D
dijetlo
Guest
Since Iraqi contracting has every ones attention today, I thought I would take a moment and see what some of our old buddies have been up to.
No worries for Haliburton. buying Dick Cheny that new job in DC seems to have been the smartest thing they could have done.
The larger problem is that many of their contracts are "cost plus" meaning that the US government pays the costs of the project, plus a profit. Haliburton is supposed to tell us the cost before it begins the work but apparently, that was an excessive request on the part of the US government.
For those who thought that we had no plan for postwar Iraq...
At least we had plans for the oil, if not what we were going to do with the police, army, politicians and people of Iraq. I guess we know why Cheny didn't want his energy taskforce investigated. Did he comply with that subpoena or is he still trying to claim that when he divided Iraq up with his big oil buddies that constituted "privileged communication"?
No worries for Haliburton. buying Dick Cheny that new job in DC seems to have been the smartest thing they could have done.
The Pentagon contracts were awarded without competitive bidding and have a potential value of $15.6 billion; recent estimates by the Army have put the current value of the Halliburton contracts at about $5 billion...Halliburton Company overcharged the government by as much as $61 million for fuel delivered to Iraq under huge no-bid reconstruction contracts, senior military officials said Thursday...Military officials said the Pentagon was negotiating with K.B.R. over how to resolve the fuel charges. But Michael Thibault, deputy director of the Defense Contract Audit Agency, said in a telephone interview that a draft report by the agency had recommended that the Army Corps of Engineers seek reimbursement... He said auditors expected to issue a final report this month, but added that the preliminary findings involved overcharging that was "potentially very substantial."
The larger problem is that many of their contracts are "cost plus" meaning that the US government pays the costs of the project, plus a profit. Haliburton is supposed to tell us the cost before it begins the work but apparently, that was an excessive request on the part of the US government.
Other questions, in a second contract with the Army, involved unacceptable delays by the subsidiary in providing cost estimates for dozens of projects already under way in Iraq, Mr. Thibault said... Among projects under way, the company has provided the government with cost estimates for just 12 orders, with 69 outstanding and overdue, the officials said. They said the delays raised the possibility that the company would eventually claim an unacceptably high cost for a project whose work was already largely completed.
For those who thought that we had no plan for postwar Iraq...
The second contract, for oil reconstruction projects, was formally awarded in March on a "sole source" basis, but the decision to give the project to Halliburton was made in late 2002 by senior administration officials who were part of a secret task force planning for postwar Iraq.
At least we had plans for the oil, if not what we were going to do with the police, army, politicians and people of Iraq. I guess we know why Cheny didn't want his energy taskforce investigated. Did he comply with that subpoena or is he still trying to claim that when he divided Iraq up with his big oil buddies that constituted "privileged communication"?