Mutually Assured Destruction

[PoliticalChic]

1. The concept is only a factor when both nations are sane.
Russia and the United States.... a U.S. doctrine of reciprocal deterrence resting on the U.S. and Soviet Union each being able to inflict unacceptable ...
But the one embraced by our Muslim President isn't sane. They actually look forward to worldwide conflagration.


First, I'll explain the view, and then show you the latest adherent.



2. Iran: Their foreign policy is aimed at world domination under the leadership of the 12th Imam.

The Hidden Imam, as he is also known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse –


“ The hidden Imam who is expected to return....
....beware of doubting, for to doubt the order of God, the Mighty, the Sublime, is apostasy (Kufr). Ibn Khaldun also states that “ When imprisoned with his mother in the house, he entered a sort of well or pit in the house that his family occupies at Samarrah, Iraq, and there he disappeared, but he is to come forth at the end of the age to fill the earth with justice”.
The Twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (Al-Mahdi-Sahibuz Zaman) (The hidden Imam who is expected to return)


12th Imam
12th Imam



3. "IRANIAN CLERIC EBAD MOHAMMADTABAR: WHEN THE HIDDEN IMAM ARRIVES, THE WHOLE WORLD WILL CONVERT TO ISLAM OR DIE; WE WILL CONFRONT, DEFEAT THE JEWS, ZIONISM
October 07, 2019
Iranian Cleric Ebad Mohammadtabar: When the Hidden Imam Arrives, The Whole World Will Convert to Islam or Die; We Will Confront, Defeat the Jews, Zionism




Any who voted for Hussein should be able to answer this question:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

 

[Moonglow]

This definitely needs to be in conspiracy theory section.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

1. The concept is only a factor when both nations are sane.
Russia and the United States.... a U.S. doctrine of reciprocal deterrence resting on the U.S. and Soviet Union each being able to inflict unacceptable ...
But the one embraced by our Muslim President isn't sane. They actually look forward to worldwide conflagration.


First, I'll explain the view, and then show you the latest adherent.



2. Iran: Their foreign policy is aimed at world domination under the leadership of the 12th Imam.

The Hidden Imam, as he is also known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse –


“ The hidden Imam who is expected to return....
....beware of doubting, for to doubt the order of God, the Mighty, the Sublime, is apostasy (Kufr). Ibn Khaldun also states that “ When imprisoned with his mother in the house, he entered a sort of well or pit in the house that his family occupies at Samarrah, Iraq, and there he disappeared, but he is to come forth at the end of the age to fill the earth with justice”.
The Twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (Al-Mahdi-Sahibuz Zaman) (The hidden Imam who is expected to return)


12th Imam
12th Imam



3. "IRANIAN CLERIC EBAD MOHAMMADTABAR: WHEN THE HIDDEN IMAM ARRIVES, THE WHOLE WORLD WILL CONVERT TO ISLAM OR DIE; WE WILL CONFRONT, DEFEAT THE JEWS, ZIONISM
October 07, 2019
Iranian Cleric Ebad Mohammadtabar: When the Hidden Imam Arrives, The Whole World Will Convert to Islam or Die; We Will Confront, Defeat the Jews, Zionism




Any who voted for Hussein should be able to answer this question:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb.

As for the apartheid state of Israel:

Israel is a military dictatorship that controls via violence and oppression a majority of the people living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, denying them basic human rights because they are not Jewish. The US supports 73% of the world’s dictatorships, so there is nothing at all odd about our support for Israel’s apartheid; we supported South Africa’s as well. And now, Israel is helping us move toward a privatized police state which surveils its own citizenry.

THE U.S. BORDER PATROL AND AN ISRAELI MILITARY CONTRACTOR ARE PUTTING A NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATION UNDER “PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE”

The U.S. Border Patrol and an Israeli Military Contractor Are Putting a Native American Reservation Under “Persistent Surveillance”


Should go nicely with our militarized white nationalist police force and our for profit concentration camps. Our future is quietly being put into place while we quibble over something Bette Midler said or the incessant tweeting of twits? Yeah, we’re truly such an exceptional people ain’t we.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. The concept is only a factor when both nations are sane.
Russia and the United States.... a U.S. doctrine of reciprocal deterrence resting on the U.S. and Soviet Union each being able to inflict unacceptable ...
But the one embraced by our Muslim President isn't sane. They actually look forward to worldwide conflagration.


First, I'll explain the view, and then show you the latest adherent.



2. Iran: Their foreign policy is aimed at world domination under the leadership of the 12th Imam.

The Hidden Imam, as he is also known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse –


“ The hidden Imam who is expected to return....
....beware of doubting, for to doubt the order of God, the Mighty, the Sublime, is apostasy (Kufr). Ibn Khaldun also states that “ When imprisoned with his mother in the house, he entered a sort of well or pit in the house that his family occupies at Samarrah, Iraq, and there he disappeared, but he is to come forth at the end of the age to fill the earth with justice”.
The Twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (Al-Mahdi-Sahibuz Zaman) (The hidden Imam who is expected to return)


12th Imam
12th Imam



3. "IRANIAN CLERIC EBAD MOHAMMADTABAR: WHEN THE HIDDEN IMAM ARRIVES, THE WHOLE WORLD WILL CONVERT TO ISLAM OR DIE; WE WILL CONFRONT, DEFEAT THE JEWS, ZIONISM
October 07, 2019
Iranian Cleric Ebad Mohammadtabar: When the Hidden Imam Arrives, The Whole World Will Convert to Islam or Die; We Will Confront, Defeat the Jews, Zionism




Any who voted for Hussein should be able to answer this question:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb.

As for the apartheid state of Israel:

Israel is a military dictatorship that controls via violence and oppression a majority of the people living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, denying them basic human rights because they are not Jewish. The US supports 73% of the world’s dictatorships, so there is nothing at all odd about our support for Israel’s apartheid; we supported South Africa’s as well. And now, Israel is helping us move toward a privatized police state which surveils its own citizenry.

THE U.S. BORDER PATROL AND AN ISRAELI MILITARY CONTRACTOR ARE PUTTING A NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATION UNDER “PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE”

The U.S. Border Patrol and an Israeli Military Contractor Are Putting a Native American Reservation Under “Persistent Surveillance”


Should go nicely with our militarized white nationalist police force and our for profit concentration camps. Our future is quietly being put into place while we quibble over something Bette Midler said or the incessant tweeting of twits? Yeah, we’re truly such an exceptional people ain’t we.

"I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb."


"We" know no such thing.

That's just the usual 'hate America pap' you picked up in government school.

What we have just learned is that you never read a book in your life.

Luckily, I'm here to give you a few pointers.


Dr. Abbas Milani is he Director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University. His recent book is “The Shah,” is based on ten years studying the archives of the United States and of Britain. The following is from his recent lecture on that subject.


1. The event that has come to define perceptions of U.S. meddling is the coup that ejected the popularly elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, in 1953. Both former secretary of state Madeleine Albright and President Obama have acknowledged America’s role in the coup in speeches that were widely taken to be apologies. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

2. Prior to 1951, Britain controlled Iran’s oil industry. The US foresaw how the one-sided dominance would result in a nationalist uprising, and warned Britain, but they refused to alter the agreements, claiming that they knew how to deal with the ‘natives.’

a. Mossedeq was the nationalist leader of the Iranian Parliament, becoming so via democratic process, and the first thing he did was nationalize the oil industry. Britain wanted to attack Iran, but Truman wouldn’t allow it. Then the Brits tried to get the Shah to use the army to throw Mossadeq out…but the Shah refused to do anything illegal.

3. When the communists attacked Mossadeq, the nationalists, the middle class, the merchants and even a broad swath of clerics—Islamists such as Ayatollah Abolgasem Kashani, a mentor of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—had initially supported Mossadegh.

4. But by November of ’52, try as they may, the US could not make a deal with Mossadeq, who demanded 100% control of oil, which would never be accepted by Britain. The US began to agree with overthrowing the Prime Minister.

a. The power of the communists was increasing in Iran…and the economy suffered a downturn. Both factors caused a loss of popular support for Mossadeq- but due to the loss of support, he felt the need to gravitate toward the communists. This scared off the clergy.

b. Brits and the US began to send in agents provocateurs to act as communists to further cause rifts between the clergy and Mossadeq.

c. As compensation for his support, Ayatollah Kashani began to demand veto rights on legislation, and Islamic laws, and laws against Baha’is. Mossadeq refused, and lost the cleric’s support.

1. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.” http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf The Shah fled to Rome.
2. By August 19th, crowds filled the streets, attacked Mossadeq’s home, and took over the radio station. The question is whether these crowds were simply concerned Iranians, nationalists, communists, as the Shah’s supporters claimed, or paid CIA operatives, and the CIA claims.

a. Professor Milani, using the latest declassified archival documents, suggests two things: a) the crowds were combinations of both, and b) “Although declassified CIA documents confirmed many details of his account, which Roosevelt told with the relish of a John le Carré thriller, his version was exceptionally self-serving. For instance, despite knowing little about Iranian society and speaking no Persian, Roosevelt launched by his own description an instantly potent propaganda campaign. Dwight Eisenhower, president during the 1953 coup, was to characterize Roosevelt’s report as seeming “more like a dime novel.” The CIA claimed more power that it actually had.
http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280




And, of course, everything you said about Israel is equally incorrect.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

1. The concept is only a factor when both nations are sane.
Russia and the United States.... a U.S. doctrine of reciprocal deterrence resting on the U.S. and Soviet Union each being able to inflict unacceptable ...
But the one embraced by our Muslim President isn't sane. They actually look forward to worldwide conflagration.


First, I'll explain the view, and then show you the latest adherent.



2. Iran: Their foreign policy is aimed at world domination under the leadership of the 12th Imam.

The Hidden Imam, as he is also known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse –


“ The hidden Imam who is expected to return....
....beware of doubting, for to doubt the order of God, the Mighty, the Sublime, is apostasy (Kufr). Ibn Khaldun also states that “ When imprisoned with his mother in the house, he entered a sort of well or pit in the house that his family occupies at Samarrah, Iraq, and there he disappeared, but he is to come forth at the end of the age to fill the earth with justice”.
The Twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (Al-Mahdi-Sahibuz Zaman) (The hidden Imam who is expected to return)


12th Imam
12th Imam



3. "IRANIAN CLERIC EBAD MOHAMMADTABAR: WHEN THE HIDDEN IMAM ARRIVES, THE WHOLE WORLD WILL CONVERT TO ISLAM OR DIE; WE WILL CONFRONT, DEFEAT THE JEWS, ZIONISM
October 07, 2019
Iranian Cleric Ebad Mohammadtabar: When the Hidden Imam Arrives, The Whole World Will Convert to Islam or Die; We Will Confront, Defeat the Jews, Zionism




Any who voted for Hussein should be able to answer this question:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb.

