darkwind]

The Palestinian agenda is to wipe out the Jews and have all the land "from the river to the sea." No one even tries to hide that. The UN sides with the ME, knowing their intentions.

We all know that if the UN demanded we return, oh say, Virginia, Maryland and DC to the Native Americans and claims we are occupying their territory, we'd tell the UN to pound sand.

With all of the atrocities around the globe, the UN's laser focus on Israel is very telling IMO.

Give up the wall and all of Jerusalem, rofl. Yeah, as soon as the US gives up DC to the Native Americans and Texas to the Mexicans. Hypocrites.

You treat the Palestinians like we great blacks

No one treats the palestinians half as badly as you treated the blacks, and still do in some places. More blacks murdered by US police this year than innocent palestinians killed by Israel over the last 10 years

I think we need to stop treating these people like second class citizens.

You need to give Palestinians their own country. One morter lobbed into Israel level 1/4 of the country. You two are an abusive couple who need to get a divorce.

What other solution is there?

You force relocate all Palestinians into Syria and fortify your borders.

Problem solved.

 

[montelatici]

Normally, and under international law, the welfare of occupied populations is the responsibility of the occupying power. Funding to support the Palestinians is welfare granted to Israel so it pays less for its occupation.

Normally, you're totally befuddled about international law. The islamic terrorist enclave of Gaza'istan is not occupied. Perhaps you can cite code from international law dealing with any requirement for the welfare of designated Islamic terrorist franchises.

1. Gaza is occupied under international law per the International Court of Justice.

"28. Although it no longer maintains a military presence in Gaza, Israel has not only shown the ability to conduct incursions into Gaza at will, but also expressly reserved the right to do so as required by military necessity. This consideration is potentially significant considering that there is support in international case law for the conclusion that it is not a prerequisite that a State maintain continuous presence in a territory in order to qualify as an occupying power. In particular, the ICTY has held that the law of occupation would also apply to areas where a state possesses “the capacity to send troops within a reasonable time to make the authority of the occupying power felt.” In this respect, it is also noted that the geographic proximity of the Gaza Strip to Israel potentially facilitates the ability of Israel to exercise effective control over the territory, despite the lack of a continuous military presence.

29. Overall, there is a reasonable basis upon which to conclude that Israel continues to be an occupying power in Gaza despite the 2005 disengagement. The Office has therefore proceeded on the basis that the situation in Gaza can be considered within the framework of an international armed conflict in view of the continuing military occupation by Israel."

Opinio Juris » Blog Archive The OTP Concludes Israel Is Still Occupying Gaza - Opinio Juris

2. The Occupying Power is responsible for the welfare of the people under occupation, per

"Under Article 43 of the Hague Regulations, an occupying power must restore and maintain public order and civil life, including public welfare, in an occupied territory.......... "

http://www.hpcrresearch.org/sites/default/files/publications/sassoli.pdf

Yes, the above is an opinion. One with no force of law or effective enforcement.

See, this is the problem faced by those like you who simply cut and paste articles they find on the web while you have no understanding of what it is you cut and paste.

Judicial decisions of higher courts are always opinions, as in "Opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States". I think we can all see who is a bit out of her depth.

Here look up some USSC Opinions. LOL

Opinions - Supreme Court of the United States

Yes, yes. As noted your cut and paste opinion has no force of law or enforcement. LOL.

Look up the definition of "opinion". We can all see your befuddlement.

Let me educate you. A judicial body renders an opinion, the enforcement of an opinion is not carried out by the judicial body, in the U.S. it is the executive branch who determines if there is to be enforcement of results of the opinion. With respect to an ICJ opinion it would be the equivalent body of the sovereign state(s) concerned or the UNSC if the state(s) do not proceed to enforcement.

You are out of your depth and frankly, you are making a fool of yourself.