Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So controlling and reducing the minority population is what? just an unfortunate?or fortunate? side effect for you? I don't want the government involved at all, nor business, nor men or their money, in fact abortion should remain legal and completely the woman's responsibility, I am just not comfortable with its real/ultimate objective they way you are.The woman. The one who’s body you want Big Government to control.
Her body is always hers. No one else has a right to it. Including the government.When a woman chose to get pregnant by having sex, her body is no longer hers. She is sharing it with another human being. No matter what the government say.That was a general non-specific rant.You can say whatever stupid thing you want to say, but when in society, you go after someone's neck, that's where your freedom ends and theirs begins.“all Men are created equal” ...The Declaration states, “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness….”
A life is created at conception.
What about Women? Apparently, they were not, in the eyes of your country’s founders. Women could not vote until the 20th century, and are still being controlled by the 80% of US Congress members who are Men. Shame.
A Women’s body (including everything in it) is HER domain, and only SHE decides.
A person is created at birth.
What the hateful women's superiority groups don't know is that it could be the American people have had enough of hearing how abortion clinics are actually killing fields that rival Chinese genocide against themselves in the few years surrounding WWII, and while the rest of the world was preoccupied with going after each other's armies, Mao was going after harmless citizens of his own country for the "crime" of speaking against him. His killings were so vast, some say he killed 100 million of his own people. Others put the figure as anywhere between 20 million and 60 million. Others call the killings "countless." His killing spree surpassed Russia's similar killings of farmers as well as Russia's gentry, and Mao killed more people than Hitler did. Socialists to horrible things once they get power, from the first minute until the last. The Soviet Socialist Republic was a terrible place to be during war years. Lenin's murders have no place in the civil world. He killed innocent farmers just because they were stubborn and wanted to have some say so in all things agricultural. He wasn't hearing of it, so he bloody starved them to death with cat-and-mouse maneuvers of the KGB to empty farmhouses of food as long as it took for the farmers to die off of starvation. What fools. It resulted in long lines at the markets all over Russia while oranges rotted on the trees, people died of scurvy. Unbelievably, Lenin was a really creepy foot shoot specialist.
The only thing positive that came out of it for America is that those of us who had good history programs from first grade on up knew that Russian people were having hard times because of the Weekly Reader program. What nobody seemed to know except for Eisenhower was that Linen was killing off his own. And now when AOC brags about being a Socialist, all I can do is envision her in a KGB outfit killing off the best people in America that she likes to poop all over.
Anything specific you want to address about a woman’s right to her own body (this thread) or about what specific language AOC said about the abortion issue?
Now that you got your emotional frustrations out, again, how about detailing any specific scientific argument you have that contradicts what I said.I agree. At birth, there are no sparkling puffs of glitter, either physical or imagined (soul), and the baby’s mind at birth is not conscious of any reality, except for physical discomfort and vocal cries & moro reflex, etc.“all Men are created equal” ...The Declaration states, “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness….”
A life is created at conception.
What about Women? Apparently, they were not, in the eyes of your country’s founders. Women could not vote until the 20th century, and are still being controlled by the 80% of US Congress members who are Men. Shame.
A Women’s body (including everything in it) is HER domain, and only SHE decides.
A person is created at birth.
Look, Noah Webster, trying to base your point on a modernized and functionally-illiterate understanding of the English language is not going to take you very far, and basing it on "This is SCIENCE, because it's how it appears to me!" won't take you anywhere at all.
First, "men" in archaic parlance often translated into "humans" or "people", as it did in that phrase. That hyper-sensitive, panty-chapped neo-savages like you have decided to make a big fucking hairy deal out of singling out sexes means exactly fuck and all to words written a long time ago.
Second, a fetus is not part of a woman's body. Ever. And there is nothing about birth which magically creates a person out of something else. I've given birth to three children myself, and been present at the births of many others. I promise you that, no matter what your Mommy told you, there were no fairy godmothers, magic wands, or sparkling puffs of glitter present.
Only if necessary, and only the pregnant woman should decide the fate of what’s inside HER body, terminating the fetus is not as big a deal for YOU, or it should not be (in case your emotions are uncontrollable).
