NC has responded to the Feds

[Pop23]

Republicans bring the fight to the toilet! How incredibly awesome this is.

Umm, yeah let's not forget that it is the Liberals who are trying to make this #1 on their agenda and Loretta Lynch who just declared that 'gender self-identification to be more important than the 'privacy, safety, and security of citizens / women in public bathrooms'.

Once again the libs are pushing a minority-supported agenda onto the majority of Americans who oppose their agenda / the issue.

It's not liberals passing silly pecker checker laws in an fit of pique over gays marrying.

These anti trans laws do not protect the privacy, safety and security of citizens / women in public bathrooms. Stupid anti trans laws require that this individual use the women's restroom.

How fucking stupid is that?

You better check your public opinion again...6 in 10 Americans oppose anti trans laws like NC passed.

Form and function are two completely different things.

Pity makes poor public policy.

A tran individual attempts to, through cosmetic surgery, fool the public that they are of the opposite sex, but in reality they remain incredibly more simalar to the sex listed on their birth certificate.

A trans male may dress like a female, apply makeup like a female, but it is simply a cosmetic disquise meant to deceive the public as well as themselves. They remain vastly more Male then female.

Taken to the extreme they will even have cosmetic surgery on their genitals and their chests, but even then, a male trans breasts will not function as a females, unable to fulfill the basic reason breasts exist to begin with. Simply cosmetic and vastly more closely related to a male then a female.

The male tran can have his penis surgically altered to resemble a vagina, but it will not function like one. A Woman has a vagina, but it is simply a small part of the entire female reproductive system that the male tran will never have. Again, the male tran is still vastly more closely related to the Male, and it remains debateable how exactly they are related to the female at all.

The government had no duty to recognize a cosmetically altered individual, when that individual does so voluntarily.

We have recognized that some will take advantage of the trans and passed law (Hate Crime), to address this. By doing this, the government has fulfilled its obligation to these people.

Major hissy fit.

As expected, a troll response from the board troll

 

[daws101]

Republicans bring the fight to the toilet! How incredibly awesome this is.

Umm, yeah let's not forget that it is the Liberals who are trying to make this #1 on their agenda and Loretta Lynch who just declared that 'gender self-identification to be more important than the 'privacy, safety, and security of citizens / women in public bathrooms'.

Once again the libs are pushing a minority-supported agenda onto the majority of Americans who oppose their agenda / the issue.

It's not liberals passing silly pecker checker laws in an fit of pique over gays marrying.

These anti trans laws do not protect the privacy, safety and security of citizens / women in public bathrooms. Stupid anti trans laws require that this individual use the women's restroom.

How fucking stupid is that?

You better check your public opinion again...6 in 10 Americans oppose anti trans laws like NC passed.

Form and function are two completely different things.

Pity makes poor public policy.

A tran individual attempts to, through cosmetic surgery, fool the public that they are of the opposite sex, but in reality they remain incredibly more simalar to the sex listed on their birth certificate.

A trans male may dress like a female, apply makeup like a female, but it is simply a cosmetic disquise meant to deceive the public as well as themselves. They remain vastly more Male then female.

Taken to the extreme they will even have cosmetic surgery on their genitals and their chests, but even then, a male trans breasts will not function as a females, unable to fulfill the basic reason breasts exist to begin with. Simply cosmetic and vastly more closely related to a male then a female.

The male tran can have his penis surgically altered to resemble a vagina, but it will not function like one. A Woman has a vagina, but it is simply a small part of the entire female reproductive system that the male tran will never have. Again, the male tran is still vastly more closely related to the Male, and it remains debateable how exactly they are related to the female at all.

The government had no duty to recognize a cosmetically altered individual, when that individual does so voluntarily.

We have recognized that some will take advantage of the trans and passed law (Hate Crime), to address this. By doing this, the government has fulfilled its obligation to these people.

Major hissy fit.

