Totally irrelevant and the grist which all conspiracy advocates feed on - lies, half-truths, rumors, innuendos and character assassinations.
First of all most people with wealth have their investments done for them, and don't know where every nickle is invested, and as importantly, post 361 offers zero, nil and no evidence that the two whose characters he attacked are invested knowingly in Russia or in anything Russian.
For the record, this form of lying - lies of omission - are the favorite method used by Trumpsters in their on going effort to blame everyone but Trump, or the foolish vote they cast.
You don't even make sense. You make an awful propagandist. I posted some facts, which if a true investigation were going on, any reasonable prosecutor would look in to.
Any reasonable prosecutor would also look in to The Clinton Foundation receiving $145 Million from Vladimir Putin, The "Russian Reset" and The Uranium One Deal.
When in a hole stop digging, the more you lie, the deeper you go.
"In 2010, Hillary Clinton, as secretary of state, was
one of nine federal agency heads to sign off on Russia’s purchase of a controlling stake in Uranium One, an international mining company headquartered in Canada with operations in several U.S. states. It was part of a regular process for approving international deals involving strategic assets, such as uranium, that could have implications for national security. Uranium One’s U.S. mines produced about 11 percent of the country’s total uranium production in 2014, according to Oilprice.com.
But even with its control of Uranium One, Russia cannot export the material from the United States. Russia was likely more interested in Uranium One’s assets in Kazakhstan, the world’s largest uranium producer.
Fact-checking Trump’s tweets about Clinton and Russia
It is funny, in the gallow humor sort of way, that supporters of Trump are so naive and dishonest, and seem to believe a meme must be true, because they read it on the Internet, in a tweet or heard it on the AM Radio dial.
The very definition of Collusion is getting other people to work with you to make something otherwise illegal or unethical appear legal or ethical. So thanks for reaffirming that Clinton and Obama colluded with Russia and a few other conspirators to sell Russia our Uranium.
Politics
Donald Trump Jr. and Russia: What the Law Says
By
CHARLIE SAVAGEJULY 11, 2017
[...]
Here are questions and answers about legal issues raised by this disclosure amid the criminal investigation by a special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, into the Trump-Russia affair.
What is collusion?
In general parlance, “collusion” means working together, usually in secret, to do something illicit. But the term has no defined legal meaning. Lawyers instead talk about the offense of
“conspiracy.”
What is conspiracy?
In
criminal law, the offense of conspiracy is generally an agreement by two or more people to commit a crime — whether or not they do. A powerful tool for prosecutors, conspiracy charges permit holding each conspirator responsible for illegal acts committed by others in the circle as part of the arrangement.
Is the meeting enough to prove conspiracy?
The events made public in the past few days are not enough to charge conspiracy, said
Renato Mariotti, a former federal prosecutor. Still, he said, the revelations are important because
if further evidence of coordination emerges, the contents of the emails and the fact of the meeting would help establish an intent to work with Russia on influencing the election.
“What this email string establishes is that Don Jr. was aware that the Russian government wanted to help the Trump campaign and he welcomed support from the Russian government,” Mr. Mariotti said.
What else is needed?
Evidence of an agreement to violate a specific criminal statute — in other words, a conspiracy to commit a certain crime.
[...]
“Anytime you are talking about coordinating or collusion, you are talking about the possibility of conspiracy charges,” said
Samuel W. Buell, a former federal prosecutor who teaches criminal law at Duke University. “But conspiracy is not a crime that floats by itself in the air. There has to be an underlying federal offense that is being conspired to be committed.”
Was election law violated?
A federal law, Section 30121 of Title 52, makes it a crime for any foreigner to contribute or donate money or some “other thing of value” in connection with an American election, or for anyone to solicit a foreigner to do so. Legal experts struggled to identify any precedent for prosecutions under that statute, but that phrase is common in other federal criminal statutes covering such crimes as bribery and threats, said
Richard L. Hasen, an election-law professor at the University of California, Irvine.
Courts have held, in other contexts, that a “thing of value” can be something intangible, like information.
[...]
Donald Trump Jr. and Russia: What the Law Says
