My love for Ted Cruz died today

Pleasantly surprised to see Cruz finally grow some balls and be honest.

It will take a lot more, but it's still nice to see.
What are your suggestions, can you elaborate on them, or just an empty sentence...?

For the record, I agree with Cruz....We can't restrict the freedom of these networks to broadcast on the basis of complementary reporting...However, that hasn't happened. Not with Colbert, nor Kimmel.
 
Thread headline from Lib:

My love for Ted Cruz died today​

Compare this with how he described Cruz in the past:


“Poodle.” 🙄 “Masochist.”

Poor Lib. It still mystifies him that he’s a recognized liar.
 
Article 2 is pretty clear.

The governmeent shall not issue licenses to any broadcaster critical of President Trump.

The founders were clear on this. But now this mexican invents some bogus free speech bullshit as part of his long running campaign against the nations father.

All because Trump dissed his pig ugly wife and called his dead dather a murderer. Please !!

keep out the kitchen soyboy.

Its time to get rid of this leftist lunatic and give the people of Texas a true conserative.

keep out the kitchen soyboy.
take your own advice,

BTW, Cruz is not 'mexican', he's Cuban.

(and I thought Biden had brain problems. you make him look like a genius)
 
I just wanna see Ted grow one of these badboys and my bucket list will be near complete...

Screen Shot 85.webp
 
No Rawley, it really isn't. There were over 1000 different girls identified on the Epstein tapes in his files, only 250 of those identified as different girls have come forward.
And tens of thousands have been sex trafficked into the country under Biden. Sorry, but I don't hear your party shedding any tears over them

And how many of these alleged men have been identified and prosecuted by the French?
 
Listen, you rotten dying ****, you made a claim. That I supported Biden. You can't prove it, you know that, so now you've turned to trolling. Santorum indeed.
Sorry dude, already proved. You had zero posts on Epstein during your pal Biden's administration. You are already north of 150 when Trump came into office again.

Only Biden supporting Democrats have that posting history.
 
Article 2 is pretty clear.

The governmeent shall not issue licenses to any broadcaster critical of President Trump.

The founders were clear on this. But now this mexican invents some bogus free speech bullshit as part of his long running campaign against the nations father.

All because Trump dissed his pig ugly wife and called his dead dather a murderer. Please !!

keep out the kitchen soyboy.

Its time to get rid of this leftist lunatic and give the people of Texas a true conserative.

Even Ted gets it right, once in a while, when not bugging out for Cancun.
 
What are your suggestions, can you elaborate on them, or just an empty sentence...?
Empty sentence....He excels at them.
For the record, I agree with Cruz....We can't restrict the freedom of these networks to broadcast on the basis of complementary reporting...However, that hasn't happened. Not with Colbert, nor Kimmel.
Note how the same people who were shouting "MUH PRIVATE BIDNESS!" from the mountaintops when antisocial media was censoring COVID news/info, vax injuries, Hunter's laptop, and more, are now screeching "CENSORSHIP!" and blaming Orange Man for business decisions made by CBS, ABC, and Sinclair Broadcasting.

They really, really do think that we're stupid.
 
Yeah, real brave on a non-issue issue.
No. It is an issue, and an important one, that Ted got right. It is important, if you want to live in a country, supposedly guaranteeing free speech as the very 1st most important amendment to the US Constitution. The supreme court has ruled 9-0 against government censoring speech and coercion in respect to controlling free speech. And, that is the current Supreme Court.
I believe in the 1st Amendment, and it's protections against government control of news, media, comedians, and people of different political views, or opinions and analysis. Without it, we have nothing but fascist central control.
 
No. It is an issue

No it's not. The FCC chair was barking on an a podcast. I think it's good to remind people how ridiculously biased broadcast TV is again conservatives. and their policies. Literally 90%+ negative coverage.

Let me know when the FCC takes action to yanks someone's license over content.
 
15th post
No it's not. The FCC chair was barking on an a podcast. I think it's good to remind people how ridiculously biased broadcast TV is again conservatives. and their policies. Literally 90%+ negative coverage.

Let me know when the FCC takes action to yanks someone's license over content.
Your opinion is not fact, simp.

In fact, it's plainly obvious the 3 major networks are currently terrified of criticizing Trump for fear of losing their FCC broadcast license. The fact that you are too stupid to recognize this is your problem.
 
No it's not. The FCC chair was barking on an a podcast. I think it's good to remind people how ridiculously biased broadcast TV is again conservatives. and their policies. Literally 90%+ negative coverage.

Let me know when the FCC takes action to yanks someone's license over content.
So? It is not the FCC's place to regulate free speech. It just isn't done. Your conservative majority Supreme Court unanimously ruled, as have every Supreme Court before them. Networks have cowardly caved, under threat, not just of regulation, but of failing to get approval for mergers. The only people that have stood their ground against the fascist impulse to control media, has been the NY Times, which this week saw another one of the President's multi-billion dollar lawsuits thrown out of court.

Protected Free Speech. Guaranteed first above all other rights. I think we'll keep it. :D
 
Even Ted gets it right, once in a while, when not bugging out for Cancun.
If Progressive Socialist Communists like Newsome were part of the growth of California 150 years ago, California would be economically like Haiti.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom