Mueller : Trump is guilty of obstruction. Congress should handle it. Don't bother me again.

[iceberg]

He made sort of kind of references to things that maybe could be construed as might be close to near to obstruction.

No. He described the elements necessary for obstruction and then showed which elements each of the ten instances of obstruction met. There were at least four that met all of the elements necessary to charge.

View attachment 263045

Too much at once? Sorry. Sometimes I forget to dumb it down. Do you have questions?

Dumbed down is your forte', the foundation of your posts.

Do you have anything to add? Are you still confused over the obstruction piece?

are you confused about when the next D gets in power we'll simply see an accusation that demands an investigation they're going to resist and as soon as they do - obstruction in return.

why does the left think their stupid shit will not come back to them?

 

[SAYIT]

Meanwhile our Democrat Socialists will continue their slide into irrelevance.

Yeah, you like to soothe yourself out loud. But the data will always trump your neuroses and fetishes. 45% want free public college. 55% want single payer healthcare. Even more want paid medical and family leave. About 18% want abortion to be illegal. These numbers are hardly "irrelevant". You are just a cackling little attack poodle. No , go on, declare victory. You always do, even when the things you say are provably stupid..

What if Democrats proposed the government buy everybody a new car every four years? What do you think the approval by the public would be about that?

Support for "free" health care is high until the costs and consequences are factored … then it's only half as popular but if we are moving to a "free" stuff economy I demand a new Maserati every year.

Thank you in advance, Comrades!!!

 

[SAYIT]

...Sorry, no do-overs. The thing is done...

None needed. The Report provided 'probable cause' for Congress to pursue..

Pursue what? The Muel Team already pursued for 2 years and stated unambiguously that "...this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..." Further pursuit would merely establish the fact that it has been nothing more than a political witch-hunt, something the IG report may soon reveal anyway.

That said, congress has all the info at their disposal that 19 prosecutors and 40 FBI investigators could uncover … the Mueller Report. They have the authority to draft articles of impeachment and they will when Pelosi either considers it politically advantageous or she can no longer restrain her Hysterical House Dems and the Lemmings.

2020 is gonna be a blast!!!

 

[SAYIT]

Incorrect. Mueller said he could not indict.

Wrong. He said he could not even accuse. The quotes have been provided to you. There's no accounting for crazy....

Except your "quote" is a lie but yeah … you have a bad case of TDS insanity. You should get it looked at.

 

[SAYIT]

Sorry, no do-overs. The thing is done.

Haha...what? Maybe if you stomp your feet and scream it...heh heh

You mean as you have done since Nov 8, 2016?

 

[SAYIT]

Get over yourself. Removing the Orange Criminal puts Pence in the White House. How does that "negate" the election?

How is Trump a criminal? You're just a brainwashed TROLL.

Do you have anything to add? Are you still confused over the obstruction piece?

No reason to add or subtract anything. The matter is concluded. All else is the Democrats' desperation.

But is it fun watching them bend. fold, spindle and mutilate the facts, themselves, and each other ... no?

"...this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..." - R. Mueller III

 

[M14 Shooter]

Mueller : Trump is guilty of obstruction.

This is a lie. Mueller did not say this.

 

[jc456]

Most important thing said: MUELLER: 'If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so'

MUELLER: 'If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so'

But, the GOP are going to continue to spin, spin, spin!

but he did say so, he didn't indict him or bring up charges, which was his job! Correct?

No, incorrect.

what was his job then?

 

[jc456]

Until the White House realizes their constitutional responsibility to release individuals to testify and subpoenaed documents, the whole thing goes to the courts.

So then....Democrats lose, right?

You're just delaying your date with doom?


.

Congress can impeach Trump.

Doom is spelled BORDER WALL.

Border Wall got him elected.

 

[M14 Shooter]

 

[jc456]

Congress can impeach Trump.

That's pretty much all the Democrats can do, at this point.

They won't. They know they can't do it. They will do jack ******* shit and like it.

Doom is spelled BORDER WALL.

Deflection.

.

the dems could wait until right before the election in 2020 to start impeachment proceedings-

how stupid would that be? LOL, you don't know what suicide looks like then.

