Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
Printed as a favor
From: EMERGENCY Final chance to save legal man-woman marriage distinction
***********
..Four attorneys general -- from Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Michigan -- have both the ability and responsibility to ask for a rehearing of the marriage cases, minus one or two of the high court judges who've performed homosexual "weddings" (Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan). But they've got only 3 days to file their vitally-important motion.
U.S Code 28, Section 455(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
DefendTheFamily.com Alert
Friends,
There is one last chance to save marriage: a Motion for Reconsideration to the Supreme Court. The brief is ready. The army of lawyers is ready. But the party with standing, Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine is still not convinced that he should file it.
Your Mission: CONVINCE HIM (nicely).
Ask to speak to a supervisor and explain that we have only 3 days left to file a motion to rehear the marriage case and protect our freedoms!
ALSO Call the Attorneys General of KY, TN and MI also. Urge them to file a "Motion for Rehearing" in the Supreme Court marriage case--before Monday, July 20th. Ask them to present the new information about how Justice Ginsburg violated federal law by officiating a homosexual "wedding" after the oral arguments but before the ruling.
(CALL THESE PEOPLE TODAY! DON'T JUST THINK ABOUT IT AND NOT DO IT)
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
OH Attorney Gen. Mike DeWine: 800-282-0515
KY Attorney General Jack Conway: 502-696-5300
TN Attorney General Herbert Slatery: 615-741-3491
MI Attorney General Bill Schuette: 517-373-1110
*********
I'm sure republicans think they're being careful not doing the right thing. After all, even though the polls against gay marriage keep regularly showing up here running in the 80% range, they may feel it's worth the risk to alienate some of the 80% from the middle/dem ground and try to win those coveted (if rare) "hard left" votes.
I got to thinking about it though. What if they took on this fight? What if they really put their backs into making a change on this one issue that is so vitally important? Let's face it, when pushed on the question, the number of people who believe it's "OK" to strip children as a tax-rewarded institution of either a father or a mother 100% of the time, is probably around under 10% of the total population. Even the gays are bickering in their own camp about whether or not their own being raised by parents should be experimentally-denied to subsequent generations:
Read more on that infighting here: Tomorrow You Will Apologize. The Year After Persecute. How Cults Progress US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
So, if the GOP took this on, forced Kagan and Ginsburg back in the shadows at least, or gave them the ultimatum "you recuse yourselves or we'll recuse you from your job"..imagine the impact that would have on the voter desperate for strong leadership in a hugely popular cause (returning the question of motherless or fatherless marriages back to the People)? Instead of a bunch of slick suits, glossy smiles and reptilian empty promises...which does not set them apart from the dems...we would have in the GOP candidates a strong, virile and rugged appearance. And considering the "threat" in 2016 from the dems, the more strong and virile the GOP looks the more votes they get. It's going to be that simple of an equation.
I would suggest at the same time a softer stance on some left issues...maybe a bone for green energy? Universal healthcare? A real and compelling plan that boosts capitalism and helps the little guys get a better wage at the same time? You've heard all my arguments before so I won't exhaust them here. Long story short, if folks weren't paying the equivalent of a second full mortgage on healthcare, they'd spend more in other markets that are now floundering or anemic in their combacks.. 'nuff said..
The two actions: retrial of the 90% popular idea of returning the decision on fatherless or motherless marriages back to the states (Don't call it "gay marriage" anymore or "same sex marriage"...call it "motherless/fatherless marriage" since that puts the focus on children involved and will render FAR more support)...then a bone thrown in the area of a favorite middle dem issue and the nazi hard left will have completely sunk all the swine in my erstwhile party right out of the game.
Tick tick tick...time's awasting... Start calling those AGs & governors NOW.
From: EMERGENCY Final chance to save legal man-woman marriage distinction
***********
..Four attorneys general -- from Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Michigan -- have both the ability and responsibility to ask for a rehearing of the marriage cases, minus one or two of the high court judges who've performed homosexual "weddings" (Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan). But they've got only 3 days to file their vitally-important motion.
U.S Code 28, Section 455(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
DefendTheFamily.com Alert
Friends,
There is one last chance to save marriage: a Motion for Reconsideration to the Supreme Court. The brief is ready. The army of lawyers is ready. But the party with standing, Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine is still not convinced that he should file it.
Your Mission: CONVINCE HIM (nicely).
Ask to speak to a supervisor and explain that we have only 3 days left to file a motion to rehear the marriage case and protect our freedoms!
ALSO Call the Attorneys General of KY, TN and MI also. Urge them to file a "Motion for Rehearing" in the Supreme Court marriage case--before Monday, July 20th. Ask them to present the new information about how Justice Ginsburg violated federal law by officiating a homosexual "wedding" after the oral arguments but before the ruling.
(CALL THESE PEOPLE TODAY! DON'T JUST THINK ABOUT IT AND NOT DO IT)
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
OH Attorney Gen. Mike DeWine: 800-282-0515
KY Attorney General Jack Conway: 502-696-5300
TN Attorney General Herbert Slatery: 615-741-3491
MI Attorney General Bill Schuette: 517-373-1110
*********
I'm sure republicans think they're being careful not doing the right thing. After all, even though the polls against gay marriage keep regularly showing up here running in the 80% range, they may feel it's worth the risk to alienate some of the 80% from the middle/dem ground and try to win those coveted (if rare) "hard left" votes.
I got to thinking about it though. What if they took on this fight? What if they really put their backs into making a change on this one issue that is so vitally important? Let's face it, when pushed on the question, the number of people who believe it's "OK" to strip children as a tax-rewarded institution of either a father or a mother 100% of the time, is probably around under 10% of the total population. Even the gays are bickering in their own camp about whether or not their own being raised by parents should be experimentally-denied to subsequent generations:
Read more on that infighting here: Tomorrow You Will Apologize. The Year After Persecute. How Cults Progress US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
So, if the GOP took this on, forced Kagan and Ginsburg back in the shadows at least, or gave them the ultimatum "you recuse yourselves or we'll recuse you from your job"..imagine the impact that would have on the voter desperate for strong leadership in a hugely popular cause (returning the question of motherless or fatherless marriages back to the People)? Instead of a bunch of slick suits, glossy smiles and reptilian empty promises...which does not set them apart from the dems...we would have in the GOP candidates a strong, virile and rugged appearance. And considering the "threat" in 2016 from the dems, the more strong and virile the GOP looks the more votes they get. It's going to be that simple of an equation.
I would suggest at the same time a softer stance on some left issues...maybe a bone for green energy? Universal healthcare? A real and compelling plan that boosts capitalism and helps the little guys get a better wage at the same time? You've heard all my arguments before so I won't exhaust them here. Long story short, if folks weren't paying the equivalent of a second full mortgage on healthcare, they'd spend more in other markets that are now floundering or anemic in their combacks.. 'nuff said..
The two actions: retrial of the 90% popular idea of returning the decision on fatherless or motherless marriages back to the states (Don't call it "gay marriage" anymore or "same sex marriage"...call it "motherless/fatherless marriage" since that puts the focus on children involved and will render FAR more support)...then a bone thrown in the area of a favorite middle dem issue and the nazi hard left will have completely sunk all the swine in my erstwhile party right out of the game.
Tick tick tick...time's awasting... Start calling those AGs & governors NOW.
