More and more engineers question the official 9/11 story.

There was no “controlled demolition”. The buildings interior structures failed and had a cascading collapse within seconds when it began.
 
So I believe the following question is essential to looking at the way this unfolded:

Were those ******* Arabs really smart enough to know that the heat of the explosions and fire would, in a fairly short time, be sufficient to weaken the structure and cause the collapse?

My guess is that they figured they would TOPPLE the buildings by the impact of the collision, but miscalculated.

Then you have to look at whether the Narrative is actually believable. The buildings survived the crash. In retrospect, it seems like a failed plan where they (the actors) had to go to a Plan B, because Plan A failed. Hence, there was the plane attack, followed by sabotage that actually brought the buildings down.

How else do you explain WTC 7 going down the same way? It wasn't hit by any ******* plane. Was it structural sympathy? Not something I've seen elsewhere.
 
Wasn't that nice of me to go ahead and post this in the 'conspiracy theory' section ?

Well to be honest, I clicked through your video at about 30 places and no where did I ever hear them discussing anything specific to 911 or the structure of the towers!
 
15th post
" Architects. Engineers...... what would they know about it ? "

Nothing.

Of course it would help if you had some architects and engineers.

Rather thasn ignoring and LYING as you always do aboutt he fraudulent AE911 truth group
 
Back
Top Bottom