As for the apartheid state of Israel:

Israel is a military dictatorship that controls via violence and oppression a majority of the people living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, denying them basic human rights because they are not Jewish. The US supports 73% of the world’s dictatorships, so there is nothing at all odd about our support for Israel’s apartheid; we supported South Africa’s as well. And now, Israel is helping us move toward a privatized police state which surveils its own citizenry.

THE U.S. BORDER PATROL AND AN ISRAELI MILITARY CONTRACTOR ARE PUTTING A NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATION UNDER “PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE”

The U.S. Border Patrol and an Israeli Military Contractor Are Putting a Native American Reservation Under “Persistent Surveillance”


Should go nicely with our militarized white nationalist police force and our for profit concentration camps. Our future is quietly being put into place while we quibble over something Bette Midler said or the incessant tweeting of twits? Yeah, we’re truly such an exceptional people ain’t we.

"I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb."


"We" know no such thing.

That's just the usual 'hate America pap' you picked up in government school.

What we have just learned is that you never read a book in your life.

Luckily, I'm here to give you a few pointers.


Dr. Abbas Milani is he Director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University. His recent book is “The Shah,” is based on ten years studying the archives of the United States and of Britain. The following is from his recent lecture on that subject.


1. The event that has come to define perceptions of U.S. meddling is the coup that ejected the popularly elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, in 1953. Both former secretary of state Madeleine Albright and President Obama have acknowledged America’s role in the coup in speeches that were widely taken to be apologies. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

2. Prior to 1951, Britain controlled Iran’s oil industry. The US foresaw how the one-sided dominance would result in a nationalist uprising, and warned Britain, but they refused to alter the agreements, claiming that they knew how to deal with the ‘natives.’

a. Mossedeq was the nationalist leader of the Iranian Parliament, becoming so via democratic process, and the first thing he did was nationalize the oil industry. Britain wanted to attack Iran, but Truman wouldn’t allow it. Then the Brits tried to get the Shah to use the army to throw Mossadeq out…but the Shah refused to do anything illegal.

3. When the communists attacked Mossadeq, the nationalists, the middle class, the merchants and even a broad swath of clerics—Islamists such as Ayatollah Abolgasem Kashani, a mentor of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—had initially supported Mossadegh.

4. But by November of ’52, try as they may, the US could not make a deal with Mossadeq, who demanded 100% control of oil, which would never be accepted by Britain. The US began to agree with overthrowing the Prime Minister.

a. The power of the communists was increasing in Iran…and the economy suffered a downturn. Both factors caused a loss of popular support for Mossadeq- but due to the loss of support, he felt the need to gravitate toward the communists. This scared off the clergy.

b. Brits and the US began to send in agents provocateurs to act as communists to further cause rifts between the clergy and Mossadeq.

c. As compensation for his support, Ayatollah Kashani began to demand veto rights on legislation, and Islamic laws, and laws against Baha’is. Mossadeq refused, and lost the cleric’s support.

1. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.” http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf The Shah fled to Rome.
2. By August 19th, crowds filled the streets, attacked Mossadeq’s home, and took over the radio station. The question is whether these crowds were simply concerned Iranians, nationalists, communists, as the Shah’s supporters claimed, or paid CIA operatives, and the CIA claims.

a. Professor Milani, using the latest declassified archival documents, suggests two things: a) the crowds were combinations of both, and b) “Although declassified CIA documents confirmed many details of his account, which Roosevelt told with the relish of a John le Carré thriller, his version was exceptionally self-serving. For instance, despite knowing little about Iranian society and speaking no Persian, Roosevelt launched by his own description an instantly potent propaganda campaign. Dwight Eisenhower, president during the 1953 coup, was to characterize Roosevelt’s report as seeming “more like a dime novel.” The CIA claimed more power that it actually had. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

A matter of historical fact love, I shant support your nonsense or "alternative facts". Cheers.

CIA-assisted coup overthrows government of Iran
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/cia-assisted-coup-overthrows-government-of-iran

Can't imagine why we might have trouble with them as a result. Why, fweedumb loving americans would welcome interventions here.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. The concept is only a factor when both nations are sane.
Russia and the United States.... a U.S. doctrine of reciprocal deterrence resting on the U.S. and Soviet Union each being able to inflict unacceptable ...
But the one embraced by our Muslim President isn't sane. They actually look forward to worldwide conflagration.


First, I'll explain the view, and then show you the latest adherent.



2. Iran: Their foreign policy is aimed at world domination under the leadership of the 12th Imam.

The Hidden Imam, as he is also known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse –


“ The hidden Imam who is expected to return....
....beware of doubting, for to doubt the order of God, the Mighty, the Sublime, is apostasy (Kufr). Ibn Khaldun also states that “ When imprisoned with his mother in the house, he entered a sort of well or pit in the house that his family occupies at Samarrah, Iraq, and there he disappeared, but he is to come forth at the end of the age to fill the earth with justice”.
The Twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (Al-Mahdi-Sahibuz Zaman) (The hidden Imam who is expected to return)


12th Imam
12th Imam



3. "IRANIAN CLERIC EBAD MOHAMMADTABAR: WHEN THE HIDDEN IMAM ARRIVES, THE WHOLE WORLD WILL CONVERT TO ISLAM OR DIE; WE WILL CONFRONT, DEFEAT THE JEWS, ZIONISM
October 07, 2019
Iranian Cleric Ebad Mohammadtabar: When the Hidden Imam Arrives, The Whole World Will Convert to Islam or Die; We Will Confront, Defeat the Jews, Zionism




Any who voted for Hussein should be able to answer this question:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb.

As for the apartheid state of Israel:

Israel is a military dictatorship that controls via violence and oppression a majority of the people living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, denying them basic human rights because they are not Jewish. The US supports 73% of the world’s dictatorships, so there is nothing at all odd about our support for Israel’s apartheid; we supported South Africa’s as well. And now, Israel is helping us move toward a privatized police state which surveils its own citizenry.

THE U.S. BORDER PATROL AND AN ISRAELI MILITARY CONTRACTOR ARE PUTTING A NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATION UNDER “PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE”

The U.S. Border Patrol and an Israeli Military Contractor Are Putting a Native American Reservation Under “Persistent Surveillance”


Should go nicely with our militarized white nationalist police force and our for profit concentration camps. Our future is quietly being put into place while we quibble over something Bette Midler said or the incessant tweeting of twits? Yeah, we’re truly such an exceptional people ain’t we.

"I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb."


"We" know no such thing.

That's just the usual 'hate America pap' you picked up in government school.

What we have just learned is that you never read a book in your life.

Luckily, I'm here to give you a few pointers.


Dr. Abbas Milani is he Director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University. His recent book is “The Shah,” is based on ten years studying the archives of the United States and of Britain. The following is from his recent lecture on that subject.


1. The event that has come to define perceptions of U.S. meddling is the coup that ejected the popularly elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, in 1953. Both former secretary of state Madeleine Albright and President Obama have acknowledged America’s role in the coup in speeches that were widely taken to be apologies. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

2. Prior to 1951, Britain controlled Iran’s oil industry. The US foresaw how the one-sided dominance would result in a nationalist uprising, and warned Britain, but they refused to alter the agreements, claiming that they knew how to deal with the ‘natives.’

a. Mossedeq was the nationalist leader of the Iranian Parliament, becoming so via democratic process, and the first thing he did was nationalize the oil industry. Britain wanted to attack Iran, but Truman wouldn’t allow it. Then the Brits tried to get the Shah to use the army to throw Mossadeq out…but the Shah refused to do anything illegal.

3. When the communists attacked Mossadeq, the nationalists, the middle class, the merchants and even a broad swath of clerics—Islamists such as Ayatollah Abolgasem Kashani, a mentor of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—had initially supported Mossadegh.

4. But by November of ’52, try as they may, the US could not make a deal with Mossadeq, who demanded 100% control of oil, which would never be accepted by Britain. The US began to agree with overthrowing the Prime Minister.

a. The power of the communists was increasing in Iran…and the economy suffered a downturn. Both factors caused a loss of popular support for Mossadeq- but due to the loss of support, he felt the need to gravitate toward the communists. This scared off the clergy.

b. Brits and the US began to send in agents provocateurs to act as communists to further cause rifts between the clergy and Mossadeq.

c. As compensation for his support, Ayatollah Kashani began to demand veto rights on legislation, and Islamic laws, and laws against Baha’is. Mossadeq refused, and lost the cleric’s support.

1. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.” http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf The Shah fled to Rome.
2. By August 19th, crowds filled the streets, attacked Mossadeq’s home, and took over the radio station. The question is whether these crowds were simply concerned Iranians, nationalists, communists, as the Shah’s supporters claimed, or paid CIA operatives, and the CIA claims.

a. Professor Milani, using the latest declassified archival documents, suggests two things: a) the crowds were combinations of both, and b) “Although declassified CIA documents confirmed many details of his account, which Roosevelt told with the relish of a John le Carré thriller, his version was exceptionally self-serving. For instance, despite knowing little about Iranian society and speaking no Persian, Roosevelt launched by his own description an instantly potent propaganda campaign. Dwight Eisenhower, president during the 1953 coup, was to characterize Roosevelt’s report as seeming “more like a dime novel.” The CIA claimed more power that it actually had. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

A matter of historical fact love, I shant support your nonsense or "alternative facts". Cheers.

CIA-assisted coup overthrows government of Iran
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/cia-assisted-coup-overthrows-government-of-iran

Can't imagine why we might have trouble with them as a result. Why, fweedumb loving americans would welcome interventions here.

"A matter of historical fact ...."

As I just explained....and proved.....it is no such thing.


Dunces....raise your paw.....drool at the idea of America being the villain.



America has no future as long as the Left controls the schools and the media....and turn out fools like this one.

 

[Moonglow]

1. The concept is only a factor when both nations are sane.
Russia and the United States.... a U.S. doctrine of reciprocal deterrence resting on the U.S. and Soviet Union each being able to inflict unacceptable ...
But the one embraced by our Muslim President isn't sane. They actually look forward to worldwide conflagration.


First, I'll explain the view, and then show you the latest adherent.



2. Iran: Their foreign policy is aimed at world domination under the leadership of the 12th Imam.

The Hidden Imam, as he is also known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse –


“ The hidden Imam who is expected to return....
....beware of doubting, for to doubt the order of God, the Mighty, the Sublime, is apostasy (Kufr). Ibn Khaldun also states that “ When imprisoned with his mother in the house, he entered a sort of well or pit in the house that his family occupies at Samarrah, Iraq, and there he disappeared, but he is to come forth at the end of the age to fill the earth with justice”.
The Twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (Al-Mahdi-Sahibuz Zaman) (The hidden Imam who is expected to return)


12th Imam
12th Imam



3. "IRANIAN CLERIC EBAD MOHAMMADTABAR: WHEN THE HIDDEN IMAM ARRIVES, THE WHOLE WORLD WILL CONVERT TO ISLAM OR DIE; WE WILL CONFRONT, DEFEAT THE JEWS, ZIONISM
October 07, 2019
Iranian Cleric Ebad Mohammadtabar: When the Hidden Imam Arrives, The Whole World Will Convert to Islam or Die; We Will Confront, Defeat the Jews, Zionism




Any who voted for Hussein should be able to answer this question:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb.