YOU are seriously trying to claim that your outdated, unscientific twaddle is the "rational" position, and mine, with every ounce of modern medicine and biology supporting it, is "emotional"? For someone who alleges that his only concern is "women's rights", you certainly are a condescending little chauvinist drooler when a woman dares to challenge your incoherent mansplaining of what she wants and needs.
I understand. Being a born with a penis is probably the only accomplishment in your sad little excuse for a life, and being confronted with a woman who's ahead of you on both education and, apparently, evolution is very threatening to "men" like you.
“Most don’t agree”?Your view-most don't agree.I applaud you for actually reading some of the report, including what suits you.
Did you even read your own linked report, you walking turd?
From your link:
"• All eight geographical regions assessed in the report have achieved at least 60% gender parity, and two have progressed above 70%. Western Europe is, on average, the region with the highest level of gender parity (75.8%). North America (72.5%) is second and Latin America (70.8%) is third. They are followed by Eastern Europe and Central Asia (70.7%), East Asia and the Pacific (68.3%), Sub-Saharan Africa (66.3%), South Asia (65.8%) and the Middle East and North Africa (60.2%). This year the 149 countries covered by the report include five new entrants: Congo, DRC; Iraq, Oman, Sierra Leone and Togo. Sierra Leone is in 114th position while the other new entrants rank lower."
"Political Empowerment is where the gender gap remains the widest: only 23% of the political gap— unchanged since last year—has been closed, and no country has yet fully closed political empowerment gaps. Even the best performer in this subindex, Iceland, still exhibits a gap of 33%, and this gap has widened significantly over the past year. Just six other countries (Nicaragua, Norway, Rwanda, Bangladesh, Finland and Sweden) have closed at least 50% of their gap. On the other end of the spectrum, almost one-quarter of the countries assessed has closed less than 10% of their gender gap, and the four worst-performing countries— Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman and Yemen—have yet to bridge over 97% of their gap."
Since I doubt that you could even find any of those four countries on a map, let me just tell you what they all have in common: they're all overwhelmingly Muslim, dolt.
"The second subindex where the gender gap remains very large is Economic Participation and Opportunity. Globally, just 58% of this gap has been closed, with minimal progress since last year. Nineteen countries— predominantly from the Middle East and North Africa region—have yet to close over 50% of their gap, 94 countries have yet to close 30% gap or more, and just 14 countries are above the 80% milestone. These countries are fairly distributed among five regions: two are from the East Asia and the Pacific (Lao PDR and the Philippines); two are from Eastern Europe (Belarus and Latvia); two are from Latin America and the Caribbean (Barbados and Bahamas); six are from Sub-Saharan Africa (Benin, Botswana, Burundi, Cameroon, Guinea and Namibia); and two are Nordic countries (Sweden and Norway). Lao PDR is the best performer on this subindex, having closed 91% of the gap."
The next time you want to mindlessly throw up a link to something and ASSume it supports you (and pray that no one bothers to fact-check your bullshit claims), don't.
However, I stand by what I focused on - Political Empowerment.
The sexist USA is ranked #98 in Political Empowerment for women. That’s very disappointing for a country that emphasizes FREEDOM for all.
You need to control your emotions. Calling people names and ASSuming you know them is the height of arrogance, if not also stupidity.
What science are you referring to?Her body is always hers. No one else has a right to it. Including the government.When a woman chose to get pregnant by having sex, her body is no longer hers. She is sharing it with another human being. No matter what the government say.That was a general non-specific rant.You can say whatever stupid thing you want to say, but when in society, you go after someone's neck, that's where your freedom ends and theirs begins.“all Men are created equal” ...
What about Women? Apparently, they were not, in the eyes of your country’s founders. Women could not vote until the 20th century, and are still being controlled by the 80% of US Congress members who are Men. Shame.
A Women’s body (including everything in it) is HER domain, and only SHE decides.
A person is created at birth.
