More people voted for Senators who decided to convict trump

[IM2]

69 million Americans voted for senators who supported impeachment

Over the course of the impeachment trial of President Trump, one figure was frequently invoked by his defenders: 63 million.

The charges against Trump must be so robustly proved, Trump attorney Robert Ray said last month, that “the 63 million people like me who voted for President Trump accept his guilt of the offense charged” — enough to “overwhelmingly persuade a supermajority of Americans and thus their senators of malfeasance warranting his removal from office.”

Those 63 million people, the people who backed Trump in the 2016 presidential contest, were presented as being at risk of having their presidential vote thrown out. For the Senate to vote to convict Trump on the charges presented by the House would be nothing short of an undoing of the election that brought Trump to power, his attorneys argued.

What that calculus ignores, of course, is that Trump is not the only person who serves with a mandate of voters. In 2018, voters handed Democrats a majority in the House, providing enough votes for the party to impeach Trump for his efforts to pressure Ukraine.

The members of the House who supported the first article of impeachment received about 38.5 million votes in 2018 — over 6 million more votes than were cast for members who opposed the article. In the Senate, the difference was even more stark. Nearly 69 million votes were cast for senators who supported removing Trump from office based on that first article of impeachment, about 12 million more votes than were received by senators who opposed his removal.

Bear in mind that the final Senate vote on the first article of impeachment was 52 votes in opposition to removal and 48 votes in support. Those 48 votes came from senators who were the choice of 69 million Americans. Those votes came from senators who received 54.8 percent of all of the votes cast for sitting senators. That’s well shy of the two-thirds margin required in the Senate to remove Trump from office, but it does show the gap between how much of the country was represented by each side in the impeachment fight.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ans-voted-senators-who-supported-impeachment/

This ain't 2016 folks.

 

[The Irish Ram]

And the intelligent people voted enough to keep our choice for President in the White House....

 

[Auld Phart]

Hilarious


Doesnt take a genius to figure out that populations of California and NY individually outnumber 4-5 states each

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

69 million Americans voted for senators who supported impeachment

Over the course of the impeachment trial of President Trump, one figure was frequently invoked by his defenders: 63 million.

The charges against Trump must be so robustly proved, Trump attorney Robert Ray said last month, that “the 63 million people like me who voted for President Trump accept his guilt of the offense charged” — enough to “overwhelmingly persuade a supermajority of Americans and thus their senators of malfeasance warranting his removal from office.”

Those 63 million people, the people who backed Trump in the 2016 presidential contest, were presented as being at risk of having their presidential vote thrown out. For the Senate to vote to convict Trump on the charges presented by the House would be nothing short of an undoing of the election that brought Trump to power, his attorneys argued.

What that calculus ignores, of course, is that Trump is not the only person who serves with a mandate of voters. In 2018, voters handed Democrats a majority in the House, providing enough votes for the party to impeach Trump for his efforts to pressure Ukraine.

The members of the House who supported the first article of impeachment received about 38.5 million votes in 2018 — over 6 million more votes than were cast for members who opposed the article. In the Senate, the difference was even more stark. Nearly 69 million votes were cast for senators who supported removing Trump from office based on that first article of impeachment, about 12 million more votes than were received by senators who opposed his removal.

Bear in mind that the final Senate vote on the first article of impeachment was 52 votes in opposition to removal and 48 votes in support. Those 48 votes came from senators who were the choice of 69 million Americans. Those votes came from senators who received 54.8 percent of all of the votes cast for sitting senators. That’s well shy of the two-thirds margin required in the Senate to remove Trump from office, but it does show the gap between how much of the country was represented by each side in the impeachment fight.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ans-voted-senators-who-supported-impeachment/

This ain't 2016 folks.

So what?

You still do not control the Senate and the Senate is the last word on if Trump should be Convicted and Removed...

You can post all about how large states like California want Trump gone but in the end he is still President and because of those like you he ( Trump ) will most likely win a second term...

 

[boedicca]

Senators are not elected by the entire country.

It's clear that knowledge of basic civics and math continue to elude the OP

 

[toobfreak]

And the intelligent people voted enough to keep our choice for President in the White House....

IR2 is obviously a bottom feeder along the broad base of the bell curve where he throws out 99 articles to find the ONE supporting his agenda. He swings from being one of the Elite few one week gracing us with his wisdom to teach the lowly, to siding with the many ignorant scum sucking trash of the House.

Whatever fits his nanometer wide mindset.

 

[Nostra]

Does this mean Trump is no longer President, or is the article just another example of the Epic Dimwinger Meltdown of 2020?

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Becky

Stop scratching

 

[JustAGuy1]

69 million Americans voted for senators who supported impeachment

Over the course of the impeachment trial of President Trump, one figure was frequently invoked by his defenders: 63 million.

The charges against Trump must be so robustly proved, Trump attorney Robert Ray said last month, that “the 63 million people like me who voted for President Trump accept his guilt of the offense charged” — enough to “overwhelmingly persuade a supermajority of Americans and thus their senators of malfeasance warranting his removal from office.”

Those 63 million people, the people who backed Trump in the 2016 presidential contest, were presented as being at risk of having their presidential vote thrown out. For the Senate to vote to convict Trump on the charges presented by the House would be nothing short of an undoing of the election that brought Trump to power, his attorneys argued.

What that calculus ignores, of course, is that Trump is not the only person who serves with a mandate of voters. In 2018, voters handed Democrats a majority in the House, providing enough votes for the party to impeach Trump for his efforts to pressure Ukraine.

The members of the House who supported the first article of impeachment received about 38.5 million votes in 2018 — over 6 million more votes than were cast for members who opposed the article. In the Senate, the difference was even more stark. Nearly 69 million votes were cast for senators who supported removing Trump from office based on that first article of impeachment, about 12 million more votes than were received by senators who opposed his removal.

Bear in mind that the final Senate vote on the first article of impeachment was 52 votes in opposition to removal and 48 votes in support. Those 48 votes came from senators who were the choice of 69 million Americans. Those votes came from senators who received 54.8 percent of all of the votes cast for sitting senators. That’s well shy of the two-thirds margin required in the Senate to remove Trump from office, but it does show the gap between how much of the country was represented by each side in the impeachment fight.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ans-voted-senators-who-supported-impeachment/

This ain't 2016 folks.

You're a very twisted old man. How can you stand being you?

 

[two_iron]

Looking for something meaningful from the fake impeachment? I mean other than the obvious - Trump gave you mother fuckers a life-altering beatdown.

Somebody said if you take the 3rd derivative of the Iowa caucus tally and squared it, and used the Bernoulli equation of state to derive the integral of the thermodynamic rate of heat transfer function, and then applied differential calculus to the result..... it equals the size of your boyfriend's dickhole. Try it.

 

[Rambunctious]

More people voted for Senators who decided to convict trump

Now that sure took some digging....Buuuaaahahahahaha...

 

[miketx]

69 million Americans voted for senators who supported impeachment

Over the course of the impeachment trial of President Trump, one figure was frequently invoked by his defenders: 63 million.

The charges against Trump must be so robustly proved, Trump attorney Robert Ray said last month, that “the 63 million people like me who voted for President Trump accept his guilt of the offense charged” — enough to “overwhelmingly persuade a supermajority of Americans and thus their senators of malfeasance warranting his removal from office.”

Those 63 million people, the people who backed Trump in the 2016 presidential contest, were presented as being at risk of having their presidential vote thrown out. For the Senate to vote to convict Trump on the charges presented by the House would be nothing short of an undoing of the election that brought Trump to power, his attorneys argued.

What that calculus ignores, of course, is that Trump is not the only person who serves with a mandate of voters. In 2018, voters handed Democrats a majority in the House, providing enough votes for the party to impeach Trump for his efforts to pressure Ukraine.

The members of the House who supported the first article of impeachment received about 38.5 million votes in 2018 — over 6 million more votes than were cast for members who opposed the article. In the Senate, the difference was even more stark. Nearly 69 million votes were cast for senators who supported removing Trump from office based on that first article of impeachment, about 12 million more votes than were received by senators who opposed his removal.

Bear in mind that the final Senate vote on the first article of impeachment was 52 votes in opposition to removal and 48 votes in support. Those 48 votes came from senators who were the choice of 69 million Americans. Those votes came from senators who received 54.8 percent of all of the votes cast for sitting senators. That’s well shy of the two-thirds margin required in the Senate to remove Trump from office, but it does show the gap between how much of the country was represented by each side in the impeachment fight.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ans-voted-senators-who-supported-impeachment/

This ain't 2016 folks.

Yep, 2016 is history and the new reality is going to be that democrats heads will be rolling.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Looking for something meaningful from the fake impeachment? I mean other than the obvious - Trump gave you mother fuckers a life-altering beatdown.