 

[jc456]

This is a sham. It doesn't matter if you are a Dem or Rep in this matter. The tax payers footed a 40 million dollar bill for Mueller to perform this investigation. Mueller's testimony could help or hurt Trump. Either way, the people of this country should demand Mueller come in and answer to Congress about his findings and decide for themselves if his report can withstand scrutiny under examination.

The House and Senate need to call him before their committees immediately and Barr should instruct him to answer every question as completely as possible until all questions are answered.

Never going to happen...He would then have to answer questions from republicans, which he certainly wants no part of.

nor do the dems.

no way, no how. as the cowardly lion once said.

 

[SAYIT]

Tsk..Tsk....someone didn't read the report.

View attachment 263046

Again.....if there were no obstructive acts.....there was no obstruction..
Hillary obstructed justice, destroyed evidence, was never put under oath for some strange reason....and she never faced charges......yet Trump never destroyed evidence or prevented anyone from investigating him.

I guess you must think that we have two legal systems in this country. One for us and another for you and Democrats.

What does this have to do with what I posted?
The red is evidence of obstructive acts.

Bullshit.
It's not evidence.
It's not even circumstantial evidence.
It's hearsay.

It's a graphic of what's in the report. You should try reading it someday since you like to talk about it so much.

I've read some of it....and I saw a lot of "He said....She said" which is hearsay.
I think the Mueller Report is just a lot of wishful thinking.
They don't have evidence of any criminal activity by Trump.
They feel they can convict someone for a crime because they claim he showed intent but never carried it out.
And this same justice department felt Hillary didn't intend on obstructing justice when she destroyed evidence.
That she didn't intend on mishandling classified information when it was clear she did when she set up her private server, and then destroyed it with BleachBit and used hammers to crush the phones she communicated with.

Jesus, you fuckers think just wishful-thinking is enough to get a conviction. To Hell with the facts.

In their rational moments - they are few and far between - some Dems get that there will not be 67 Senators waiting to convict and that their Hysterical House Political Circus will end in defeat and an admonition from the Senate to GTF up.

That said, we have witnessed a consistent disconnect from reality by our bitter Dems who daily cut off their own noses to spite their faces. They are willing, even eager to concede the 2020 election to Trump and many new Repub House and Senate members. Elections do have consequences and this one will be epic. Bigly.

 

[Slyhunter]

Meanwhile our Democrat Socialists will continue their slide into irrelevance.

Yeah, you like to soothe yourself out loud. But the data will always trump your neuroses and fetishes. 45% want free public college. 55% want single payer healthcare. Even more want paid medical and family leave. About 18% want abortion to be illegal. These numbers are hardly "irrelevant". You are just a cackling little attack poodle. No , go on, declare victory. You always do, even when the things you say are provably stupid..

What if Democrats proposed the government buy everybody a new car every four years? What do you think the approval by the public would be about that?

Don't they already do that?

 

[SAYIT]

so what mueller said from another point of view is -

i'm so bad at my job that i spent 2-3 years looking as hard as i could to find SOMETHING to go after trump with but came up empty. while i'm sure if someone wants to keep digging, i'm tapping out because i simply can't find it - but it's there. i know it. we know it. keep looking, keep the faith. i'm going to go to the country and milk cows.

so - good luck with that.

 

[SAYIT]

No. He described the elements necessary for obstruction and then showed which elements each of the ten instances of obstruction met. There were at least four that met all of the elements necessary to charge.

View attachment 263045

Too much at once? Sorry. Sometimes I forget to dumb it down. Do you have questions?

Dumbed down is your forte', the foundation of your posts.

Do you have anything to add? Are you still confused over the obstruction piece?

are you confused about when the next D gets in power we'll simply see an accusation that demands an investigation they're going to resist and as soon as they do - obstruction in return.

why does the left think their stupid shit will not come back to them?

Lefties never consider the consequences of their words and actions - see any of our large cities - and I suspect many of 'em are more than a little concerned that the next Dem POTUS has not yet been born (and may have been or may yet be aborted).