What the hateful women's superiority groups don't know is that it could be the American people have had enough of hearing how abortion clinics are actually killing fields that rival Chinese genocide against themselves in the few years surrounding WWII, and while the rest of the world was preoccupied with going after each other's armies, Mao was going after harmless citizens of his own country for the "crime" of speaking against him. His killings were so vast, some say he killed 100 million of his own people. Others put the figure as anywhere between 20 million and 60 million. Others call the killings "countless." His killing spree surpassed Russia's similar killings of farmers as well as Russia's gentry, and Mao killed more people than Hitler did. Socialists to horrible things once they get power, from the first minute until the last. The Soviet Socialist Republic was a terrible place to be during war years. Lenin's murders have no place in the civil world. He killed innocent farmers just because they were stubborn and wanted to have some say so in all things agricultural. He wasn't hearing of it, so he bloody starved them to death with cat-and-mouse maneuvers of the KGB to empty farmhouses of food as long as it took for the farmers to die off of starvation. What fools. It resulted in long lines at the markets all over Russia while oranges rotted on the trees, people died of scurvy. Unbelievably, Lenin was a really creepy foot shoot specialist.
The only thing positive that came out of it for America is that those of us who had good history programs from first grade on up knew that Russian people were having hard times because of the Weekly Reader program. What nobody seemed to know except for Eisenhower was that Linen was killing off his own. And now when AOC brags about being a Socialist, all I can do is envision her in a KGB outfit killing off the best people in America that she likes to poop all over.
Anything specific you want to address about a woman’s right to her own body (this thread) or about what specific language AOC said about the abortion issue?
But as I said in the OP, her baby's body is NOT hers, and this is science. It cannot be disputed.
What science are you referring to?Her body is always hers. No one else has a right to it. Including the government.When a woman chose to get pregnant by having sex, her body is no longer hers. She is sharing it with another human being. No matter what the government say.That was a general non-specific rant.You can say whatever stupid thing you want to say, but when in society, you go after someone's neck, that's where your freedom ends and theirs begins.
What the hateful women's superiority groups don't know is that it could be the American people have had enough of hearing how abortion clinics are actually killing fields that rival Chinese genocide against themselves in the few years surrounding WWII, and while the rest of the world was preoccupied with going after each other's armies, Mao was going after harmless citizens of his own country for the "crime" of speaking against him. His killings were so vast, some say he killed 100 million of his own people. Others put the figure as anywhere between 20 million and 60 million. Others call the killings "countless." His killing spree surpassed Russia's similar killings of farmers as well as Russia's gentry, and Mao killed more people than Hitler did. Socialists to horrible things once they get power, from the first minute until the last. The Soviet Socialist Republic was a terrible place to be during war years. Lenin's murders have no place in the civil world. He killed innocent farmers just because they were stubborn and wanted to have some say so in all things agricultural. He wasn't hearing of it, so he bloody starved them to death with cat-and-mouse maneuvers of the KGB to empty farmhouses of food as long as it took for the farmers to die off of starvation. What fools. It resulted in long lines at the markets all over Russia while oranges rotted on the trees, people died of scurvy. Unbelievably, Lenin was a really creepy foot shoot specialist.
The only thing positive that came out of it for America is that those of us who had good history programs from first grade on up knew that Russian people were having hard times because of the Weekly Reader program. What nobody seemed to know except for Eisenhower was that Linen was killing off his own. And now when AOC brags about being a Socialist, all I can do is envision her in a KGB outfit killing off the best people in America that she likes to poop all over.
Anything specific you want to address about a woman’s right to her own body (this thread) or about what specific language AOC said about the abortion issue?
But as I said in the OP, her baby's body is NOT hers, and this is science. It cannot be disputed.
The baby’s body (aka fetus or embryo) INSIDE the pregnant woman’s body is her “matter”. Although the fetus has its own DNA profile, its biological growth is COMPLETELY dependent on the mother, who decides her own destiny.
Same for non-human animals too.
It’s HER fetus/embryo.What science are you referring to?Her body is always hers. No one else has a right to it. Including the government.When a woman chose to get pregnant by having sex, her body is no longer hers. She is sharing it with another human being. No matter what the government say.That was a general non-specific rant.
