More Communist Garbage

[Dr Gregg]

Communist were always anti-religious for many reasons. Its the reason why they got rid of all religion in their nations. I also notice that most anti-religious stuff comes from the left. That could be a coincidence but I doubt it.

The only bright spot in the whole Communist philosophy.

I'm not sure which are more annoying, religious fanatics or anti-religious fanatics.

When do you ever hear of anti-religion fanatics?
Religious fanatics have to tell everybody how religious they are, preach everywhere, have TV shows, etc.

Never see non religious people do that.

 

[MIPS]

The only bright spot in the whole Communist philosophy.

I'm not sure which are more annoying, religious fanatics or anti-religious fanatics.

When do you ever hear of anti-religion fanatics?
Religious fanatics have to tell everybody how religious they are, preach everywhere, have TV shows, etc.

Never see non religious people do that.

ROFLMAO!

Wait, you were trying to be as serious as a religulous weren't you?

Allow me to restate my original post,

I don't know which are more annoying religious fanatics, anti-religious fanatics or fanatics that deny both kinds of fanatics are annoying.

 

[Kex]

Communism- kicking out religious nut bags out of your property. Redefinition complete.

 

[Dr Gregg]

I'm not sure which are more annoying, religious fanatics or anti-religious fanatics.

When do you ever hear of anti-religion fanatics?
Religious fanatics have to tell everybody how religious they are, preach everywhere, have TV shows, etc.

Never see non religious people do that.

ROFLMAO!

Wait, you were trying to be as serious as a religulous weren't you?

Allow me to restate my original post,

I don't know which are more annoying religious fanatics, anti-religious fanatics or fanatics that deny both kinds of fanatics are annoying.

So, you can't tell me where you ever see anti religious fanatics

And don't say message board, posting opinions doesn't make one a fanatic

 

[Some Guy]

I don't see what the problem is with having a "no religious discussion" policy within one's store. You could easily put politics in there too. I just had a superbowl party at my house and told people to not talk about politics because it could only end up in people arguing, and no one wants that. So from a business owner standpoint: if people are arguing (or even talking about it), then they're not shopping and not buying things. Furthermore, they're probably detouring others from shopping there as well.

If i owned a store, then i would definitely make a policy like that. I'm not religious but i couldn't care less what religion you are; just keep it out of my store.

 

[MIPS]

When do you ever hear of anti-religion fanatics?
Religious fanatics have to tell everybody how religious they are, preach everywhere, have TV shows, etc.

Never see non religious people do that.

ROFLMAO!

Wait, you were trying to be as serious as a religulous weren't you?

Allow me to restate my original post,

I don't know which are more annoying religious fanatics, anti-religious fanatics or fanatics that deny both kinds of fanatics are annoying.

So, you can't tell me where you ever see anti religious fanatics

And don't say message board, posting opinions doesn't make one a fanatic

I dunno, Maybe you can contact Mr. Mahr and ask him to point you to his other umpteen "celebrity" pals that never miss an opportunity to denigrate, mock and/or stereotype people with religious beliefs, perhaps you and they can get together with some of the nice folks from The Organization of American Atheists and hold a seance to summon up the ghost of Ms. O'Hare or something.

OR alternatively

You can take off the blinders you're wearing and observe what is actually going on in the world instead of seeing only what you want to see.

OR alternatively

You can continue to live in ignorance since you don't really care about the answer to the question anyways, do you?

 

[ihopehefails]

Communism- kicking out religious nut bags out of your property. Redefinition complete.

You missed about three or four leaps of logic.

The guy sees someone violating the rules, evaluates who they are, sees that they are christians, realizes that his 'liberal' philosophy can't tolerate that, looks up rules again, is angry that he is violating those rules, kicks him out.

 

[ihopehefails]

The only bright spot in the whole Communist philosophy.

I'm not sure which are more annoying, religious fanatics or anti-religious fanatics.

When do you ever hear of anti-religion fanatics?
Religious fanatics have to tell everybody how religious they are, preach everywhere, have TV shows, etc.

Never see non religious people do that.

And you have the choice to accept or reject what they say. No one is forcing you to participate in their religion but you however are objecting to their right to express their religious views. Your 'liberal' philosophy then demands that they shut the **** up and that is how people get kicked out of malls.

 

[ihopehefails]

It doesn't matter, they don't have to explain their reasons any more than you would have to explain your reasons for throwing two people out of your house because you didn't happen to like the color of their hair at that particular moment.


Completely irrelevant, they are under no obligation to apply any restrictions on what they find acceptable on their property in a consistent manner, they OWN the property and can toss anyone they choose off of it just for fun if it pleases them.

What happens if the guy is enforcing the rules selectively against a certain group while allowing other groups to violate the same rules?

Nothing since it's well within the property owners rights to do so .... as in if you wish to throw people off your property for discussing Christianity and not throw people off your property for discussing Islam, then you have every right to do so.

What if that group he was enforcing the rules against were black and they let every white person get away with the same stuff? Wouldn't you assume that there is some kind racial prejudice behind his actions?

I might assume that, however the property owner would be in violation of federal civil rights statutes if it could be demonstrated sufficiently in a court of law that he/she was discriminating based solely on race (the propriety of which are a completely different matter and outside the bounds of the case in point). However that's not applicable with respect to this case.

This is what I am saying. He has the right to throw anyone out he wants but the motives behind it might have been less than pure.

Explain how his motives might have been "less than pure", since his motive was to remove people from his property that he didn't wish to be on his property because they were behaving in a way that he found unacceptable on his property, seems like a pretty "pure" motive to me.

OK. He has the right to kick people out for whatever reason whether those reasons are fair or unfair. I don't contest that but I believe his reasons were in the unfair category since he probably doesn't enforce those rules universally for every violation.