As expected, a troll response from the board troll

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

 

[Pop23]

Umm, yeah let's not forget that it is the Liberals who are trying to make this #1 on their agenda and Loretta Lynch who just declared that 'gender self-identification to be more important than the 'privacy, safety, and security of citizens / women in public bathrooms'.

Once again the libs are pushing a minority-supported agenda onto the majority of Americans who oppose their agenda / the issue.

It's not liberals passing silly pecker checker laws in an fit of pique over gays marrying.

These anti trans laws do not protect the privacy, safety and security of citizens / women in public bathrooms. Stupid anti trans laws require that this individual use the women's restroom.

How fucking stupid is that?

You better check your public opinion again...6 in 10 Americans oppose anti trans laws like NC passed.

Form and function are two completely different things.

Pity makes poor public policy.

A tran individual attempts to, through cosmetic surgery, fool the public that they are of the opposite sex, but in reality they remain incredibly more simalar to the sex listed on their birth certificate.

A trans male may dress like a female, apply makeup like a female, but it is simply a cosmetic disquise meant to deceive the public as well as themselves. They remain vastly more Male then female.

Taken to the extreme they will even have cosmetic surgery on their genitals and their chests, but even then, a male trans breasts will not function as a females, unable to fulfill the basic reason breasts exist to begin with. Simply cosmetic and vastly more closely related to a male then a female.

The male tran can have his penis surgically altered to resemble a vagina, but it will not function like one. A Woman has a vagina, but it is simply a small part of the entire female reproductive system that the male tran will never have. Again, the male tran is still vastly more closely related to the Male, and it remains debateable how exactly they are related to the female at all.

The government had no duty to recognize a cosmetically altered individual, when that individual does so voluntarily.

We have recognized that some will take advantage of the trans and passed law (Hate Crime), to address this. By doing this, the government has fulfilled its obligation to these people.

Major hissy fit.

As expected, a troll response from the board troll

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

Must not be or you'd destroy it. You can't so you wimped idiocy.

And you, someone who thinks child birth is cosmetic.

Go figure.

 

[daws101]

It's not liberals passing silly pecker checker laws in an fit of pique over gays marrying.

These anti trans laws do not protect the privacy, safety and security of citizens / women in public bathrooms. Stupid anti trans laws require that this individual use the women's restroom.

How fucking stupid is that?

You better check your public opinion again...6 in 10 Americans oppose anti trans laws like NC passed.

Form and function are two completely different things.

Pity makes poor public policy.

A tran individual attempts to, through cosmetic surgery, fool the public that they are of the opposite sex, but in reality they remain incredibly more simalar to the sex listed on their birth certificate.

A trans male may dress like a female, apply makeup like a female, but it is simply a cosmetic disquise meant to deceive the public as well as themselves. They remain vastly more Male then female.

Taken to the extreme they will even have cosmetic surgery on their genitals and their chests, but even then, a male trans breasts will not function as a females, unable to fulfill the basic reason breasts exist to begin with. Simply cosmetic and vastly more closely related to a male then a female.

The male tran can have his penis surgically altered to resemble a vagina, but it will not function like one. A Woman has a vagina, but it is simply a small part of the entire female reproductive system that the male tran will never have. Again, the male tran is still vastly more closely related to the Male, and it remains debateable how exactly they are related to the female at all.

The government had no duty to recognize a cosmetically altered individual, when that individual does so voluntarily.

We have recognized that some will take advantage of the trans and passed law (Hate Crime), to address this. By doing this, the government has fulfilled its obligation to these people.

Major hissy fit.

As expected, a troll response from the board troll

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

Must not be or you'd destroy it. You can't so you wimped idiocy.

And you, someone who thinks child birth is cosmetic.

Go figure.

False pop , I'll just let it rot in its own idiocy.

All these false assumptions and accusations have made you stupid.

 

[Pop23]

Form and function are two completely different things.

