This thread is addressed to supporters of minimum wage laws. Detractors claim that minimum wage causes unemployment and/or inflation. But most supporters will vigorously deny this. Yet they seem to set their sights pretty low when it comes to setting the level of minimum wage. I assume this is because they believe there is some downside to minimum wage, some reason to not raise it to $200/hr, but it seems they never want to talk about what that reason might be. Hopefully, someone will step up here, and clear the air.
So, what are you saying? No MW AT ALL?
Well, in the OP I was focused on trying to understand what MW advocates mean when they claim that there are
no negative repercussions to setting or raising the minimum wage. That makes no sense to me.
But that was then. The thread has mostly devolved into the usual debates over MW.
I am against a $15 MW. But no MW is crazy.
What's crazy about it? If people are allowed to work for free (volunteer), why shouldn't they be allowed to work for a very small amount?
All the major/medium corporations/businesses could get together and set their own MW at like $3/hr.. And what could anyone do about it?
Not work for them?
If they are ALL in cahoots - you could not use economic boycott to force them to raise it.
Well, if all major/medium corporations/businesses get together (on anything) I'm buying stock ice skates, because hell will have just frozen over.
No...you have to have a remotely reasonable MW BUT having it as a 'living wage' is also ridiculous and is not in either the Constitution or the UN Charter.
The problem is that "remotely reasonable" and "living wage" are entirely subjective terms. Some people can live on $15/day, and for some $15/hr won't be nearly enough.
$9.50/hr with yearly increases for inflation seems fair to me.
Awesome, then you should refuse to work for less than that. But other people might have a different number in mind. Any reason yours is better? Any reason government should force your values on others?