As for the apartheid state of Israel:

Israel is a military dictatorship that controls via violence and oppression a majority of the people living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, denying them basic human rights because they are not Jewish. The US supports 73% of the world’s dictatorships, so there is nothing at all odd about our support for Israel’s apartheid; we supported South Africa’s as well. And now, Israel is helping us move toward a privatized police state which surveils its own citizenry.

THE U.S. BORDER PATROL AND AN ISRAELI MILITARY CONTRACTOR ARE PUTTING A NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATION UNDER “PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE”

The U.S. Border Patrol and an Israeli Military Contractor Are Putting a Native American Reservation Under “Persistent Surveillance”


Should go nicely with our militarized white nationalist police force and our for profit concentration camps. Our future is quietly being put into place while we quibble over something Bette Midler said or the incessant tweeting of twits? Yeah, we’re truly such an exceptional people ain’t we.

"I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb."


"We" know no such thing.

That's just the usual 'hate America pap' you picked up in government school.

What we have just learned is that you never read a book in your life.

Luckily, I'm here to give you a few pointers.


Dr. Abbas Milani is he Director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University. His recent book is “The Shah,” is based on ten years studying the archives of the United States and of Britain. The following is from his recent lecture on that subject.


1. The event that has come to define perceptions of U.S. meddling is the coup that ejected the popularly elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, in 1953. Both former secretary of state Madeleine Albright and President Obama have acknowledged America’s role in the coup in speeches that were widely taken to be apologies. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

2. Prior to 1951, Britain controlled Iran’s oil industry. The US foresaw how the one-sided dominance would result in a nationalist uprising, and warned Britain, but they refused to alter the agreements, claiming that they knew how to deal with the ‘natives.’

a. Mossedeq was the nationalist leader of the Iranian Parliament, becoming so via democratic process, and the first thing he did was nationalize the oil industry. Britain wanted to attack Iran, but Truman wouldn’t allow it. Then the Brits tried to get the Shah to use the army to throw Mossadeq out…but the Shah refused to do anything illegal.

3. When the communists attacked Mossadeq, the nationalists, the middle class, the merchants and even a broad swath of clerics—Islamists such as Ayatollah Abolgasem Kashani, a mentor of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—had initially supported Mossadegh.

4. But by November of ’52, try as they may, the US could not make a deal with Mossadeq, who demanded 100% control of oil, which would never be accepted by Britain. The US began to agree with overthrowing the Prime Minister.

a. The power of the communists was increasing in Iran…and the economy suffered a downturn. Both factors caused a loss of popular support for Mossadeq- but due to the loss of support, he felt the need to gravitate toward the communists. This scared off the clergy.

b. Brits and the US began to send in agents provocateurs to act as communists to further cause rifts between the clergy and Mossadeq.

c. As compensation for his support, Ayatollah Kashani began to demand veto rights on legislation, and Islamic laws, and laws against Baha’is. Mossadeq refused, and lost the cleric’s support.

1. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.” http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf The Shah fled to Rome.
2. By August 19th, crowds filled the streets, attacked Mossadeq’s home, and took over the radio station. The question is whether these crowds were simply concerned Iranians, nationalists, communists, as the Shah’s supporters claimed, or paid CIA operatives, and the CIA claims.

a. Professor Milani, using the latest declassified archival documents, suggests two things: a) the crowds were combinations of both, and b) “Although declassified CIA documents confirmed many details of his account, which Roosevelt told with the relish of a John le Carré thriller, his version was exceptionally self-serving. For instance, despite knowing little about Iranian society and speaking no Persian, Roosevelt launched by his own description an instantly potent propaganda campaign. Dwight Eisenhower, president during the 1953 coup, was to characterize Roosevelt’s report as seeming “more like a dime novel.” The CIA claimed more power that it actually had. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

A matter of historical fact love, I shant support your nonsense or "alternative facts". Cheers.

CIA-assisted coup overthrows government of Iran
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/cia-assisted-coup-overthrows-government-of-iran

Can't imagine why we might have trouble with them as a result. Why, fweedumb loving americans would welcome interventions here.

The fantasy life of the OP doesn't allow reality what being a fifth columnist Asian plant. Rhetorical propaganda is her tête-à-tête bon mot moment...
The shah blew off the promises of more social mobility and income increases from the reforms he instilled and the Iranians were tired of their slave masters from the West.
..

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

1. The concept is only a factor when both nations are sane.
Russia and the United States.... a U.S. doctrine of reciprocal deterrence resting on the U.S. and Soviet Union each being able to inflict unacceptable ...
But the one embraced by our Muslim President isn't sane. They actually look forward to worldwide conflagration.


First, I'll explain the view, and then show you the latest adherent.



2. Iran: Their foreign policy is aimed at world domination under the leadership of the 12th Imam.

The Hidden Imam, as he is also known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse –


“ The hidden Imam who is expected to return....
....beware of doubting, for to doubt the order of God, the Mighty, the Sublime, is apostasy (Kufr). Ibn Khaldun also states that “ When imprisoned with his mother in the house, he entered a sort of well or pit in the house that his family occupies at Samarrah, Iraq, and there he disappeared, but he is to come forth at the end of the age to fill the earth with justice”.
The Twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (Al-Mahdi-Sahibuz Zaman) (The hidden Imam who is expected to return)


12th Imam
12th Imam



3. "IRANIAN CLERIC EBAD MOHAMMADTABAR: WHEN THE HIDDEN IMAM ARRIVES, THE WHOLE WORLD WILL CONVERT TO ISLAM OR DIE; WE WILL CONFRONT, DEFEAT THE JEWS, ZIONISM
October 07, 2019
Iranian Cleric Ebad Mohammadtabar: When the Hidden Imam Arrives, The Whole World Will Convert to Islam or Die; We Will Confront, Defeat the Jews, Zionism




Any who voted for Hussein should be able to answer this question:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb.

As for the apartheid state of Israel:

Israel is a military dictatorship that controls via violence and oppression a majority of the people living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, denying them basic human rights because they are not Jewish. The US supports 73% of the world’s dictatorships, so there is nothing at all odd about our support for Israel’s apartheid; we supported South Africa’s as well. And now, Israel is helping us move toward a privatized police state which surveils its own citizenry.

THE U.S. BORDER PATROL AND AN ISRAELI MILITARY CONTRACTOR ARE PUTTING A NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATION UNDER “PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE”

The U.S. Border Patrol and an Israeli Military Contractor Are Putting a Native American Reservation Under “Persistent Surveillance”


Should go nicely with our militarized white nationalist police force and our for profit concentration camps. Our future is quietly being put into place while we quibble over something Bette Midler said or the incessant tweeting of twits? Yeah, we’re truly such an exceptional people ain’t we.

"I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb."


"We" know no such thing.

That's just the usual 'hate America pap' you picked up in government school.

What we have just learned is that you never read a book in your life.

Luckily, I'm here to give you a few pointers.


Dr. Abbas Milani is he Director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University. His recent book is “The Shah,” is based on ten years studying the archives of the United States and of Britain. The following is from his recent lecture on that subject.


1. The event that has come to define perceptions of U.S. meddling is the coup that ejected the popularly elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, in 1953. Both former secretary of state Madeleine Albright and President Obama have acknowledged America’s role in the coup in speeches that were widely taken to be apologies. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

2. Prior to 1951, Britain controlled Iran’s oil industry. The US foresaw how the one-sided dominance would result in a nationalist uprising, and warned Britain, but they refused to alter the agreements, claiming that they knew how to deal with the ‘natives.’

a. Mossedeq was the nationalist leader of the Iranian Parliament, becoming so via democratic process, and the first thing he did was nationalize the oil industry. Britain wanted to attack Iran, but Truman wouldn’t allow it. Then the Brits tried to get the Shah to use the army to throw Mossadeq out…but the Shah refused to do anything illegal.

3. When the communists attacked Mossadeq, the nationalists, the middle class, the merchants and even a broad swath of clerics—Islamists such as Ayatollah Abolgasem Kashani, a mentor of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—had initially supported Mossadegh.

4. But by November of ’52, try as they may, the US could not make a deal with Mossadeq, who demanded 100% control of oil, which would never be accepted by Britain. The US began to agree with overthrowing the Prime Minister.

a. The power of the communists was increasing in Iran…and the economy suffered a downturn. Both factors caused a loss of popular support for Mossadeq- but due to the loss of support, he felt the need to gravitate toward the communists. This scared off the clergy.

b. Brits and the US began to send in agents provocateurs to act as communists to further cause rifts between the clergy and Mossadeq.

c. As compensation for his support, Ayatollah Kashani began to demand veto rights on legislation, and Islamic laws, and laws against Baha’is. Mossadeq refused, and lost the cleric’s support.

1. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.” http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf The Shah fled to Rome.
2. By August 19th, crowds filled the streets, attacked Mossadeq’s home, and took over the radio station. The question is whether these crowds were simply concerned Iranians, nationalists, communists, as the Shah’s supporters claimed, or paid CIA operatives, and the CIA claims.

a. Professor Milani, using the latest declassified archival documents, suggests two things: a) the crowds were combinations of both, and b) “Although declassified CIA documents confirmed many details of his account, which Roosevelt told with the relish of a John le Carré thriller, his version was exceptionally self-serving. For instance, despite knowing little about Iranian society and speaking no Persian, Roosevelt launched by his own description an instantly potent propaganda campaign. Dwight Eisenhower, president during the 1953 coup, was to characterize Roosevelt’s report as seeming “more like a dime novel.” The CIA claimed more power that it actually had. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

A matter of historical fact love, I shant support your nonsense or "alternative facts". Cheers.

CIA-assisted coup overthrows government of Iran
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/cia-assisted-coup-overthrows-government-of-iran

Can't imagine why we might have trouble with them as a result. Why, fweedumb loving americans would welcome interventions here.

"A matter of historical fact ...."

As I just explained....and proved.....it is no such thing.


Dunces....raise your paw.....drool at the idea of America being the villain.



America has no future as long as the Left controls the schools and the media....and turn out fools like this one.

It happened, we did it, the entire world witnessed it. We pulled a coup in Honduras in 2009 as well, which has contributed to migration out of that country and we just attempted, rather fecklessly, yet again, to put a handpicked stooge in place of who Venezuelan's chose. This sort of thing is simply what we do.

If you find the behavior villainous, I think we've made some progress today here.

 

[Moonglow]

1. The concept is only a factor when both nations are sane.
Russia and the United States.... a U.S. doctrine of reciprocal deterrence resting on the U.S. and Soviet Union each being able to inflict unacceptable ...
But the one embraced by our Muslim President isn't sane. They actually look forward to worldwide conflagration.


First, I'll explain the view, and then show you the latest adherent.



2. Iran: Their foreign policy is aimed at world domination under the leadership of the 12th Imam.

The Hidden Imam, as he is also known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse –


“ The hidden Imam who is expected to return....
....beware of doubting, for to doubt the order of God, the Mighty, the Sublime, is apostasy (Kufr). Ibn Khaldun also states that “ When imprisoned with his mother in the house, he entered a sort of well or pit in the house that his family occupies at Samarrah, Iraq, and there he disappeared, but he is to come forth at the end of the age to fill the earth with justice”.
The Twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (Al-Mahdi-Sahibuz Zaman) (The hidden Imam who is expected to return)


12th Imam
12th Imam



3. "IRANIAN CLERIC EBAD MOHAMMADTABAR: WHEN THE HIDDEN IMAM ARRIVES, THE WHOLE WORLD WILL CONVERT TO ISLAM OR DIE; WE WILL CONFRONT, DEFEAT THE JEWS, ZIONISM
October 07, 2019
Iranian Cleric Ebad Mohammadtabar: When the Hidden Imam Arrives, The Whole World Will Convert to Islam or Die; We Will Confront, Defeat the Jews, Zionism




Any who voted for Hussein should be able to answer this question:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb.

As for the apartheid state of Israel:

Israel is a military dictatorship that controls via violence and oppression a majority of the people living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, denying them basic human rights because they are not Jewish. The US supports 73% of the world’s dictatorships, so there is nothing at all odd about our support for Israel’s apartheid; we supported South Africa’s as well. And now, Israel is helping us move toward a privatized police state which surveils its own citizenry.

THE U.S. BORDER PATROL AND AN ISRAELI MILITARY CONTRACTOR ARE PUTTING A NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATION UNDER “PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE”

The U.S. Border Patrol and an Israeli Military Contractor Are Putting a Native American Reservation Under “Persistent Surveillance”


Should go nicely with our militarized white nationalist police force and our for profit concentration camps. Our future is quietly being put into place while we quibble over something Bette Midler said or the incessant tweeting of twits? Yeah, we’re truly such an exceptional people ain’t we.

"I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb."


"We" know no such thing.

That's just the usual 'hate America pap' you picked up in government school.

What we have just learned is that you never read a book in your life.

Luckily, I'm here to give you a few pointers.


Dr. Abbas Milani is he Director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University. His recent book is “The Shah,” is based on ten years studying the archives of the United States and of Britain. The following is from his recent lecture on that subject.


1. The event that has come to define perceptions of U.S. meddling is the coup that ejected the popularly elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, in 1953. Both former secretary of state Madeleine Albright and President Obama have acknowledged America’s role in the coup in speeches that were widely taken to be apologies. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

2. Prior to 1951, Britain controlled Iran’s oil industry. The US foresaw how the one-sided dominance would result in a nationalist uprising, and warned Britain, but they refused to alter the agreements, claiming that they knew how to deal with the ‘natives.’

a. Mossedeq was the nationalist leader of the Iranian Parliament, becoming so via democratic process, and the first thing he did was nationalize the oil industry. Britain wanted to attack Iran, but Truman wouldn’t allow it. Then the Brits tried to get the Shah to use the army to throw Mossadeq out…but the Shah refused to do anything illegal.

3. When the communists attacked Mossadeq, the nationalists, the middle class, the merchants and even a broad swath of clerics—Islamists such as Ayatollah Abolgasem Kashani, a mentor of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—had initially supported Mossadegh.

4. But by November of ’52, try as they may, the US could not make a deal with Mossadeq, who demanded 100% control of oil, which would never be accepted by Britain. The US began to agree with overthrowing the Prime Minister.

a. The power of the communists was increasing in Iran…and the economy suffered a downturn. Both factors caused a loss of popular support for Mossadeq- but due to the loss of support, he felt the need to gravitate toward the communists. This scared off the clergy.

b. Brits and the US began to send in agents provocateurs to act as communists to further cause rifts between the clergy and Mossadeq.

c. As compensation for his support, Ayatollah Kashani began to demand veto rights on legislation, and Islamic laws, and laws against Baha’is. Mossadeq refused, and lost the cleric’s support.

1. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.” http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf The Shah fled to Rome.
2. By August 19th, crowds filled the streets, attacked Mossadeq’s home, and took over the radio station. The question is whether these crowds were simply concerned Iranians, nationalists, communists, as the Shah’s supporters claimed, or paid CIA operatives, and the CIA claims.

a. Professor Milani, using the latest declassified archival documents, suggests two things: a) the crowds were combinations of both, and b) “Although declassified CIA documents confirmed many details of his account, which Roosevelt told with the relish of a John le Carré thriller, his version was exceptionally self-serving. For instance, despite knowing little about Iranian society and speaking no Persian, Roosevelt launched by his own description an instantly potent propaganda campaign. Dwight Eisenhower, president during the 1953 coup, was to characterize Roosevelt’s report as seeming “more like a dime novel.” The CIA claimed more power that it actually had. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

A matter of historical fact love, I shant support your nonsense or "alternative facts". Cheers.

CIA-assisted coup overthrows government of Iran
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/cia-assisted-coup-overthrows-government-of-iran

Can't imagine why we might have trouble with them as a result. Why, fweedumb loving americans would welcome interventions here.

"A matter of historical fact ...."

As I just explained....and proved.....it is no such thing.


Dunces....raise your paw.....drool at the idea of America being the villain.



America has no future as long as the Left controls the schools and the media....and turn out fools like this one.

Tha ivy league school you claim to be a graduate from is also ran by so called leftist, of which you have never proven.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. The concept is only a factor when both nations are sane.
Russia and the United States.... a U.S. doctrine of reciprocal deterrence resting on the U.S. and Soviet Union each being able to inflict unacceptable ...
But the one embraced by our Muslim President isn't sane. They actually look forward to worldwide conflagration.


First, I'll explain the view, and then show you the latest adherent.



2. Iran: Their foreign policy is aimed at world domination under the leadership of the 12th Imam.

The Hidden Imam, as he is also known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse –


“ The hidden Imam who is expected to return....
....beware of doubting, for to doubt the order of God, the Mighty, the Sublime, is apostasy (Kufr). Ibn Khaldun also states that “ When imprisoned with his mother in the house, he entered a sort of well or pit in the house that his family occupies at Samarrah, Iraq, and there he disappeared, but he is to come forth at the end of the age to fill the earth with justice”.
The Twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (Al-Mahdi-Sahibuz Zaman) (The hidden Imam who is expected to return)


12th Imam
12th Imam



3. "IRANIAN CLERIC EBAD MOHAMMADTABAR: WHEN THE HIDDEN IMAM ARRIVES, THE WHOLE WORLD WILL CONVERT TO ISLAM OR DIE; WE WILL CONFRONT, DEFEAT THE JEWS, ZIONISM
October 07, 2019
Iranian Cleric Ebad Mohammadtabar: When the Hidden Imam Arrives, The Whole World Will Convert to Islam or Die; We Will Confront, Defeat the Jews, Zionism




Any who voted for Hussein should be able to answer this question:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb.

As for the apartheid state of Israel:

Israel is a military dictatorship that controls via violence and oppression a majority of the people living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, denying them basic human rights because they are not Jewish. The US supports 73% of the world’s dictatorships, so there is nothing at all odd about our support for Israel’s apartheid; we supported South Africa’s as well. And now, Israel is helping us move toward a privatized police state which surveils its own citizenry.

THE U.S. BORDER PATROL AND AN ISRAELI MILITARY CONTRACTOR ARE PUTTING A NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATION UNDER “PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE”

The U.S. Border Patrol and an Israeli Military Contractor Are Putting a Native American Reservation Under “Persistent Surveillance”


Should go nicely with our militarized white nationalist police force and our for profit concentration camps. Our future is quietly being put into place while we quibble over something Bette Midler said or the incessant tweeting of twits? Yeah, we’re truly such an exceptional people ain’t we.

"I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb."


"We" know no such thing.

That's just the usual 'hate America pap' you picked up in government school.

What we have just learned is that you never read a book in your life.

Luckily, I'm here to give you a few pointers.


Dr. Abbas Milani is he Director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University. His recent book is “The Shah,” is based on ten years studying the archives of the United States and of Britain. The following is from his recent lecture on that subject.


1. The event that has come to define perceptions of U.S. meddling is the coup that ejected the popularly elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, in 1953. Both former secretary of state Madeleine Albright and President Obama have acknowledged America’s role in the coup in speeches that were widely taken to be apologies. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

2. Prior to 1951, Britain controlled Iran’s oil industry. The US foresaw how the one-sided dominance would result in a nationalist uprising, and warned Britain, but they refused to alter the agreements, claiming that they knew how to deal with the ‘natives.’

a. Mossedeq was the nationalist leader of the Iranian Parliament, becoming so via democratic process, and the first thing he did was nationalize the oil industry. Britain wanted to attack Iran, but Truman wouldn’t allow it. Then the Brits tried to get the Shah to use the army to throw Mossadeq out…but the Shah refused to do anything illegal.

3. When the communists attacked Mossadeq, the nationalists, the middle class, the merchants and even a broad swath of clerics—Islamists such as Ayatollah Abolgasem Kashani, a mentor of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—had initially supported Mossadegh.

4. But by November of ’52, try as they may, the US could not make a deal with Mossadeq, who demanded 100% control of oil, which would never be accepted by Britain. The US began to agree with overthrowing the Prime Minister.

a. The power of the communists was increasing in Iran…and the economy suffered a downturn. Both factors caused a loss of popular support for Mossadeq- but due to the loss of support, he felt the need to gravitate toward the communists. This scared off the clergy.

b. Brits and the US began to send in agents provocateurs to act as communists to further cause rifts between the clergy and Mossadeq.

c. As compensation for his support, Ayatollah Kashani began to demand veto rights on legislation, and Islamic laws, and laws against Baha’is. Mossadeq refused, and lost the cleric’s support.

1. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.” http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf The Shah fled to Rome.
2. By August 19th, crowds filled the streets, attacked Mossadeq’s home, and took over the radio station. The question is whether these crowds were simply concerned Iranians, nationalists, communists, as the Shah’s supporters claimed, or paid CIA operatives, and the CIA claims.

a. Professor Milani, using the latest declassified archival documents, suggests two things: a) the crowds were combinations of both, and b) “Although declassified CIA documents confirmed many details of his account, which Roosevelt told with the relish of a John le Carré thriller, his version was exceptionally self-serving. For instance, despite knowing little about Iranian society and speaking no Persian, Roosevelt launched by his own description an instantly potent propaganda campaign. Dwight Eisenhower, president during the 1953 coup, was to characterize Roosevelt’s report as seeming “more like a dime novel.” The CIA claimed more power that it actually had. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

A matter of historical fact love, I shant support your nonsense or "alternative facts". Cheers.

CIA-assisted coup overthrows government of Iran
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/cia-assisted-coup-overthrows-government-of-iran

Can't imagine why we might have trouble with them as a result. Why, fweedumb loving americans would welcome interventions here.

"A matter of historical fact ...."

As I just explained....and proved.....it is no such thing.


Dunces....raise your paw.....drool at the idea of America being the villain.