Somebody said if you take the 3rd derivative of the Iowa caucus tally and squared it, and used the Bernoulli equation of state to derive the integral of the thermodynamic rate of heat transfer function, and then applied differential calculus to the result..... it equals the size of your boyfriend's dickhole. Try it.

Very creative, kudos

 

[Redfish]

69 million Americans voted for senators who supported impeachment

Over the course of the impeachment trial of President Trump, one figure was frequently invoked by his defenders: 63 million.

The charges against Trump must be so robustly proved, Trump attorney Robert Ray said last month, that “the 63 million people like me who voted for President Trump accept his guilt of the offense charged” — enough to “overwhelmingly persuade a supermajority of Americans and thus their senators of malfeasance warranting his removal from office.”

Those 63 million people, the people who backed Trump in the 2016 presidential contest, were presented as being at risk of having their presidential vote thrown out. For the Senate to vote to convict Trump on the charges presented by the House would be nothing short of an undoing of the election that brought Trump to power, his attorneys argued.

What that calculus ignores, of course, is that Trump is not the only person who serves with a mandate of voters. In 2018, voters handed Democrats a majority in the House, providing enough votes for the party to impeach Trump for his efforts to pressure Ukraine.

The members of the House who supported the first article of impeachment received about 38.5 million votes in 2018 — over 6 million more votes than were cast for members who opposed the article. In the Senate, the difference was even more stark. Nearly 69 million votes were cast for senators who supported removing Trump from office based on that first article of impeachment, about 12 million more votes than were received by senators who opposed his removal.

Bear in mind that the final Senate vote on the first article of impeachment was 52 votes in opposition to removal and 48 votes in support. Those 48 votes came from senators who were the choice of 69 million Americans. Those votes came from senators who received 54.8 percent of all of the votes cast for sitting senators. That’s well shy of the two-thirds margin required in the Senate to remove Trump from office, but it does show the gap between how much of the country was represented by each side in the impeachment fight.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ans-voted-senators-who-supported-impeachment/

This ain't 2016 folks.

so the rabid dems control LA county, and NYC--------------BFD means nothing. Trump acquited---------FOREVER.

 

[Nostra]

Looking for something meaningful from the fake impeachment? I mean other than the obvious - Trump gave you mother fuckers a life-altering beatdown.

Somebody said if you take the 3rd derivative of the Iowa caucus tally and squared it, and used the Bernoulli equation of state to derive the integral of the thermodynamic rate of heat transfer function, and then applied differential calculus to the result..... it equals the size of your boyfriend's dickhole. Try it.

I believe I saw AOC saying that.

 

[boedicca]

More people believe in the Jedi Religion than participated in the Iowa Caucus.

And Americans will never elect a President with Buttplug for a namephreak.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

69 million Americans voted for senators who supported impeachment

Over the course of the impeachment trial of President Trump, one figure was frequently invoked by his defenders: 63 million.

The charges against Trump must be so robustly proved, Trump attorney Robert Ray said last month, that “the 63 million people like me who voted for President Trump accept his guilt of the offense charged” — enough to “overwhelmingly persuade a supermajority of Americans and thus their senators of malfeasance warranting his removal from office.”

Those 63 million people, the people who backed Trump in the 2016 presidential contest, were presented as being at risk of having their presidential vote thrown out. For the Senate to vote to convict Trump on the charges presented by the House would be nothing short of an undoing of the election that brought Trump to power, his attorneys argued.

What that calculus ignores, of course, is that Trump is not the only person who serves with a mandate of voters. In 2018, voters handed Democrats a majority in the House, providing enough votes for the party to impeach Trump for his efforts to pressure Ukraine.

The members of the House who supported the first article of impeachment received about 38.5 million votes in 2018 — over 6 million more votes than were cast for members who opposed the article. In the Senate, the difference was even more stark. Nearly 69 million votes were cast for senators who supported removing Trump from office based on that first article of impeachment, about 12 million more votes than were received by senators who opposed his removal.

Bear in mind that the final Senate vote on the first article of impeachment was 52 votes in opposition to removal and 48 votes in support. Those 48 votes came from senators who were the choice of 69 million Americans. Those votes came from senators who received 54.8 percent of all of the votes cast for sitting senators. That’s well shy of the two-thirds margin required in the Senate to remove Trump from office, but it does show the gap between how much of the country was represented by each side in the impeachment fight.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ans-voted-senators-who-supported-impeachment/

This ain't 2016 folks.

