Musk Unveils Grokipedia - Plans To Counter Wikipedia's Manipulation Of "Truth" Controlled By Leftists

I didn't know you were a tank or armor enthusiast. My interest is easily understandable, as professionally driven, due to background in Cavalry and Armor. A lot of people to have an interest, unrelated to service, as the evolution of Armor pretty amazing, the continued problem-solving up upgrades, and new series to fill niches, or work in an overall strategy for what somebody thought the next battlefield would be. And for every upgrade in capability, there have always been upgrades in overcoming the latest upgrade or capability. I now look at Ukraine, and their dealing with Russian Armor, and wondering if the concept of tanks, to take and hold large areas, using mobility, fire power, armored protection, is not gone out the window. With the use of $500 - $1,000 dollar drones controlled from safe, off the battlefield locations to take out $16 Million Dollar mobile, armored, firing platforms, with advance protective capabilities, safeguarding their offensive power, and taking them out with ease.
Yes, the Russian barn tanks and the Israelis trying a version as well looks like junk yard wars variants to stop attacks. I wonder if future AFVs will be more like IFVs with a small turret for drones/aircraft and infantry, and missiles for bigger booms.
 
I love Wikipedia, hard to believe that nutjobs find it to be biased, but there are so many wingnuts in the information silo of using only wingnut sources for their propaganda that they are deathly afraid of accurate news sources, of which Wikipedia happens to be one.

They want alternate sources for alternate reality.

They always have.

They tried this before with Conservopedia. I have no idea what became of that.

Of course, the BS and lies are now delivered with a firehose!
 
I love Wikipedia, hard to believe that nutjobs find it to be biased,
That's because you're a nutjob and approve of lies such as :

1. Men can get pregnant

2. Math is racist

3. Joe Biden is sharp as a tack

4. Serial Felon George Floyd was a model citizen

5. The covid vax is 99.99% safe
 
I have no problem with him publishing his AI version of Wikipedia, though, I, for one, do not trust AI, certainly not Grok. I like Wikipedia, actually supporting it, and have not found wrong information in it, myself.
not surprising ..

 
I have no problem with him publishing his AI version of Wikipedia, though, I, for one, do not trust AI, certainly not Grok. I like Wikipedia, actually supporting it, and have not found wrong information in it, myself.
To you wrong information is someone saying - affirmative action is anti-white racism.
 
To you wrong information is someone saying - affirmative action is anti-white racism.
Wrong. You do know (at some level), you really aren't smart enough, intuitive enough, or level headed enough to know what normal people consider wrong information. Right? Most people think of statements of fact, yet nobody on here seems to be able to find statements of fact in Wikipedia, that were incorrect. Could mean, people here, on the far right, are too bone lazy to look. Could mean, there has never been an article pointing out actual faulty statements of fact in Wikipedia, that were incorrect. Could mean they are to bone dumbassed lazy to create a search argument to support their position. Could mean, it is all about their feelings, rather than statements of fact. We all know how sensitive, the far right is. Just a bunch of touchy/feely sensitives, kind of like whiney crybabies, not knowing really why crying, only that it hurts.:itsok:
 
Wrong. You do know (at some level), you really aren't smart enough, intuitive enough, or level headed enough to know what normal people consider wrong information. Right? Most people think of statements of fact, yet nobody on here seems to be able to find statements of fact in Wikipedia, that were incorrect. Could mean, people here, on the far right, are too bone lazy to look. Could mean, there has never been an article pointing out actual faulty statements of fact in Wikipedia, that were incorrect. Could mean they are to bone dumbassed lazy to create a search argument to support their position. Could mean, it is all about their feelings, rather than statements of fact. We all know how sensitive, the far right is. Just a bunch of touchy/feely sensitives, kind of like whiney crybabies, not knowing really why crying, only that it hurts.:itsok:
HAHAHA. Another loonybird who thinks men can get pregnant.
 
.

Finally. An information resource for White Nationalists.

.
If your side was in charge, you’d be pushing for Musk and the Wikipedia alternative to be charged with crimes for misinformation without proving misinformation.
 
.

Finally. An information resource for White Nationalists.

.


Just the facts, please, and keep inappropriate racial overtones out of it..,..


1761681907349.webp


1761681960639.webp
 
I have no problem with him publishing his AI version of Wikipedia, though, I, for one, do not trust AI, certainly not Grok. I like Wikipedia, actually supporting it, and have not found wrong information in it, myself.

Pure confirmation bias.
 
This is a good idea but we'll see if musky means it. X (twitter) is very woke itself . They won't let you say anything bad about a person or group based on their race or sex!


Ive tried using grok, not a fan. Seems like it will only allow you to ask 3 questions, then it locks you out, unless you create an account i think.

Chat gpt will let you spend as long as you want with no account.
 
Pure confirmation bias.
Maybe. What information did you find in it, that was not accurate, for what you use it, or in the old days and encyclopedia for?
 

How Wikipedia Got Captured: Leftist Editors & Foreign Influence On Internet's Biggest Source of Info​

Dec 9, 2025
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom