I don't find this information terribly useful. It's given in the much-abused myth-fact format, but the "facts" aren't all facts and the myths aren't all myths. The "myth",
"Myth: President Obama caved"
is a purely subjective conclusion, and one that I largely agree with. It certainly isn't factually false. Similarly, the "fact"
"Fact: They [Republicans] won’t admit it publicly, but when push came to shove, Republicans backed down on their key demands."
is based on the entirely subjective and nonfactual judgment of what demands were "key". Boehner for example made the equally subjective claim that he got 98% of what he wanted.
Beyond the subjectivity of the claims, there are other problems with the information. First, of course, the White House simply isn't unbiased about the deal Obama struck-- they are advocates, not analysts. Second, the article provides very little evidence, either through linking or through original research. If I wanted to reassess the debt ceiling agreement, which I have no particular interest in doing at least until the Super Committee starts making noises, I'd look for information from other sources.