America has no future as long as the Left controls the schools and the media....and turn out fools like this one.

It happened, we did it, the entire world witnessed it. We pulled a coup in Honduras in 2009 which has contributed to migration out of that country and we just attempted, rather fecklessly, yet again, to put our stooge in place of who Venezuelans chose. This sort of thing is simply what we do.

If you find the behavior villainous, I think we've made some progress today here.

And the usual Liberal response to a linked, documented, sourced exposure of your stupidity: "Is not, issssssss nooootttttttttt!!!!"


Drop back when you gain an education, dunce.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb.

As for the apartheid state of Israel:

Israel is a military dictatorship that controls via violence and oppression a majority of the people living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, denying them basic human rights because they are not Jewish. The US supports 73% of the world’s dictatorships, so there is nothing at all odd about our support for Israel’s apartheid; we supported South Africa’s as well. And now, Israel is helping us move toward a privatized police state which surveils its own citizenry.

THE U.S. BORDER PATROL AND AN ISRAELI MILITARY CONTRACTOR ARE PUTTING A NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATION UNDER “PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE”

The U.S. Border Patrol and an Israeli Military Contractor Are Putting a Native American Reservation Under “Persistent Surveillance”


Should go nicely with our militarized white nationalist police force and our for profit concentration camps. Our future is quietly being put into place while we quibble over something Bette Midler said or the incessant tweeting of twits? Yeah, we’re truly such an exceptional people ain’t we.

"I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb."


"We" know no such thing.

That's just the usual 'hate America pap' you picked up in government school.

What we have just learned is that you never read a book in your life.

Luckily, I'm here to give you a few pointers.


Dr. Abbas Milani is he Director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University. His recent book is “The Shah,” is based on ten years studying the archives of the United States and of Britain. The following is from his recent lecture on that subject.


1. The event that has come to define perceptions of U.S. meddling is the coup that ejected the popularly elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, in 1953. Both former secretary of state Madeleine Albright and President Obama have acknowledged America’s role in the coup in speeches that were widely taken to be apologies. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

2. Prior to 1951, Britain controlled Iran’s oil industry. The US foresaw how the one-sided dominance would result in a nationalist uprising, and warned Britain, but they refused to alter the agreements, claiming that they knew how to deal with the ‘natives.’

a. Mossedeq was the nationalist leader of the Iranian Parliament, becoming so via democratic process, and the first thing he did was nationalize the oil industry. Britain wanted to attack Iran, but Truman wouldn’t allow it. Then the Brits tried to get the Shah to use the army to throw Mossadeq out…but the Shah refused to do anything illegal.

3. When the communists attacked Mossadeq, the nationalists, the middle class, the merchants and even a broad swath of clerics—Islamists such as Ayatollah Abolgasem Kashani, a mentor of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—had initially supported Mossadegh.

4. But by November of ’52, try as they may, the US could not make a deal with Mossadeq, who demanded 100% control of oil, which would never be accepted by Britain. The US began to agree with overthrowing the Prime Minister.

a. The power of the communists was increasing in Iran…and the economy suffered a downturn. Both factors caused a loss of popular support for Mossadeq- but due to the loss of support, he felt the need to gravitate toward the communists. This scared off the clergy.

b. Brits and the US began to send in agents provocateurs to act as communists to further cause rifts between the clergy and Mossadeq.

c. As compensation for his support, Ayatollah Kashani began to demand veto rights on legislation, and Islamic laws, and laws against Baha’is. Mossadeq refused, and lost the cleric’s support.

1. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.” http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf The Shah fled to Rome.
2. By August 19th, crowds filled the streets, attacked Mossadeq’s home, and took over the radio station. The question is whether these crowds were simply concerned Iranians, nationalists, communists, as the Shah’s supporters claimed, or paid CIA operatives, and the CIA claims.

a. Professor Milani, using the latest declassified archival documents, suggests two things: a) the crowds were combinations of both, and b) “Although declassified CIA documents confirmed many details of his account, which Roosevelt told with the relish of a John le Carré thriller, his version was exceptionally self-serving. For instance, despite knowing little about Iranian society and speaking no Persian, Roosevelt launched by his own description an instantly potent propaganda campaign. Dwight Eisenhower, president during the 1953 coup, was to characterize Roosevelt’s report as seeming “more like a dime novel.” The CIA claimed more power that it actually had. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

A matter of historical fact love, I shant support your nonsense or "alternative facts". Cheers.

CIA-assisted coup overthrows government of Iran
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/cia-assisted-coup-overthrows-government-of-iran

Can't imagine why we might have trouble with them as a result. Why, fweedumb loving americans would welcome interventions here.

"A matter of historical fact ...."

As I just explained....and proved.....it is no such thing.


Dunces....raise your paw.....drool at the idea of America being the villain.



America has no future as long as the Left controls the schools and the media....and turn out fools like this one.

It happened, we did it, the entire world witnessed it. We pulled a coup in Honduras in 2009 which has contributed to migration out of that country and we just attempted, rather fecklessly, yet again, to put our stooge in place of who Venezuelans chose. This sort of thing is simply what we do.

If you find the behavior villainous, I think we've made some progress today here.

And the usual Liberal response to a linked, documented, sourced exposure of your stupidity: "Is not, issssssss nooootttttttttt!!!!"


Drop back when you gain an education, dunce.

You do not handle non-agreement well do you love.

Already reduced to flinging the labels you were taught to hiss.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

1. The concept is only a factor when both nations are sane.
Russia and the United States.... a U.S. doctrine of reciprocal deterrence resting on the U.S. and Soviet Union each being able to inflict unacceptable ...
But the one embraced by our Muslim President isn't sane. They actually look forward to worldwide conflagration.


First, I'll explain the view, and then show you the latest adherent.



2. Iran: Their foreign policy is aimed at world domination under the leadership of the 12th Imam.

The Hidden Imam, as he is also known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse –


“ The hidden Imam who is expected to return....
....beware of doubting, for to doubt the order of God, the Mighty, the Sublime, is apostasy (Kufr). Ibn Khaldun also states that “ When imprisoned with his mother in the house, he entered a sort of well or pit in the house that his family occupies at Samarrah, Iraq, and there he disappeared, but he is to come forth at the end of the age to fill the earth with justice”.
The Twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (Al-Mahdi-Sahibuz Zaman) (The hidden Imam who is expected to return)


12th Imam
12th Imam



3. "IRANIAN CLERIC EBAD MOHAMMADTABAR: WHEN THE HIDDEN IMAM ARRIVES, THE WHOLE WORLD WILL CONVERT TO ISLAM OR DIE; WE WILL CONFRONT, DEFEAT THE JEWS, ZIONISM
October 07, 2019
Iranian Cleric Ebad Mohammadtabar: When the Hidden Imam Arrives, The Whole World Will Convert to Islam or Die; We Will Confront, Defeat the Jews, Zionism




Any who voted for Hussein should be able to answer this question:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb.

As for the apartheid state of Israel:

Israel is a military dictatorship that controls via violence and oppression a majority of the people living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, denying them basic human rights because they are not Jewish. The US supports 73% of the world’s dictatorships, so there is nothing at all odd about our support for Israel’s apartheid; we supported South Africa’s as well. And now, Israel is helping us move toward a privatized police state which surveils its own citizenry.

THE U.S. BORDER PATROL AND AN ISRAELI MILITARY CONTRACTOR ARE PUTTING A NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATION UNDER “PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE”

The U.S. Border Patrol and an Israeli Military Contractor Are Putting a Native American Reservation Under “Persistent Surveillance”


Should go nicely with our militarized white nationalist police force and our for profit concentration camps. Our future is quietly being put into place while we quibble over something Bette Midler said or the incessant tweeting of twits? Yeah, we’re truly such an exceptional people ain’t we.

"I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb."


"We" know no such thing.

That's just the usual 'hate America pap' you picked up in government school.

What we have just learned is that you never read a book in your life.

Luckily, I'm here to give you a few pointers.


Dr. Abbas Milani is he Director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University. His recent book is “The Shah,” is based on ten years studying the archives of the United States and of Britain. The following is from his recent lecture on that subject.


1. The event that has come to define perceptions of U.S. meddling is the coup that ejected the popularly elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, in 1953. Both former secretary of state Madeleine Albright and President Obama have acknowledged America’s role in the coup in speeches that were widely taken to be apologies. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

2. Prior to 1951, Britain controlled Iran’s oil industry. The US foresaw how the one-sided dominance would result in a nationalist uprising, and warned Britain, but they refused to alter the agreements, claiming that they knew how to deal with the ‘natives.’

a. Mossedeq was the nationalist leader of the Iranian Parliament, becoming so via democratic process, and the first thing he did was nationalize the oil industry. Britain wanted to attack Iran, but Truman wouldn’t allow it. Then the Brits tried to get the Shah to use the army to throw Mossadeq out…but the Shah refused to do anything illegal.

3. When the communists attacked Mossadeq, the nationalists, the middle class, the merchants and even a broad swath of clerics—Islamists such as Ayatollah Abolgasem Kashani, a mentor of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—had initially supported Mossadegh.

4. But by November of ’52, try as they may, the US could not make a deal with Mossadeq, who demanded 100% control of oil, which would never be accepted by Britain. The US began to agree with overthrowing the Prime Minister.

a. The power of the communists was increasing in Iran…and the economy suffered a downturn. Both factors caused a loss of popular support for Mossadeq- but due to the loss of support, he felt the need to gravitate toward the communists. This scared off the clergy.

b. Brits and the US began to send in agents provocateurs to act as communists to further cause rifts between the clergy and Mossadeq.

c. As compensation for his support, Ayatollah Kashani began to demand veto rights on legislation, and Islamic laws, and laws against Baha’is. Mossadeq refused, and lost the cleric’s support.

1. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.” http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf The Shah fled to Rome.
2. By August 19th, crowds filled the streets, attacked Mossadeq’s home, and took over the radio station. The question is whether these crowds were simply concerned Iranians, nationalists, communists, as the Shah’s supporters claimed, or paid CIA operatives, and the CIA claims.

a. Professor Milani, using the latest declassified archival documents, suggests two things: a) the crowds were combinations of both, and b) “Although declassified CIA documents confirmed many details of his account, which Roosevelt told with the relish of a John le Carré thriller, his version was exceptionally self-serving. For instance, despite knowing little about Iranian society and speaking no Persian, Roosevelt launched by his own description an instantly potent propaganda campaign. Dwight Eisenhower, president during the 1953 coup, was to characterize Roosevelt’s report as seeming “more like a dime novel.” The CIA claimed more power that it actually had. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

A matter of historical fact love, I shant support your nonsense or "alternative facts". Cheers.

CIA-assisted coup overthrows government of Iran
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/cia-assisted-coup-overthrows-government-of-iran

Can't imagine why we might have trouble with them as a result. Why, fweedumb loving americans would welcome interventions here.

"A matter of historical fact ...."

As I just explained....and proved.....it is no such thing.