Anything specific you want to address about a woman’s right to her own body (this thread) or about what specific language AOC said about the abortion issue?
But as I said in the OP, her baby's body is NOT hers, and this is science. It cannot be disputed.
The baby’s body (aka fetus or embryo) INSIDE the pregnant woman’s body is her “matter”. Although the fetus has its own DNA profile, its biological growth is COMPLETELY dependent on the mother, who decides her own destiny.
Same for non-human animals too.
It is an entirely unique situation. It is not like HER kidney, HER ovaries, HER lungs. It is in her body but NOT her body. It is a unique life.
This is beyond dispute.
It’s HER fetus/embryo.What science are you referring to?Her body is always hers. No one else has a right to it. Including the government.When a woman chose to get pregnant by having sex, her body is no longer hers. She is sharing it with another human being. No matter what the government say.
But as I said in the OP, her baby's body is NOT hers, and this is science. It cannot be disputed.
The baby’s body (aka fetus or embryo) INSIDE the pregnant woman’s body is her “matter”. Although the fetus has its own DNA profile, its biological growth is COMPLETELY dependent on the mother, who decides her own destiny.
Same for non-human animals too.
It is an entirely unique situation. It is not like HER kidney, HER ovaries, HER lungs. It is in her body but NOT her body. It is a unique life.
This is beyond dispute.
This is beyond dispute.
That’s YOUR opinion.It’s HER fetus/embryo.What science are you referring to?Her body is always hers. No one else has a right to it. Including the government.
But as I said in the OP, her baby's body is NOT hers, and this is science. It cannot be disputed.
The baby’s body (aka fetus or embryo) INSIDE the pregnant woman’s body is her “matter”. Although the fetus has its own DNA profile, its biological growth is COMPLETELY dependent on the mother, who decides her own destiny.
Same for non-human animals too.
It is an entirely unique situation. It is not like HER kidney, HER ovaries, HER lungs. It is in her body but NOT her body. It is a unique life.
This is beyond dispute.
This is beyond dispute.
I suspect you're not American and so have not internalized Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
She does not own that life. It is not hers. It is in her body, yes. But again it is not like HER kidneys, HER lungs, HER liver
That’s YOUR opinion.It’s HER fetus/embryo.What science are you referring to?But as I said in the OP, her baby's body is NOT hers, and this is science. It cannot be disputed.
The baby’s body (aka fetus or embryo) INSIDE the pregnant woman’s body is her “matter”. Although the fetus has its own DNA profile, its biological growth is COMPLETELY dependent on the mother, who decides her own destiny.
Same for non-human animals too.
It is an entirely unique situation. It is not like HER kidney, HER ovaries, HER lungs. It is in her body but NOT her body. It is a unique life.
This is beyond dispute.
This is beyond dispute.
I suspect you're not American and so have not internalized Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
She does not own that life. It is not hers. It is in her body, yes. But again it is not like HER kidneys, HER lungs, HER liver
I say she does own her own fetus, embryo, and everything inside her body.
Yes, I was expressing my opinion, like you were.That’s YOUR opinion.It’s HER fetus/embryo.What science are you referring to?
The baby’s body (aka fetus or embryo) INSIDE the pregnant woman’s body is her “matter”. Although the fetus has its own DNA profile, its biological growth is COMPLETELY dependent on the mother, who decides her own destiny.
Same for non-human animals too.
It is an entirely unique situation. It is not like HER kidney, HER ovaries, HER lungs. It is in her body but NOT her body. It is a unique life.
This is beyond dispute.
This is beyond dispute.
I suspect you're not American and so have not internalized Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
She does not own that life. It is not hers. It is in her body, yes. But again it is not like HER kidneys, HER lungs, HER liver
I say she does own her own fetus, embryo, and everything inside her body.
In America it's not a matter of OPINION. It's in the Constitution and in fact, is in many of our state laws. If someone murders a pregnant woman, that person is charged with the murder of the fetus as well. The same is not true of being charged for "murdering" the woman's heart, lungs or spleen.
Yes, I was expressing my opinion, like you were.That’s YOUR opinion.It’s HER fetus/embryo.It is an entirely unique situation. It is not like HER kidney, HER ovaries, HER lungs. It is in her body but NOT her body. It is a unique life.
This is beyond dispute.
This is beyond dispute.
I suspect you're not American and so have not internalized Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
She does not own that life. It is not hers. It is in her body, yes. But again it is not like HER kidneys, HER lungs, HER liver
I say she does own her own fetus, embryo, and everything inside her body.
In America it's not a matter of OPINION. It's in the Constitution and in fact, is in many of our state laws. If someone murders a pregnant woman, that person is charged with the murder of the fetus as well. The same is not true of being charged for "murdering" the woman's heart, lungs or spleen.
What US Constitution text supports your opinion?
You could not answer my US Constitution question?Yes, I was expressing my opinion, like you were.That’s YOUR opinion.It’s HER fetus/embryo.
This is beyond dispute.
I suspect you're not American and so have not internalized Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
She does not own that life. It is not hers. It is in her body, yes. But again it is not like HER kidneys, HER lungs, HER liver
I say she does own her own fetus, embryo, and everything inside her body.
In America it's not a matter of OPINION. It's in the Constitution and in fact, is in many of our state laws. If someone murders a pregnant woman, that person is charged with the murder of the fetus as well. The same is not true of being charged for "murdering" the woman's heart, lungs or spleen.
What US Constitution text supports your opinion?
Right that's what we do here. Express opinions. And since you're not a US citizen, obviously, I'm gone arguing with you about this.
BTW, why are foreigners so obsessed with America? Does NOTHING happen in your nation?
People on USMB“Most don’t agree”?Your view-most don't agree.I applaud you for actually reading some of the report, including what suits you.
Did you even read your own linked report, you walking turd?
From your link:
"• All eight geographical regions assessed in the report have achieved at least 60% gender parity, and two have progressed above 70%. Western Europe is, on average, the region with the highest level of gender parity (75.8%). North America (72.5%) is second and Latin America (70.8%) is third. They are followed by Eastern Europe and Central Asia (70.7%), East Asia and the Pacific (68.3%), Sub-Saharan Africa (66.3%), South Asia (65.8%) and the Middle East and North Africa (60.2%). This year the 149 countries covered by the report include five new entrants: Congo, DRC; Iraq, Oman, Sierra Leone and Togo. Sierra Leone is in 114th position while the other new entrants rank lower."
"Political Empowerment is where the gender gap remains the widest: only 23% of the political gap— unchanged since last year—has been closed, and no country has yet fully closed political empowerment gaps. Even the best performer in this subindex, Iceland, still exhibits a gap of 33%, and this gap has widened significantly over the past year. Just six other countries (Nicaragua, Norway, Rwanda, Bangladesh, Finland and Sweden) have closed at least 50% of their gap. On the other end of the spectrum, almost one-quarter of the countries assessed has closed less than 10% of their gender gap, and the four worst-performing countries— Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman and Yemen—have yet to bridge over 97% of their gap."
Since I doubt that you could even find any of those four countries on a map, let me just tell you what they all have in common: they're all overwhelmingly Muslim, dolt.
"The second subindex where the gender gap remains very large is Economic Participation and Opportunity. Globally, just 58% of this gap has been closed, with minimal progress since last year. Nineteen countries— predominantly from the Middle East and North Africa region—have yet to close over 50% of their gap, 94 countries have yet to close 30% gap or more, and just 14 countries are above the 80% milestone. These countries are fairly distributed among five regions: two are from the East Asia and the Pacific (Lao PDR and the Philippines); two are from Eastern Europe (Belarus and Latvia); two are from Latin America and the Caribbean (Barbados and Bahamas); six are from Sub-Saharan Africa (Benin, Botswana, Burundi, Cameroon, Guinea and Namibia); and two are Nordic countries (Sweden and Norway). Lao PDR is the best performer on this subindex, having closed 91% of the gap."
The next time you want to mindlessly throw up a link to something and ASSume it supports you (and pray that no one bothers to fact-check your bullshit claims), don't.
