More and more engineers question the official 9/11 story.

So I believe the following question is essential to looking at the way this unfolded:

Were those fucking Arabs really smart enough to know that the heat of the explosions and fire would, in a fairly short time, be sufficient to weaken the structure and cause the collapse?

My guess is that they figured they would TOPPLE the buildings by the impact of the collision, but miscalculated.

Then you have to look at whether the Narrative is actually believable. The buildings survived the crash. In retrospect, it seems like a failed plan where they (the actors) had to go to a Plan B, because Plan A failed. Hence, there was the plane attack, followed by sabotage that actually brought the buildings down.

How else do you explain WTC 7 going down the same way? It wasn't hit by any fucking plane. Was it structural sympathy? Not something I've seen elsewhere.
 

Forum List

Back
Top