Nazi Pelousy MUST send the Articles of Impeachment to Senate, or Trump wasn't impeached.

[Nostra]

If that were true Nancy should send the articles of impeachment to the senate.
Then she could claim the senate is dragging its feet and delaying the trial due to political bias.

The Great Nancy Pelosi is pulling a Merrick Garland on poor Mitch

Let this thing sit till after the election. Claim you will submit Articles of Impeachment as soon as Trumps court cases blocking release of documents and testimony are resolved

This way the delay is blamed on Trump and the Republicans

Doesnt work that way.

It can work any way the Great Nancy Pelosi chooses

Ball is still in her court

Your game isn't working, troll. Much like Nazi Pelousy's

She seems to have Turtle Mitch by the balls

Sure she does, Troll.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Yeah, it will give McConnell and the White House more time to coordinate the best defense, how long to keep the democrats off the campaign trail, which democrats to call in the investigation into how the phone call was handled, that sort of thing. I mean, the democrats are already insisting that the Senate not restrict itself only to what the House passes over, so why not really open it up?

McConnell is suppose to be impartial, this is a Senate trial for ALL of the American people... we deserve to hear the truth, and the President deserves a fair trial, so ALL of 'we the people' can see why he is acquitted of the article charges.

A FIX in an impeachment trial by the Senate leader, Is NOT what our founders created.

We The people need to know the trial is fair and JUST, in order to accept the end results and not be so divided.

Divided only helps the politicians, not the citizens of this Nation.

This whole thing was emphatically partisan from the get-go. Is it any wonder McConnell is willing to reject it out of hand?

The House are simply the overzealous prosecutors bringing charges... they only need probable cause for them as grand jurors to indict.

The Senate is where there is the allegedly fair trial, where the burden of proof and evidence and testimony, has to be BEYOND a reasonable doubt for Senators/ the jury to convict and 2/3s having to do such for eviction from office.

This is why all evidence is not needed to Charge

and More Evidence....as much as possible, from both the defendant and prosecution, so the jury can make, impartial, sound, decision in the Senate trial.

All true but to me Bush lying about WMDs is much more of a crime than anything Trump did allegedly and he was never considered for impeachment. Why is that?

Obama didn’t have the balls

You mean the "Great Obama" as you have called him on numerous occasions. I do not think the word means what you think it means.

 

[Care4all]

It's Christmas Holiday for the hose and Senate, they are all going home until Jan 7th. No harm done by holding back for a couple of weeks, they won't even be there....

She will pass them on to the Senate in due time...right around the time they all return from holiday break.

In the mean time, McConnell's admission to FIXING the trial for the defendant to win, and not being IMPARTIAL as his impeachment oath requires, can be told to the American people....

Yeah, it will give McConnell and the White House more time to coordinate the best defense, how long to keep the democrats off the campaign trail, which democrats to call in the investigation into how the phone call was handled, that sort of thing. I mean, the democrats are already insisting that the Senate not restrict itself only to what the House passes over, so why not really open it up?

McConnell is suppose to be impartial, this is a Senate trial for ALL of the American people... we deserve to hear the truth, and the President deserves a fair trial, so ALL of 'we the people' can see why he is acquitted of the article charges.

A FIX in an impeachment trial by the Senate leader, Is NOT what our founders created.

We The people need to know the trial is fair and JUST, in order to accept the end results and not be so divided.

Divided only helps the politicians, not the citizens of this Nation.

This whole thing was emphatically partisan from the get-go. Is it any wonder McConnell is willing to reject it out of hand?

The House are simply the overzealous prosecutors bringing charges... they only need probable cause for them as grand jurors to indict.

The Senate is where there is the allegedly fair trial, where the burden of proof and evidence and testimony, has to be BEYOND a reasonable doubt for Senators/ the jury to convict and 2/3s having to do such for eviction from office.

This is why all evidence is not needed to Charge

and More Evidence....as much as possible, from both the defendant and prosecution, so the jury can make, impartial, sound, decisions.

It is not like Trump is sitting in prison awaiting trial. He is a free man

Pelosi can point to many reasons for a delay including :

Pending lawsuits on release of records and testimony
McConnell admitting he is not impartial in violation of Senate oath
McConnell coordinating prosecution with the accused

Plus, most importantly, she needs to know what Managers from the House to use in the prosecution team for the trial...

This would vary, depending on McDonnell's strategy... allow witnesses, use strong interrogator prosecutors, use only evidence with no witnesses allowed, she would need good story telling Prosecutor Managers for the impeachment trial to send over.

 

[rightwinger]

Yeah, it will give McConnell and the White House more time to coordinate the best defense, how long to keep the democrats off the campaign trail, which democrats to call in the investigation into how the phone call was handled, that sort of thing. I mean, the democrats are already insisting that the Senate not restrict itself only to what the House passes over, so why not really open it up?

McConnell is suppose to be impartial, this is a Senate trial for ALL of the American people... we deserve to hear the truth, and the President deserves a fair trial, so ALL of 'we the people' can see why he is acquitted of the article charges.

A FIX in an impeachment trial by the Senate leader, Is NOT what our founders created.

We The people need to know the trial is fair and JUST, in order to accept the end results and not be so divided.

Divided only helps the politicians, not the citizens of this Nation.

This whole thing was emphatically partisan from the get-go. Is it any wonder McConnell is willing to reject it out of hand?

The House are simply the overzealous prosecutors bringing charges... they only need probable cause for them as grand jurors to indict.

The Senate is where there is the allegedly fair trial, where the burden of proof and evidence and testimony, has to be BEYOND a reasonable doubt for Senators/ the jury to convict and 2/3s having to do such for eviction from office.

This is why all evidence is not needed to Charge

and More Evidence....as much as possible, from both the defendant and prosecution, so the jury can make, impartial, sound, decisions.

It is not like Trump is sitting in prison awaiting trial. He is a free man

Pelosi can point to many reasons for a delay including :

Pending lawsuits on release of records and testimony
McConnell admitting he is not impartial in violation of Senate oath
McConnell coordinating prosecution with the accused

Plus, most importantly, she needs to know what Managers from the House to prosecute, in the trial...

This would vary, depending on McDonnell's strategy... allow witnesses, use strong interrogator prosecutors, use only evidence with no witnesses allowed, she would need good story telling Prosecution Managers for the impeachment trial to send over.

Let’s see how Trumps lawsuit blocking release of records and testimony turns out.

 

[NoVote]

America is in a constitutional crisis. A real one. The person third in line to suceed the President has clearly lost her marbles. Isn't it an emergency that needs to be rectified Imediately?

 

[Nostra]

Yeah, it will give McConnell and the White House more time to coordinate the best defense, how long to keep the democrats off the campaign trail, which democrats to call in the investigation into how the phone call was handled, that sort of thing. I mean, the democrats are already insisting that the Senate not restrict itself only to what the House passes over, so why not really open it up?

McConnell is suppose to be impartial, this is a Senate trial for ALL of the American people... we deserve to hear the truth, and the President deserves a fair trial, so ALL of 'we the people' can see why he is acquitted of the article charges.

A FIX in an impeachment trial by the Senate leader, Is NOT what our founders created.

We The people need to know the trial is fair and JUST, in order to accept the end results and not be so divided.

Divided only helps the politicians, not the citizens of this Nation.

This whole thing was emphatically partisan from the get-go. Is it any wonder McConnell is willing to reject it out of hand?

The House are simply the overzealous prosecutors bringing charges... they only need probable cause for them as grand jurors to indict.

The Senate is where there is the allegedly fair trial, where the burden of proof and evidence and testimony, has to be BEYOND a reasonable doubt for Senators/ the jury to convict and 2/3s having to do such for eviction from office.

This is why all evidence is not needed to Charge

and More Evidence....as much as possible, from both the defendant and prosecution, so the jury can make, impartial, sound, decisions.

