1miseryindex
Platinum Member
So let's have a little reality check. The Catholic Church has been in existence (as we conceive it) for about two thousand years. The Church has CONSTANTLY sought to remain faithful to the teachings of Christ and the guidance of the "founding fathers" [to coin a phrase]. It recognizes not only the Scriptures themselves, but also traditions that originated with the Apostles and have carried forward. It employs an army of linguists, theologians, and scientists around the world who strive to ensure that "we" are understanding everything correctly, even to correcting translations of biblical texts as new information comes to light.
The Church has done a lot of awful things in its history, but one is only appalled at these acts in a vacuum, as HUMANS have done a lot of awful things, in the name of religious dogma and other inexplicable principles. The Church is a human organization, like it or not. But it has always strived to "get it right," and it continues to do so today.
For illustration, there is TREMENDOUS global pressure on the Vatical (the Church) to accept homosexuals and other sexual irregulars, to condone abortion in some circumstances, to embrace divorce and remarriage as endemic to the human condition, but it declines to do these things, because the Scriptures and Traditions are clear, in the opposite direction of the public pressure.
K9Buck, you have embraced the folly of Protestantism. You believe that you can read the Book and decide for yourself what it means. In effect, you say, "No, I'm smarter than your armies of theologians and hundreds of years of study."
Based on what? Conceit?
Your thinking is literally analogous to someone with a telescope, spending 30 years looking up into the sky and coming to the conclusion that all of what astronomers have figured out for the past thousands of years is wrong, because that is not what your scope sightings tell you.
You are a fool. You have a right to be a fool, but make no mistake about it. There is only one true Christian Church, and you have rejected it out of nothing but personal arrogance.
P.S. I admit that I did not go through the OP in detail. I have better things to do with my time, and you don't have to test every apple in the barrel to conclude that it is a barrel of rotten apples.
LOL at your candor! I love it!
I do think you are a little hard on the dude by calling him conceited and a fool. Jesus said not to call anyone a fool, so I'm not criticizing, just saying...
BUt other than that, I totally agree w/ this response. It's ironic as hell: people criticizing the RCC 4 having a human head, the pope, and yet they are their own popes who make up Christianity as they go. Jesus knew it would come to this.
And you know, I was o/side the RCC for a brief time recently and it was awful. I was outside of it for many reasons that I don't want to discuss at this time but one reason was that I was taken by the logic of the Sedevacantists, who say the Chair of Peter is vacant. I still believe (know) that it is indeed vacant, but that does not mean, as I was beginning to think, that Jesus has abandoned His Church. That is a lie from the devil, the one the devil loves the most, IMO. Get people out of CHrist's true Church, he schemes.
And he is winning.