Mueller Report Exceeds 300 Pages, Raising Questions About Four-Page Summary

[AntonToo]

The difference is: All of us would be able to tell if your summary is bullshit because we can find the Atlas Shrugged online.

If you can prove the Atlas Shrugged was blocked by Mitch McConnell you get A+.

We know the Mule's report is exactly as Barr says it is, because if there was any deviation from it Mule and his 16 angry democrat shysters would have been on every cable "news" show telling you moonbats all about it.

Dummy - there is 100% deviation in Barr taking it upon himself to clear Trump on Obstruction of Justice.

 

[Darkwind]

Well, that is amusing.

You see, there is a question of motive for wanting to see it.

I too, want to see the report. I, however; want to ensure that the law is followed and information that is legally bared from being disclosed is not actually disclosed.

You, however; wish to see the entire report so that you can twist it to say something it does not so that you and your ilk can then continue on with actually harming America by trying to illicitly overthrow a legally elected President.

Shove the apocalyptic treason against Trump bullshit. Trump is going to talk a bunch of bullshit but he will never take any action against the "traitors" because he knows it's bullshit, why don't you?

Which traitors would those be? Schitt, Pelosi and Schumer?

Why? Are you making an enemies list for Nixon 2.0?

What, why would I horn in on the progressive side of the street. After all, isn't it youse guys who have lists and lists of people in the GOP and this administration who are traitors, even though there is no evidence of treason?

Who says McCarthy is dead?

I do. McCarthy is dead. His kind of far right authoritarian politics were nothing new when he gave it a try.

Now they're resurrected by the Democrats.

 

[Darkwind]

The investigation took two years, over 2,000 subpoenas, over 500 witnesses and several midnight gestapo raids. How many pages are good for y'all liberals?

One paragraph would have been sufficient...

What wasn't sufficient was a 10 hour review of 22 months, 2,000 subpoenas, 500 witnesses.

There were zero gestapo raids.

----

Getting it on Friday night and issuing your report on Sunday afternoon? There was not enough time for a sufficient review to summarize that amount of work.

It was very much like OJ's jury compressing 9 months of testimony into less than 4 hours of deliberation.

Really?

So, how long does it take to review no evidence at all?

Depends on how thorough you want to be. Apparently thoroughness wasn't a priority with Mr. Barr. There is no way to responsibly review that amount of data in 10 hours.

100 hours? 200?

In two days, I can read nearly 1200 words if I break for coffee, dinner, and sleep for 8 hours each day.

The report is reportedly 400+ pages long.

I could read that in a single day -- with notes.

So, you read, discover that he - Mueller - questioned a lot of people and found nothing. The documents show there was nothing, there is a whole lot o 'nothing' to see, and all of it is classified Grand Jury documents and testimony of innocent people.


Seems to Me he should have had it done by Saturday afternoon and saved himself a Sunday for the family.

Ok. Thanks for your viewpoint.

Meanwhile back in reality, they are now going through the report and figuring out what can be released and what cannot. It seems to me such a careful reading would be what you would want to do in the first place before rendering your verdict on what is submitted to you. One does not responsibly proclaim that there was "no evidence at all" and then going back to read what you just deemed as not-evidentiary.

Seems to Me that he anticipated your sides nonsense and read through the document, took notes of the salient and unclassified points, which were Mueller's own conclusions, and summarized them. Hardly an exercise in graduate thesis research.

He'll get it done as I trust HIM far more than I trust the Democrats, and that is saying a lot cause I don't really trust any of them, and we'll deal with it when it becomes available.

I'm sure that by then, the left will have a whole set of twisted motivations and talking points they'll pivot to when it turns out that this exercise in futility finally comes to an end.

I'm already there; since there was no questioning of the blob, I question the thoroughness of the report in any light. We have precedent where the sitting president has sat with the OIC (Clinton/Ken Starr). Why the blob was too scared to? Who knows. That he didn't probably means it wasn't as thorough as it could have been.

