Mueller Spokesman Issues Clarification: OLC Opinion Had NO Impact On Mueller Decision

[Zorro!]

‘Not Exonerated’ Is Not a Standard Any Free Country Should Accept'

Democrats and snowflakes also attempted to declare during their ruthless political, yet shameful, assault on Judge Kavanaugh that in THEIR America Conservatives are 'GUILTY until Proven Innocent' and that the 'burden of proof' was on the ACCUSED, not the accuser.

Thank God we do not actually live in THEIR America, that they have failed to 'fundamentally change' the United States into what they want it to be.

We've gone from Arlen Spector's NOT PROVED! To Dirty Bob Mueller's NOT, NOT GUILTY!

 

[BlindBoo]

End of story.

Stop right there. End of Report, not end of story. Supposition on Mueller's intent is just that. Whereas his intend is precisely documented in his written report.

 

[Yarddog]

Joint DOJ?

That's BARR speaking...and we know he's a blatant liar

Of course we do, which is why he agrees to testify under oath before Congress while Mueller sticks to ' drive-by' where he is safe from being caught in perjury / where he doesn't have to answer questions or defend his 'investigation'.

Mueller needs to have his ass dragged in front of Congress and answer some questions. He got paid a lot of money to do this investigation, but you can bet the left will turn him into a poor victim next.

 

[Yarddog]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."

that's great because McCabe in an interview with Anderson Cooper said Suspicions of Trump being a Russian asset/ agent, was the reason they started the investigation. These frauds of human beings cant keep their stories straight.

 

[Lesh]

"Mueller needs to have his ass dragged in front of Congress and answer some questions"

What questions?

 

[Zorro!]

Joint DOJ?

That's BARR speaking...and we know he's a blatant liar

Of course we do, which is why he agrees to testify under oath before Congress while Mueller sticks to ' drive-by' where he is safe from being caught in perjury / where he doesn't have to answer questions or defend his 'investigation'.

Mueller needs to have his ass dragged in front of Congress and answer some questions. He got paid a lot of money to do this investigation, but you can bet the left will turn him into a poor victim next.

Screw him. He is completely dishonest, I have no interest in his opinion. His probe has been a sham from the start, never what it claimed to be, it was always an extralegal impeachment probe. The Executive Branch does not handle impeachment probes, Congress has bloated staffs to handle those.

It was clear a long time ago that there was no collusion case, yet Dirty Bob continued his show investigation, silent while the press and the Left openly speculated that the President of the United States was a Kremlin agent. Dirty Bob said nothing because he was trying to lure Trump into obstructing the investigation.

Trump never fell for the bait, so we got the muddled mess Dirty Bob is now trying to kick to Congress.

Obstruction is a process crime — pricks like Dirty Bob love those. Remember, his protegee Comey jailed Martha Stewart for deny that she committed a crime she was never charged with.

Prosecutors generally do not let a cooperator settle a case by pleading guilty to a mere process crime. But if the main case the prosecutor is trying to build is itself a process crime, no underlying crime (like an espionage conspiracy) needs have been committed. He is looking for sanctions against Trump (impeachment by Congress) absent an underlying crime.

These bastards like Dirty Bob and his evil spawn Comey think they are untouchable and as such that Trump committed an unpardonable sin by firing his lying ass. The fatal flaw in these two pricks thinking is: As president, Trump had incontestable power to exercise prosecutorial discretion and to fire the FBI director.

Mueller Strategy: Obstruction of Justice Investigation Leading to Impeachment | National Review

 

[Zorro!]

Joint DOJ?

That's BARR speaking...and we know he's a blatant liar

No Barr didn't lie. Mueller didn't say "But for the OLC opinion, I would have found the President obstructed justice."

We know precisely what he said. He wrote it down for everyone to read.

The rubes needed some red meat and Donnie needs a little butthurt cream.

Mueller stated that if he believed the President had not committed a crime he would have said so....which infers if he had thought the President had committed a crime he WOULD have said so, which he never clearly stated..