Irrelevant.

The Senate doesn't represent the people. The Senate represents the states. That's why every state has the same number of Senators.

 

[Oddball]

69 million Americans voted for senators who supported impeachment

Over the course of the impeachment trial of President Trump, one figure was frequently invoked by his defenders: 63 million.

The charges against Trump must be so robustly proved, Trump attorney Robert Ray said last month, that “the 63 million people like me who voted for President Trump accept his guilt of the offense charged” — enough to “overwhelmingly persuade a supermajority of Americans and thus their senators of malfeasance warranting his removal from office.”

Those 63 million people, the people who backed Trump in the 2016 presidential contest, were presented as being at risk of having their presidential vote thrown out. For the Senate to vote to convict Trump on the charges presented by the House would be nothing short of an undoing of the election that brought Trump to power, his attorneys argued.

What that calculus ignores, of course, is that Trump is not the only person who serves with a mandate of voters. In 2018, voters handed Democrats a majority in the House, providing enough votes for the party to impeach Trump for his efforts to pressure Ukraine.

The members of the House who supported the first article of impeachment received about 38.5 million votes in 2018 — over 6 million more votes than were cast for members who opposed the article. In the Senate, the difference was even more stark. Nearly 69 million votes were cast for senators who supported removing Trump from office based on that first article of impeachment, about 12 million more votes than were received by senators who opposed his removal.

Bear in mind that the final Senate vote on the first article of impeachment was 52 votes in opposition to removal and 48 votes in support. Those 48 votes came from senators who were the choice of 69 million Americans. Those votes came from senators who received 54.8 percent of all of the votes cast for sitting senators. That’s well shy of the two-thirds margin required in the Senate to remove Trump from office, but it does show the gap between how much of the country was represented by each side in the impeachment fight.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ans-voted-senators-who-supported-impeachment/

This ain't 2016 folks.

Digging super deep to dredge up statistics that mean exactly bupkis.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

69 million Americans voted for senators who supported impeachment

Over the course of the impeachment trial of President Trump, one figure was frequently invoked by his defenders: 63 million.

The charges against Trump must be so robustly proved, Trump attorney Robert Ray said last month, that “the 63 million people like me who voted for President Trump accept his guilt of the offense charged” — enough to “overwhelmingly persuade a supermajority of Americans and thus their senators of malfeasance warranting his removal from office.”

Those 63 million people, the people who backed Trump in the 2016 presidential contest, were presented as being at risk of having their presidential vote thrown out. For the Senate to vote to convict Trump on the charges presented by the House would be nothing short of an undoing of the election that brought Trump to power, his attorneys argued.

What that calculus ignores, of course, is that Trump is not the only person who serves with a mandate of voters. In 2018, voters handed Democrats a majority in the House, providing enough votes for the party to impeach Trump for his efforts to pressure Ukraine.

The members of the House who supported the first article of impeachment received about 38.5 million votes in 2018 — over 6 million more votes than were cast for members who opposed the article. In the Senate, the difference was even more stark. Nearly 69 million votes were cast for senators who supported removing Trump from office based on that first article of impeachment, about 12 million more votes than were received by senators who opposed his removal.

Bear in mind that the final Senate vote on the first article of impeachment was 52 votes in opposition to removal and 48 votes in support. Those 48 votes came from senators who were the choice of 69 million Americans. Those votes came from senators who received 54.8 percent of all of the votes cast for sitting senators. That’s well shy of the two-thirds margin required in the Senate to remove Trump from office, but it does show the gap between how much of the country was represented by each side in the impeachment fight.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ans-voted-senators-who-supported-impeachment/

This ain't 2016 folks.

Yes it is moron.

You lost.

Your shit post is meaningless.

Trump is exhonerated.

Suck on it.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Looking for something meaningful from the fake impeachment? I mean other than the obvious - Trump gave you mother fuckers a life-altering beatdown.

Somebody said if you take the 3rd derivative of the Iowa caucus tally and squared it, and used the Bernoulli equation of state to derive the integral of the thermodynamic rate of heat transfer function, and then applied differential calculus to the result..... it equals the size of your boyfriend's dickhole. Try it.

The Bernoulli equation is a fluid flow analysis.

My guess is that IM2 (a moron) is still looking all this up.

It was funny to read.