Still, the American people owe Mueller a debt of thanks for taking so many Trump felons off the street.

And think, why just last Saturday, the left was screaming on why it was taking so long.

 

[candycorn]

One paragraph would have been sufficient...

What wasn't sufficient was a 10 hour review of 22 months, 2,000 subpoenas, 500 witnesses.

There were zero gestapo raids.

----

Getting it on Friday night and issuing your report on Sunday afternoon? There was not enough time for a sufficient review to summarize that amount of work.

It was very much like OJ's jury compressing 9 months of testimony into less than 4 hours of deliberation.

Really?

So, how long does it take to review no evidence at all?

Depends on how thorough you want to be. Apparently thoroughness wasn't a priority with Mr. Barr. There is no way to responsibly review that amount of data in 10 hours.

100 hours? 200?

In two days, I can read nearly 1200 words if I break for coffee, dinner, and sleep for 8 hours each day.

The report is reportedly 400+ pages long.

I could read that in a single day -- with notes.

So, you read, discover that he - Mueller - questioned a lot of people and found nothing. The documents show there was nothing, there is a whole lot o 'nothing' to see, and all of it is classified Grand Jury documents and testimony of innocent people.


Seems to Me he should have had it done by Saturday afternoon and saved himself a Sunday for the family.

Ok. Thanks for your viewpoint.

Meanwhile back in reality, they are now going through the report and figuring out what can be released and what cannot. It seems to me such a careful reading would be what you would want to do in the first place before rendering your verdict on what is submitted to you. One does not responsibly proclaim that there was "no evidence at all" and then going back to read what you just deemed as not-evidentiary.

Seems to Me that he anticipated your sides nonsense and read through the document, took notes of the salient and unclassified points, which were Mueller's own conclusions, and summarized them. Hardly an exercise in graduate thesis research.

He'll get it done as I trust HIM far more than I trust the Democrats, and that is saying a lot cause I don't really trust any of them, and we'll deal with it when it becomes available.

I'm sure that by then, the left will have a whole set of twisted motivations and talking points they'll pivot to when it turns out that this exercise in futility finally comes to an end.

I'm already there; since there was no questioning of the blob, I question the thoroughness of the report in any light. We have precedent where the sitting president has sat with the OIC (Clinton/Ken Starr). Why the blob was too scared to? Who knows. That he didn't probably means it wasn't as thorough as it could have been.

Still, the American people owe Mueller a debt of thanks for taking so many Trump felons off the street.

And think, why just last Saturday, the left was screaming on why it was taking so long.

I was?

 

[Indeependent]

The report is going to be made public Barr is on record saying that Trump has said he is fine with it being made public Barr has a sterling reputation so why would he risk trying to mislead people in his summary letter knowing full well the report is going to be made public? The chances of anyting being in the full report that will contradict what Barr said in his summary letter are slim and none.

Lies all lies. When it becomes clear to all they are lying you still will think they are fine upstanding men. They are going to fight an honest release of the report until someone pries it from their cold dead hands, you can bet your bottom dollar.

Well we have the moron response looking foreward to an intelligent one.

You are not looking for an intelligent response, you are looking for someone to agree with you. I would be happy to be wrong about Trump making it his mission in life to hide the Mueller report from America but by now I have a pretty good idea who we are dealing with.

I don't think you do know. You're the idiot in the conversation claiming the high ground of knowing better than the evidence your last hope of impeachment couldn't even invent. And trust me. He tried. And all of his democrat lawyers tried. They came up with nothing.

They came up with a report we will never see if Trump gets his way. Again, if the Barr report totally clears the president then you tell me why they are fighting release.

Like the investigation that never happened because Trump didn’t want it to happen?
You fucking idiot.

 

[Darkwind]

Really?

So, how long does it take to review no evidence at all?