It is not like Trump is sitting in prison awaiting trial. He is a free man

Pelosi can point to many reasons for a delay including :

Pending lawsuits on release of records and testimony
McConnell admitting he is not impartial in violation of Senate oath
McConnell coordinating prosecution with the accused

Plus, most importantly, she needs to know what Managers from the House to use in the prosecution team for the trial...

This would vary, depending on McDonnell's strategy... allow witnesses, use strong interrogator prosecutors, use only evidence with no witnesses allowed, she would need good story telling Prosecutor Managers for the impeachment trial to send over.

Just send Schifferbrains over there to make it all up again. It would have to be better than the case they have.

She has no power. She is along for the ride now.

 

[Care4all]

McConnell is suppose to be impartial, this is a Senate trial for ALL of the American people... we deserve to hear the truth, and the President deserves a fair trial, so ALL of 'we the people' can see why he is acquitted of the article charges.

A FIX in an impeachment trial by the Senate leader, Is NOT what our founders created.

We The people need to know the trial is fair and JUST, in order to accept the end results and not be so divided.

Divided only helps the politicians, not the citizens of this Nation.

This whole thing was emphatically partisan from the get-go. Is it any wonder McConnell is willing to reject it out of hand?

The House are simply the overzealous prosecutors bringing charges... they only need probable cause for them as grand jurors to indict.

The Senate is where there is the allegedly fair trial, where the burden of proof and evidence and testimony, has to be BEYOND a reasonable doubt for Senators/ the jury to convict and 2/3s having to do such for eviction from office.

This is why all evidence is not needed to Charge

and More Evidence....as much as possible, from both the defendant and prosecution, so the jury can make, impartial, sound, decisions.

It is not like Trump is sitting in prison awaiting trial. He is a free man

Pelosi can point to many reasons for a delay including :

Pending lawsuits on release of records and testimony
McConnell admitting he is not impartial in violation of Senate oath
McConnell coordinating prosecution with the accused

Plus, most importantly, she needs to know what Managers from the House to prosecute, in the trial...

This would vary, depending on McDonnell's strategy... allow witnesses, use strong interrogator prosecutors, use only evidence with no witnesses allowed, she would need good story telling Prosecution Managers for the impeachment trial to send over.

Let’s see how Trumps lawsuit blocking release of records and testimony turns out.

That too!!!

But, McConnell can likely still stop the introduction of that in to the trial...

These two weeks are needed for some assurance from 3 republican senators to vote with the Democrats when requesting witnesses and the introduction of evidence the House did not have available to them.... for a fair and just trial to take place.

If, they can get that assurance from 3 republicans, not to conspire with the rest of republicans in their FIX is in for the President, illegal shenanigans.... then the trial should start shortly after holiday break is over, imho.

 

[Care4all]

McConnell is suppose to be impartial, this is a Senate trial for ALL of the American people... we deserve to hear the truth, and the President deserves a fair trial, so ALL of 'we the people' can see why he is acquitted of the article charges.

A FIX in an impeachment trial by the Senate leader, Is NOT what our founders created.

We The people need to know the trial is fair and JUST, in order to accept the end results and not be so divided.

Divided only helps the politicians, not the citizens of this Nation.

This whole thing was emphatically partisan from the get-go. Is it any wonder McConnell is willing to reject it out of hand?

The House are simply the overzealous prosecutors bringing charges... they only need probable cause for them as grand jurors to indict.

The Senate is where there is the allegedly fair trial, where the burden of proof and evidence and testimony, has to be BEYOND a reasonable doubt for Senators/ the jury to convict and 2/3s having to do such for eviction from office.

This is why all evidence is not needed to Charge

and More Evidence....as much as possible, from both the defendant and prosecution, so the jury can make, impartial, sound, decisions.

