my my how two faced liberals are

[eagle7_31]

Facebook Data Scandal: When Obama Harvested Facebook Data On Millions To Win In 2012, Everyone Cheered

lets look back at 2012 and the BO campaign in regards to facebook. Sound familiar???? None of the left wing political sluts whined about that.

 

[The Original Tree]

They’ll continue to dream up stories for the next 8 years president Trump is in office.

The only way to end that is to clean up the swamp and get Mueller out of the way.

Here is how to end The Mueller Hoax Investigation.

Order him to investigate Obama, Clinton, Fusion GPS, COIE Lawfirm, The DNC, Sid Blumenthal, and all parties involved with purchasing compiling and disseminating Russian Propaganda for the sole purposes of impacting the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

He’ll immediately make an announcement that the Investigation has concluded and that no reasonable prosecutor would pursue criminal charges in such a case.

 

[Rambunctious]

Never met an honest liberal...they lie to themselves so of course they will lie to you...

 

[del]

eight years

 

[Rambunctious]

eight years

16 you forget Pence.....

 

[Care4all]

one was done through theft and lying, the other was with permission....AND facebook had changed their rules since the O campaign.


The effort was called a "game-changer" in the 2012 election, and the Obama campaign boasted that it was "the most groundbreaking piece of technology developed for the campaign."

The only difference, as far as we can discern, between the two campaigns' use of Facebook, is that in the case of Obama the users themselves agreed to share their data with the Obama campaign, as well as that of their friends.


The users that downloaded the Cambridge app, meanwhile, were only told that the information would be used for academic purposes. Nor was the data to be used for anything other than academic purposes.


It's an important distinction, to be sure, and Facebook is right to be attacked for its inability to control how its user data were being gathered and shopped around. (Facebook tightened its privacy rules on data sharing apps in 2015.)

 

[Rambunctious]

Facebook is for 12 year old girls...give me a break...

 

[Defiant1]

I'm still trying to figure out how my smartphone filled in the oval for Trump without me seeing it.

TWICE!!!!

 

[The Original Tree]

Remember kids, Facebook Legally sells your data to anyone it wants despite what anything in their Policies say.

Even your private IMs are not private.

And Facebook also legally takes money from foreign entities for advertisements.

But all ta’ll already knew that, right?

 

[Seawytch]

one was done through theft and lying, the other was with permission....AND facebook had changed their rules since the O campaign.


The effort was called a "game-changer" in the 2012 election, and the Obama campaign boasted that it was "the most groundbreaking piece of technology developed for the campaign."

The only difference, as far as we can discern, between the two campaigns' use of Facebook, is that in the case of Obama the users themselves agreed to share their data with the Obama campaign, as well as that of their friends.


The users that downloaded the Cambridge app, meanwhile, were only told that the information would be used for academic purposes. Nor was the data to be used for anything other than academic purposes.


It's an important distinction, to be sure, and Facebook is right to be attacked for its inability to control how its user data were being gathered and shopped around. (Facebook tightened its privacy rules on data sharing apps in 2015.)

Besides..the data mining pales in comparison to the other shit CA has been pulling.

Analysis | A new undercover video raises significant questions about Cambridge Analytica’s elections work

 

[protectionist]

16 you forget Pence.....

24 You forgot Tom Cotton.

 

[bripat9643]

one was done through theft and lying, the other was with permission....AND facebook had changed their rules since the O campaign.


The effort was called a "game-changer" in the 2012 election, and the Obama campaign boasted that it was "the most groundbreaking piece of technology developed for the campaign."

The only difference, as far as we can discern, between the two campaigns' use of Facebook, is that in the case of Obama the users themselves agreed to share their data with the Obama campaign, as well as that of their friends.


The users that downloaded the Cambridge app, meanwhile, were only told that the information would be used for academic purposes. Nor was the data to be used for anything other than academic purposes.


It's an important distinction, to be sure, and Facebook is right to be attacked for its inability to control how its user data were being gathered and shopped around. (Facebook tightened its privacy rules on data sharing apps in 2015.)