He also went to great lengths to insinuate it was because of the OCL that he did not declare Trump has committed a crime and why he did not indict him.

Mueller's spokesman, not the DOJ released the 'clarification' that Mueller did not mean that the OCL decision had anything to do with Mueller's final decision.

Instead of doing what you snowflakes usually do, which is defend the conspirators and claim Trump is lying and Barr is covering up for him, why don't you have Nadler settle this once and for all by subpoenaing Mueller and force him to testify? That way he can clear the air, say what he really meant, and answer some questions about his investigation!

Oh wait...that's right - Mueller begged Nadler not to call him to testify before Congress during his Press Conference...

The last place wants to find himself is under oath before Congress....

 

[IM2]

The OP is based on an article from the daily mail. A right wing piece of misinformation and fake news .

 

[Lesh]

His probe has been a sham from the start, never what it claimed to be, it was always an extralegal impeachment probe. The Executive Branch does not handle impeachment probes, Congress has bloated staffs to handle those.

Yo never heard of Watergate or Ken Starr huh?

 

[easyt65]

The OP is based on an article from the daily mail. A right wing piece of misinformation and fake news .

Why do snowflakes always attempt to discredit the source WHEN THEY CAN'T DISPROVE WHAT IS BEING REPORTED?

 

[Zorro!]

His probe has been a sham from the start, never what it claimed to be, it was always an extralegal impeachment probe. The Executive Branch does not handle impeachment probes, Congress has bloated staffs to handle those.

Yo never heard of Watergate or Ken Starr huh?

Yes. Congress was handled with Congressional hearings, Ken Starr was appointed under the now lapsed Independent Counsel Statute. Dirty Bob and his vile band of Democrats Hillary donors is neither of these.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

Meuller is a disgusting liar and con artist

And high treason traitor trying to stop the American voters who voted in trump to do the work of a president for 4 years and then gets judged again

But the crooked deep state has tried to sabatogue his 4 years

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Joint DOJ?

That's BARR speaking...and we know he's a blatant liar

No Barr didn't lie. Mueller didn't say "But for the OLC opinion, I would have found the President obstructed justice."

We know precisely what he said. He wrote it down for everyone to read.

The rubes needed some red meat and Donnie needs a little butthurt cream.

Mueller stated that if he believed the President had not committed a crime he would have said so....which infers if he had thought the President had committed a crime he WOULD have said so, which he never clearly stated..

He also went to great lengths to insinuate it was because of the OCL that he did not declare Trump has committed a crime and why he did not indict him.

Mueller's spokesman, not the DOJ released the 'clarification' that Mueller did not mean that the OCL decision had anything to do with Mueller's final decision.

Instead of doing what you snowflakes usually do, which is defend the conspirators and claim Trump is lying and Barr is covering up for him, why don't you have Nadler settle this once and for all by subpoenaing Mueller and force him to testify? That way he can clear the air, say what he really meant, and answer some questions about his investigation!

Oh wait...that's right - Mueller begged Nadler not to call him to testify before Congress during his Press Conference...

The last place wants to find himself is under oath before Congress....

That clarification was the traitors realizing mueller has commited high treason and must help him avoid the gallows

Disgusting bunch of people for sure

 

[Lesh]

That clarification was the traitors realizing mueller has commited high treason and must help him avoid the gallows

Disgusting bunch of people for sure

Investigating malfeasance by authoritiesmay be treason in your country (Russia) but not here

 

[Lesh]

His probe has been a sham from the start, never what it claimed to be, it was always an extralegal impeachment probe. The Executive Branch does not handle impeachment probes, Congress has bloated staffs to handle those.

Yo never heard of Watergate or Ken Starr huh?

Yes. Congress was handled with Congressional hearings, Ken Starr was appointed under the now lapsed Independent Counsel Statute. Dirty Bob and his vile band of Democrats Hillary donors is neither of these.

What was Clinton investigated for?

A land deal from years before he became President?

And he was impeached by Republicans over what?

A BJ?

