karpenter
Gold Member
- Jun 5, 2018
- 3,289
- 442
- 170
What Difference Does It Makesealybobo said:Do you believe the people who claim they have been abducted?
Abductees Don't Know What The Abductors Are
Or Where They're From
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What Difference Does It Makesealybobo said:Do you believe the people who claim they have been abducted?
Yet they cannot even prove that life on earth, originated on earth. Our oldest native ancestors might in fact be "extraterrestrials"...Well, the headline is misleading. The NASA administrators comment was:That makes no sense. If there is a chance of Alien life outside of the Earth, it would be impossible to prove those Aliens have not visited Earth.
"“I don’t think extraterrestrial life has ever visited this planet"
Our oldest native ancestors might in fact be "extraterrestrials"...
Pretty darn good; since a collection of atoms did just that...What’s the probability of atoms writing Beethoven’s 5th? Because that’s what we’re talking about here.NASA deals in probabilitiesExactly what an alien assuming human form would say.....
‘There’s a Chance’ of Alien Life Out There, But it Hasn’t Visited Earth.
Nobody in NASA has a clue if there is life outside Earth.
None of the scientists have any more valid information on that than any other human because right now we only have one data point and that is earth.
Until we get another data point from some place else all we have are jackshit guesses.
They look at the vastness of the universe and calculate the probability of the existence of life.
Then they look at the vastness of the universe and calculate the improbability of ever getting there
And Knowledge Can Be Lostfncceo said:Many people believe that ancient peoples had no knowledge to create, design, and build ancient wonders but in fact, they did. The vast potential of humans to create new and better ways of doing things has been proven over and over again
So what? Such a thing would not have to be proven for abiogenis to be a foregone conclusion, or for one to determine that life has likely formed more than once in the universe.Yet they cannot even prove that life on earth, originated on earth.
Really!?Pretty darn good; since a collection of atoms did just that...What’s the probability of atoms writing Beethoven’s 5th? Because that’s what we’re talking about here.NASA deals in probabilitiesExactly what an alien assuming human form would say.....
‘There’s a Chance’ of Alien Life Out There, But it Hasn’t Visited Earth.
Nobody in NASA has a clue if there is life outside Earth.
None of the scientists have any more valid information on that than any other human because right now we only have one data point and that is earth.
Until we get another data point from some place else all we have are jackshit guesses.
They look at the vastness of the universe and calculate the probability of the existence of life.
Then they look at the vastness of the universe and calculate the improbability of ever getting there
Our oldest native ancestors go much, much farther back than apes...So what? Such a thing would not have to be proven for abiogenis to be a foregone conclusion, or for one to determine that life has likely formed more than once in the universe.Yet they cannot even prove that life on earth, originated on earth.
"Oldest native ancestors"
Why would there be any need of aliens to exain such a thing? We can follow the evolution of all apes, including humans, on a smooth continuum back through the fossil record.
As it turns out, that may not be entirely correct:Evolutionarily, We Are Exactly The Same Today
As Mere 5,000yrs Ago
Their Geniuses Had The Same Brains As Our Geniuses
Were the atoms that did what you ask; placed in a Tupperware bowl?Really!?Pretty darn good; since a collection of atoms did just that...What’s the probability of atoms writing Beethoven’s 5th? Because that’s what we’re talking about here.NASA deals in probabilitiesExactly what an alien assuming human form would say.....
‘There’s a Chance’ of Alien Life Out There, But it Hasn’t Visited Earth.
Nobody in NASA has a clue if there is life outside Earth.
None of the scientists have any more valid information on that than any other human because right now we only have one data point and that is earth.
Until we get another data point from some place else all we have are jackshit guesses.
They look at the vastness of the universe and calculate the probability of the existence of life.
Then they look at the vastness of the universe and calculate the improbability of ever getting there
So all I need to do is put the equivalent amount of atoms in a Tupperware bowl and it writes music!
Yes, any two species on Earth share a common ancestor. That's one of the fundamental ideas of evolution. So what you just said still doesn't have much bearing on anything.Our oldest native ancestors go much, much farther back than apes..
So have ice, and amino acids. What's your point?So what? Such a thing would not have to be proven for abiogenis to be a foregone conclusion, or for one to determine that life has likely formed more than once in the universe.Yet they cannot even prove that life on earth, originated on earth.
Really!?Pretty darn good; since a collection of atoms did just that...What’s the probability of atoms writing Beethoven’s 5th? Because that’s what we’re talking about here.NASA deals in probabilitiesExactly what an alien assuming human form would say.....
‘There’s a Chance’ of Alien Life Out There, But it Hasn’t Visited Earth.
Nobody in NASA has a clue if there is life outside Earth.
None of the scientists have any more valid information on that than any other human because right now we only have one data point and that is earth.
Until we get another data point from some place else all we have are jackshit guesses.
They look at the vastness of the universe and calculate the probability of the existence of life.
Then they look at the vastness of the universe and calculate the improbability of ever getting there
So all I need to do is put the equivalent amount of atoms in a Tupperware bowl and it writes music!
Or you don't get it... I'll bet on me for the win...Yes, any two species on Earth share a common ancestor. That's one of the fundamental ideas of evolution. So what you just said still doesn't have much bearing on anything.Our oldest native ancestors go much, much farther back than apes..
So have ice, and amino acids. What's your point?So what? Such a thing would not have to be proven for abiogenis to be a foregone conclusion, or for one to determine that life has likely formed more than once in the universe.Yet they cannot even prove that life on earth, originated on earth.
I have done nothing but invite you to make your arguments. So do so.... Or, just sit there and keep declaring how awesome they are.Or you don't get it... I'll bet on me for the win...
...anymore than the need for native genesis...So have ice, and amino acids. What's your point?So what? Such a thing would not have to be proven for abiogenis to be a foregone conclusion, or for one to determine that life has likely formed more than once in the universe.Yet they cannot even prove that life on earth, originated on earth.
What's yours? I made my point...there is no need of your alien hypothesis to explain anything at all.
Massive Genetic Study Reveals 90 Percent Of Earth’s Animals Appeared At The Same Time.So what? Such a thing would not have to be proven for abiogenis to be a foregone conclusion, or for one to determine that life has likely formed more than once in the universe.Yet they cannot even prove that life on earth, originated on earth.
"Oldest native ancestors"
Why would there be any need of aliens to exain such a thing? We can follow the evolution of all apes, including humans, on a smooth continuum back through the fossil record.
Actually, people were smarter 5,000 years ago. Part of the decay process of nature.And Knowledge Can Be Lostfncceo said:Many people believe that ancient peoples had no knowledge to create, design, and build ancient wonders but in fact, they did. The vast potential of humans to create new and better ways of doing things has been proven over and over again
And Re-Discovered
Evolutionarily, We Are Exactly The Same Today
As Mere 5,000yrs Ago
Their Geniuses Had The Same Brains As Our Geniuses