Dunces....raise your paw.....drool at the idea of America being the villain.



America has no future as long as the Left controls the schools and the media....and turn out fools like this one.

Tha ivy league school you claim to be a graduate from is also ran by so called leftist, of which you have never proven.

And we've all seen how the aristocracy bribes their spawn into ivy league schools.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"I'm sure we all recall that the US took out/down Iran's duly elected democratic govt so we could implant our stooge in the early 1950's. Fweedumb."


"We" know no such thing.

That's just the usual 'hate America pap' you picked up in government school.

What we have just learned is that you never read a book in your life.

Luckily, I'm here to give you a few pointers.


Dr. Abbas Milani is he Director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University. His recent book is “The Shah,” is based on ten years studying the archives of the United States and of Britain. The following is from his recent lecture on that subject.


1. The event that has come to define perceptions of U.S. meddling is the coup that ejected the popularly elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, in 1953. Both former secretary of state Madeleine Albright and President Obama have acknowledged America’s role in the coup in speeches that were widely taken to be apologies. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

2. Prior to 1951, Britain controlled Iran’s oil industry. The US foresaw how the one-sided dominance would result in a nationalist uprising, and warned Britain, but they refused to alter the agreements, claiming that they knew how to deal with the ‘natives.’

a. Mossedeq was the nationalist leader of the Iranian Parliament, becoming so via democratic process, and the first thing he did was nationalize the oil industry. Britain wanted to attack Iran, but Truman wouldn’t allow it. Then the Brits tried to get the Shah to use the army to throw Mossadeq out…but the Shah refused to do anything illegal.

3. When the communists attacked Mossadeq, the nationalists, the middle class, the merchants and even a broad swath of clerics—Islamists such as Ayatollah Abolgasem Kashani, a mentor of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—had initially supported Mossadegh.

4. But by November of ’52, try as they may, the US could not make a deal with Mossadeq, who demanded 100% control of oil, which would never be accepted by Britain. The US began to agree with overthrowing the Prime Minister.

a. The power of the communists was increasing in Iran…and the economy suffered a downturn. Both factors caused a loss of popular support for Mossadeq- but due to the loss of support, he felt the need to gravitate toward the communists. This scared off the clergy.

b. Brits and the US began to send in agents provocateurs to act as communists to further cause rifts between the clergy and Mossadeq.

c. As compensation for his support, Ayatollah Kashani began to demand veto rights on legislation, and Islamic laws, and laws against Baha’is. Mossadeq refused, and lost the cleric’s support.

1. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.” http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf The Shah fled to Rome.
2. By August 19th, crowds filled the streets, attacked Mossadeq’s home, and took over the radio station. The question is whether these crowds were simply concerned Iranians, nationalists, communists, as the Shah’s supporters claimed, or paid CIA operatives, and the CIA claims.

a. Professor Milani, using the latest declassified archival documents, suggests two things: a) the crowds were combinations of both, and b) “Although declassified CIA documents confirmed many details of his account, which Roosevelt told with the relish of a John le Carré thriller, his version was exceptionally self-serving. For instance, despite knowing little about Iranian society and speaking no Persian, Roosevelt launched by his own description an instantly potent propaganda campaign. Dwight Eisenhower, president during the 1953 coup, was to characterize Roosevelt’s report as seeming “more like a dime novel.” The CIA claimed more power that it actually had. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

A matter of historical fact love, I shant support your nonsense or "alternative facts". Cheers.

CIA-assisted coup overthrows government of Iran
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/cia-assisted-coup-overthrows-government-of-iran

Can't imagine why we might have trouble with them as a result. Why, fweedumb loving americans would welcome interventions here.

"A matter of historical fact ...."

As I just explained....and proved.....it is no such thing.


Dunces....raise your paw.....drool at the idea of America being the villain.



America has no future as long as the Left controls the schools and the media....and turn out fools like this one.

It happened, we did it, the entire world witnessed it. We pulled a coup in Honduras in 2009 which has contributed to migration out of that country and we just attempted, rather fecklessly, yet again, to put our stooge in place of who Venezuelans chose. This sort of thing is simply what we do.

If you find the behavior villainous, I think we've made some progress today here.

And the usual Liberal response to a linked, documented, sourced exposure of your stupidity: "Is not, issssssss nooootttttttttt!!!!"


Drop back when you gain an education, dunce.

You do not handle non-agreement well do you love.

Already reduced to flinging the labels you were taught to hiss.

Here, among a myriad of points, is a major one you've missed: I am never wrong.


Mossadegh.....hero to the uninformed.


One of those recurring fables designed to put America in a bad light was posted by a less than literate member….the one about America destabilizing Iran.

It is opportune just as Iran is advancing toward nuclear weapons, and the Left needs to provide a rationalization for same.


That’s what they teach the uninformed in the sweatshops of Liberalism, the universities.


Supposedly Iran has righteous indignation against the United State, because we removed Mossadeqh….

False. We didn’t….but, the very opposite is true: Democrat Carter installed the insane Islamist Ayatollah Khomeini in control of Iran.

“It has become an article of faith among many that just as Iran was emerging into a free, tolerant society in 1953, its democratically-elected leader was ousted by a CIA coup that supplanted him with an more pliable monarch. According to NPR's naïve telling of events "the CIA overthrew Iran's democracy in four days." But better sources, like Richard Cottam, insist that "distortions of the Mossadegh era, both in the press and in academic studies, border on the grotesque."

…in 1953, but its parliament, called the Majlis, governed at the discretion of its monarch, the Shah of Iran, who ruled. As per the 1906 Persian constitution (still technically in effect until the 1979 Islamic revolution), ministers were appointed by the Shah.

Mossadeq was "democratically elected" when he won a seat in the majlis in 1924, but he was appointed, not elected, to the post of prime minister by the shah in 1951….the shah appointed, and dismissed the prime minister." In Death, Morsi Becomes Mossadeq




Watching you work through a new concept would make one think of prescribing Ritalin to a glacier.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

A matter of historical fact love, I shant support your nonsense or "alternative facts". Cheers.

CIA-assisted coup overthrows government of Iran
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/cia-assisted-coup-overthrows-government-of-iran

Can't imagine why we might have trouble with them as a result. Why, fweedumb loving americans would welcome interventions here.

"A matter of historical fact ...."

As I just explained....and proved.....it is no such thing.


Dunces....raise your paw.....drool at the idea of America being the villain.



America has no future as long as the Left controls the schools and the media....and turn out fools like this one.

It happened, we did it, the entire world witnessed it. We pulled a coup in Honduras in 2009 which has contributed to migration out of that country and we just attempted, rather fecklessly, yet again, to put our stooge in place of who Venezuelans chose. This sort of thing is simply what we do.

If you find the behavior villainous, I think we've made some progress today here.

And the usual Liberal response to a linked, documented, sourced exposure of your stupidity: "Is not, issssssss nooootttttttttt!!!!"


Drop back when you gain an education, dunce.

You do not handle non-agreement well do you love.

Already reduced to flinging the labels you were taught to hiss.

Here, among a myriad of points, is a major one you've missed: I am never wrong.


Mossadegh.....hero to the uninformed.


One of those recurring fables designed to put America in a bad light was posted by a less than literate member….the one about America destabilizing Iran.

It is opportune just as Iran is advancing toward nuclear weapons, and the Left needs to provide a rationalization for same.


That’s what they teach the uninformed in the sweatshops of Liberalism, the universities.


Supposedly Iran has righteous indignation against the United State, because we removed Mossadeqh….

False. We didn’t….but, the very opposite is true: Democrat Carter installed the insane Islamist Ayatollah Khomeini in control of Iran.

“It has become an article of faith among many that just as Iran was emerging into a free, tolerant society in 1953, its democratically-elected leader was ousted by a CIA coup that supplanted him with an more pliable monarch. According to NPR's naïve telling of events "the CIA overthrew Iran's democracy in four days." But better sources, like Richard Cottam, insist that "distortions of the Mossadegh era, both in the press and in academic studies, border on the grotesque."

…in 1953, but its parliament, called the Majlis, governed at the discretion of its monarch, the Shah of Iran, who ruled. As per the 1906 Persian constitution (still technically in effect until the 1979 Islamic revolution), ministers were appointed by the Shah.

Mossadeq was "democratically elected" when he won a seat in the majlis in 1924, but he was appointed, not elected, to the post of prime minister by the shah in 1951….the shah appointed, and dismissed the prime minister." In Death, Morsi Becomes Mossadeq




Watching you work through a new concept would make one think of prescribing Ritalin to a glacier.

"I am never wrong."

Sure sign of an idiot. WE did what WE did and WE would shat ourselves if anyone ever mentioned doing that to US. And now we live daily with the consequences. What pray tell might be our answer?

More global endless war, occupations and interventions into the sovereignty of other nations. We're very entitled that way.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"A matter of historical fact ...."

As I just explained....and proved.....it is no such thing.


Dunces....raise your paw.....drool at the idea of America being the villain.



America has no future as long as the Left controls the schools and the media....and turn out fools like this one.

It happened, we did it, the entire world witnessed it. We pulled a coup in Honduras in 2009 which has contributed to migration out of that country and we just attempted, rather fecklessly, yet again, to put our stooge in place of who Venezuelans chose. This sort of thing is simply what we do.

If you find the behavior villainous, I think we've made some progress today here.

And the usual Liberal response to a linked, documented, sourced exposure of your stupidity: "Is not, issssssss nooootttttttttt!!!!"


Drop back when you gain an education, dunce.

You do not handle non-agreement well do you love.

Already reduced to flinging the labels you were taught to hiss.

Here, among a myriad of points, is a major one you've missed: I am never wrong.


Mossadegh.....hero to the uninformed.


One of those recurring fables designed to put America in a bad light was posted by a less than literate member….the one about America destabilizing Iran.

It is opportune just as Iran is advancing toward nuclear weapons, and the Left needs to provide a rationalization for same.


That’s what they teach the uninformed in the sweatshops of Liberalism, the universities.


Supposedly Iran has righteous indignation against the United State, because we removed Mossadeqh….

False. We didn’t….but, the very opposite is true: Democrat Carter installed the insane Islamist Ayatollah Khomeini in control of Iran.

“It has become an article of faith among many that just as Iran was emerging into a free, tolerant society in 1953, its democratically-elected leader was ousted by a CIA coup that supplanted him with an more pliable monarch. According to NPR's naïve telling of events "the CIA overthrew Iran's democracy in four days." But better sources, like Richard Cottam, insist that "distortions of the Mossadegh era, both in the press and in academic studies, border on the grotesque."

…in 1953, but its parliament, called the Majlis, governed at the discretion of its monarch, the Shah of Iran, who ruled. As per the 1906 Persian constitution (still technically in effect until the 1979 Islamic revolution), ministers were appointed by the Shah.

Mossadeq was "democratically elected" when he won a seat in the majlis in 1924, but he was appointed, not elected, to the post of prime minister by the shah in 1951….the shah appointed, and dismissed the prime minister." In Death, Morsi Becomes Mossadeq




Watching you work through a new concept would make one think of prescribing Ritalin to a glacier.

