Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Given you don't have the capacity to handle the torque, that's probably good.I do not have only a little idea about what is going on in your brain.I cannot help but laugh at he fact the point you wanted to make backfired on youI fear the policmen, which will have to shoot you down one day, will have to use silver bullets.What's that? You -were- wrong and you -did- try to move the goalpost?Sure you laugh at me. You would shoot me also down laughing. And afterwards you would call me a criminal idiot, because I did not buy your weapons.
I accept your apology.
That's what happens when you don't have a clue as to what you're talking about.
The law controls legal possession of machine guns is the answer for all but the invincibly ignorant. You can recite your dogmatic mantras all day long but reality will laugh at you.The law does not prevent people form committing crimes with machineguns, because it cannot prevent people from committing crimes with machineguns.
Thus, the number of machineguns in circulation is irrelevant.
The Las Vegas shooter needed them.Because criminals don't need them to rape women, they don't need them to commit armed robbery and the don't need them to kill their gang rivals
Ok - you've become boring.An idiot is able to kill Archimede....Given you don't have the capacity to handle the torque, that's probably good.I do not have only a little idea about what is going on in your brain.I cannot help but laugh at he fact the point you wanted to make backfired on youI fear the policmen, which will have to shoot you down one day, will have to use silver bullets.What's that? You -were- wrong and you -did- try to move the goalpost?
I accept your apology.
That's what happens when you don't have a clue as to what you're talking about.
Does the law control illegal possession?The law controls legal possession of machine guns.The law does not prevent people form committing crimes with machineguns, because it cannot prevent people from committing crimes with machineguns.
Thus, the number of machineguns in circulation is irrelevant.
Ah, ignorance.The Las Vegas shooter needed them.Because criminals don't need them to rape women, they don't need them to commit armed robbery and the don't need them to kill their gang rivals
Ok - you've become boring.An idiot is able to kill Archimede....Given you don't have the capacity to handle the torque, that's probably good.I do not have only a little idea about what is going on in your brain.I cannot help but laugh at he fact the point you wanted to make backfired on youI fear the policmen, which will have to shoot you down one day, will have to use silver bullets.
That's what happens when you don't have a clue as to what you're talking about.
Buh-bye.
It reduces the instances of such things, as demonstrated by the number of belt fed machine guns in circulation. That you want to play all or nothing is merely a game on your part to avoid acknowledging the paucity of your arguments.Does the law control illegal possession?
Does the law prevent illegal actions?
No?
There you go.
Fallacy: post hoc ergo propter hocIt reduces the instances of such things, as demonstrated by the number of belt fed machine guns in circulation.Does the law control illegal possession?
Does the law prevent illegal actions?
No?
There you go.
No response?Ah, ignorance.The Las Vegas shooter needed them.Because criminals don't need them to rape women, they don't need them to commit armed robbery and the don't need them to kill their gang rivals
The LV shooter had the means to legally purchase, and thus use, FAR deadlier weapons than a handful of AR15s with bump stocks.
Go on.Ah, ignorance.
The LV shooter had the means to legally purchase, and thus use, FAR deadlier weapons than a handful of AR15s with bump stocks.
With only the evidence of the small number of belt fed machine guns in circulation to back it up. Sad.Fallacy: post hoc ergo propter hoc
Try again
...
No response?
Thought so.
With what?Go on.Ah, ignorance.
The LV shooter had the means to legally purchase, and thus use, FAR deadlier weapons than a handful of AR15s with bump stocks.
Nothing here changes the fact you cannot support your position.With only the evidence of the small number of belt fed machine guns in circulation to back it up. Sad.Fallacy: post hoc ergo propter hoc
Try again
...
No response?
Thought so.
It's unimportant what someone says to you. You are not able to change your mind. You are possessed by the idea "firearms". But indeed to buy firearms is only a waste of money in our times today, because the only senseful use of firearms is to shoot holes in pieces of round paper to get the wonderful feeling to be a good shooter. Buy tanks, what's better if you don't trust in your own police or army. Or nukes if you like to force the current government in Washington to stop their totally stupid politics. Or you try it with the might of some pieces of paper: read books. Books are a very good substitution for bulletproof waistcoats, specially if you use prints on some kevlar pages inside.
The Las Vegas shooter needed them.Because criminals don't need them to rape women, they don't need them to commit armed robbery and the don't need them to kill their gang rivals
It reduces the instances of such things, as demonstrated by the number of belt fed machine guns in circulation. That you want to play all or nothing is merely a game on your part to avoid acknowledging the paucity of your arguments.Does the law control illegal possession?
Does the law prevent illegal actions?
No?
There you go.
The actual truth in the real world is demonstrated by the low instances of belt fed machine guns.
I accept US rightard gun nuts avoid reality.
...
No, moron......belt fed machine guns aren't used by more criminals because you can't hide them in your baby mommas purse, or under your car seat.........and belt fed machine guns are unnecessary for rape, robbery and murder.....if they were needed, criminals would have them.
...
No response?
Thought so.
It's unimportant what someone says to you. You are not able to change your mind. You are possessed by the idea "firearms". But indeed to buy firearms is only a waste of money in our times today, because the only senseful use of firearms is to shoot holes in pieces of round paper to get the wonderful feeling to be a good shooter. Buy tanks, what's better if you don't trust in your own police or army. Or nukes if you like to force the current government in Washington to stop their totally stupid politics. Or you try it with the might of some pieces of paper: read books. Books are a very good substitution for bulletproof waistcoats, specially if you use prints on some kevlar pages inside.
Well.....according to the U.S. Centers For Disease Control, Americans use their legal guns 1.1 million times a year to stop rapes, robberies and murders.....
those are not pieces of paper, but innocent people whose lives are saved because they own and perhaps carry a gun for self defense.....
