Most important fact of all about ISIS

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Yeah, religious fundamentalists are liberals.


BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

dear, those who want powerful central government are liberals

It does not get dumber than this, kids. It really doesn't.

the liberal wants to believe its dumb when he discovers he lacks the IQ to participate.

 

[g5000]

Yeah, religious fundamentalists are liberals.


BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

dear, those who want powerful central government are liberals

It does not get dumber than this, kids. It really doesn't.

the liberal wants to believe its dumb when he discovers he lacks the IQ to participate.

I lack the seven pounds of brain damage it takes to agree with you.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Yeah, religious fundamentalists are liberals.


BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

dear, those who want powerful central government are liberals

It does not get dumber than this, kids. It really doesn't.

the liberal wants to believe its dumb when he discovers he lacks the IQ to participate.

I lack the seven pounds of brain damage it takes to agree with you.

you lack the IQ as a liberal to comment intelligently on OP and you find pure ad hominem attacks meaningful. What does that teach us

 

[LiberalMedia]

Too bad for you that enlightened lybyryls make up the majority of the country's voterbase now.

actually almost 40% identify as conservatives

Does that, in your mind, conflict with my statement in any way?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Too bad for you that enlightened lybyryls make up the majority of the country's voterbase now.

actually almost 40% identify as conservatives

Does that, in your mind, conflict with my statement in any way?

dear cut the small talk and tell us why you are a liberal or admit you lack the IQ for it.

 

[LiberalMedia]

Too bad for you that enlightened lybyryls make up the majority of the country's voterbase now.

actually almost 40% identify as conservatives

Does that, in your mind, conflict with my statement in any way?

dear cut the small talk and tell us why you are a liberal or admit you lack the IQ for it.

Reconcile this post with the following, made earlier today:

you lack the IQ as a liberal to comment intelligently on OP and you find pure ad hominem attacks meaningful. What does that teach us

You attacked another poster for straying from the topic in the OP and for allegedly engaging in ad hominem attacks, yet you do exactly that on the same page in the same thread on the same day. It's almost as if you're a complete hypocrite. Is that an accurate characterization of your overt doublethink, and if not, why not?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Too bad for you that enlightened lybyryls make up the majority of the country's voterbase now.

actually almost 40% identify as conservatives

Does that, in your mind, conflict with my statement in any way?

dear cut the small talk and tell us why you are a liberal or admit you lack the IQ for it.

Reconcile this post with the following, made earlier today:

you lack the IQ as a liberal to comment intelligently on OP and you find pure ad hominem attacks meaningful. What does that teach us

You attacked another poster for straying from the topic in the OP and for allegedly engaging in ad hominem attacks, yet you do exactly that on the same page in the same thread on the same day. It's almost as if you're a complete hypocrite. Is that an accurate characterization of your overt doublethink, and if not, why not?

dear, please cut the BS trivial pursuit small talk and tell us why you are a libcommie or admit you lack the IQ for it.

 

[Hum Dinger]

If the Founding Fathers were so against a central government, why did they create one?

The Founding Fathers are known as the Founding Fathers because they Founded something - that would be the Federal Government.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

If the Founding Fathers were so against a central government, why did they create one?

The Founding Fathers are known as the Founding Fathers because they Founded something - that would be the Federal Government.

dear, they created a tiny tiny federal, not national, government with only a very few enumerated powers that was 1% the size of todays on an inflation adjustion per capita basis. Do you understand?

 

[Toronado3800]

Ed, there is something you must understand. The shape of the political horse shoe

See how the far right and left in some ways are closer to eachother than they are to the middle?

Not saying I really understand where Feminism is leftist or but hey, Feminists do/did tend to be non Conservatives a few decades back just because they were fighting for change.

Regardless, I like the X/Y graphs better

Notice I picked a graph w/o too many divisive US figures on there. Both Hitler and Stalin were Authoritarian even if they ended up enemies and Hitler supported the Conservatives in the Spanish Civil War. Perhaps you are a Libertarian more than anything and that is why you see the others as soo similar?

 

[francoHFW]

OP- Dumbest I've seen recently...ISIS is so stupid and violent of course they're far RW jackasses- they want to go back to the 13th century, and now they're going to get their ass kicked by Obama and liberals around the world...in other words, a good thing. NOT another GOP/ Booosh/Reagan/Pat Robertson or WHOEVER catastrophe...

