Most Say Tea Party Has Better Understanding of Issues than Congress

[California Girl]

This is exactly why they have tried to besmirch the Tea Party by such names as astro turf, nazi, terrorist, and teabagger. They know that this organization is a major threat. In the past they were successful in using Alinksy rules to shut down any opposition, but little do they know that this tactic has failed so much so that it has increased the movement members.

You will notice this by how posters will come in and try to make personal hateful, funny comments about the Tea Party Members. They do not know what to do so they fall back on what was taught to them.

The Teabaggers are the ones using Saul Alinsky...

Tea Partiers have adopted the tactics of the New Left. They go in for street theater, mass rallies, marches and extreme statements that are designed to shock polite society out of its stupor. This mimicry is no accident. Dick Armey, one of the spokesmen for the Tea Party movement, recently praised the methods of Saul Alinsky, the leading tactician of the New Left.

These days the same people who are buying Alinsky’s book “Rules for Radicals” on Amazon.com are, according to the company’s software, also buying books like “Liberal Fascism,” “Rules for Conservative Radicals,” “Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left,” and “The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party.”

David Brooks

The 60's radicals never did seize control of the democratic party. If they had, life in the US would be very different than what it is today. All they were able to do is to become major components of the Democratic party. As the party stands today, no single train of thought is in control of the democratic party.

You are either:

a. seriously stupid
b. completely blind
c. both

Because if you can't see what is plain to everyone outside the 'Democratic' Party, then you really are a joke. Because those radicals ARE in control of the party.

 

[Bfgrn]

The Teabaggers are the ones using Saul Alinsky...

Tea Partiers have adopted the tactics of the New Left. They go in for street theater, mass rallies, marches and extreme statements that are designed to shock polite society out of its stupor. This mimicry is no accident. Dick Armey, one of the spokesmen for the Tea Party movement, recently praised the methods of Saul Alinsky, the leading tactician of the New Left.

These days the same people who are buying Alinsky’s book “Rules for Radicals” on Amazon.com are, according to the company’s software, also buying books like “Liberal Fascism,” “Rules for Conservative Radicals,” “Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left,” and “The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party.”

David Brooks

The 60's radicals never did seize control of the democratic party. If they had, life in the US would be very different than what it is today. All they were able to do is to become major components of the Democratic party. As the party stands today, no single train of thought is in control of the democratic party.

You are either:

a. seriously stupid
b. completely blind
c. both

Because if you can't see what is plain to everyone outside the 'Democratic' Party, then you really are a joke. Because those radicals ARE in control of the party.

There's a 4th option; you are a pea brain.

The Democratic party today is controlled by a more right leaning element than it was in 50's and 60's. Today's Democratic party contains all the elements and ideologies that was the sum of BOTH parties in the 50's and 60's...

The Republican party is rapidly becoming a regional party of white southerners. The GOP, starting in 1980 was hijacked by extreme right theocrats AND extreme left neoconservatives, who were shunned by the Democrats after the Vietnam war decimated the party.

Don't believe me? Name ONE liberal Republican today? Just one will do...