Model Prosecution Memo for Trump Classified Documents

g5000

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 2011
123,561
55,013
2,290
Trump's lawyers met with the Justice Department today to beg the DOJ not to prosecute their client. Due to the surfeit of evidence of Trump's crimes surrounding classified documents, it is highly doubtful the attorneys succeeded in their mission.

Below is an analysis of what a prosecution memo will look like.


Before indicting a case, prosecutors prepare a prosecution memo (or “pros memo”) that lays out admissible evidence, possible charges, and legal issues. This document provides a basis for prosecutors and their supervisors to assess whether the case meets the standard set forth in the Federal Principles of Prosecution, which permit prosecution only when there is sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction. Before a decision is made about bringing charges against Trump (and co-conspirators, if any), prosecutors will prepare such a memo.

There is sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction here, if the information gleaned from government filings and statements and voluminous public reporting is accurate.


[snip]


Our memo analyzes six federal crimes in depth:

Mishandling of Government Documents
1. Retention of National Defense Information (18 U.S.C. § 793(e))
2. Concealing Government Records (18 U.S.C. § 2071)
3. Conversion of Government Property (18 U.S.C. § 641)

Obstruction, Contempt, False Information

1. Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1519)
2. Criminal Contempt (18 U.S.C. § 402)
3. False Statements to Federal Investigators (18 U.S.C. § 1001)


[snip]


Two of the authors of this model prosecution memo, Norman Eisen and Fred Wertheimer, were among the counsel for amici supporting DOJ’s position in litigation before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, related to the criminal investigation mentioned in this report.




You can read the full model pros memo here: https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-con...sified-documents-second-edition-june-2023.pdf
 
The whole purpose of this prosecution is to impair President Trump's campaign for 2024. Nothing more. There are no crimes, nothing that any ethical prosecutor would waste time on.

As a hilarious aside, former FBI director James Comey predicted the other day that if Trump won the Presidency in 2024, he would "politicize DoJ."

Un.
Fucking.
Believable.
 
The whole purpose of this prosecution is to impair President Trump's campaign for 2024. Nothing more. There are no crimes, nothing that any ethical prosecutor would waste time on.

As a hilarious aside, former FBI director James Comey predicted the other day that if Trump won the Presidency in 2024, he would "politicize DoJ."

Un.
Fucking.
Believable.
He means COMPLETELY. And he’s right.
 
Trump's lawyers met with the Justice Department today to beg the DOJ not to prosecute their client. Due to the surfeit of evidence of Trump's crimes surrounding classified documents, it is highly doubtful the attorneys succeeded in their mission.

Below is an analysis of what a prosecution memo will look like.


Before indicting a case, prosecutors prepare a prosecution memo (or “pros memo”) that lays out admissible evidence, possible charges, and legal issues. This document provides a basis for prosecutors and their supervisors to assess whether the case meets the standard set forth in the Federal Principles of Prosecution, which permit prosecution only when there is sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction. Before a decision is made about bringing charges against Trump (and co-conspirators, if any), prosecutors will prepare such a memo.

There is sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction here, if the information gleaned from government filings and statements and voluminous public reporting is accurate.


[snip]


Our memo analyzes six federal crimes in depth:

Mishandling of Government Documents
1. Retention of National Defense Information (18 U.S.C. § 793(e))
2. Concealing Government Records (18 U.S.C. § 2071)
3. Conversion of Government Property (18 U.S.C. § 641)

Obstruction, Contempt, False Information

1. Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1519)
2. Criminal Contempt (18 U.S.C. § 402)
3. False Statements to Federal Investigators (18 U.S.C. § 1001)


[snip]


Two of the authors of this model prosecution memo, Norman Eisen and Fred Wertheimer, were among the counsel for amici supporting DOJ’s position in litigation before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, related to the criminal investigation mentioned in this report.




You can read the full model pros memo here: https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-con...sified-documents-second-edition-june-2023.pdf
Garland wasen't at the meeting with will give Trump's mouth breather's something else to piss & moan about.

Worth it's weight in gold.
 
Trump's lawyers met with the Justice Department today to beg the DOJ not to prosecute their client. Due to the surfeit of evidence of Trump's crimes surrounding classified documents, it is highly doubtful the attorneys succeeded in their mission.

Below is an analysis of what a prosecution memo will look like.


Before indicting a case, prosecutors prepare a prosecution memo (or “pros memo”) that lays out admissible evidence, possible charges, and legal issues. This document provides a basis for prosecutors and their supervisors to assess whether the case meets the standard set forth in the Federal Principles of Prosecution, which permit prosecution only when there is sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction. Before a decision is made about bringing charges against Trump (and co-conspirators, if any), prosecutors will prepare such a memo.

There is sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction here, if the information gleaned from government filings and statements and voluminous public reporting is accurate.


[snip]


Our memo analyzes six federal crimes in depth:

Mishandling of Government Documents
1. Retention of National Defense Information (18 U.S.C. § 793(e))
2. Concealing Government Records (18 U.S.C. § 2071)
3. Conversion of Government Property (18 U.S.C. § 641)

Obstruction, Contempt, False Information

1. Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1519)A
2. Criminal Contempt (18 U.S.C. § 402)
3. False Statements to Federal Investigators (18 U.S.C. § 1001)


[snip]


Two of the authors of this model prosecution memo, Norman Eisen and Fred Wertheimer, were among the counsel for amici supporting DOJ’s position in litigation before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, related to the criminal investigation mentioned in this report.




You can read the full model pros memo here: https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-con...sified-documents-second-edition-june-2023.pdf
Not sure if you've heard, but Joe Biden has left classified documents unsecured all over the country. Does "equal justice under the law" mean anything to you?
 
Not sure if you've heard, but Joe Biden has left classified documents unsecured all over the country. Does "equal justice under the law" mean anything to you?
Did Biden attempt to obstruct the return of those documents?

Nope!

Did he brag to unauthorized people about those documents and tell them the contents?

Nope!

Did he deliberately hide classified documents when asked to return them?

Nope!
 
Former President's are covered by the PRA.

Nothing in the PRA authorizes DoJ involvement with records a former President has in his possession.

The PRA anticipates all former President's possessing classified documents, and then it is up to the former President's people and the Archive to negotiate the issue. Which is exactly what was going on until Reichsleiter Garland decided he needed cover for Biden's numerous stashes of classified documents.
 
Wrong.

The records belong to the National Archives, not the former president.

Nice try.

I never said that. I said the PRA anticipates negotiations between a former President and the Archive, which negotiations were ongoing.

Like with Øbama.
 
Former President's are covered by the PRA.

Nothing in the PRA authorizes DoJ involvement with records a former President has in his possession.

The PRA anticipates all former President's possessing classified documents, and then it is up to the former President's people and the Archive to negotiate the issue. Which is exactly what was going on until Reichsleiter Garland decided he needed cover for Biden's numerous stashes of classified documents.
The PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of the President from private to public, and established a new statutory structure under which Presidents, and subsequently NARA, must manage the records of their Administrations. The PRA was amended in 2014, which established several new provisions.

Specifically, the PRA:

[snip]


  • Establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office.
 
The PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of the President from private to public, and established a new statutory structure under which Presidents, and subsequently NARA, must manage the records of their Administrations. The PRA was amended in 2014, which established several new provisions.

Specifically, the PRA:

[snip]

  • Establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office.


Negotiations are the norm. Understand the word 'negotiate'?
 

Forum List

Back
Top