I am not going to try to make some kind of excuse because I can't and won't.
And I'm not going to try to paint a "not SO bad" picture of the unemployment numbers, because they are terrifying. Thank god I have a job.
But reading the posts here I really think a lot of you are just plain nutty.
To think that the president of The United States would be ACTIVELY trying to bring down this country is absolutely ludicrous.
You have to see that..right?
I mean the previous administration was PROVEN to have done things that have turned out to be great detriment to our country in many aspects. But I don't for a minute think these tragic missteps were done to purposefully harm the country.
C'mon...we are all Americans.
You miss the point, at least with regard to what I said.
Presidents have an immense impact on this country's economy and therefore the world's economy and every action they take needs careful review. A wise man in that office with a keen view of history and understanding of the effect of his actions will take a different path than a lesser man.
Compare the two Bush presidents faced with the same choice as the invasion of iraq proceeds. One stops due to the implications of advancing and the other "goes it alone".
Which was the wise decision?
Bush has the economy crash due to 9/11 and Obama has the economy crash due to the banking debacle. One tells folks to go out and go shopping. The other says that this is worst economy in history and we all need to brace for the worst.
Which was the wise advice?
Reagan takes office after a decade of worsening economic numbers, unemployment out of control, inflation out of site, mortgage interest rates in the teens, hostages in Iran, failing car companies, oil prices doubled, international prestige dissolved. the Cold War raging and a general feeling of hopelessness gripping the nation.
Reagan said that we, as Americans, were blessed, powerful, creative and that America was both the hope and the envy of the world. That the rest of the world looked to us as a "Shining house on the hill". Reagan said and believed that the power of this country flowed from the people and that the best Government was one that got out of the way and let that power find a direction to benefit those that work to create it.
Compare that message to the one that Obama proclaims: That we have lost jobs that won't return, that we are not capable to overcome anything without government help, that we have injured all of the world and we need to make amends, that most of the pain and suffering in the world is the result of what we do and don't do, that the rich are stealing from the poor, that the whites are stealing from the blacks, that every group is against every other group. That our wealth today is the result of injustice and our history is one of criminal greed.
Which advice seems more likely to inspire achievement?
Which advice seems more likely to inspire excuses, in-fighting, division and confusion?
Every leader of every organization be it a team or a club or a company knows that he must inspire the soul, enrich the spirit, enhance the strengths and overcome the weaknesses within his group if he is to lead his group to success. He must effectively direct his group to a clear vision of what it means to be successful.
Reagan was called "The Gipper" due to his rallying approach to communication. He chose to inspire people to achieve to make a better country. The results of his re-election in which he came closer than any other modern President to a 100% Electoral College sweep speaks volumes.
Obama has not the first clue on what he is doing now that he in in office. He understands only campaigning and winning elections. As a Community Organizer, he was adept at fanning the rage and outrage of his community to elicite action to get more from the haves to the have nots that he was working to help. Watch his best speeches today. They are accusative, divisive, blame fixing, class defining and fatalistically pessamistic.
His method is to divide. It's what he does and it is his winning move. He uses it at every opportunity. It's his default approach to everything.
It's possible that he could change, but not likely.
As long as he chooses to play one end against the other in everything he does, we as a people cannot win.