Depends on how thorough you want to be. Apparently thoroughness wasn't a priority with Mr. Barr. There is no way to responsibly review that amount of data in 10 hours.

100 hours? 200?

In two days, I can read nearly 1200 words if I break for coffee, dinner, and sleep for 8 hours each day.

The report is reportedly 400+ pages long.

I could read that in a single day -- with notes.

So, you read, discover that he - Mueller - questioned a lot of people and found nothing. The documents show there was nothing, there is a whole lot o 'nothing' to see, and all of it is classified Grand Jury documents and testimony of innocent people.


Seems to Me he should have had it done by Saturday afternoon and saved himself a Sunday for the family.

Ok. Thanks for your viewpoint.

Meanwhile back in reality, they are now going through the report and figuring out what can be released and what cannot. It seems to me such a careful reading would be what you would want to do in the first place before rendering your verdict on what is submitted to you. One does not responsibly proclaim that there was "no evidence at all" and then going back to read what you just deemed as not-evidentiary.

Seems to Me that he anticipated your sides nonsense and read through the document, took notes of the salient and unclassified points, which were Mueller's own conclusions, and summarized them. Hardly an exercise in graduate thesis research.

He'll get it done as I trust HIM far more than I trust the Democrats, and that is saying a lot cause I don't really trust any of them, and we'll deal with it when it becomes available.

I'm sure that by then, the left will have a whole set of twisted motivations and talking points they'll pivot to when it turns out that this exercise in futility finally comes to an end.

I'm already there; since there was no questioning of the blob, I question the thoroughness of the report in any light. We have precedent where the sitting president has sat with the OIC (Clinton/Ken Starr). Why the blob was too scared to? Who knows. That he didn't probably means it wasn't as thorough as it could have been.

Still, the American people owe Mueller a debt of thanks for taking so many Trump felons off the street.

And think, why just last Saturday, the left was screaming on why it was taking so long.

I was?

I'd say about 95% of you leftists were.

 

[baileyn45]

The investigation took two years, over 2,000 subpoenas, over 500 witnesses and several midnight gestapo raids. How many pages are good for y'all liberals?

One paragraph would have been sufficient...

What wasn't sufficient was a 10 hour review of 22 months, 2,000 subpoenas, 500 witnesses.

There were zero gestapo raids.

----

Getting it on Friday night and issuing your report on Sunday afternoon? There was not enough time for a sufficient review to summarize that amount of work.

It was very much like OJ's jury compressing 9 months of testimony into less than 4 hours of deliberation.

Really?

So, how long does it take to review no evidence at all?

Depends on how thorough you want to be. Apparently thoroughness wasn't a priority with Mr. Barr. There is no way to responsibly review that amount of data in 10 hours.

100 hours? 200?

In two days, I can read nearly 1200 words if I break for coffee, dinner, and sleep for 8 hours each day.

The report is reportedly 400+ pages long.

I could read that in a single day -- with notes.

So, you read, discover that he - Mueller - questioned a lot of people and found nothing. The documents show there was nothing, there is a whole lot o 'nothing' to see, and all of it is classified Grand Jury documents and testimony of innocent people.


Seems to Me he should have had it done by Saturday afternoon and saved himself a Sunday for the family.

Ok. Thanks for your viewpoint.

Meanwhile back in reality, they are now going through the report and figuring out what can be released and what cannot. It seems to me such a careful reading would be what you would want to do in the first place before rendering your verdict on what is submitted to you. One does not responsibly proclaim that there was "no evidence at all" and then going back to read what you just deemed as not-evidentiary.

Seems to Me that he anticipated your sides nonsense and read through the document, took notes of the salient and unclassified points, which were Mueller's own conclusions, and summarized them. Hardly an exercise in graduate thesis research.

He'll get it done as I trust HIM far more than I trust the Democrats, and that is saying a lot cause I don't really trust any of them, and we'll deal with it when it becomes available.

