Mueller, in First Comments on Russia Inquiry, Declines to Clear Trump
It's clear where Mueller stands on the issue:
"If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” Mr. Mueller said, reading from prepared notes behind a lectern at the Justice Department. “We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.”
He also said that while Justice Department policy prohibits charging a sitting president with a crime, the Constitution provides for another process to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing — a clear reference to the ability of Congress to begin impeachment proceedings.
1) HIS SPEACH WAS MORE THEN JUST NERVOUS, HE SOUNDED LIKE HE WAS IN DEEP INTO SOMETHING HE HAS NO CONTROL OVER
this is important to discern the whole picture:
2) his comments contradicted his written report
and his conversation with Barr, and sounded
EXACTLY LIKE CONGRESSIONAL TALKING POINTS AS IF COHERSED AND THREATENED(COMPROMISED).
There is only 2 explainations for this: 1 he was forced to or 2 he left a protection for himself since in a number of ways he was at a conflict of interest and broke the law by not recusing himself.
3) He found no proof either way of a crime or not a crime, but liberal media and Pelosi and Nadler just use one talking point to misslead people by eleviating the
"no proof of an obstruction crime".
Then they turn on Barr for not getting their verdict and then Pelosi admits her abuse & treason crime by stating they have other ways "to get him". That's in addition to their comitting
obstruction by trying to oust Barr to obstruct with the investigations against their collegues.
Mueller was nervous because the oversight of the congress by the OCE might bring up contacts with him, leak violations, obstruction, instruction, or questions on his conflicts of interest.