However, I stand by what I focused on - Political Empowerment.
The sexist USA is ranked #98 in Political Empowerment for women. That’s very disappointing for a country that emphasizes FREEDOM for all.
You need to control your emotions. Calling people names and ASSuming you know them is the height of arrogance, if not also stupidity.
What are you talking about? Can you be specific?
Even if you had valid statistics to back up your statement, so what? Majority opinion does not confirm the righteousness of statements. Logic does.People on USMB“Most don’t agree”?Your view-most don't agree.I applaud you for actually reading some of the report, including what suits you.
Did you even read your own linked report, you walking turd?
From your link:
"• All eight geographical regions assessed in the report have achieved at least 60% gender parity, and two have progressed above 70%. Western Europe is, on average, the region with the highest level of gender parity (75.8%). North America (72.5%) is second and Latin America (70.8%) is third. They are followed by Eastern Europe and Central Asia (70.7%), East Asia and the Pacific (68.3%), Sub-Saharan Africa (66.3%), South Asia (65.8%) and the Middle East and North Africa (60.2%). This year the 149 countries covered by the report include five new entrants: Congo, DRC; Iraq, Oman, Sierra Leone and Togo. Sierra Leone is in 114th position while the other new entrants rank lower."
"Political Empowerment is where the gender gap remains the widest: only 23% of the political gap— unchanged since last year—has been closed, and no country has yet fully closed political empowerment gaps. Even the best performer in this subindex, Iceland, still exhibits a gap of 33%, and this gap has widened significantly over the past year. Just six other countries (Nicaragua, Norway, Rwanda, Bangladesh, Finland and Sweden) have closed at least 50% of their gap. On the other end of the spectrum, almost one-quarter of the countries assessed has closed less than 10% of their gender gap, and the four worst-performing countries— Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman and Yemen—have yet to bridge over 97% of their gap."
Since I doubt that you could even find any of those four countries on a map, let me just tell you what they all have in common: they're all overwhelmingly Muslim, dolt.
"The second subindex where the gender gap remains very large is Economic Participation and Opportunity. Globally, just 58% of this gap has been closed, with minimal progress since last year. Nineteen countries— predominantly from the Middle East and North Africa region—have yet to close over 50% of their gap, 94 countries have yet to close 30% gap or more, and just 14 countries are above the 80% milestone. These countries are fairly distributed among five regions: two are from the East Asia and the Pacific (Lao PDR and the Philippines); two are from Eastern Europe (Belarus and Latvia); two are from Latin America and the Caribbean (Barbados and Bahamas); six are from Sub-Saharan Africa (Benin, Botswana, Burundi, Cameroon, Guinea and Namibia); and two are Nordic countries (Sweden and Norway). Lao PDR is the best performer on this subindex, having closed 91% of the gap."
The next time you want to mindlessly throw up a link to something and ASSume it supports you (and pray that no one bothers to fact-check your bullshit claims), don't.
However, I stand by what I focused on - Political Empowerment.
The sexist USA is ranked #98 in Political Empowerment for women. That’s very disappointing for a country that emphasizes FREEDOM for all.
You need to control your emotions. Calling people names and ASSuming you know them is the height of arrogance, if not also stupidity.
What are you talking about? Can you be specific?
You could not answer my US Constitution question?Yes, I was expressing my opinion, like you were.That’s YOUR opinion.I suspect you're not American and so have not internalized Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
She does not own that life. It is not hers. It is in her body, yes. But again it is not like HER kidneys, HER lungs, HER liver
I say she does own her own fetus, embryo, and everything inside her body.
In America it's not a matter of OPINION. It's in the Constitution and in fact, is in many of our state laws. If someone murders a pregnant woman, that person is charged with the murder of the fetus as well. The same is not true of being charged for "murdering" the woman's heart, lungs or spleen.
What US Constitution text supports your opinion?
Right that's what we do here. Express opinions. And since you're not a US citizen, obviously, I'm gone arguing with you about this.
BTW, why are foreigners so obsessed with America? Does NOTHING happen in your nation?