I'm sure that by then, the left will have a whole set of twisted motivations and talking points they'll pivot to when it turns out that this exercise in futility finally comes to an end.

I'm already there; since there was no questioning of the blob, I question the thoroughness of the report in any light. We have precedent where the sitting president has sat with the OIC (Clinton/Ken Starr). Why the blob was too scared to? Who knows. That he didn't probably means it wasn't as thorough as it could have been.

Still, the American people owe Mueller a debt of thanks for taking so many Trump felons off the street.

It's funny but years ago Mueller was enemy number one, what with his testimony that Iraq had WMD. Now he's the darling of the left. The fact he's found nothing will of course spurn years of conspiracy theories. The bottom line is if this witch hunt, that pulled out all the stops, made up bullshit on top of bullshit, can't find anything, maybe there is nothing to find.

 

[candycorn]

One paragraph would have been sufficient...

What wasn't sufficient was a 10 hour review of 22 months, 2,000 subpoenas, 500 witnesses.

There were zero gestapo raids.

----

Getting it on Friday night and issuing your report on Sunday afternoon? There was not enough time for a sufficient review to summarize that amount of work.

It was very much like OJ's jury compressing 9 months of testimony into less than 4 hours of deliberation.

Really?

So, how long does it take to review no evidence at all?

Depends on how thorough you want to be. Apparently thoroughness wasn't a priority with Mr. Barr. There is no way to responsibly review that amount of data in 10 hours.

100 hours? 200?

In two days, I can read nearly 1200 words if I break for coffee, dinner, and sleep for 8 hours each day.

The report is reportedly 400+ pages long.

I could read that in a single day -- with notes.

So, you read, discover that he - Mueller - questioned a lot of people and found nothing. The documents show there was nothing, there is a whole lot o 'nothing' to see, and all of it is classified Grand Jury documents and testimony of innocent people.


Seems to Me he should have had it done by Saturday afternoon and saved himself a Sunday for the family.

Ok. Thanks for your viewpoint.

Meanwhile back in reality, they are now going through the report and figuring out what can be released and what cannot. It seems to me such a careful reading would be what you would want to do in the first place before rendering your verdict on what is submitted to you. One does not responsibly proclaim that there was "no evidence at all" and then going back to read what you just deemed as not-evidentiary.

Seems to Me that he anticipated your sides nonsense and read through the document, took notes of the salient and unclassified points, which were Mueller's own conclusions, and summarized them. Hardly an exercise in graduate thesis research.

He'll get it done as I trust HIM far more than I trust the Democrats, and that is saying a lot cause I don't really trust any of them, and we'll deal with it when it becomes available.

I'm sure that by then, the left will have a whole set of twisted motivations and talking points they'll pivot to when it turns out that this exercise in futility finally comes to an end.

I'm already there; since there was no questioning of the blob, I question the thoroughness of the report in any light. We have precedent where the sitting president has sat with the OIC (Clinton/Ken Starr). Why the blob was too scared to? Who knows. That he didn't probably means it wasn't as thorough as it could have been.

Still, the American people owe Mueller a debt of thanks for taking so many Trump felons off the street.

It's funny but years ago Mueller was enemy number one, what with his testimony that Iraq had WMD. Now he's the darling of the left. The fact he's found nothing will of course spurn years of conspiracy theories. The bottom line is if this witch hunt, that pulled out all the stops, made up bullshit on top of bullshit, can't find anything, maybe there is nothing to find.

What testimony was that about Iraq having WMDs? I really have no idea what you're talking about.

I knew he was the head of the FBI at the time but I don't recall him giving a lot of testimony about WMDs... Colin Powell did, as did Condi Rice.

Link please.

 

[blackhawk]

Unless I have missed something neither Mueller or anyone on his team has challenged or called into question anything Barr said in his four page summary. Now it seems to me if there were any outright lies or misrepresentations in Barrs summary of Muellers report either Mueller or someone on his team would have said something.

 

[baileyn45]

Really?