It is not like Trump is sitting in prison awaiting trial. He is a free man

Pelosi can point to many reasons for a delay including :

Pending lawsuits on release of records and testimony
McConnell admitting he is not impartial in violation of Senate oath
McConnell coordinating prosecution with the accused

Plus, most importantly, she needs to know what Managers from the House to use in the prosecution team for the trial...

This would vary, depending on McDonnell's strategy... allow witnesses, use strong interrogator prosecutors, use only evidence with no witnesses allowed, she would need good story telling Prosecutor Managers for the impeachment trial to send over.

Just send Schifferbrains over there to make it all up again. It would have to be better than the case they have.

She has no power. She is along for the ride now.

FYI
Schiff said upfront, his statement was a parody, paraphrased before he made his comment.

He still should have refrained, imho.

 

[Nostra]

This whole thing was emphatically partisan from the get-go. Is it any wonder McConnell is willing to reject it out of hand?

The House are simply the overzealous prosecutors bringing charges... they only need probable cause for them as grand jurors to indict.

The Senate is where there is the allegedly fair trial, where the burden of proof and evidence and testimony, has to be BEYOND a reasonable doubt for Senators/ the jury to convict and 2/3s having to do such for eviction from office.

This is why all evidence is not needed to Charge

and More Evidence....as much as possible, from both the defendant and prosecution, so the jury can make, impartial, sound, decisions.

It is not like Trump is sitting in prison awaiting trial. He is a free man

Pelosi can point to many reasons for a delay including :

Pending lawsuits on release of records and testimony
McConnell admitting he is not impartial in violation of Senate oath
McConnell coordinating prosecution with the accused

Plus, most importantly, she needs to know what Managers from the House to use in the prosecution team for the trial...

This would vary, depending on McDonnell's strategy... allow witnesses, use strong interrogator prosecutors, use only evidence with no witnesses allowed, she would need good story telling Prosecutor Managers for the impeachment trial to send over.

Just send Schifferbrains over there to make it all up again. It would have to be better than the case they have.

She has no power. She is along for the ride now.

FYI
Schiff said upfront, his statement was a parody, before he made his comment.

He still should have refrained, imho.

Lies.

He came up with "It was a parody" after he was slammed for his blatant lies.

 

[Care4all]

The House are simply the overzealous prosecutors bringing charges... they only need probable cause for them as grand jurors to indict.

The Senate is where there is the allegedly fair trial, where the burden of proof and evidence and testimony, has to be BEYOND a reasonable doubt for Senators/ the jury to convict and 2/3s having to do such for eviction from office.

This is why all evidence is not needed to Charge

and More Evidence....as much as possible, from both the defendant and prosecution, so the jury can make, impartial, sound, decisions.

It is not like Trump is sitting in prison awaiting trial. He is a free man

Pelosi can point to many reasons for a delay including :

Pending lawsuits on release of records and testimony
McConnell admitting he is not impartial in violation of Senate oath
McConnell coordinating prosecution with the accused

Plus, most importantly, she needs to know what Managers from the House to use in the prosecution team for the trial...

This would vary, depending on McDonnell's strategy... allow witnesses, use strong interrogator prosecutors, use only evidence with no witnesses allowed, she would need good story telling Prosecutor Managers for the impeachment trial to send over.

Just send Schifferbrains over there to make it all up again. It would have to be better than the case they have.

She has no power. She is along for the ride now.

FYI
Schiff said upfront, his statement was a parody, before he made his comment.

He still should have refrained, imho.

Lies.

He came up with "It was a parody" after he was slammed for his blatant lies.

He said he was PARAHRAISING the President's comment BEFORE he made his comment...

Look up the video of it.

 

[Nostra]

It is not like Trump is sitting in prison awaiting trial. He is a free man

Pelosi can point to many reasons for a delay including :

Pending lawsuits on release of records and testimony
McConnell admitting he is not impartial in violation of Senate oath
McConnell coordinating prosecution with the accused

Plus, most importantly, she needs to know what Managers from the House to use in the prosecution team for the trial...