"I am never wrong."

Sure sign of an idiot. WE did what WE did and WE would shat ourselves if anyone ever mentioned doing that to US. And now we live daily with the consequences. What pray tell might be our answer?

More global endless war, occupations and interventions into the sovereignty of other nations. We're very entitled that way.

Doubting my fully documented posts is a sure sign of a government school grad.

That indoctrination appears to be indelible....and no amount of remediation seems to help...at least among the less....able.


But I am the eternal optimist....



More truth:

1. The Shah was in power between 1941 and 1979. The true explanation of the Mossadeq unseating is neither that of the Royalists who claimed it was due to a national uprising, nor was it, as Mossadeq’s followers claimed, a CIA plot.

a. Due to the American pressure, the Shah launched a series of reforms, known as the White Revolution, in 1963. This included many American ideas for modernization, such as a) land reform, b) modernization of infrastructure including railroads, c) education, d) enfranchising women, e) urbanization, f) encouragement of a class of technocrats and competent bureaucrats, etc. tried (unsuccessfully) to enable Iran’s religious minorities—principally Baha’is, Jews, and Christians—to take the oath of office on a holy book of their own choosing.


b. The conservative clergy viewed the White Revolution as an affront to Islam and a dangerous move toward Western modernity: Ayatollah Khomeini immediately denounced the proposed reforms, led the clerical opposition

2. Go back to the first time the Shah was overthrown by a democratically elected Parliment under the leadership of Mossadeq.

Mossadegh didn't exactly overthrow the Shah. He managed to wrest considerable power away from the Shah, but the Shah remained the Shah throughout the entire event. Furthermore, Mossadegh himself was appointed prime minister by the parliament upon recommendation of the Shah himself.

Parliament did not change. Only Mossadegh, the prime minister, was deposed. He was elected by parliament (which remained after he was deposed), not by any popular vote. And constitutionally, his dismissal was arguably within the Shah's power anyways.

3. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.”http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf



4. "When the Iranian revolution came to power, with the help of Democratic President Jimmy Carter, the Ayatollah Khomeini killed more human beings (about twenty thousand) in two weeks than had been killed by the Shah during his entire thirty-eight years. Khomeini followed this by sending hundreds of thousands of Iranians to die in the Iran-Iraq war, as martyrdom was needed to resurrect the Islamic Empire."
Paul Berman, “Terror and Liberalism,” p. 108




I never mind showing....and proving....how much more I know than you indoctrinated dolts know.


Never hesitate to ask for the education of which you've been deprived.


Now I'd like to give you a going-away present ... but you have to do your part.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

It happened, we did it, the entire world witnessed it. We pulled a coup in Honduras in 2009 which has contributed to migration out of that country and we just attempted, rather fecklessly, yet again, to put our stooge in place of who Venezuelans chose. This sort of thing is simply what we do.

If you find the behavior villainous, I think we've made some progress today here.

And the usual Liberal response to a linked, documented, sourced exposure of your stupidity: "Is not, issssssss nooootttttttttt!!!!"


Drop back when you gain an education, dunce.

You do not handle non-agreement well do you love.

Already reduced to flinging the labels you were taught to hiss.

Here, among a myriad of points, is a major one you've missed: I am never wrong.


Mossadegh.....hero to the uninformed.


One of those recurring fables designed to put America in a bad light was posted by a less than literate member….the one about America destabilizing Iran.

It is opportune just as Iran is advancing toward nuclear weapons, and the Left needs to provide a rationalization for same.


That’s what they teach the uninformed in the sweatshops of Liberalism, the universities.


Supposedly Iran has righteous indignation against the United State, because we removed Mossadeqh….

False. We didn’t….but, the very opposite is true: Democrat Carter installed the insane Islamist Ayatollah Khomeini in control of Iran.

“It has become an article of faith among many that just as Iran was emerging into a free, tolerant society in 1953, its democratically-elected leader was ousted by a CIA coup that supplanted him with an more pliable monarch. According to NPR's naïve telling of events "the CIA overthrew Iran's democracy in four days." But better sources, like Richard Cottam, insist that "distortions of the Mossadegh era, both in the press and in academic studies, border on the grotesque."

…in 1953, but its parliament, called the Majlis, governed at the discretion of its monarch, the Shah of Iran, who ruled. As per the 1906 Persian constitution (still technically in effect until the 1979 Islamic revolution), ministers were appointed by the Shah.

Mossadeq was "democratically elected" when he won a seat in the majlis in 1924, but he was appointed, not elected, to the post of prime minister by the shah in 1951….the shah appointed, and dismissed the prime minister." In Death, Morsi Becomes Mossadeq




Watching you work through a new concept would make one think of prescribing Ritalin to a glacier.

"I am never wrong."

Sure sign of an idiot. WE did what WE did and WE would shat ourselves if anyone ever mentioned doing that to US. And now we live daily with the consequences. What pray tell might be our answer?

More global endless war, occupations and interventions into the sovereignty of other nations. We're very entitled that way.

Doubting my fully documented posts is a sure sign of a government school grad.

That indoctrination appears to be indelible....and no amount of remediation seems to help...at least among the less....able.


But I am the eternal optimist....



More truth:

1. The Shah was in power between 1941 and 1979. The true explanation of the Mossadeq unseating is neither that of the Royalists who claimed it was due to a national uprising, nor was it, as Mossadeq’s followers claimed, a CIA plot.

a. Due to the American pressure, the Shah launched a series of reforms, known as the White Revolution, in 1963. This included many American ideas for modernization, such as a) land reform, b) modernization of infrastructure including railroads, c) education, d) enfranchising women, e) urbanization, f) encouragement of a class of technocrats and competent bureaucrats, etc. tried (unsuccessfully) to enable Iran’s religious minorities—principally Baha’is, Jews, and Christians—to take the oath of office on a holy book of their own choosing.


b. The conservative clergy viewed the White Revolution as an affront to Islam and a dangerous move toward Western modernity: Ayatollah Khomeini immediately denounced the proposed reforms, led the clerical opposition

2. Go back to the first time the Shah was overthrown by a democratically elected Parliment under the leadership of Mossadeq.

Mossadegh didn't exactly overthrow the Shah. He managed to wrest considerable power away from the Shah, but the Shah remained the Shah throughout the entire event. Furthermore, Mossadegh himself was appointed prime minister by the parliament upon recommendation of the Shah himself.

Parliament did not change. Only Mossadegh, the prime minister, was deposed. He was elected by parliament (which remained after he was deposed), not by any popular vote. And constitutionally, his dismissal was arguably within the Shah's power anyways.

3. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.”http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf



4. "When the Iranian revolution came to power, with the help of Democratic President Jimmy Carter, the Ayatollah Khomeini killed more human beings (about twenty thousand) in two weeks than had been killed by the Shah during his entire thirty-eight years. Khomeini followed this by sending hundreds of thousands of Iranians to die in the Iran-Iraq war, as martyrdom was needed to resurrect the Islamic Empire."
Paul Berman, “Terror and Liberalism,” p. 108




I never mind showing....and proving....how much more I know than you indoctrinated dolts know.


Never hesitate to ask for the education of which you've been deprived.


Now I'd like to give you a going-away present ... but you have to do your part.

Endless rationalization do not refute what went down love. The US has repeatedly attempted to render the entire Middle East an economic colony of the US. Don't whine about blowback.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And the usual Liberal response to a linked, documented, sourced exposure of your stupidity: "Is not, issssssss nooootttttttttt!!!!"


Drop back when you gain an education, dunce.

You do not handle non-agreement well do you love.

Already reduced to flinging the labels you were taught to hiss.

Here, among a myriad of points, is a major one you've missed: I am never wrong.


Mossadegh.....hero to the uninformed.


One of those recurring fables designed to put America in a bad light was posted by a less than literate member….the one about America destabilizing Iran.

It is opportune just as Iran is advancing toward nuclear weapons, and the Left needs to provide a rationalization for same.


That’s what they teach the uninformed in the sweatshops of Liberalism, the universities.


Supposedly Iran has righteous indignation against the United State, because we removed Mossadeqh….

False. We didn’t….but, the very opposite is true: Democrat Carter installed the insane Islamist Ayatollah Khomeini in control of Iran.

“It has become an article of faith among many that just as Iran was emerging into a free, tolerant society in 1953, its democratically-elected leader was ousted by a CIA coup that supplanted him with an more pliable monarch. According to NPR's naïve telling of events "the CIA overthrew Iran's democracy in four days." But better sources, like Richard Cottam, insist that "distortions of the Mossadegh era, both in the press and in academic studies, border on the grotesque."

…in 1953, but its parliament, called the Majlis, governed at the discretion of its monarch, the Shah of Iran, who ruled. As per the 1906 Persian constitution (still technically in effect until the 1979 Islamic revolution), ministers were appointed by the Shah.

Mossadeq was "democratically elected" when he won a seat in the majlis in 1924, but he was appointed, not elected, to the post of prime minister by the shah in 1951….the shah appointed, and dismissed the prime minister." In Death, Morsi Becomes Mossadeq




Watching you work through a new concept would make one think of prescribing Ritalin to a glacier.

"I am never wrong."

Sure sign of an idiot. WE did what WE did and WE would shat ourselves if anyone ever mentioned doing that to US. And now we live daily with the consequences. What pray tell might be our answer?

More global endless war, occupations and interventions into the sovereignty of other nations. We're very entitled that way.

Doubting my fully documented posts is a sure sign of a government school grad.

That indoctrination appears to be indelible....and no amount of remediation seems to help...at least among the less....able.


But I am the eternal optimist....



More truth:

1. The Shah was in power between 1941 and 1979. The true explanation of the Mossadeq unseating is neither that of the Royalists who claimed it was due to a national uprising, nor was it, as Mossadeq’s followers claimed, a CIA plot.

a. Due to the American pressure, the Shah launched a series of reforms, known as the White Revolution, in 1963. This included many American ideas for modernization, such as a) land reform, b) modernization of infrastructure including railroads, c) education, d) enfranchising women, e) urbanization, f) encouragement of a class of technocrats and competent bureaucrats, etc. tried (unsuccessfully) to enable Iran’s religious minorities—principally Baha’is, Jews, and Christians—to take the oath of office on a holy book of their own choosing.


b. The conservative clergy viewed the White Revolution as an affront to Islam and a dangerous move toward Western modernity: Ayatollah Khomeini immediately denounced the proposed reforms, led the clerical opposition

2. Go back to the first time the Shah was overthrown by a democratically elected Parliment under the leadership of Mossadeq.

Mossadegh didn't exactly overthrow the Shah. He managed to wrest considerable power away from the Shah, but the Shah remained the Shah throughout the entire event. Furthermore, Mossadegh himself was appointed prime minister by the parliament upon recommendation of the Shah himself.

Parliament did not change. Only Mossadegh, the prime minister, was deposed. He was elected by parliament (which remained after he was deposed), not by any popular vote. And constitutionally, his dismissal was arguably within the Shah's power anyways.

3. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.”http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf



4. "When the Iranian revolution came to power, with the help of Democratic President Jimmy Carter, the Ayatollah Khomeini killed more human beings (about twenty thousand) in two weeks than had been killed by the Shah during his entire thirty-eight years. Khomeini followed this by sending hundreds of thousands of Iranians to die in the Iran-Iraq war, as martyrdom was needed to resurrect the Islamic Empire."
Paul Berman, “Terror and Liberalism,” p. 108




I never mind showing....and proving....how much more I know than you indoctrinated dolts know.


Never hesitate to ask for the education of which you've been deprived.


Now I'd like to give you a going-away present ... but you have to do your part.

Endless rationalization do not refute what went down love. The US has repeatedly attempted to make the entire Middle East an economic colony of the US.

"Endless rationalization ..."


ra·tion·al·i·za·tion

1. the action of attempting to explain or justify behavior or an attitude with logical reasons, even if these are not appropriate.:

I use documentation
doc·u·men·ta·tion

1. material that provides official information or evidence or that serves as a record.

See the difference?

Try to stick to words you can define.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

You do not handle non-agreement well do you love.

Already reduced to flinging the labels you were taught to hiss.

Here, among a myriad of points, is a major one you've missed: I am never wrong.


Mossadegh.....hero to the uninformed.


One of those recurring fables designed to put America in a bad light was posted by a less than literate member….the one about America destabilizing Iran.

It is opportune just as Iran is advancing toward nuclear weapons, and the Left needs to provide a rationalization for same.


That’s what they teach the uninformed in the sweatshops of Liberalism, the universities.


Supposedly Iran has righteous indignation against the United State, because we removed Mossadeqh….

False. We didn’t….but, the very opposite is true: Democrat Carter installed the insane Islamist Ayatollah Khomeini in control of Iran.

“It has become an article of faith among many that just as Iran was emerging into a free, tolerant society in 1953, its democratically-elected leader was ousted by a CIA coup that supplanted him with an more pliable monarch. According to NPR's naïve telling of events "the CIA overthrew Iran's democracy in four days." But better sources, like Richard Cottam, insist that "distortions of the Mossadegh era, both in the press and in academic studies, border on the grotesque."

…in 1953, but its parliament, called the Majlis, governed at the discretion of its monarch, the Shah of Iran, who ruled. As per the 1906 Persian constitution (still technically in effect until the 1979 Islamic revolution), ministers were appointed by the Shah.

Mossadeq was "democratically elected" when he won a seat in the majlis in 1924, but he was appointed, not elected, to the post of prime minister by the shah in 1951….the shah appointed, and dismissed the prime minister." In Death, Morsi Becomes Mossadeq




Watching you work through a new concept would make one think of prescribing Ritalin to a glacier.

"I am never wrong."

Sure sign of an idiot. WE did what WE did and WE would shat ourselves if anyone ever mentioned doing that to US. And now we live daily with the consequences. What pray tell might be our answer?

More global endless war, occupations and interventions into the sovereignty of other nations. We're very entitled that way.

Doubting my fully documented posts is a sure sign of a government school grad.

That indoctrination appears to be indelible....and no amount of remediation seems to help...at least among the less....able.


But I am the eternal optimist....



More truth:

1. The Shah was in power between 1941 and 1979. The true explanation of the Mossadeq unseating is neither that of the Royalists who claimed it was due to a national uprising, nor was it, as Mossadeq’s followers claimed, a CIA plot.

a. Due to the American pressure, the Shah launched a series of reforms, known as the White Revolution, in 1963. This included many American ideas for modernization, such as a) land reform, b) modernization of infrastructure including railroads, c) education, d) enfranchising women, e) urbanization, f) encouragement of a class of technocrats and competent bureaucrats, etc. tried (unsuccessfully) to enable Iran’s religious minorities—principally Baha’is, Jews, and Christians—to take the oath of office on a holy book of their own choosing.


b. The conservative clergy viewed the White Revolution as an affront to Islam and a dangerous move toward Western modernity: Ayatollah Khomeini immediately denounced the proposed reforms, led the clerical opposition

2. Go back to the first time the Shah was overthrown by a democratically elected Parliment under the leadership of Mossadeq.

Mossadegh didn't exactly overthrow the Shah. He managed to wrest considerable power away from the Shah, but the Shah remained the Shah throughout the entire event. Furthermore, Mossadegh himself was appointed prime minister by the parliament upon recommendation of the Shah himself.

Parliament did not change. Only Mossadegh, the prime minister, was deposed. He was elected by parliament (which remained after he was deposed), not by any popular vote. And constitutionally, his dismissal was arguably within the Shah's power anyways.

3. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.”http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf



4. "When the Iranian revolution came to power, with the help of Democratic President Jimmy Carter, the Ayatollah Khomeini killed more human beings (about twenty thousand) in two weeks than had been killed by the Shah during his entire thirty-eight years. Khomeini followed this by sending hundreds of thousands of Iranians to die in the Iran-Iraq war, as martyrdom was needed to resurrect the Islamic Empire."
Paul Berman, “Terror and Liberalism,” p. 108




I never mind showing....and proving....how much more I know than you indoctrinated dolts know.


Never hesitate to ask for the education of which you've been deprived.


Now I'd like to give you a going-away present ... but you have to do your part.

Endless rationalization do not refute what went down love. The US has repeatedly attempted to make the entire Middle East an economic colony of the US.

"Endless rationalization ..."


ra·tion·al·i·za·tion

1. the action of attempting to explain or justify behavior or an attitude with logical reasons, even if these are not appropriate.:

I use documentation
doc·u·men·ta·tion

1. material that provides official information or evidence or that serves as a record.

See the difference?

Try to stick to words you can define.

Rationalizing documents to support a rationalization is what you do love, we've all borne witness to that. Thrash about for us some more as our putrid saga continues?

Betrayal Is American Foreign Policy

 

[MACAULAY]

Yes, Ayatollahs must not be allowed to have nuclear weapons.

Even a Half-wit Socialist educated in a public school in a rotting Northern city run by Democrats for half a century...ought to be able to understand that.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here, among a myriad of points, is a major one you've missed: I am never wrong.


Mossadegh.....hero to the uninformed.


One of those recurring fables designed to put America in a bad light was posted by a less than literate member….the one about America destabilizing Iran.

It is opportune just as Iran is advancing toward nuclear weapons, and the Left needs to provide a rationalization for same.


That’s what they teach the uninformed in the sweatshops of Liberalism, the universities.


Supposedly Iran has righteous indignation against the United State, because we removed Mossadeqh….

False. We didn’t….but, the very opposite is true: Democrat Carter installed the insane Islamist Ayatollah Khomeini in control of Iran.

“It has become an article of faith among many that just as Iran was emerging into a free, tolerant society in 1953, its democratically-elected leader was ousted by a CIA coup that supplanted him with an more pliable monarch. According to NPR's naïve telling of events "the CIA overthrew Iran's democracy in four days." But better sources, like Richard Cottam, insist that "distortions of the Mossadegh era, both in the press and in academic studies, border on the grotesque."

…in 1953, but its parliament, called the Majlis, governed at the discretion of its monarch, the Shah of Iran, who ruled. As per the 1906 Persian constitution (still technically in effect until the 1979 Islamic revolution), ministers were appointed by the Shah.

Mossadeq was "democratically elected" when he won a seat in the majlis in 1924, but he was appointed, not elected, to the post of prime minister by the shah in 1951….the shah appointed, and dismissed the prime minister." In Death, Morsi Becomes Mossadeq




Watching you work through a new concept would make one think of prescribing Ritalin to a glacier.

"I am never wrong."

Sure sign of an idiot. WE did what WE did and WE would shat ourselves if anyone ever mentioned doing that to US. And now we live daily with the consequences. What pray tell might be our answer?

More global endless war, occupations and interventions into the sovereignty of other nations. We're very entitled that way.

Doubting my fully documented posts is a sure sign of a government school grad.

That indoctrination appears to be indelible....and no amount of remediation seems to help...at least among the less....able.


But I am the eternal optimist....



More truth:

1. The Shah was in power between 1941 and 1979. The true explanation of the Mossadeq unseating is neither that of the Royalists who claimed it was due to a national uprising, nor was it, as Mossadeq’s followers claimed, a CIA plot.

a. Due to the American pressure, the Shah launched a series of reforms, known as the White Revolution, in 1963. This included many American ideas for modernization, such as a) land reform, b) modernization of infrastructure including railroads, c) education, d) enfranchising women, e) urbanization, f) encouragement of a class of technocrats and competent bureaucrats, etc. tried (unsuccessfully) to enable Iran’s religious minorities—principally Baha’is, Jews, and Christians—to take the oath of office on a holy book of their own choosing.


b. The conservative clergy viewed the White Revolution as an affront to Islam and a dangerous move toward Western modernity: Ayatollah Khomeini immediately denounced the proposed reforms, led the clerical opposition

2. Go back to the first time the Shah was overthrown by a democratically elected Parliment under the leadership of Mossadeq.

Mossadegh didn't exactly overthrow the Shah. He managed to wrest considerable power away from the Shah, but the Shah remained the Shah throughout the entire event. Furthermore, Mossadegh himself was appointed prime minister by the parliament upon recommendation of the Shah himself.

Parliament did not change. Only Mossadegh, the prime minister, was deposed. He was elected by parliament (which remained after he was deposed), not by any popular vote. And constitutionally, his dismissal was arguably within the Shah's power anyways.

3. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.”http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf



4. "When the Iranian revolution came to power, with the help of Democratic President Jimmy Carter, the Ayatollah Khomeini killed more human beings (about twenty thousand) in two weeks than had been killed by the Shah during his entire thirty-eight years. Khomeini followed this by sending hundreds of thousands of Iranians to die in the Iran-Iraq war, as martyrdom was needed to resurrect the Islamic Empire."
Paul Berman, “Terror and Liberalism,” p. 108




I never mind showing....and proving....how much more I know than you indoctrinated dolts know.


Never hesitate to ask for the education of which you've been deprived.


Now I'd like to give you a going-away present ... but you have to do your part.

Endless rationalization do not refute what went down love. The US has repeatedly attempted to make the entire Middle East an economic colony of the US.

"Endless rationalization ..."


ra·tion·al·i·za·tion

1. the action of attempting to explain or justify behavior or an attitude with logical reasons, even if these are not appropriate.:

I use documentation
doc·u·men·ta·tion

1. material that provides official information or evidence or that serves as a record.

See the difference?

Try to stick to words you can define.

Rationalizing documents to support a rationalization is what you do love, we've all borne witness to that. Thrash about for us some more as our putrid saga continues?

Betrayal Is American Foreign Policy

As proven...PROVEN... in my several posts, Mossadeq was removed by the Shah....the Shah, not the CIA....as the Iranian constitution.


The truth, of course, will have no effect on the marginally intelligent totally indoctrinated government school grad....you.


Please don't bother to respond.

You bore me.