 

[NYcarbineer]

I miss the good old days when the RWnuts routinely referred to liberals as godless. Now all of the sudden we're religious extremists.

 

[Camp]

ISIS has become the new Benghazi. Just mention it in the thread title, and bash away at your desired target.

 

[frigidweirdo]

dear, they created a tiny tiny federal, not national, government with only a very few enumerated powers that was 1% the size of todays on an inflation adjustion per capita basis. Do you understand?

But then again, the US were fighting to free themselves from a tyranny that had a smaller government than just about any country that currently exists. It's just that things have changed. Especially the number of people. in 1776 Russia had 20 million people, in 1790 the US had a population of 3.9 million people. How much govt did they actually need?

They made a constitution that was designed to change with the times.

You want smaller govt, but the support a party, the GOP, that wants more control over people's lives, not less. In fact "smaller govt" seems not to mean smaller govt, but "lower taxes" which is something completely different.


But then the same people who argue for less taxes are the same people who support the healthcare and it's 3% GDP wastage on corruption and don't want to sort it out..... hmmm. Giving money to rich people = good, spending money on stuff people need = bad.... I don't get it.

 

[frigidweirdo]

OP- Dumbest I've seen recently...ISIS is so stupid and violent of course they're far RW jackasses- they want to go back to the 13th century, and now they're going to get their ass kicked by Obama and liberals around the world...in other words, a good thing. NOT another GOP/ Booosh/Reagan/Pat Robertson or WHOEVER catastrophe...

ISIS is stupid? Well they've managed to get people from all over the world to their cause, that's not stupidity. They work based on stupidity, but then so does the US govt. How many times do you see nationalism being used as a reason to support some war or other, with not much in the way of intelligent debate about what the after effects?

I could list loads. Giving weapons to Saddam to fight the Iranians, then having these weapons come back against US forces.
Giving weapons to the Mujaheddin and seeing these weapons come back against US forces in Afghanistan.

Two perfect examples. Another example would have been the US giving weapons to the anti-Assad Syrians, with McCain at the forefront of this, just as he was in Libya (but unsurprisingly not for this in Ivory Coast with it's lack of oil).

They want to go back to the 13th century? Hardly surprising seeing what the 18th, 19th, 20th and 21th centuries have inflicted on them in the name of imperialism and now whatever you want to call the invasion of any oil rich country which doesn't support US policy.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

It's not magic, conservatard, it's science. Do you understand now?

dear, if liberalism is science why did the Great Depression last 10 years and lead to world war, why is Obama's recovery the worst since the Great Depression, why did the Great Society amount to a near genocide against American Blacks, and why did China switch to conservative capitalism after liberalism had slowly starved 60 million human beings to death?

Isn't thinking fun?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

OP- Dumbest I've seen recently...ISIS is so stupid and violent of course they're far RW jackasses-.

of course the RW wants a very limited central govt( a child should know this) while ISIS wants a 100% powerful central govt. See why we are 100% positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

.
They want to go back to the 13th century? Hardly surprising seeing what the 18th, 19th, 20th and 21th centuries have inflicted on them in the name of imperialism and now whatever you want to call the invasion of any oil rich country which doesn't support US policy.

1) people will often resort to perfecting religious practices to appease angry Gods as ISIS is doing now

2) they get paid plenty for their oil based on world free market oil price, not based on imperialism

3) they are backward only because liberals have prevented them from adopting capitalist values by blunting the shot heard around the world. Liberalism is a growing cancer on the world.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. in 1776 Russia had 20 million people, in 1790 the US had a population of 3.9 million people. How much govt did they actually need?

they needed very little then as China is now discovering with 1.4 billion people that the less govt is has the better off it is. Isn't thinking fun? China instantly eliminated 40% of world poverty by simply switching to Republican capitalism away from big govt liberalism. Got it now?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. In fact "smaller govt" seems not to mean smaller govt, but "lower taxes" which is something completely different.

dear, if you cut taxes in half you would for most intents and purposes cut govt size in half.
Did someone tell you that govt grows as taxes are cut? Slow?