So, how long does it take to review no evidence at all?

Depends on how thorough you want to be. Apparently thoroughness wasn't a priority with Mr. Barr. There is no way to responsibly review that amount of data in 10 hours.

100 hours? 200?

In two days, I can read nearly 1200 words if I break for coffee, dinner, and sleep for 8 hours each day.

The report is reportedly 400+ pages long.

I could read that in a single day -- with notes.

So, you read, discover that he - Mueller - questioned a lot of people and found nothing. The documents show there was nothing, there is a whole lot o 'nothing' to see, and all of it is classified Grand Jury documents and testimony of innocent people.


Seems to Me he should have had it done by Saturday afternoon and saved himself a Sunday for the family.

Ok. Thanks for your viewpoint.

Meanwhile back in reality, they are now going through the report and figuring out what can be released and what cannot. It seems to me such a careful reading would be what you would want to do in the first place before rendering your verdict on what is submitted to you. One does not responsibly proclaim that there was "no evidence at all" and then going back to read what you just deemed as not-evidentiary.

Seems to Me that he anticipated your sides nonsense and read through the document, took notes of the salient and unclassified points, which were Mueller's own conclusions, and summarized them. Hardly an exercise in graduate thesis research.

He'll get it done as I trust HIM far more than I trust the Democrats, and that is saying a lot cause I don't really trust any of them, and we'll deal with it when it becomes available.

I'm sure that by then, the left will have a whole set of twisted motivations and talking points they'll pivot to when it turns out that this exercise in futility finally comes to an end.

I'm already there; since there was no questioning of the blob, I question the thoroughness of the report in any light. We have precedent where the sitting president has sat with the OIC (Clinton/Ken Starr). Why the blob was too scared to? Who knows. That he didn't probably means it wasn't as thorough as it could have been.

Still, the American people owe Mueller a debt of thanks for taking so many Trump felons off the street.

It's funny but years ago Mueller was enemy number one, what with his testimony that Iraq had WMD. Now he's the darling of the left. The fact he's found nothing will of course spurn years of conspiracy theories. The bottom line is if this witch hunt, that pulled out all the stops, made up bullshit on top of bullshit, can't find anything, maybe there is nothing to find.

What testimony was that about Iraq having WMDs? I really have no idea what you're talking about.

I knew he was the head of the FBI at the time but I don't recall him giving a lot of testimony about WMDs... Colin Powell did, as did Condi Rice.

Link please.

You may wish to enlighten yourself as to Mr Mueller's past. As head of the FBI he testified to the veracity of the whole WMD crap as much as anyone. Whichever way the wind blows.

 

[hunarcy]

I can understand Trump and his appointees going to ridiculous lengths to bury the Mueller report but I am still trying to understand why anyone else would not want to see it.

The idea that the Mueller report is being "buried" is ridiculous on its face. What is hilarious is the idea that it can be examined and redacted in a week...of course, the Democrats knew this and so their demand to see it by April 2 is an obvious stunt that must be mocked!

 

[hunarcy]

The Barr Letter took a public opinion hit today:

The total of 300-plus pages suggests that Mr. Mueller went well beyond the kind of bare-bones summary required by the Justice Department regulation governing his appointment and detailed his conclusions at length. And it raises questions about what Mr. Barr might have left out of the four dense pages he sent Congress.

Expect the Barr Letter to continue to make headlines until election day 2020:
Mueller Report Exceeds 300 Pages, Raising Questions About Four-Page Summary

Dear god give it up. Barr is going to release more. He’s working with mueller and his team to decide what info is okay to release without breaching confidentiality. He released a summery, that’s a normal thing to do for a 300 plus page report. Especially a report with many different people in it where there are privacy concerns.

It isn’t odd to you that if Barr was lying, or grossly spinning, that mueller hasn’t come out and said something. Mueller certainly wasn’t afraid to correct buzzfeed when they reported that indictments were on the way a few months ago. Is it also not odd to you that Barr would spin and lie about this, even though there are plenty of other people reviewing the report, and it’s all gonna come out anyway. That seems like a very stupid plan.

