Musk "If we don't fix the deficit, America goes bankrupt. It's that simple."

[Donald H]

No intelligent and honest economist thinks tax cuts pay for themselves. That’s just the shit they tell children like you to keep you compliant.

It's just the next attempt at the Supply Side economics scheme that was invented by Laffer, Wanniski, Reagan and company, to fk over the working class again!

Reduce taxes on the wealthy to increase tax revenue! Right?

Works every time!

 

[Nostra]

It's just the next attempt at the Supply Side economics scheme that was invented by Laffer, Wanniski, Reagan and company, to fk over the working class again!

Reduce taxes on the wealthy to increase tax revenue! Right?

Works every time!

It does. The track record proves it.

 

[pknopp]

Link?

When the House passed the Republican budget Tuesday night, it was an important step towards funding President Trump’s agenda. Their bill includes tax cuts totaling $4.5 trillion, spending cuts amounting to $1.5 to $2 trillion and about $3 trillion added to the deficit over the next ten years.

'A lot of bloat': Rep. Arrington defends GOP budget plan that slashes spending, cuts taxes

 

[Marener]

They are wrong. You know howi know? Cuz revenues went up, so that part of the equation can’t be why deficits went up, Simp.

Oh wow. You’re really stupid.

Stupid enough to think you know better than Ivy League economists.

You’re the poster child for Dunning Kruger.

 

[Marener]

It's just the next attempt at the Supply Side economics scheme that was invented by Laffer, Wanniski, Reagan and company, to fk over the working class again!

Reduce taxes on the wealthy to increase tax revenue! Right?

Works every time!

It’s been decades of supply side economics and the only thing that’s gone up is inequality.

 

[Nostra]

When the House passed the Republican budget Tuesday night, it was an important step towards funding President Trump’s agenda. Their bill includes tax cuts totaling $4.5 trillion, spending cuts amounting to $1.5 to $2 trillion and about $3 trillion added to the deficit over the next ten years.

'A lot of bloat': Rep. Arrington defends GOP budget plan that slashes spending, cuts taxes

Your link has a claim backed up by zero supporting evidence. Explain how deficits would go up when revenues go up. Are you smart enough to figure that out?

 

[SeaMajor7]

Oh wow. You’re really stupid.

Stupid enough to think you know better than Ivy League economists.

You’re the poster child for Dunning Kruger.

IRONY

 

[Nostra]

Oh wow. You’re really stupid.

Stupid enough to think you know better than Ivy League economists.

You’re the poster child for Dunning Kruger.

It is a proven fact revenues have increased after every major tax cut, Stupid. Fuck =k your egghead “economists’. History proves they are idiots.

 

[Marener]

It is a proven fact revenues have increased after every major tax cut, Stupid. Fuck =k your egghead “economists’. History proves they are idiots.

Irrelevant. You’re not smart enough to understand the issue.

 

[Nostra]

Irrelevant. You’re not smart enough to understand the issue.

Facts are never relevant to you because they ALWAYS destroy your bullshit, Moroner,

 

[Rawley]

After every major tax cut revenue went up, Moroner. So tell the class how MORE REVENUE would add to a deficit.

He's simply spewing his party's propaganda.

Despite CBO’s Predictions, Trump Tax Cuts Were a Boon for America’s Economy and Working Families | The U.S. House Committee on the Budget - House Budget Committee

The Official U.S. Congressional website of The Republican Budget Committee

budget.house.gov

 

[Rawley]

Irrelevant. You’re not smart enough to understand the issue.

QED True to form

 

[Donald H]

When the House passed the Republican budget Tuesday night, it was an important step towards funding President Trump’s agenda. Their bill includes tax cuts totaling $4.5 trillion, spending cuts amounting to $1.5 to $2 trillion and about $3 trillion added to the deficit over the next ten years.

'A lot of bloat': Rep. Arrington defends GOP budget plan that slashes spending, cuts taxes

Only if the very wealthy inherits the money that was spent on social programs that are being eliminated.

If the money saved off of the backs of the working class was returned to the country's revenue then the deficit could be reduced.

But of course that just deprives and enrages the working class more and can never work. And of course the economy won't see any of the money saved by the elimination of the social net. The very wealthy will pocket it!

Do you understand that?

 

[Moonglow]

Another moron who doesn't understand that cutting taxes raises revenue.

Not cutting taxes raises revenue also

 

[Nostra]

Not cutting taxes raises revenue also

So you agree spending is the only reason deficits go up.

 

[Moonglow]

So you agree spending is the only reason deficits go up.

Only when it's a spending deficit.

 

[Marener]

Facts are never relevant to you because they ALWAYS destroy your bullshit, Moroner,

Irrelevant facts and irrelevant.

It’s not a question as to whether revenue goes up. It’s a question as to how they differ compared to baseline.

Like I said, you aren’t smart enough to grasp this.

 

[Donald H]

It’s been decades of supply side economics and the only thing that’s gone up is inequality.

Yes, of course you're right! And as the Maga scam fails, a new scam will be invented and the working class will anxiously buy into the next goatfk that makes them even poorer.

Social change is not in their heads. They've more likely to go for something even worse than Maga.

Can there be anything worse than full on fascism?

Especially now that America can't have anymore wars that will be profitable.

 

[pknopp]

Only if the very wealthy inherits the money that was spent on social programs that are being eliminated.

If the money saved off of the backs of the working class was returned to the country's revenue then the deficit could be reduced.

But of course that just deprives and enrages the working class more and can never work. And of course the economy won't see any of the money saved by the elimination of the social net. The very wealthy will pocket it!

Do you understand that?

IF makes no difference. Only thing that matters is what is.

 

[Nostra]

Irrelevant facts and irrelevant.

It’s not a question as to whether revenue goes up. It’s a question as to how they differ compared to baseline.

Like I said, you aren’t smart enough to grasp this.

Your eggheads assume there are no changes to behavior after a major tax cut. Tax cuts lead to increases in economic activity that results in the higher revenues. That increase wouldn’t be there without the tax cuts.

YOU are the one too stupid to comprehend the topic, Moroner.