This would vary, depending on McDonnell's strategy... allow witnesses, use strong interrogator prosecutors, use only evidence with no witnesses allowed, she would need good story telling Prosecutor Managers for the impeachment trial to send over.

Just send Schifferbrains over there to make it all up again. It would have to be better than the case they have.

She has no power. She is along for the ride now.

FYI
Schiff said upfront, his statement was a parody, before he made his comment.

He still should have refrained, imho.

Lies.

He came up with "It was a parody" after he was slammed for his blatant lies.

He said he was PARAHRAISING the President's comment BEFORE he made his comment...

Look up the video of it.

Apparently you don't know the meaning of "parahraising" nor parody.

 

[hadit]

The US Constitution clearly states that the Senate SHALL HAVE the sole power to try all impeachments. Nazi can't withhold that from the Senate. If she does, she is in violation of the Constitution, and Trump wasn't impeached.



Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.

Impeachment in the United States - Wikipedia

Didn’t see a timeframe there just like you didn’t see a timeframe on the Senate approving Supreme Court Nominees

Funny how that stuff works out

I suppose she could hold out until December to see what the house and Senate look like but I believe SCOTUS Will intervene at that point and toss it.

Her problem is that she knows it's DOA in the Senate And it drives her crazy that she cannot control that.

Jo

She can point to pending court decisions as justification for holding back

Second Article is Obstruction of Congress. If the court instructs Trump to release records and allow testimony and Trump refuses, Senate has no choice but to convict

Too late for that. The time for holding back was before the vote was taken, if she wanted to include the testimony. As it stands now, it's just a rank political stunt.

 

[hadit]

It is not like Trump is sitting in prison awaiting trial. He is a free man

Pelosi can point to many reasons for a delay including :

Pending lawsuits on release of records and testimony
McConnell admitting he is not impartial in violation of Senate oath
McConnell coordinating prosecution with the accused

Plus, most importantly, she needs to know what Managers from the House to use in the prosecution team for the trial...

This would vary, depending on McDonnell's strategy... allow witnesses, use strong interrogator prosecutors, use only evidence with no witnesses allowed, she would need good story telling Prosecutor Managers for the impeachment trial to send over.

Just send Schifferbrains over there to make it all up again. It would have to be better than the case they have.

She has no power. She is along for the ride now.

FYI
Schiff said upfront, his statement was a parody, before he made his comment.

He still should have refrained, imho.

Lies.

He came up with "It was a parody" after he was slammed for his blatant lies.

He said he was PARAHRAISING the President's comment BEFORE he made his comment...

Look up the video of it.

It's not a paraphrase when it bears little resemblance to truth.

 

[Care4all]

Plus, most importantly, she needs to know what Managers from the House to use in the prosecution team for the trial...

This would vary, depending on McDonnell's strategy... allow witnesses, use strong interrogator prosecutors, use only evidence with no witnesses allowed, she would need good story telling Prosecutor Managers for the impeachment trial to send over.

Just send Schifferbrains over there to make it all up again. It would have to be better than the case they have.

She has no power. She is along for the ride now.

FYI
Schiff said upfront, his statement was a parody, before he made his comment.

He still should have refrained, imho.

Lies.

He came up with "It was a parody" after he was slammed for his blatant lies.

He said he was PARAHRAISING the President's comment BEFORE he made his comment...

Look up the video of it.

It's not a paraphrase when it bears little resemblance to truth.

Sure, whatever!

It was very close to the truth in every manner and the impeachment hearing witness sworn testimony supported his comments.

 

[Nostra]

Just send Schifferbrains over there to make it all up again. It would have to be better than the case they have.

She has no power. She is along for the ride now.

FYI
Schiff said upfront, his statement was a parody, before he made his comment.

He still should have refrained, imho.

Lies.

He came up with "It was a parody" after he was slammed for his blatant lies.

He said he was PARAHRAISING the President's comment BEFORE he made his comment...

Look up the video of it.

It's not a paraphrase when it bears little resemblance to truth.

Sure, whatever!

It was very close to the truth in every manner and the impeachment hearing witness sworn testimony supported his comments.

It wasn't remotely close to the truth. You lie as much as Schifferbrains does.

 

[justoffal]

The US Constitution clearly states that the Senate SHALL HAVE the sole power to try all impeachments. Nazi can't withhold that from the Senate. If she does, she is in violation of the Constitution, and Trump wasn't impeached.



Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.

Impeachment in the United States - Wikipedia

Didn’t see a timeframe there just like you didn’t see a timeframe on the Senate approving Supreme Court Nominees

Funny how that stuff works out

I suppose she could hold out until December to see what the house and Senate look like but I believe SCOTUS Will intervene at that point and toss it.

Her problem is that she knows it's DOA in the Senate And it drives her crazy that she cannot control that.

Jo

She can point to pending court decisions as justification for holding back

Second Article is Obstruction of Congress. If the court instructs Trump to release records and allow testimony and Trump refuses, Senate has no choice but to convict

Too late for that. The time for holding back was before the vote was taken, if she wanted to include the testimony. As it stands now, it's just a rank political stunt.

The complete list of the yes votes has been handed out to the districts where the Democrats are hanging on by a thread. I believe 80% of them will lose their seats just for this reason.

Jo

 

[hadit]

Just send Schifferbrains over there to make it all up again. It would have to be better than the case they have.

She has no power. She is along for the ride now.

FYI
Schiff said upfront, his statement was a parody, before he made his comment.

He still should have refrained, imho.

Lies.

He came up with "It was a parody" after he was slammed for his blatant lies.

He said he was PARAHRAISING the President's comment BEFORE he made his comment...

Look up the video of it.

It's not a paraphrase when it bears little resemblance to truth.

Sure, whatever!

It was very close to the truth in every manner and the impeachment hearing witness sworn testimony supported his comments.

Even him trying to pretend it was a parody betrayed the truth. You don't try to make a joke like that during the impeachment process. And it was ludicrously far from the truth. Actually, I believe it was what he originally intended to pass off as the truth, and was stymied when Trump release the transcript.

 

[jillian]

The US Constitution clearly states that the Senate SHALL HAVE the sole power to try all impeachments. Nazi can't withhold that from the Senate. If she does, she is in violation of the Constitution, and Trump wasn't impeached.



Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.

Impeachment in the United States - Wikipedia

Perhaps your third grade education didn’t teach you what nazis were and are, loser.

what sick scum trumpkins are

 

[jillian]

The US Constitution clearly states that the Senate SHALL HAVE the sole power to try all impeachments. Nazi can't withhold that from the Senate. If she does, she is in violation of the Constitution, and Trump wasn't impeached.



Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.

Impeachment in the United States - Wikipedia

Yeah, well it doesn't say WHEN she needs to send it by, does it? Does Merrick Garland ring a bell?

Where did I say anything about a time frame, Moron.

Learn to read.

SO YOU'RE OK WITH HER DELAY -

you dont know wtf youre talking about do you moronboi ..

Why wouldn’t you be ok with her delay?

you’re ok with the tortoise rigging the proceeding?

tough

 

[jillian]

FYI
Schiff said upfront, his statement was a parody, before he made his comment.

He still should have refrained, imho.

Lies.

He came up with "It was a parody" after he was slammed for his blatant lies.

He said he was PARAHRAISING the President's comment BEFORE he made his comment...

Look up the video of it.

It's not a paraphrase when it bears little resemblance to truth.

Sure, whatever!

It was very close to the truth in every manner and the impeachment hearing witness sworn testimony supported his comments.

Even him trying to pretend it was a parody betrayed the truth. You don't try to make a joke like that during the impeachment process. And it was ludicrously far from the truth. Actually, I believe it was what he originally intended to pass off as the truth, and was stymied when Trump release the transcript.

Trump admitted everything he did, you psychotic freak.