Jesus, the Mueller team for the past few months has been airdropping pamphlets left and right letting you know “get out of collusion city, we’re about to Nuke it.” I get that y’all rested all your hopes and dreams on this trump Russia collusion, that just wasn’t a smart decision. It was all based on a dossier that had validity issues from the get-go. This should not have blindsided y’all like it has. Maybe it’s time to re-evaluate your media sources and recognize that it seems like they’re pretty biased and wanted this to be true as much as you did. Which is no way to be a journalist.

Mueller would not say anything to breach the confidentiality of his report even to correct a lying sack of shit. The only way he would do so is if he is called before congress. Expect that if this snow job continues.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.07cd6f7ba50b

Looks like you're wrong yet again.

 

[Flopper]

Incredible! The Mueller Report is 300+ page's at a cost of $30 million dollars.

Yes, draining the swamp is expensive.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It could be 50000 pages and I could summarize it in four words:

No collusion. No obstruction.

That Republicans and others on the right are hostile to giving the American people access to the full report comes as no surprise.

 

[Darkwind]

It could be 50000 pages and I could summarize it in four words:

No collusion. No obstruction.

That Republicans and others on the right are hostile to giving the American people access to the full report comes as no surprise.

your ignorance of the law really comes as no surprise.

 

[NoVote]

Congress gave the power of the Justice department to the Executive branch. There is no law that dictates the publishing to congress or the public of these papers. The tard fucks are begging, screw them, they do NOT have any right to this report at ALL. PERIOD.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

The Barr Letter took a public opinion hit today:

The total of 300-plus pages suggests that Mr. Mueller went well beyond the kind of bare-bones summary required by the Justice Department regulation governing his appointment and detailed his conclusions at length. And it raises questions about what Mr. Barr might have left out of the four dense pages he sent Congress.

Expect the Barr Letter to continue to make headlines until election day 2020:
Mueller Report Exceeds 300 Pages, Raising Questions About Four-Page Summary

The NYT is just the deep state opinion, not the public one

Besides, the 'public' isn't going to read 300 pages anyway, 4 pages is already a bit much.. 4 sentences might be better...

Individual 1 is not the orange Manchuarian candidate

Hillary's novel belongs in the fiction section

Fake news does exist

The #resistance needs to come up with a new fixation for the coming selections

 

[Claudette]

The Barr Letter took a public opinion hit today:

The total of 300-plus pages suggests that Mr. Mueller went well beyond the kind of bare-bones summary required by the Justice Department regulation governing his appointment and detailed his conclusions at length. And it raises questions about what Mr. Barr might have left out of the four dense pages he sent Congress.

Expect the Barr Letter to continue to make headlines until election day 2020:
Mueller Report Exceeds 300 Pages, Raising Questions About Four-Page Summary

Its a summary stupid. Summaries are short, sweet and to the point.

You don't need more than four pages to get your point made.

Keep doubling down on stupid. You will fit right in the Dem led House.

 

[dannyboys]

I can understand Trump and his appointees going to ridiculous lengths to bury the Mueller report but I am still trying to understand why anyone else would not want to see it.

You MORON!
Barr and Muller and their families have been very close friends for decades! Muller trusts Barr implicitly.
You really believe Barr would "hide" what Muller reported?
Why the fuck would he ever "bury" anything knowing the full report will soon be sent to Congress.?
The FACT is the report is going to be made public, after the Grand Jury proceedings are scrubbed, ACCORDING TO LAW!!!!!!. Anything in the report that has anything to do with ongoing investigations is scrubbed ACCORDING TO LAW!!!!!!! and anything to do with 'sources and methods is scrubbed ACCORDING TO LAW!!!!!!!
Adam shit for brains is demanding he be allowed to see the entire unredacted report.
How many minutes after he read the report would it take for him to be on the phone to the NYT??????
Barr/Rosenstein/the office of the Inspector General will release everword to Congress they are allowed to UNDER THE LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!
Of course the fucking LIB MSM and the DEMs will scream their tiny heads off. LET THEM!

