MSNBC Poll: 86% Will Not Vote for Hillary

[Meathead]

Who woulda thunk? I mean it is MSNBC, but still, 86%?

Poll Hillary 2016 MSNBC

 

[Manonthestreet]

she's a stalking horse, get out there take some fire, make em use up resources.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Aside from being a lying, corrupt, scumbag bitch . . .

She. Is. Too. Damn. Old.

Personally I don't think she is healthy enough either, I think there is something more that we know going on with regards to her health.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Final cash roundup before she retires. Notice she wants nothing to do with people.

 

[depotoo]

Goes along with the popularity of the twitter hashtag I won't vote for hillary (something like that), which is rumored to have been removed due to a payoff, or some sort. They can't have the negative exposed so early.

 

[HenryBHough]

Hillary won't be the Democrat candidate.

Remember, this is post-constitutional America and there is no reason George Soros can't eliminate the middle man and just buy the job for himself.

 

[Meathead]

she's a stalking horse, get out there take some fire, make em use up resources.

I think the word you're looking for is "nag", an old horse in bad condition or a bitchy woman. Two for two, eh?

 

[Siete]

pretty sure her research team who advised her to run based on their findings agreed with you morons.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Who woulda thunk? I mean it is MSNBC, but still, 86%?

Poll Hillary 2016 MSNBC

this is not a scientific poll. It means absolutely nothing.

 

[Moonglow]

That would be more like 86% of the 1,100 people ask...

 

[AceRothstein]

Internet polls are known for having extreme accuracy.

 

[Meathead]

Who woulda thunk? I mean it is MSNBC, but still, 86%?

Poll Hillary 2016 MSNBC

this is not a scientific poll. It means absolutely nothing.

Not a scientific poll.! God, you're amazing! Did you deduce that by yourself?

 

[Manonthestreet]

pretty sure her research team who advised her to run based on their findings agreed with you morons.

Please, do ya think she even bothered with that....she doesn't need research to recognize a weak democrat field

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Internet polls are known for having extreme accuracy.

Just ask President Ron Paul.

 

[Meathead]

Come on guys, on MSNBC? This is like polling Daily Kos readership.

 

[FA_Q2]

That would be more like 86% of the 1,100 people ask...

Nothing wrong with that sample size at all. It is not the size that is the problem but the manner it was conducted.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

That would be more like 86% of the 1,100 people ask...

Nothing wrong with that sample size at all. It is not the size that is the problem but the manner it was conducted.

Bingo.

It's amazing to me how little people understand polling.

 

[Moonglow]

That would be more like 86% of the 1,100 people ask...

Nothing wrong with that sample size at all. It is not the size that is the problem but the manner it was conducted.

If you want a factor of 100% they need to ask all in the US that vote..

 

[FA_Q2]

Come on guys, on MSNBC? This is like polling Daily Kos readership.

Yes it is and?
Do you think that for one small microsecond every one of the democrat naysayers in this poll that ‘wouldn’t vote for Hillary would not go vote for her in the main?
Don’t bet on it – they will cast a vote for Hillary in a hot second should she get the nomination and she is a sure fire nominee without real opposition.
Where are her opponents right now? Is she a shoe in – no, of course not. She might very well be defeated in the primaries. HOWEVER, there is no indication of that at this time.

 

[AceRothstein]

That would be more like 86% of the 1,100 people ask...

Nothing wrong with that sample size at all. It is not the size that is the problem but the manner it was conducted.

Bingo.

It's amazing to me how little people understand polling.

Teh poles our skewed.