 

[B. Kidd]

His probe has been a sham from the start, never what it claimed to be, it was always an extralegal impeachment probe. The Executive Branch does not handle impeachment probes, Congress has bloated staffs to handle those.

Yo never heard of Watergate or Ken Starr huh?

Yes. Congress was handled with Congressional hearings, Ken Starr was appointed under the now lapsed Independent Counsel Statute. Dirty Bob and his vile band of Democrats Hillary donors is neither of these.

What was Clinton investigated for?

A land deal from years before he became President?

And he was impeached by Republicans over what?

A BJ?

And a cigar!
Claimed it wasn't sex or sumthin'.....

 

[bripat9643]

That clarification was the traitors realizing mueller has commited high treason and must help him avoid the gallows

Disgusting bunch of people for sure

Investigating malfeasance by authoritiesmay be treason in your country (Russia) but not here

That's why Comey, Brennan and Clapper are going to be investigated.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

That clarification was the traitors realizing mueller has commited high treason and must help him avoid the gallows

Disgusting bunch of people for sure

Investigating malfeasance by authoritiesmay be treason in your country (Russia) but not here

Weakening the nation and helping the enemies is indeed high treason in usa

 

[Zorro!]

His probe has been a sham from the start, never what it claimed to be, it was always an extralegal impeachment probe. The Executive Branch does not handle impeachment probes, Congress has bloated staffs to handle those.

Yo never heard of Watergate or Ken Starr huh?

Yes. Congress was handled with Congressional hearings, Ken Starr was appointed under the now lapsed Independent Counsel Statute. Dirty Bob and his vile band of Democrats Hillary donors is neither of these.

What was Clinton investigated for?

A land deal from years before he became President?

And he was impeached by Republicans over what?

A BJ?

And a cigar!
Claimed it wasn't sex or sumthin'.....

Article I charged that Clinton lied to the grand jury concerning:

1. the nature and details of his relationship with Lewinsky
2. prior false statements he made in the Jones deposition
3. prior false statements he allowed his lawyer to make characterizing Lewinsky's affidavit
4. his attempts to tamper with witnesses

Article III charged Clinton with attempting to obstruct justice in the Jones case by:

1. encouraging Lewinsky to file a false affidavit
2. encouraging Lewinsky to give false testimony if and when she was called to testify
3. concealing gifts he had given to Lewinsky that had been subpoenaed
4. attempting to secure a job for Lewinsky to influence her testimony
5. permitting his lawyer to make false statements characterizing Lewinsky's affidavit
6. attempting to tamper with the possible testimony of his secretary Betty Curie
7. making false and misleading statements to potential grand jury witnesses

 

[Zorro!]

His probe has been a sham from the start, never what it claimed to be, it was always an extralegal impeachment probe. The Executive Branch does not handle impeachment probes, Congress has bloated staffs to handle those.

Yo never heard of Watergate or Ken Starr huh?

Yes. Congress was handled with Congressional hearings, Ken Starr was appointed under the now lapsed Independent Counsel Statute. Dirty Bob and his vile band of Democrats Hillary donors is neither of these.

What was Clinton investigated for?

A land deal from years before he became President?

And he was impeached by Republicans over what?

A BJ?

Article I charged that Clinton lied to the grand jury concerning:

1. the nature and details of his relationship with Lewinsky
2. prior false statements he made in the Jones deposition
3. prior false statements he allowed his lawyer to make characterizing Lewinsky's affidavit
4. his attempts to tamper with witnesses

Article III charged Clinton with attempting to obstruct justice in the Jones case by:

1. encouraging Lewinsky to file a false affidavit
2. encouraging Lewinsky to give false testimony if and when she was called to testify
3. concealing gifts he had given to Lewinsky that had been subpoenaed
4. attempting to secure a job for Lewinsky to influence her testimony
5. permitting his lawyer to make false statements characterizing Lewinsky's affidavit
6. attempting to tamper with the possible testimony of his secretary Betty Curie
7. making false and misleading statements to potential grand jury witnesses

And the country did NOT support the GOP impeaching Clinton.