 

[sakinago]

The Barr Letter took a public opinion hit today:

The total of 300-plus pages suggests that Mr. Mueller went well beyond the kind of bare-bones summary required by the Justice Department regulation governing his appointment and detailed his conclusions at length. And it raises questions about what Mr. Barr might have left out of the four dense pages he sent Congress.

Expect the Barr Letter to continue to make headlines until election day 2020:
Mueller Report Exceeds 300 Pages, Raising Questions About Four-Page Summary

Dear god give it up. Barr is going to release more. He’s working with mueller and his team to decide what info is okay to release without breaching confidentiality. He released a summery, that’s a normal thing to do for a 300 plus page report. Especially a report with many different people in it where there are privacy concerns.

It isn’t odd to you that if Barr was lying, or grossly spinning, that mueller hasn’t come out and said something. Mueller certainly wasn’t afraid to correct buzzfeed when they reported that indictments were on the way a few months ago. Is it also not odd to you that Barr would spin and lie about this, even though there are plenty of other people reviewing the report, and it’s all gonna come out anyway. That seems like a very stupid plan.

Jesus, the Mueller team for the past few months has been airdropping pamphlets left and right letting you know “get out of collusion city, we’re about to Nuke it.” I get that y’all rested all your hopes and dreams on this trump Russia collusion, that just wasn’t a smart decision. It was all based on a dossier that had validity issues from the get-go. This should not have blindsided y’all like it has. Maybe it’s time to re-evaluate your media sources and recognize that it seems like they’re pretty biased and wanted this to be true as much as you did. Which is no way to be a journalist.

Mueller would not say anything to breach the confidentiality of his report even to correct a lying sack of shit. The only way he would do so is if he is called before congress. Expect that if this snow job continues.

Oh so his report actually proves the russia bullshit? Are you stoned are just stupid? You're looking at the 300 pages of nothing he found. Just grow up and deal with it.

I have no idea what the Mueller report says and neither do you. I want to see it and can't understand why you Trumpbots would be happy as clams to never know what it says. If you are so certain Barr's analysis of the report is correct then quit opposing it's release. The sooner we see it the sooner we can get past all this.

Sweet Jesus, is it possible for the left to communicate in any other way outside of either strawman arguments, ad hominems, non-sequiters, and appeals to ignorance. I wanna see Gal Godot naked, probably not gonna happen, not in the cinema at least. I could do so by non legal methods if I lacked the integrity and had the know how to do so like hacking her cloud, but that’s illegal. Just because I don’t try to hack her cloud, doesn’t mean that I don’t want to still see it.

I would liken the lefts reaction to the mueller report to rumors about Gal Gadot showing nudity in her upcoming movie. Everyone believes it, up until a film critic who got a speacial early screening to the movie says “sorry fellas, there’s no nudity in this movie, even in the deleted scenes that won’t be shown.” Half the people don’t believe the critic and want to see her naked so badly, they are convinced there must be nudity in the deleted scenes, and the critic must be lying. Even though the critics reputation and career would be quickly trashed once the movie came out and there was indeed nudity. The people who want to see the walking art that is gal gadot in her natural form soooo badly also don’t ever stop to think why aren’t any of the other critics who’ve seen it coming out and saying otherwise? Why aren’t the people who made the film coming out and saying otherwise, including the outspoken director who’d increase movie sales by showing Gal naked? This sounds like a silly scenario, but it’s happening right before my eyes. Trump derangement syndrome is real. Anything that doesn’t confirm that Trump is basically satan must therefore be a conspiracy theory by trump lackies or trump himself, however illogical that scenario must be.