Where is the evidence that any users agreed to share their data with Obama?

 

[protectionist]

Where is the evidence that any users agreed to share their data with Obama?

Obama's main ally to share info with, was al Baghdadi (ISIS) .. >> AKA "Collusion"

 

[Care4all]

one was done through theft and lying, the other was with permission....AND facebook had changed their rules since the O campaign.


The effort was called a "game-changer" in the 2012 election, and the Obama campaign boasted that it was "the most groundbreaking piece of technology developed for the campaign."

The only difference, as far as we can discern, between the two campaigns' use of Facebook, is that in the case of Obama the users themselves agreed to share their data with the Obama campaign, as well as that of their friends.


The users that downloaded the Cambridge app, meanwhile, were only told that the information would be used for academic purposes. Nor was the data to be used for anything other than academic purposes.


It's an important distinction, to be sure, and Facebook is right to be attacked for its inability to control how its user data were being gathered and shopped around. (Facebook tightened its privacy rules on data sharing apps in 2015.)

Where is the evidence that any users agreed to share their data with Obama?

It says the Obama application, had an agreement that they signed agreeing the O campaign would gather their and friends emails and info.

Also Facebook changed their terms of agreement AFTER that in 2013

Cambridge analitica info was gathered through deceit and lies.....

Was suppose to be an academic survey for academic use only.

The Russian professor at Cambridge university stole their profiles and that of friends without permission and then used them for profiling for POLITICAL use and not for just academics..



You and your ilk of trumpsters don't care anyway.....So why bother posting on this?

 

[Old Rocks]

Poor Trumpanzees, all they can do when another of the treasonous fat senile old orange clown's crimes are discovered is holler 'Obama, Obama, Clinton, Clinton!' Never any defense of the bastard because they know there is no defense of the asshole.

 

[BluesLegend]

Poor Trumpanzees, all they can do when another of the treasonous fat senile old orange clown's crimes are discovered is holler 'Obama, Obama, Clinton, Clinton!' Never any defense of the bastard because they know there is no defense of the asshole.

Pointing our liberal hypocrisy and double standards is fun, choke on it.

 

[miketx]

Facebook is for 12 year old girls...give me a break...

But they look 14.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Facebook Data Scandal: When Obama Harvested Facebook Data On Millions To Win In 2012, Everyone Cheered

lets look back at 2012 and the BO campaign in regards to facebook. Sound familiar???? None of the left wing political sluts whined about that.

Get this:

"The only difference, as far as we can discern, between the two campaigns' use of Facebook, is that in the case of Obama the users themselves agreed to share their data with the Obama campaign, as well as that of their friends."

The ONLY difference here is that the people Obama took the information from, AGREED to have the info taken from them.

Yeah, no difference at all, especially if you're a blind Trump supporter. In fact if you're a blind Trump supporter, you probably think it's BETTER to not ask first now.

 

[miketx]

Facebook Data Scandal: When Obama Harvested Facebook Data On Millions To Win In 2012, Everyone Cheered

lets look back at 2012 and the BO campaign in regards to facebook. Sound familiar???? None of the left wing political sluts whined about that.

Get this:

"The only difference, as far as we can discern, between the two campaigns' use of Facebook, is that in the case of Obama the users themselves agreed to share their data with the Obama campaign, as well as that of their friends."

The ONLY difference here is that the people Obama took the information from, AGREED to have the info taken from them.

Yeah, no difference at all, especially if you're a blind Trump supporter. In fact if you're a blind Trump supporter, you probably think it's BETTER to not ask first now.

Prove it liar.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Remember kids, Facebook Legally sells your data to anyone it wants despite what anything in their Policies say.

Even your private IMs are not private.

And Facebook also legally takes money from foreign entities for advertisements.

But all ta’ll already knew that, right?

I was born more than 100 years ago, my birthday used to be February 29th until people started giving me Happy Birthday messages in the 28th February. So I changed it to April 1st, some people still don't get it.