 

[Hutch Starskey]

What does this have to do with what I posted?
The red is evidence of obstructive acts.

Bullshit.
It's not evidence.
It's not even circumstantial evidence.
It's hearsay.

It's a graphic of what's in the report. You should try reading it someday since you like to talk about it so much.

I've read some of it....and I saw a lot of "He said....She said" which is hearsay.
I think the Mueller Report is just a lot of wishful thinking.
They don't have evidence of any criminal activity by Trump.
They feel they can convict someone for a crime because they claim he showed intent but never carried it out.
And this same justice department felt Hillary didn't intend on obstructing justice when she destroyed evidence.
That she didn't intend on mishandling classified information when it was clear she did when she set up her private server, and then destroyed it with BleachBit and used hammers to crush the phones she communicated with.

Jesus, you fuckers think just wishful-thinking is enough to get a conviction. To Hell with the facts.

Wishful thinking?
Jesus christ, dude. I just gave you a graphic of how Mueller broke it down.

Yeah.....Mueller wanted to head the FBI and Trump said no.
So this graphic means nothing.
I saw the evidence in the report.
Volume 2
Somebody said Trump said something.
That's not obstruction because discussing firing that Prick Mueller isn't obstruction.
Did he fire him?
No.
Mueller claims that talking about it establishes intent.
However none of the above ever took place.
The media constantly talked about Trump firing him and Trump may have wanted to, but he never did....even though Mueller did plenty to deserve firing.
Mueller thinks that wanting to fire his worthless ass is enough to begin impeachment.
But Mueller knew he didn't have evidence of an actual crime.
All he had was a very nasty opinion of the president....because of huge conflicts.
Mueller never should have been put in charge of an investigation on Trump because of his inherent prejudices.

Yeah.....Mueller wanted to head the FBI and Trump said no.
So this graphic means nothing.
I saw the evidence in the report.

Is that you, Donnie?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

What does this have to do with what I posted?
The red is evidence of obstructive acts.

Bullshit.
It's not evidence.
It's not even circumstantial evidence.
It's hearsay.

It's a graphic of what's in the report. You should try reading it someday since you like to talk about it so much.

I've read some of it....and I saw a lot of "He said....She said" which is hearsay.
I think the Mueller Report is just a lot of wishful thinking.
They don't have evidence of any criminal activity by Trump.
They feel they can convict someone for a crime because they claim he showed intent but never carried it out.
And this same justice department felt Hillary didn't intend on obstructing justice when she destroyed evidence.
That she didn't intend on mishandling classified information when it was clear she did when she set up her private server, and then destroyed it with BleachBit and used hammers to crush the phones she communicated with.

Jesus, you fuckers think just wishful-thinking is enough to get a conviction. To Hell with the facts.

Wishful thinking?
Jesus christ, dude. I just gave you a graphic of how Mueller broke it down.

and your past unbiased manner didn't lead the way to the honest land?

wow. i am stumped at the fate of the universe.

Well, if you had read the report you would understand what was posted rather than look like a dope.
Just as had you listened to us saying a president cannot be indicted over the last two years you wouldn't be shocked and butthurt now.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

No. He described the elements necessary for obstruction and then showed which elements each of the ten instances of obstruction met. There were at least four that met all of the elements necessary to charge.

View attachment 263045

Too much at once? Sorry. Sometimes I forget to dumb it down. Do you have questions?

Dumbed down is your forte', the foundation of your posts.

Do you have anything to add? Are you still confused over the obstruction piece?

are you confused about when the next D gets in power we'll simply see an accusation that demands an investigation they're going to resist and as soon as they do - obstruction in return.

why does the left think their stupid shit will not come back to them?

This investigation didn't happen out of political spite, dope.

There was a very real and serious intrusion of our electoral process by a foreign advesary acting in favor of a candidate.

That candidate and his campaign accepted offers of assistance, did not report it and lied about any and all interactions they had with that foreign power.

The ante was upped to a SC when the then president fired the FBI director.


Not a political motive to be found.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Except your "quote" is a lie

No, liar, it's a direct quote.