Pity makes poor public policy.

A tran individual attempts to, through cosmetic surgery, fool the public that they are of the opposite sex, but in reality they remain incredibly more simalar to the sex listed on their birth certificate.

A trans male may dress like a female, apply makeup like a female, but it is simply a cosmetic disquise meant to deceive the public as well as themselves. They remain vastly more Male then female.

Taken to the extreme they will even have cosmetic surgery on their genitals and their chests, but even then, a male trans breasts will not function as a females, unable to fulfill the basic reason breasts exist to begin with. Simply cosmetic and vastly more closely related to a male then a female.

The male tran can have his penis surgically altered to resemble a vagina, but it will not function like one. A Woman has a vagina, but it is simply a small part of the entire female reproductive system that the male tran will never have. Again, the male tran is still vastly more closely related to the Male, and it remains debateable how exactly they are related to the female at all.

The government had no duty to recognize a cosmetically altered individual, when that individual does so voluntarily.

We have recognized that some will take advantage of the trans and passed law (Hate Crime), to address this. By doing this, the government has fulfilled its obligation to these people.

Major hissy fit.

As expected, a troll response from the board troll

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

Must not be or you'd destroy it. You can't so you wimped idiocy.

And you, someone who thinks child birth is cosmetic.

Go figure.

False pop , I'll just let it rot in its own idiocy.

All these false assumptions and accusations have made you stupid.

Yet you can't point out a single false assumption or accusation.

Oh, well. Trolls never can

 

[Silhouette]

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

Speaking of a false premise: Nowhere in the 1964 Civil Rights Act was it anticipated or implied that men pretending to be women have dominant rights to women and girls' rights to expectation of privacy from men behind doors marked "women" outside. Many women and girls have been sexually assaulted by men.

The courts should and must properly place a stay in the interim protecting the much more dominant, older, established and sensible rights protecting these victims of sexual assault from intrusion by the gender who assaulted them. Men pretending to be women can take a back seat in the interim.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

Speaking of a false premise: Nowhere in the 1964 Civil Rights Act was it anticipated or implied that men pretending to be women have dominant rights to women and girls' rights to expectation of privacy from men behind doors marked "women" outside. Many women and girls have been sexually assaulted by men.

The courts should and must properly place a stay in the interim protecting the much more dominant, older, established and sensible rights protecting these victims of sexual assault from intrusion by the gender who assaulted them. Men pretending to be women can take a back seat in the interim.

At the end of the day, NC will lose because of the stupid inclusion of using the gender on your bitch certificate in public bathrooms. IF they had limited the bill to privately owned restrooms and merely maintained that private businesses can do what they want in regards to toilet policy, they would have won.

 

[daws101]

Major hissy fit.

As expected, a troll response from the board troll

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

Must not be or you'd destroy it. You can't so you wimped idiocy.

And you, someone who thinks child birth is cosmetic.

Go figure.

False pop , I'll just let it rot in its own idiocy.

All these false assumptions and accusations have made you stupid.

Yet you can't point out a single false assumption or accusation.

Oh, well. Trolls never can

False ! Since all of it is there is no need to point any single part out.
There is no section or sections that are any more false than any other.
It's a waste of time.

 

[daws101]

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

Speaking of a false premise: Nowhere in the 1964 Civil Rights Act was it anticipated or implied that men pretending to be women have dominant rights to women and girls' rights to expectation of privacy from men behind doors marked "women" outside. Many women and girls have been sexually assaulted by men.

The courts should and must properly place a stay in the interim protecting the much more dominant, older, established and sensible rights protecting these victims of sexual assault from intrusion by the gender who assaulted them. Men pretending to be women can take a back seat in the interim.

Another hail Mary pass from sill that misses it's mark!

 

[daws101]

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

Speaking of a false premise: Nowhere in the 1964 Civil Rights Act was it anticipated or implied that men pretending to be women have dominant rights to women and girls' rights to expectation of privacy from men behind doors marked "women" outside. Many women and girls have been sexually assaulted by men.