OK then, but why does nationality make a difference in your thread topic?
Do you also disapprove of Russians meddling in US elections?
Your logic should dictate what others think?Even if you had valid statistics to back up your statement, so what? Majority opinion does not confirm the righteousness of statements. Logic does.People on USMB“Most don’t agree”?Your view-most don't agree.I applaud you for actually reading some of the report, including what suits you.Did you even read your own linked report, you walking turd?
From your link:
"• All eight geographical regions assessed in the report have achieved at least 60% gender parity, and two have progressed above 70%. Western Europe is, on average, the region with the highest level of gender parity (75.8%). North America (72.5%) is second and Latin America (70.8%) is third. They are followed by Eastern Europe and Central Asia (70.7%), East Asia and the Pacific (68.3%), Sub-Saharan Africa (66.3%), South Asia (65.8%) and the Middle East and North Africa (60.2%). This year the 149 countries covered by the report include five new entrants: Congo, DRC; Iraq, Oman, Sierra Leone and Togo. Sierra Leone is in 114th position while the other new entrants rank lower."
"Political Empowerment is where the gender gap remains the widest: only 23% of the political gap— unchanged since last year—has been closed, and no country has yet fully closed political empowerment gaps. Even the best performer in this subindex, Iceland, still exhibits a gap of 33%, and this gap has widened significantly over the past year. Just six other countries (Nicaragua, Norway, Rwanda, Bangladesh, Finland and Sweden) have closed at least 50% of their gap. On the other end of the spectrum, almost one-quarter of the countries assessed has closed less than 10% of their gender gap, and the four worst-performing countries— Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman and Yemen—have yet to bridge over 97% of their gap."
Since I doubt that you could even find any of those four countries on a map, let me just tell you what they all have in common: they're all overwhelmingly Muslim, dolt.
"The second subindex where the gender gap remains very large is Economic Participation and Opportunity. Globally, just 58% of this gap has been closed, with minimal progress since last year. Nineteen countries— predominantly from the Middle East and North Africa region—have yet to close over 50% of their gap, 94 countries have yet to close 30% gap or more, and just 14 countries are above the 80% milestone. These countries are fairly distributed among five regions: two are from the East Asia and the Pacific (Lao PDR and the Philippines); two are from Eastern Europe (Belarus and Latvia); two are from Latin America and the Caribbean (Barbados and Bahamas); six are from Sub-Saharan Africa (Benin, Botswana, Burundi, Cameroon, Guinea and Namibia); and two are Nordic countries (Sweden and Norway). Lao PDR is the best performer on this subindex, having closed 91% of the gap."
The next time you want to mindlessly throw up a link to something and ASSume it supports you (and pray that no one bothers to fact-check your bullshit claims), don't.
However, I stand by what I focused on - Political Empowerment.
The sexist USA is ranked #98 in Political Empowerment for women. That’s very disappointing for a country that emphasizes FREEDOM for all.
You need to control your emotions. Calling people names and ASSuming you know them is the height of arrogance, if not also stupidity.
What are you talking about? Can you be specific?
Why does each person in the world think they are a de facto American citizen?
Where did anybody ever get the idea that the US has to or should be world leader? The founding fathers warned against entangling alliances as part of an isolationist approach.Why does each person in the world think they are a de facto American citizen?
Because the US government thinks it's the de facto world leader.
That's only traditionally.It’s HER fetus/embryo.What science are you referring to?Her body is always hers. No one else has a right to it. Including the government.When a woman chose to get pregnant by having sex, her body is no longer hers. She is sharing it with another human being. No matter what the government say.
But as I said in the OP, her baby's body is NOT hers, and this is science. It cannot be disputed.
The baby’s body (aka fetus or embryo) INSIDE the pregnant woman’s body is her “matter”. Although the fetus has its own DNA profile, its biological growth is COMPLETELY dependent on the mother, who decides her own destiny.
Same for non-human animals too.
It is an entirely unique situation. It is not like HER kidney, HER ovaries, HER lungs. It is in her body but NOT her body. It is a unique life.
This is beyond dispute.
This is beyond dispute.