 

[ihopehefails]

I don't see what the problem is with having a "no religious discussion" policy within one's store. You could easily put politics in there too. I just had a superbowl party at my house and told people to not talk about politics because it could only end up in people arguing, and no one wants that. So from a business owner standpoint: if people are arguing (or even talking about it), then they're not shopping and not buying things. Furthermore, they're probably detouring others from shopping there as well.

If i owned a store, then i would definitely make a policy like that. I'm not religious but i couldn't care less what religion you are; just keep it out of my store.

If that was the reason to kick them out then I would not be upset about it but I suspect that it was not.

 

[ihopehefails]

When do you ever hear of anti-religion fanatics?
Religious fanatics have to tell everybody how religious they are, preach everywhere, have TV shows, etc.

Never see non religious people do that.

ROFLMAO!

Wait, you were trying to be as serious as a religulous weren't you?

Allow me to restate my original post,

I don't know which are more annoying religious fanatics, anti-religious fanatics or fanatics that deny both kinds of fanatics are annoying.

So, you can't tell me where you ever see anti religious fanatics

And don't say message board, posting opinions doesn't make one a fanatic

redefinition complete - religious fanatics are now people who say the word God or attend church or dare use their first amendment right to express their religious views.

 

[Wry Catcher]

but a nearby store employee said they "looked nervous," so he ordered the evangelist to leave. After Snatchko refused, mall security arrested him.

"He was put in handcuffs and hauled down to the mall’s security station and later booked at the local jail,"

Private property, you were asked to leave the mall, you refused....you were arrested

Thats the way it is supposed to work

Did I say that they could not do that? NO! I said the motives behind were anti-religious in nature.

And what's wrong with being anti-religious?

 

[Toro]

A mall guard

arrests

some for

talking about God!



Surely, this is the funniest thing reported today.

 

[Smartt33]

Man Sues California Mall After Guard Arrests Him for Having Conversation About God - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News - FOXNews.com

OK, let me start out to say that the constitution does not ban the mall from excercising their right to kick this guy out for any reason but I can't understand when a voluntary conversation about religion was so offensive to the owner that it made them want to kick them out of the mall.

What reason would you have to throw people out of a mall when they were engaging in a private conversation that was not offensive to those that participated in it.

I suggest you don't shop at the mall, and tell all your friends that you will not be shopoping there because of their free speech policies, and send your email to everyone on your list.

It does sound like there was wrong on the part of the owner. However, the part where when told to leave you need to leave, that is true.

Let the stores in the mall all know that you will be letting all your friends know and asking them not to shop there too.

It is "UNAMERICAN." for any mall to do this.

 

[ihopehefails]

Private property, you were asked to leave the mall, you refused....you were arrested

Thats the way it is supposed to work

Did I say that they could not do that? NO! I said the motives behind were anti-religious in nature.

And what's wrong with being anti-religious?

Nothing. Some people just don't like religion as a concept and they are true atheist but these people don't have a need to squash someone else free expression of that religion. However, 'liberals' just can't tolerate someone having that belief so they use whatever power they have (in this case it was being the owner of the mall) to silence that expression.

Other 'liberals' misuse the first amendment to silence religious expression any way they can.

 

[ihopehefails]

Man Sues California Mall After Guard Arrests Him for Having Conversation About God - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News - FOXNews.com

OK, let me start out to say that the constitution does not ban the mall from excercising their right to kick this guy out for any reason but I can't understand when a voluntary conversation about religion was so offensive to the owner that it made them want to kick them out of the mall.

What reason would you have to throw people out of a mall when they were engaging in a private conversation that was not offensive to those that participated in it.

I suggest you don't shop at the mall, and tell all your friends that you will not be shopoping there because of their free speech policies, and send your email to everyone on your list.

It does sound like there was wrong on the part of the owner. However, the part where when told to leave you need to leave, that is true.

Let the stores in the mall all know that you will be letting all your friends know and asking them not to shop there too.

It is "UNAMERICAN." for any mall to do this.

That is what I think as well.

 

[xotoxi]

a nearby store employee said they "looked nervous," so he ordered the evangelist to leave.

He was bothering people and asked to leave.

How does Communism factor into this situation?

Do you even know what Communism is?

Communist were always anti-religious for many reasons. Its the reason why they got rid of all religion in their nations. I also notice that most anti-religious stuff comes from the left. That could be a coincidence but I doubt it.

So anything that is antireligion is communist?

Wow.

 

[xotoxi]

A mall guard

arrests

some for

talking about God!



Surely, this is the funniest thing reported today.

 

[ihopehefails]

He was bothering people and asked to leave.

How does Communism factor into this situation?

Do you even know what Communism is?

Communist were always anti-religious for many reasons. Its the reason why they got rid of all religion in their nations. I also notice that most anti-religious stuff comes from the left. That could be a coincidence but I doubt it.

So anything that is antireligion is communist?

Wow.

No. Its the source of your religion that makes you a communist. If you derive it from the private non-political sphere then you are not but if you derive it from the public sphere then it could be.

 

[mightypeon]

Dudes, Communism IS a religion. The first thing that new religions do is to label all competing religions as "False!" "Infidel" or "Bourgois-Imperialist Opium for the Masses!"


For you interest, Communism had Dogmatic schisms ("Socialism in one country! No, World Revolution now!"), persecution of heretics ("Kill the Trotzkists!") and interconfessional warfare ("This is the Chinese Communist Internationale, DIE Imperialist Soviet Scum!"). they midly defered from other religions by placing "paradise", known as "true communism", on this world.
To be more successfull they should chosen a "bible" that is less complicated than Marx`s "Capital" though.