- Dec 26, 2010
- 14,968
- 2,565
- 265
There is no explanation that will be acceptable to the braying mobs.Someone is making the assumption that there is a complete electronic copy of all emails. Since a personal email server was being used for at least part of the emails, the policy may have been to make paper copies of all correspondence. If that was the case, it would make sense to just make a copy of all the email correspondence.Why did Mrs. Clinton have her staff go through the trouble of printing out, boxing and shipping 50,000 or 55,000 pages instead of just sending a copy of the electronic record? One can only speculate, but there is an obvious advantage: Printed files are less informative and far harder to search than the electronic originals.
Because State has only printouts of emails, department personnel responding to a Freedom of Information Act request have to go through the whole haystack rather than type "needle" into a search engine. At best, that would mean long delays in FOIA compliance.
Likewise, printouts are not subject to electronic discovery in the event of investigation or lawsuit. The Times reports that department lawyers responding to a request from the House Select Committee on Benghazi took two months to find "roughly 900 pages pertaining to the Benghazi attacks." And printouts do not include electronic "metadata," which can provide crucial forensic evidence.
This fucking cow actually did this. WTF?
Her motives could have been innocent...they could have been completely evil...it doesn't matter.