The courts should and must properly place a stay in the interim protecting the much more dominant, older, established and sensible rights protecting these victims of sexual assault from intrusion by the gender who assaulted them. Men pretending to be women can take a back seat in the interim.

At the end of the day, NC will lose because of the stupid inclusion of using the gender on your bitch certificate in public bathrooms. IF they had limited the bill to privately owned restrooms and merely maintained that private businesses can do what they want in regards to toilet policy, they would have won.

Nope if those private businesses deal with the public they would not have won.
For that to work a business would have to be invitation only or a club of sometime.
Even then it wouldn't be a sure thing.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

Speaking of a false premise: Nowhere in the 1964 Civil Rights Act was it anticipated or implied that men pretending to be women have dominant rights to women and girls' rights to expectation of privacy from men behind doors marked "women" outside. Many women and girls have been sexually assaulted by men.

The courts should and must properly place a stay in the interim protecting the much more dominant, older, established and sensible rights protecting these victims of sexual assault from intrusion by the gender who assaulted them. Men pretending to be women can take a back seat in the interim.

At the end of the day, NC will lose because of the stupid inclusion of using the gender on your bitch certificate in public bathrooms. IF they had limited the bill to privately owned restrooms and merely maintained that private businesses can do what they want in regards to toilet policy, they would have won.

Nope if those private businesses deal with the public they would not have won.
For that to work a business would have to be invitation only or a club of sometime.
Even then it wouldn't be a sure thing.

And this is why you stupid liberals are as big of assholes as the asshole conservatives. At no point will either one of you say "okay let's do what's fair for the most people" This issue is fucking stupid. If you go into a store and don't like their bathroom policy, no matter which way it is, go shop somewhere fucking else, no one owes you a bathroom of your choosing simply because they are in business.

 

[TNHarley]

I STILL don't know how making people piss in their proper sex designated bathrooms is discrimination..

 

[Pop23]

As expected, a troll response from the board troll

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

Must not be or you'd destroy it. You can't so you wimped idiocy.

And you, someone who thinks child birth is cosmetic.

Go figure.

False pop , I'll just let it rot in its own idiocy.

All these false assumptions and accusations have made you stupid.

Yet you can't point out a single false assumption or accusation.

Oh, well. Trolls never can

False ! Since all of it is there is no need to point any single part out.
There is no section or sections that are any more false than any other.
It's a waste of time.

translation:

YOU CAN'T POINT OUT A SINGLE ONE.

Proven trolls go on the ignore list!

 

[daws101]

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

Speaking of a false premise: Nowhere in the 1964 Civil Rights Act was it anticipated or implied that men pretending to be women have dominant rights to women and girls' rights to expectation of privacy from men behind doors marked "women" outside. Many women and girls have been sexually assaulted by men.

The courts should and must properly place a stay in the interim protecting the much more dominant, older, established and sensible rights protecting these victims of sexual assault from intrusion by the gender who assaulted them. Men pretending to be women can take a back seat in the interim.

At the end of the day, NC will lose because of the stupid inclusion of using the gender on your bitch certificate in public bathrooms. IF they had limited the bill to privately owned restrooms and merely maintained that private businesses can do what they want in regards to toilet policy, they would have won.

Nope if those private businesses deal with the public they would not have won.
For that to work a business would have to be invitation only or a club of sometime.
Even then it wouldn't be a sure thing.

And this is why you stupid liberals are as big of assholes as the asshole conservatives. At no point will either one of you say "okay let's do what's fair for the most people" This issue is fucking stupid. If you go into a store and don't like their bathroom policy, no matter which way it is, go shop somewhere fucking else, no one owes you a bathroom of your choosing simply because they are in business.

And there's the rub.

Fair is subjective.
What the majority "thinks" is rarely fair to anyone but itself.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

I STILL don't know how making people piss in their proper sex designated bathrooms is discrimination..

In actuality, the discrimination is in allowing SOME men into the women's restroom, but not others.

 

[daws101]

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

Must not be or you'd destroy it. You can't so you wimped idiocy.

And you, someone who thinks child birth is cosmetic.

Go figure.

False pop , I'll just let it rot in its own idiocy.

All these false assumptions and accusations have made you stupid.

Yet you can't point out a single false assumption or accusation.

Oh, well. Trolls never can

False ! Since all of it is there is no need to point any single part out.
There is no section or sections that are any more false than any other.
It's a waste of time.

translation:

YOU CAN'T POINT OUT A SINGLE ONE.

Proven trolls go on the ignore list!

False! no need to.
I'm also disinclined to do so.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Fact is fact, your statement is false premise.

Speaking of a false premise: Nowhere in the 1964 Civil Rights Act was it anticipated or implied that men pretending to be women have dominant rights to women and girls' rights to expectation of privacy from men behind doors marked "women" outside. Many women and girls have been sexually assaulted by men.

The courts should and must properly place a stay in the interim protecting the much more dominant, older, established and sensible rights protecting these victims of sexual assault from intrusion by the gender who assaulted them. Men pretending to be women can take a back seat in the interim.

At the end of the day, NC will lose because of the stupid inclusion of using the gender on your bitch certificate in public bathrooms. IF they had limited the bill to privately owned restrooms and merely maintained that private businesses can do what they want in regards to toilet policy, they would have won.

Nope if those private businesses deal with the public they would not have won.
For that to work a business would have to be invitation only or a club of sometime.
Even then it wouldn't be a sure thing.

And this is why you stupid liberals are as big of assholes as the asshole conservatives. At no point will either one of you say "okay let's do what's fair for the most people" This issue is fucking stupid. If you go into a store and don't like their bathroom policy, no matter which way it is, go shop somewhere fucking else, no one owes you a bathroom of your choosing simply because they are in business.

And there's the rub.

Fair is subjective.
What the majority "thinks" is rarely fair to anyone but itself.

So you'd rather let the minority rule? LOL insane

 

[daws101]

I STILL don't know how making people piss in their proper sex designated bathrooms is discrimination..

Proper is also subjective.

 

[Pop23]

I STILL don't know how making people piss in their proper sex designated bathrooms is discrimination..

In actuality, the discrimination is in allowing SOME men into the women's restroom, but not others.

True, if this is the case, it would be an arbitrary exclussion

 

[daws101]

Speaking of a false premise: Nowhere in the 1964 Civil Rights Act was it anticipated or implied that men pretending to be women have dominant rights to women and girls' rights to expectation of privacy from men behind doors marked "women" outside. Many women and girls have been sexually assaulted by men.

The courts should and must properly place a stay in the interim protecting the much more dominant, older, established and sensible rights protecting these victims of sexual assault from intrusion by the gender who assaulted them. Men pretending to be women can take a back seat in the interim.

At the end of the day, NC will lose because of the stupid inclusion of using the gender on your bitch certificate in public bathrooms. IF they had limited the bill to privately owned restrooms and merely maintained that private businesses can do what they want in regards to toilet policy, they would have won.

Nope if those private businesses deal with the public they would not have won.
For that to work a business would have to be invitation only or a club of sometime.
Even then it wouldn't be a sure thing.

And this is why you stupid liberals are as big of assholes as the asshole conservatives. At no point will either one of you say "okay let's do what's fair for the most people" This issue is fucking stupid. If you go into a store and don't like their bathroom policy, no matter which way it is, go shop somewhere fucking else, no one owes you a bathroom of your choosing simply because they are in business.

And there's the rub.

Fair is subjective.
What the majority "thinks" is rarely fair to anyone but itself.

So you'd rather let the minority rule? LOL insane

They already do.
Next inane question.?